ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07250529LBBP-AHREUpdated Mar 13, 2026

Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Right Ventricular Pacing on AHRE Burden in Patients With Preserved LVEF

An interventional study of Right Ventricular Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Pacemaker Therapy and Atrioventricular Block, sponsored by University Hospital of Patras. Recruiting at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-13.

Sponsored by University Hospital of Patras · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
244
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) compared with conventional right ventricular (RV) pacing on the cumulative duration (total time) of atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who are expected to require frequent ventricular pacing.

Atrial High-Rate Episodes (AHREs) are defined as episodes of atrial tachyarrhythmia that are automatically recorded by device diagnostics and detected by implanted cardiac devices. These episodes usually have an atrial rate ≥170 beats per minute and a duration ≥6 minutes. AHREs are linked to a higher risk of thromboembolic events and clinical atrial fibrillation (AF), and they may indicate subclinical AF or other atrial tachyarrhythmias.

Chronic RV pacing has been linked to mechanical and electrical dyssynchrony, which may encourage atrial remodeling and the development of AF. LBBP provides a more physiological ventricular activation and may reduce atrial tachyarrhythmia time (AHRE time).

Patients with LVEF >50% and atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorders requiring a dual-chamber pacemaker will be randomized to either conventional RV septal pacing or LBBP.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) compared with conventional right ventricular (RV) pacing on the cumulative duration (total time) of atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who are expected to require frequent ventricular pacing.

Atrial High-Rate Episodes (AHREs) are defined as episodes of atrial tachyarrhythmia that are automatically recorded by device diagnostics and detected by implanted cardiac devices. These episodes usually have an atrial rate ≥170 beats per minute and a duration ≥6 minutes. AHREs are linked to a higher risk of thromboembolic events and clinical atrial fibrillation (AF), and they may indicate subclinical AF or other atrial tachyarrhythmias.

Device Algorithm Specificity: AHREs will be validated by reviewing the stored atrial electrograms (EGMs) for a random sample of at least 20% of detected episodes to confirm atrial origin, exclude oversensing, and differentiate atrial tachycardia from atrial fibrillation-like episodes. Device model-specific detection thresholds, including refractory oversensing behavior, atrial blanking periods, and sensitivity parameters, will be documented and standardized across participants where possible.

Chronic RV pacing has been linked to mechanical and electrical dyssynchrony, which may encourage atrial remodeling and the development of AF. LBBP provides a more physiological ventricular activation and may reduce atrial tachyarrhythmia time (AHRE time).

LBBP produces a narrower paced QRS, shorter left ventricular activation time, and more synchronous ventricular contraction compared with RV pacing. These electrophysiologic differences may reduce atrial stretch, left atrial pressure, and atrial substrate remodeling, which are mechanisms believed to lower AHRE burden.

Patients with LVEF >50% and atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorders requiring a dual-chamber pacemaker will be randomized to either conventional RV septal pacing or LBBP.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
  • Pacemaker Therapy
  • Atrioventricular Block
  • Preserved Ejection Fraction

Keywords

  • Left bundle branch pacing
  • Cardiac electrophysiology
  • Right ventricular pacing
  • AHRE burden
  • Preserved ejection fraction
  • Heart Failure
  • Quality of life
  • Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM)
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

4,009 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 961 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 244 is above the median of 150 across 2,476 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital of Patras is the lead sponsor of 43 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Scheduled implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker for:

Permanent complete heart block Permanent second-degree AV block (Mobitz II or Mobitz I)

  • Documented preserved (≥50%)
  • Sinus rhythm at baseline
  • Ability to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation
  • Previous atrial fibrillation ablation (catheter-based or surgical)
  • \< 50%
  • Sinus node disease
  • Transient AV block requiring pacemaker implantation
  • Significant structural or valvular heart disease
  • Requirement for pacemaker system upgrade during the study period
  • Requirement for antiarrhythmic therapy for causes other than atrial fibrillation
  • Existing pacemaker or other cardiac device requiring modification for study participation
  • Enrollment in another clinical trial that could interfere with study endpoints or pacing parameters
  • to LBBP or associated lead implantation procedure
  • \< 12 months
  • Any condition judged by the investigator to compromise participation or the integrity of study data
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
244 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm 1: Conventional Right Ventricular Pacing

    Procedure: Standard right ventricular septal pacing Description: Implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker with the ventricular lead placed in the RV septum. At follow-up, the ventricular pacing percentage and pacing configuration will be noted.

    Device: Right Ventricular Pacing

  • Active comparator
    Arm 2: Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP)

    Procedure: Left bundle branch pacing lead implantation Description: Implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker with the ventricular lead placed at the left bundle branch area. Physiological pacing will be programmed into the devices and, at follow-up, the percentage of spontaneous pacing will be noted.

    Device: Left Bundle Branch Pacing

Interventions

  • DeviceRight Ventricular Pacing

    Implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker with the ventricular lead placed in the RV septum. At follow-up, the ventricular pacing percentage and pacing configuration will be noted. All devices used in this study are commercially available in the European Union and carry a valid CE mark.

  • DeviceLeft Bundle Branch Pacing

    Implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker with the ventricular lead placed at the left bundle branch area. Physiological pacing will be programmed into the devices and, at follow-up, the percentage of spontaneous pacing will be noted. All devices used in this study are commercially available in the European Union and carry a valid CE mark.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total cumulative AHRE time for device-detected episodes lasting >6 minutes

    Sum of the durations of all device-detected AHREs with individual episode duration \>6 minutes (atrial rate threshold per device diagnostics, typically ≥170 bpm), expressed as total time (minutes/hours). Total analyzable monitoring time will be defined as the interval from implantation to the last successful device interrogation/remote transmission, excluding periods of missing device data.

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months (primary endpoint)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total cumulative time in AHRE episodes with individual episode duration 0 to 6 minutes.

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months (primary endpoint)

  2. Total cumulative time in AHRE episodes with individual episode duration 6 minutes to 6 hours.

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  3. Total cumulative time in AHRE episodes with individual episode duration 6 hours to 24 hours.

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  4. Total cumulative time in AHRE episodes with individual episode duration >24 hours.

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  5. Time to event - for AHRE episodes > 6 min

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  6. Incidence of progression to clinically documented atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal or persistent, symptomatic or asymptomatic, confirmed by ECG, Holter, or wearable monitoring).

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  7. Time to first clinically documented atrial fibrillation.

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  8. Development of permanent atrial fibrillation.

    Atrial fibrillation (AF) will be evaluated using routine interrogation of implanted pacemakers, which provide device-recorded atrial arrhythmia data, including AF burden and episode duration. Permanent atrial fibrillation will be defined according to the ESC Guidelines for Atrial Fibrillation and will require a consensus decision between the treating physician and the patient that the arrhythmia is ongoing. This consensus will also include an agreement to pursue a rate-control strategy with no further attempts to restore or maintain sinus rhythm.

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  9. Time to progression to permanent atrial fibrillation.

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  10. Device- or procedure-related complications (e.g., cardiac perforation, pericardial tamponade, pneumothorax, hemothorax, infection requiring antibiotics or system removal, generator or lead malfunction, hematoma).

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  11. All-cause mortality.

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  12. Hospitalization due to AF

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  13. Hospitalization due to HF

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  14. Need for cardioversion.

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  15. Development of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM)

    Defined as a drop in LVEF of at least 10 percentage points resulting in LVEF \<50%, or a relative reduction in global longitudinal strain of at least 15%

    Time frame: From pacemaker implantation (or randomization) to 24 months

  16. Changes in biomarkers associated with myocardial stress, inflammation, or injury

    NT-proBNP, hsCRP, and troponin

    Time frame: At baseline and at 12 and 24 months, where available.

  17. Changes in structured echocardiographic parameters

    Including left atrial strain, left atrial volume index, interventricular mechanical delay, left ventricular mechanical delay, and global longitudinal strain, in participants with available echocardiographic studies from centers able to perform these measurements.

    Time frame: At baseline and at 12 and 24 months, where available.

  18. Quality-of-life change assessed using a validated questionnaire during follow-up.

    Minnesota living with heart-failure questionnaire

    Time frame: At baseline and at 3,6,12,18 and 24 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Becher N, Metzner A, Toennis T, Kirchhof P, Schnabel RB. Atrial fibrillation burden: a new outcome predictor and therapeutic target. Eur Heart J. 2024 Aug 16;45(31):2824-2838. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae373. PubMed 38953776 ↗
  • Jansson V, Bergfeldt L, Schwieler J, Kenneback G, Rubulis A, Jensen SM, Raatikainen P, Sciaraffia E, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C. Atrial fibrillation burden, episode duration and frequency in relation to quality of life in patients with implantable cardiac monitor. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2021 May 11;34:100791. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100791. eCollection 2021 Jun. PubMed 34036145 ↗
  • Rosner GF, Reiffel JA, Hickey K. The Concept of "Burden" in Atrial Fibrillation. J Atr Fibrillation. 2012 Feb 2;4(5):400. doi: 10.4022/jafib.400. eCollection 2012 Feb-Mar. PubMed 28496712 ↗
  • Boriani G, Tartaglia E, Trapanese P, Tritto F, Gerra L, Bonini N, Vitolo M, Imberti JF, Mei DA. Subclinical atrial fibrillation/atrial high-rate episodes: what significance and decision-making? Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Feb 19;27(Suppl 1):i162-i166. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae088. eCollection 2025 Feb. PubMed 39980773 ↗
  • Simu G, Rosu R, Cismaru G, Puiu M, Gusetu G, Minciuna I, Istratoaie S, Tomoaia R, Zdrenghea D, Pop D. Atrial high-rate episodes: a comprehensive review. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2021 Mar-Apr 23;32(2):102-107. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2020-052. Epub 2021 Jan 15. PubMed 33496721 ↗
  • AlTurki A, Essebag V. Atrial Fibrillation Burden: Impact on Stroke Risk and Beyond. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 26;60(4):536. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040536. PubMed 38674182 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2029, 38 months after the start.

Of 796 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Atrial Fibrillation, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 38 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,051 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 54.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 14, 2025
First posted
Nov 26, 2025
StartActual
Feb 5, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 20, 2029
CompletionEst.
Jun 20, 2029
Last update
Mar 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07250529
Lead sponsor
University Hospital of Patras
Responsible party
Georgios Leventopoulos (Assistant Professor of Cardiology - Electrophysiology Patras University Hospital, Greece, University Hospital of Patras) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 26, 2025
Start date
Feb 5, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 20, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 20, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 13, 2026

Study contacts

GEORGIOS LEVENTOPOULOS
Contact
levent2669@gmail.com
+306977786020
Periklis Davlouros
Contact
pdav@upatras.gr
+306986726300

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion