ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07816458Alert-HFUpdated Nov 10, 2026

Alert-HF: Early Detection and Intervention on Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure Patients

An interventional study of Implantable loop recorder and Patient-driven portable ECG monitoring in Heart Failure, sponsored by Medisch Spectrum Twente. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by Medisch Spectrum Twente · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 10, 2026Enrollment updatedEligibility revised+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
266
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if using remote heart rhythm monitoring strategies can reduce unplanned cardiac care utilization and improve health-related quality of life in adults with heart failure (HF). It focuses on adults with heart failure who have no history of an irregular heartbeat called atrial fibrillation (AF) and do not have an existing pacemaker or implantable defibrillator.

The main questions the trial aims to answer are:

  • Does a continuous rhythm monitor placed under the skin or a patient-driven portable home device decrease unplanned cardiac care utilization?
  • Do these rhythm monitoring strategies influence therapeutic management?
  • Do these rhythm monitoring strategies improve patient-reported quality of life and overall survival?

Researchers will compare two monitoring groups to a standard care group over an 18-month period to see which approach works best in heart failure treatment

Participants will:

  • either have a small heart monitor placed under their chest skin for heart rhythm observation (arm 1), use a handheld device to take regular heart recordings at home (arm 2) or follow standard care (arm 3) for a period of 18 months
  • Answer a health survey at the start of the study and after 18 months of follow-up.
02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure

Keywords

  • Heart Failure
  • Implantable loop recorder (ILR)
  • Portable ECG
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Care consumption
03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 266 is above the median of 76 across 4,049 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Medisch Spectrum Twente is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

The criteria were revised on the registry on Nov 10, 2026. See what changed

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients with HF and no history of documented AF on (ECG)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with CIED, such as an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D), or pacemaker.
  • Documented AF before inclusion
  • Admission to hospices or palliative care
  • Inability to communicate in Dutch or English.
  • Participant under the age of 18 years old
  • Participant is pregnant
  • Mental disorders that, according to the treating physician, make participation unsafe
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
266 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm 1: Hospital-driven continuous monitoring with an implantable loop recorder

    Arm 1: Hospital-driven continuous rhythm monitoring with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) placed subcutaneously in the left pectoral region.

    Device: Implantable loop recorder

  • Active comparator
    Arm 2: Patient-driven portable ECG monitoring

    Patient-driven single-lead portable ECG monitoring in which patients are instructed to send ECG recordings of at least 30 seconds both on a scheduled routine basis and whenever experiencing symptoms suggestive of an arrhytmia.

    Device: Patient-driven portable ECG monitoring

  • Active comparator
    Arm 3: Usual Care

    All patients are treated according to the ESC guidelines (ESC HF 2026). This includes periodic outpatient utilization.

    Other: Usual Care

Interventions

  • DeviceImplantable loop recorder

    Hospital-driven continuous monitoring with an implantable loop recorder

  • DevicePatient-driven portable ECG monitoring

    Patient-driven portable ECG monitoring

  • OtherUsual Care

    Usual care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of unplanned cardiac care utilization

    Unplanned cardiac healthcare utilization will be assessed through systematic review of patients' medical records. The number of healthcare episodes occurring during the study observation period will be recorded. Each unique healthcare episode will be classified according to the principal setting of care: outpatient clinic, daycare/day-case admission, emergency care without admission, or hospitalization. Both total and stratified care utilization will be reported. An episode will be considered unplanned when healthcare is initiated in response to an acute, unexpected, worsening, or urgent cardiac health problem. Healthcare episodes involving transfers between care settings as part of the same continuous episode will be counted once and classified according to the highest level of care reached, to avoid double counting.

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of planned cardiac care utilization

    Planned healthcare utilization comprises healthcare episodes scheduled or arranged in advance for routine, preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, monitoring, rehabilitation, or follow-up care. This includes planned hospitalizations, planned daycare/day-case encounters, and planned outpatient clinic visits.

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Time from inclusion to first diagnosis of AF

    The clinical diagnosis of AF by a healthcare professional must be supported by ECG documentation demonstrating AF on a single-lead recording of at least 30 seconds or a standard 12-lead ECG, obtained using the assigned monitoring device or as part of routine clinical care.

    Time frame: 18 months

  3. The number of participants diagnosed with AF according to the electronic health rercords (EHR)

    AF diagnosis will be established based on electrocardiographic (ECG) documentation obtained either through the assigned monitoring strategy or as part of routine clinical care, as assessed by a qualified healthcare professional.

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. Number of AF-related pharmacological and non-pharmacological management changes

    Pharmacological changes include initiation, discontinuation, dose increase, dose decrease or switching of oral anticoagulants (OAC) and rate- and/or rhythm-control medications, including antiarrhythmic drugs. Non-pharmacological interventions include electrical or pharmacological cardioversion, catheter ablation and AF-related CIED implantation or reprogramming. The number of management changes will be grouped according to the treatment type and type of adjustment.

    Time frame: 18 months

  5. Number of HF-related pharmacological and non-pharmacological management changes during the study observation period.

    Pharmacological changes include initiation, discontinuation, dose increase, dose decrease or switching of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), including ARNI/ACEi/ARB, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and diuretics. Non-pharmacological interventions include HF-related CIED implantation or device reprogramming. The number of management changes will be grouped according to the treatment type and type of adjustment.

    Time frame: 18 months

  6. Number of overall arrhythmia diagnosis extracted from EHR

    Number of overall arrhythmia diagnosis

    Time frame: 18 months

  7. Changes in Quality of life from baseline to 18 months follow-up as assessed by the Quality of life Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire

    The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) will be collected at baseline and 18 months. The scores are represented on a scale from 0 to 100 points, where lower scores represent more severe symptoms and higher scores less or no symptoms.

    Time frame: 18 months

  8. Change in heart failure-related quality of life from baseline to 18-month follow-up, as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ).

    The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) will be collected at baseline and 18 months. The scores are represented on a scale from 0 to 100 points, where lower scores represent more severe symptoms and higher scores less or no symptoms.

    Time frame: 18 months

  9. Changes in overall Quality of Life from baseline to 18 months follow-up as assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized questionnaire assessing health-related quality of life across five dimensions on a score from 1 to 5, with one no problems to a score of five with extreme problems on that domain. This allows for direct comparison between baseline and follow-up. The questionnaire also includes a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health), on which participants rate their overall health. Furthermore, responses are used to calculate a health utility index score with values between 0 and 1. 0 indicates life valuation equal to death and one full health.

    Time frame: 18 months

  10. Mortality

    Mortality

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Santhanakrishnan R, Wang N, Larson MG, Magnani JW, McManus DD, Lubitz SA, Ellinor PT, Cheng S, Vasan RS, Lee DS, Wang TJ, Levy D, Benjamin EJ, Ho JE. Atrial Fibrillation Begets Heart Failure and Vice Versa: Temporal Associations and Differences in Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction. Circulation. 2016 Feb 2;133(5):484-92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018614. Epub 2016 Jan 8. PubMed 26746177 ↗
  • Bhatnagar R, Fonarow GC, Heidenreich PA, Ziaeian B. Expenditure on Heart Failure in the United States: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2009-2018. JACC Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;10(8):571-580. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.05.006. Epub 2022 Jul 6. PubMed 35902161 ↗
  • Kober L, Adamo M, Ruwald AC, Tomasoni D, Anderson LJ, Andersson C, Brugts JJ, Chioncel O, Donal E, Ferdinandy P, Jhund PS, Leyva F, Lorusso R, Madigan M, Mullens W, Paolillo S, Ryan N, Simpson M, Thiele H, Thune JJ, Van Craenenbroeck EM, Van Laake LW, Verbakel M; ESC Guidelines Advisory Group. 2026 ESC Guidelines for the management of heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2026 Aug 28:ehag100. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehag100. Online ahead of print. No abstract available. PubMed 42661420 ↗
  • Baez-Ferrer N, Rodriguez-Cabrera CM, Parra-Esquivel PC, Burillo-Putze G, Dominguez-Rodriguez A. Prognostic Impact of Hospital Discharge After Heart Failure Admission Without Structured Heart Failure Follow-Up. J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 13;13(24):7589. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247589. PubMed 39768511 ↗
  • Kwok CS, Seferovic PM, Van Spall HG, Helliwell T, Clarson L, Lawson C, Kontopantelis E, Patwala A, Duckett S, Fung E, Mallen CD, Mamas MA. Early Unplanned Readmissions After Admission to Hospital With Heart Failure. Am J Cardiol. 2019 Sep 1;124(5):736-745. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.053. Epub 2019 Jun 6. PubMed 31300202 ↗
  • Jansen C, Otterspoor LC, van Pol PEJ, IJff GC, Sinkeler SJ, van den Heuvel M, Jansen MEP, Scholten M, van Zutphen K, Verstappen CCAG, Hermanides N, Joosen IA, Heinen S, Valk JG, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, Schuuring MJ, van Hout GPJ. Structuring telemonitoring in heart failure care in The Netherlands: design and operational protocol of a nationwide initiative. Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 Nov 5;7(2):ztaf130. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf130. eCollection 2026 Mar. PubMed 41624560 ↗
  • Savarese G, Becher PM, Lund LH, Seferovic P, Rosano GMC, Coats AJS. Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2023 Jan 18;118(17):3272-3287. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac013. PubMed 35150240 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Enrollment
258→266
Nov 10, 2026
Eligibility
1 inclusion criterion edited; 2 exclusion criteria edited
What changed in the criteria
Inclusion criteria
  • EditedAdult patients with HF and no history of documented AF on electrocardiogram (ECG) are eligible.
Exclusion criteria
  • EditedPatients with CIED, such as an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), Cardiac Resyn-chronizationResynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D), or pacemaker.
  • EditedParticipant is underunder the age of 18 years old
Nov 10, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionNumber of unplanned cardiac care utilization: how it is measured was reworded
Nov 10, 2026
Secondary outcomes
3 edited, 5 added, 2 removed
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedTime from inclusion to first diagnosis of AFTime frame: 18 months
  • EditedThe number of participants diagnosed with AF according to the electronic health rercords (EHR)Time frame: 18 months
  • EditedNumber of overall arrhythmia diagnosis extracted from EHRTime frame: 18 months
  • AddedNumber of AF-related pharmacological and non-pharmacological management changesTime frame: 18 months
  • AddedNumber of HF-related pharmacological and non-pharmacological management changes during the study observation period.Time frame: 18 months
  • AddedChanges in Quality of life from baseline to 18 months follow-up as assessed by the Quality of life Kansas City Cardiomyopathy QuestionnaireTime frame: 18 months
  • AddedChange in heart failure-related quality of life from baseline to 18-month follow-up, as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ).Time frame: 18 months
  • AddedChanges in overall Quality of Life from baseline to 18 months follow-up as assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)Time frame: 18 months
  • RemovedPharmaceutical and/or CIED implantation management changesTime frame: 18 months
  • RemovedQuality of life Kansas City Cardiomyopathy QuestionnaireTime frame: 18 months
Nov 10, 2026
Design
Phase 4→Not applicable
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    Enrollment 258→266
    Eligibility 1 inclusion criterion edited; 2 exclusion criteria edited
    What changed in the criteria
    Inclusion criteria
    • EditedAdult patients with HF and no history of documented AF on electrocardiogram (ECG) are eligible.
    Exclusion criteria
    • EditedPatients with CIED, such as an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), Cardiac Resyn-chronizationResynchronization Therapy Defibrillator (CRT-D), or pacemaker.
    • EditedParticipant is underunder the age of 18 years old
    Primary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionNumber of unplanned cardiac care utilization: how it is measured was reworded
    Secondary outcomes 3 edited, 5 added, 2 removed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedTime from inclusion to first diagnosis of AFTime frame: 18 months
    • EditedThe number of participants diagnosed with AF according to the electronic health rercords (EHR)Time frame: 18 months
    • EditedNumber of overall arrhythmia diagnosis extracted from EHRTime frame: 18 months
    • AddedNumber of AF-related pharmacological and non-pharmacological management changesTime frame: 18 months
    • AddedNumber of HF-related pharmacological and non-pharmacological management changes during the study observation period.Time frame: 18 months
    • AddedChanges in Quality of life from baseline to 18 months follow-up as assessed by the Quality of life Kansas City Cardiomyopathy QuestionnaireTime frame: 18 months
    • AddedChange in heart failure-related quality of life from baseline to 18-month follow-up, as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ).Time frame: 18 months
    • AddedChanges in overall Quality of Life from baseline to 18 months follow-up as assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)Time frame: 18 months
    • RemovedPharmaceutical and/or CIED implantation management changesTime frame: 18 months
    • RemovedQuality of life Kansas City Cardiomyopathy QuestionnaireTime frame: 18 months
    Design Phase 4→Not applicable
    + 2 other changes: description and arm descriptions

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07816458
Lead sponsor
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2026
Start date
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Study contacts

Dr. Schuuring, MD PhD
Contact
mark.schuuring@utwente.nl
0031534872000

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion