ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07413874Updated Jul 30, 2026

Telehealth Music Therapy for Adults With Endocrine Disorder and Depression

An interventional study of Telehealth Resource Oriented Music Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes, Hashimoto Disease and Graves Disease, sponsored by Appalachian State University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-30.

Sponsored by Appalachian State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to explore if a telehealth music therapy intervention helps with quality of life, depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms. It will also explore the participants' relationship to music. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Refine and tailor the music therapy intervention to fit the specific needs of adults living with an autoimmune disease and depression.
  • Examine the feasibility of the study protocol to support a future full-scale trial
  • Examine how music therapy impacts quality of life, depression symptoms, and anxiety symptoms
  • Explore how music therapy impacts one's relationship to music

Participants will:

  • have a short interview to fill out a questionnaire with some basic information, answers about depression, quality of life, and potential anxiety, and a question about how they feel about music at the start and end of the sessions
  • attend 8 weekly sessions, approximately 30-45 minutes each, with a board certified music therapist over telehealth/Zoom
  • answer a few questions about the music therapy intervention
Read the detailed description

Of all known chronic illnesses in the United States, it is reported that autoimmune diseases (AD) are the third most common cause, with an estimated five to eight percent of the population living with one or more AD. Adults living with AD often face chronic health challenges, including increased stress, anxiety, pain, discomfort, social isolation, and depression. Additional evidence supports the use of music therapy to supplement traditional pharmacotherapies to improve physical and mental well-being of people with numerous disease states such as trait anxiety, state anxiety, mood disorders, psychological distress, behavioral and emotional problems, and depression. However, there is limited research examining intervention development of music therapy to address psychosocial symptoms of autoimmune diseases.

The investigators propose to conduct an intervention development study with 8-10 adults with a) an autoimmune endocrine disease and b) depression to examine an 8-week telehealth music therapy intervention, enabling them to refine research procedures for a future high priority, full-scale efficacy clinical trial. All participants will receive an 8-week music therapy intervention and usual care, as provided by their medical team (medication management, therapy, and appropriate support for self-management). Collection of outcome measures will occur at baseline and post-intervention (8-weeks). Additionally, the investigators will complete interviews with the participants at the end of the intervention to gain perspectives on intervention and study protocol.

Aim 1 Refine and tailor the 8-week telehealth music therapy intervention to fit the specific, individual needs of adults living with and autoimmune endocrine disease and depression. Using community-engaged research methods, the investigators will accomplish this aim through an iterative process of a) engagement of an advisory panel of adults with AD to provide critical input on the 8-week music therapy intervention prior to, during, and after the intervention delivery; b) refinement of the conceptual framework; and c) interviews with the participants at intervention completion for intervention and study design acceptability.

Adults living with autoimmune diseases and mental health conditions are at a higher risk for adverse health events. Feasibility studies are required to assess innovative interventions to promote their overall health and well-being, to provide the foundation for full-scale complementary health clinical trials that can effectively transform the standards of care for autoimmune diseases, and to advance health in under-resourced communities.

Adults with autoimmune disorders need practitioners who are trained in the impacts of these conditions on physical, social, and emotional wellbeing, utilizing an engaging approach that music therapy (MT) offers. Providing adults living with autoimmune diseases and depression/anxiety services that are specifically tailored to individuals and using a more accessible approach of telehealth has the potential to support adult empowerment, resilience, and coping strategies required to manage chronic condition

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes
  • Hashimoto Disease
  • Graves Disease
  • Addison Disease
  • Autoimmune Polyglandular Syndrome Type III
  • Depression
  • Endocrine System Diseases

Keywords

  • type 1 diabetes
  • music therapy
  • behavioral health
  • psychosocial
  • diabetes
  • behavioral intervention
  • quality of life
  • telehealth
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,754 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 600 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 40 across 2,820 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

Appalachian State University is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • self-reported depression
  • self-reported endocrine disease
  • 18-65 years of age
  • have a device that supports the Zoom platform (camera and audio)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • intellectual or developmental disability
  • no auto-immune disease
  • no depression
  • lack of access to device
  • under the age of 18 years
  • over the age of 65 years
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention: Telehealth Music Therapy

    10 participants will receive the telehealth music therapy intervention. This is an 8-week study utilizing a resource-oriented approach keeping the principles of empowerment philosophy, self-determination, collaboration, recovery-oriented or salutogenesis ways of working, and utilizing music as a health resource.

    Behavioral: Telehealth Resource Oriented Music Therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralTelehealth Resource Oriented Music Therapy

    The interventions used during the sessions may include any of the following: Creating play lists, Song discussion, Song writing, Improvisation/Electronic music creation, Music assisted relaxation, Music listening journal, and Music combined with art creation as a form of receptive music therapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Families Consented Versus Approached

    One feasibility measure was to evaluate the number and percentage of families consented compared to those approached for participation in the study.

    Time frame: 8-week post treatment initiation

  2. Number and Percentage of Intervention Group Condition Participants Retained vs Enrolled

    Number and Percentage of Intervention Group participants retained in the study compared to those enrolled. Retention is defined as participants who completed post-intervention assessments.

    Time frame: 8-week post treatment initiation

  3. Number and Percentage of Surveys Completed by Participants Who Completed the Study

    Number and Percentage of surveys over time completed by participants who completed the study.

    Time frame: 8-week post treatment initiation

  4. Number and Percentage of attendance at telehealth sessions

    The total number/amount of sessions attended out of the total number of sessions available, reported as both the total number and the percentage.

    Time frame: 8-week post treatment initiation

  5. Number and percentage of participants enrolled for the different recruitment strategies

    For each recruitment strategy, the researchers will document the total number and percentage of how many families were eligible, approached, and enrolled

    Time frame: 8-week post treatment initiation

  6. Telehealth Satisfaction Survey

    A self-reported questionnaire for participants to rate how satisfied they were with the telehealth sessions (a measure of study acceptability). It includes 10 questions with 1-4 ratings, with higher scores indicating higher levels of satisfaction.

    Time frame: 8-week post treatment initiation

  7. Training Satisfaction Rating Scale

    A self-reported questionnaire for participants to rate their satisfaction with the Music Therapy intervention. It includes the following subdomains: Objectives and content (3 questions); Method of training context (6 questions); Usefulness and overall rating (3 questions). Items are rated on a 1-5 scale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of acceptability.

    Time frame: 8-week post treatment initiation

  8. Study Specific Interview Guide

    A semi-structured interview guide to qualitatively assess feasibility and acceptability of the Music Therapy intervention framework. It includes questions related to recruitment and enrollment (3 questions); scheduling and time commitment (3 questions); assessments and data collection (3 questions); technology use (2 questions); overall burden/ease (2 questions); perceived value of the intervention ( 2 questions); engagement and enjoyment (2 questions); format delivery (2 questions); relevance to family's life (2 questions); therapist interaction (2 questions); rural context (2 questions); modules and content (3 questions); habit \& routine focus of the intervention (3 questions); perceived changes/impact (2 questions); recommendations for improvement (2 questions); and overall reflections (2 questions). Qualitative results will be reported by each sub-domain.

    Time frame: 8-week post treatment initiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. European Quality of Life 5-Dimension(5D) 5-Level (5L) (EQ-5D-5L)

    Patient reported health-related quality of life scores using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. EQ-5D-5L is a preference-based measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scores from each of the five dimensions range from 1 to 5. Total score ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate worse health status.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8-week post treatment initiation

  2. Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score

    The PHQ-9 has a total range of 0-27, where 0 = No depression, 1-4 = Minimal depression, 5-9 = Mild depression, 10-14 = Moderate depression, 15-19 = Moderately severe depression, 20-27 = Severe depression. A negative score change indicates a decrease in depressive symptoms and a positive score change indicates an increase in depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8-week post treatment initiation

  3. Change in Anxiety-related Symptoms as Measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score

    GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21, calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 to the response categories, respectively, of "not at all," "several days," "more than half the days," and "nearly every day." A total score of 0-4 = minimal anxiety, 5-9 = mild anxiety, 10-14 = moderate anxiety, 15-21 = severe anxiety. A negative score change indicates a decrease in anxiety symptoms and a positive score change indicates an increase in anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8-week post treatment initiation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Appalachian State University
    Boone, North Carolina 28608, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the sensitive nature of the clinical data, which includes participant health records regarding endocrine autoimmune disorders and depression. Given the small sample size and the telehealth-based nature of the intervention, there is a heightened risk of participant re-identification. Data may be made available from the principal investigator upon reasonable request, subject to approval by the Institutional Review Board and the execution of a formal Data Use Agreement.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 5 months after the start.

Of 844 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 38. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 949 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 10, 2026
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
StartActual
Jul 16, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Jul 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07413874
Lead sponsor
Appalachian State University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
Start date
Jul 16, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 30, 2026

Study contacts

Melody Schwantes, PhD, MT-BC
Contact
ms18994@appstate.edu
828-262-8216
Vanessa Jewell, PhD, OTR/L
Contact
vanessa_jewell@med.unc.edu
919-843-4472
Melody Schwantes, PhD, MT-BC
principal investigator · Appalachian State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion