ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07286578Updated Nov 10, 2026

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Value of Coronary CT Angiography in the Understanding and Management of Coronary Calcium (The Optimal Trial)

An interventional study of CT(Computed Tomography) guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and IVUS (Intravascular Ultrasound) guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiovascular Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia and Heart Diseases, sponsored by Fundación EPIC. Recruiting at 15 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Primary conditionCoronary Artery DiseaseRegistry: Cardiovascular DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Cardiovascular Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Coronary Artery Disease
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Coronary Artery Disease, a narrower term within Cardiovascular Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Fundación EPIC · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 10 months later.
Updated Nov 10, 2026Site recruiting status changedSponsor changed+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
700
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial has been designed to compare two imaging strategies and to test the hypothesis that a calcium modification strategy informed by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) will improve procedural efficiency and effectiveness compared with the current standard of care (IVUS-guided PCI) while achieving similar clinical outcomes in patients with hemodynamically significant calcified coronary artery disease.

Read the detailed description

The OPTIMAL Trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study evaluating whether a coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-guided calcium modification strategy can improve the treatment of patients with hemodynamically significant, calcified coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Seven hundred patients with flow-limiting stenosis (FFRCT ≤0.80) and moderate-to-severe calcification on CCTA will be randomized 1:1 to either CCTA-guided or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided calcium modification. The study includes two co-primary endpoints: (1) superiority in final minimal stent area assessed by IVUS, and (2) non-inferiority in 12-month target vessel failure (cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization).

CCTA-guided strategy uses advanced calcium characterization to inform pre-procedural planning and selection of plaque modification techniques. IVUS-guided strategy follows contemporary intravascular imaging-based criteria for plaque preparation and PCI optimization.

The trial aims to determine whether leveraging non-invasive CT-based calcium assessment can enhance procedural efficiency and stent results while maintaining clinical safety comparable to IVUS-guided PCI.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Myocardial Ischemia
  • Heart Diseases
  • Arteriosclerosis
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases
  • Vascular Diseases
  • Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

  • IVUS
  • CT
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease Reclassified

4,857 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 890 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 700 is above the median of 124 across 3,006 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundación EPIC is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Compared within Coronary Artery Disease, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Cardiovascular Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject must be at least 18 years of age and younger than 85 years old
  • Subject must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable angina, silent ischemia (ischemia in the absence of chest pain or other anginal equivalents), unstable angina, or acute myocardial infarction) suitable for PCI. Patients with a clinical indication for revascularization presenting with stable coronary artery disease or stabilized acute coronary syndrome defined as follows unstable angina (Braunwald class IB, IC, IIB, IIC, IIIB, IIIC), patients with NSTEMI without high-risk features such as recurrence of chest pain, ST-segment depression>1mm in ≥6 leads plus STsegment elevation in aVR, life-threatening arrhythmias, mechanical complications of MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, GRACE risk score>140.
  • All target vessels must have reference vessel diameter (visually assessed by CCTA) ≥ 2.5 mm
  • Subject must provide written before any study-related procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • STEMI as the clinical presentation.
  • Uncontrolled or recurrent ventricular tachycardia.
  • Hemodynamic instability.
  • Hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.
  • Left main coronary artery stenosis > 50%
  • Atrial fibrillation, flutter, or arrhythmias during CT acquisition.
  • Previous PCI in the target vessel or CABG.
  • ≥ 40 kg/m2
  • Insufficient CT quality assessed by the Core lab.
  • Comorbidity with ≤ 2 years.
  • Planned major cardiac or non-cardiac surgery within 24 months after the index procedure Note: Major surgery is any invasive operative procedure in which an extensive resection is performed, e.g., a body cavity is entered, organs are removed, or normal anatomy is altered. Note: Minor surgery is an operation on the superficial structures of the body or a manipulative procedure that does not involve a serious risk. Planned minor surgery is not excluded.
  • The subject has received a solid organ transplant that is functioning or is active on a waiting list for any solid organ transplants with expected transplantation within 24 months.
  • The subject receives therapy or has known immunosuppressive or severe disease that requires chronic immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., , systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.). Note: are not included as immunosuppressant therapy.
  • The subject has previously received or is scheduled to receive radiotherapy to a coronary artery (vascular brachytherapy) or the chest/mediastinum.
  • Subject has a count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3.
  • The subject has a documented or suspected hepatic disorder as defined as cirrhosis or ≥ Class B.
  • The subject has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or has had a significant gastro-intestinal or significant urinary bleed within the past six months. The subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic neurological attack () within the past six months, or any prior intracranial bleed, or any permanent neurologic defect, or any known intracranial pathology (e.g., aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, etc. The subject has a life expectancy \<2 years for any non-cardiac cause.
  • Subject is currently participating in another drug or device clinical study.
  • Pregnant or nursing subjects and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 2 years following index procedure. Female subjects of must have a negative pregnancy test done within 7 days prior to the index procedure per site standard test.
  • Presence of other anatomic or comorbid conditions, or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the subject's ability to participate in the clinical investigation or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific soundness of the clinical investigation results.
  • Unable to provide written (IC).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
700 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CT-guide calcium modification strategy

    Pre-procedural CT will be used to determine lesion characteristics.

    Device: CT(Computed Tomography) guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

  • Active comparator
    IVUS-guide calcium modification strategy

    Pre-procedural IVUS will be used to determine lesion characteristics.

    Device: IVUS (Intravascular Ultrasound) guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Interventions

  • DeviceCT(Computed Tomography) guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    CT will be used to determine lesion characteristics and post-procedural IVUS to confirm correct implantation of stent

  • DeviceIVUS (Intravascular Ultrasound) guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    IVUS will be used to determine lesion characteristics and post-procedural IVUS to confirm correct implantation of stent

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Demonstrate that CT-guided calcium modification results in a superior final MSA Minimal Stent Area (MSA) - Imaging Endpoint (Superiority)

    Final post-PCI minimal stent area per target lesion, measured by independent core laboratory using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Assesses whether CT-guided calcium modification results in superior stent expansion compared with IVUS-guided PCI.

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

  2. Target Vessel Failure (TVF) - Clinical Endpoint (Non-Inferiority)

    Composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (ID-TVR). TV-MI and ID-TVR are defined according to ARC-2 and the Fourth Universal Definition of MI.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Procedural efficiency: Procedure time

    Time from first angiogram to final angiogram

    Time frame: During PCI

  2. Procedural efficiency:Radiation dose-area product

    Dose-area product (DAP) recorded during PCI.

    Time frame: During PCI

  3. Procedural efficiency: Contrast volume

    Total contrast volume (mL) used during PCI.IVUS-Derived Mechanistic Endpoints (Core Lab)

    Time frame: During PCI

  4. Procedural Efficiency: Stent Area on Immediate Post-Stent IVUS

    MSA prior to any final IVUS-guided optimization.

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

  5. Procedural Efficiency: Final Stent Area at Original Minimal Lumen Area (MLA)

    Stent area at the co-registered site of the baseline MLA.

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

  6. Procedural Efficiency: Final Stent Area at Site of Maximum Calcium Arc

    Stent area measured at the co-registered IVUS site with maximal calcium arc

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

  7. Procedural Efficiency: Final Stent Area at Site of Maximum Calcium Density

    Stent area measured at the co-registered CT-identified region of greatest Hounsfield Unit (HU) calcium density.

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

  8. Procedural Efficiency: Relative Stent Expansion

    Percentage expansion calculated as: MSA ÷ mean distal reference lumen area × 100.

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

  9. Procedural Efficiency: Number of Calcium Fractures

    Fractures identified on intermediary IVUS after calcium modification.

    Time frame: Post-modification, pre-stent

  10. Procedural Efficiency: Change in Plaque Attenuation

    Change in IVUS plaque characteristics following calcium modification.Angiographic Endpoints

    Time frame: Post-modification, pre-stent

  11. Procedural Efficiency: Final Minimal Lumen Diameter

    Minimum lumen diameter by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

  12. Procedural Efficiency: Final Percent Diameter Stenosis

    Percent stenosis of treated lesion after PCI, by QCA

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

  13. Procedural Efficiency: Final TIMI Flow Grade

    Target vessel flow graded 0-3 based on TIMI criteria. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Flow Grade is a 0-3 angiographic scale used during coronary angiography to describe how well blood is flowing through a coronary artery.TIMI 0 No perfusion, TIMI 1 Penetration without perfusion, TIMI 2 Partial perfusion TIMI 3 Complete perfusion (normal flow)

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

  14. Procedural Efficiency: Angiographic Complications

    According to Coronary dissection (NHLBI classification)

    Time frame: Day of procedure

  15. Procedural Efficiency: Angiographic Complications

    According to Coronary perforation (Ellis classification)

    Time frame: Day of procedure

  16. Procedural Efficiency: Angiographic Complications

    Slow-flow / no-reflow

    Time frame: Day of procedure

  17. Procedural Efficiency: Angiographic Complications

    Side branch closure (TIMI 0-1)

    Time frame: Day of procedure

  18. Clinical & Safety Outcomes: Procedural Success

    Final stenosis \<30%, TIMI 3 flow, no angiographic complications, and no in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

    Time frame: Perioperative/Periprocedural

  19. Clinical & Safety Outcomes: Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction (Type 4a MI)

    Defined by ARC-2 and 4th Universal Definition of MI (troponin criteria + evidence of ischemia).

    Time frame: Day 0-1

  20. Clinical & Safety Outcomes: Stent Thrombosis

    Definite or probable stent thrombosis according to ARC-2 definitions.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

  21. Patient-Reported Outcomes: Residual Angina (SAQ-7 Angina Frequency)

    Residual angina defined as SAQ-7 Angina Frequency score \<100. Angina frequency represent how often a patient has had angina (chest pain/discomfort) over a recent recall period. Reported as a 0 to 100 scale: 100 = no angina; 0 = angina occurring very frequently

    Time frame: 12 months

  22. Patient-Reported Outcomes: Change in Angina (SAQ-7)

    Change in angina frequency domain score; positive values indicate improvement. Angina frequency represent how often a patient has had angina (chest pain/discomfort) over a recent recall period. Reported as a 0 to 100 scale: 100 = no angina; 0 = angina occurring very frequently

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months

07

Study locations

10 of 15 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Collet C, Sonck J, Vandeloo B, Mizukami T, Roosens B, Lochy S, Argacha JF, Schoors D, Colaiori I, Di Gioia G, Kodeboina M, Suzuki H, Van 't Veer M, Bartunek J, Barbato E, Cosyns B, De Bruyne B. Measurement of Hyperemic Pullback Pressure Gradients to Characterize Patterns of Coronary Atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 8;74(14):1772-1784. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.072. PubMed 31582137 ↗
  • Tajima A, Bouisset F, Ohashi H, Sakai K, Mizukami T, Rizzini ML, Gallo D, Chiastra C, Morbiducci U, Ali ZA, Spratt JC, Ando H, Amano T, Kitslaar P, Wilgenhof A, Sonck J, De Bruyne B, Collet C. Advanced CT Imaging for the Assessment of Calcific Coronary Artery Disease and PCI Planning. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Mar 26;3(3Part B):101299. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101299. eCollection 2024 Mar. PubMed 39131223 ↗
  • Monizzi G, Sonck J, Nagumo S, Buytaert D, Van Hoe L, Grancini L, Bartorelli AL, Vanhoenacker P, Simons P, Bladt O, Wyffels E, De Bruyne B, Andreini D, Collet C. Quantification of calcium burden by coronary CT angiography compared to optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec;36(12):2393-2402. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01839-z. Epub 2020 Nov 17. PubMed 33205340 ↗
  • Sonck J, Nagumo S, Norgaard BL, Otake H, Ko B, Zhang J, Mizukami T, Maeng M, Andreini D, Takahashi Y, Jensen JM, Ihdayhid A, Heggermont W, Barbato E, Mileva N, Munhoz D, Bartunek J, Updegrove A, Collinsworth A, Penicka M, Van Hoe L, Leipsic J, Koo BK, De Bruyne B, Collet C. Clinical Validation of a Virtual Planner for Coronary Interventions Based on Coronary CT Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jul;15(7):1242-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Apr 13. PubMed 35798401 ↗
  • Collet C, Collison D, Mizukami T, McCartney P, Sonck J, Ford T, Munhoz D, Berry C, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd K. Differential Improvement in Angina and Health-Related Quality of Life After PCI in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Dec 26;15(24):2506-2518. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.09.048. Epub 2022 Nov 30. PubMed 36543445 ↗
09

Updates

4 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Sites
2 sites added, 1 site removed. Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital is now Recruiting
Show 2 added (1 United Kingdom, 1 United States)
  • Guys & St Thomas Nhs Foundation Trust · London, United Kingdom
  • NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center · New York, United States
Show 1 removed
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital · New York, United States
across 3 updates, Oct 26, 2026 – Nov 10, 2026
Sponsor
Collaborators added: St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; collaborators removed: St George's University Hospital
Sep 28, 2026
Show all 4 updates
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    1 site added, 1 site removed
    Show site
    • NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center · New York, United States
    Show 1 removed
    • Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital · New York, United States
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Oct 30, 2026
    1 site added
    Show site
    • Guys & St Thomas Nhs Foundation Trust · London, United Kingdom
  3. Oct 26, 2026
    Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital is now Recruiting
    + 1 other change: verification date
  4. Sep 28, 2026
    Sponsor Collaborators added: St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; collaborators removed: St George's University Hospital

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07286578
Lead sponsor
Fundación EPIC
Collaborators
Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
Start date
Dec 22, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

CAROLINA FOCELLA
Contact
cfocella@crf.org
001 917 753 6695
CARLOS COLLET, MD,PhD
Contact
carloscollet@gmail.com
001 917 753 6695

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion