ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07305194AHRE-BLASTUpdated Dec 26, 2025

Study of AHRE Burden in Patients Undergoing Bachmann Bundle Area Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Pacing.

An observational study in Atrial Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Pacemaker Implantation, sponsored by University Hospital of Patras. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-26.

Sponsored by University Hospital of Patras · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
460
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective observational study evaluates the burden of Atrial High-Rate Episodes (AHRE) in patients without a prior history of atrial fibrillation who undergo concurrent Bachmann Bundle Area Pacing (BBAP) and Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP). Physiological pacing at these sites aims to improve interatrial conduction and reduce the risk of atrial arrhythmias.

The study includes a comparative assessment across three patient groups:

  1. BBAP + LBBP (physiological pacing group)
  2. Right Atrial Appendage (RAA) pacing + LBBP
  3. Conventional pacing - RAA and Right Ventricular (RV) pacing AHRE burden will be quantified via device diagnostics and remote monitoring at 3, 12 and 24 months post-implantation. Episodes will be classified by duration (0-6 min, 6-24 h, >24 h), differentiating subclinical AHRE from clinically documented AF.

Secondary analyses include electrocardiographic changes (P-wave indices), the need for antiarrhythmic therapy, and comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation of atrial function (e.g., LA strain, conduction delays, LAVI).

The study aims to determine whether physiological pacing (BBAP + LBBP) provides superior protection against AHRE development compared with RAA + LBBP and conventional pacing strategies.

Read the detailed description

Atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) detected by cardiac implantable devices are associated with an increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke, and atrial remodeling. Traditional right atrial and right ventricular pacing may alter atrial activation patterns, potentially promoting electrical and structural changes that predispose to atrial arrhythmias.

Physiologic pacing strategies targeting the Bachmann bundle region and the left bundle branch have emerged as alternatives designed to preserve normal conduction pathways. Bachmann Bundle Area Pacing (BBAP) facilitates more synchronous biatrial activation, while Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) results in near-physiologic ventricular activation. Both methods may reduce conduction delays and improve atrial and ventricular electromechanical function.

This prospective observational study examines whether physiologic atrial and ventricular pacing reduces the burden of device-detected AHRE compared with commonly used pacing configurations. Three groups are evaluated: (1) BBAP combined with LBBP, (2) right atrial appendage pacing combined with LBBP, and (3) conventional right atrial and right ventricular pacing. All enrolled participants have a clinical indication for permanent pacing and no prior diagnosis of AF.

AHRE burden will be assessed through routine device diagnostics and remote monitoring over a 24-month follow-up. Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data will also be collected to explore relationships between conduction patterns, atrial function, and arrhythmia occurrence. The study aims to clarify whether preserving physiologic conduction pathways influences long-term AHRE burden and may contribute to AF prevention in paced patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Arrhythmia
  • Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
  • Pacemaker Implantation
  • Left Bundle Branch Pacing
  • Conduction System Pacing

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Atrial High-Rate Episodes (AHRE)
  • Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation
  • Bachmann Bundle Area Pacing (BBAP)
  • Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP)
  • Physiological Pacing
  • Interatrial Conduction
  • Atrial Synchrony
  • P-wave Duration
  • Atrial Electromechanical Remodeling
  • Atrial Strain
  • Left Atrial Reservoir Strain
  • Inter-atrial Conduction Delay (IACD)
  • Speckle Tracking Echocardiography
  • Left Atrial Volume Index (LAVI)
  • Atrial Arrhythmias
  • Device-Detected AF
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

4,009 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 961 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 460 is above the median of 300 across 1,400 observational studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital of Patras is the lead sponsor of 43 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a clear indication for permanent pacing, according to ESC guidelines [15] for the management of conduction disturbances (e.g. symptomatic bradycardia, complete atrioventricular block, sinus node dysfunction).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a clear indication for permanent pacing, according to ESC guidelines [15] for the management of conduction disturbances (e.g. symptomatic bradycardia, complete atrioventricular block, sinus node dysfunction).
  • Sinus rhythm at the time of implantation, with no documented episodes of atrial fibrillation prior to implantation, either in the medical history or in previous recordings (, Holter, telemetry).
  • Ability to be followed up for at least 24 months after implantation.
  • Provision of written to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of atrial fibrillation prior to implantation, either permanent or paroxysmal, documented on , Holter, or telemetry.
  • Prior pharmacological or interventional treatment for AF (e.g. antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation).
  • Inability to comply with long-term follow-up or non-adherence to follow-up visits.
  • to pacemaker lead placement at the selected sites.
  • Participation in another study that could influence the results.
  • Previous device implantation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
460 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
24 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Concurrent BBAP + LBBP (total physiological pacing)
  • RAA pacing + LBBP
  • Conventional pacing (RAA + RV pacing)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. AHRE burden

    PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE Unit of measure : percent (%) AHRE Burden (% of monitored time) Percentage of total monitored time spent in device-detected atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE), as defined by manufacturer diagnostic criteria

    Time frame: 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of AHRE episodes (0-6 minutes )

    Device-detected AHRE episodes lasting 0-6 minutes. Unit of measure: Number of episodes

    Time frame: 24 months

  2. Number of AHRE Episodes (6 minutes-24 hours)

    Device-detected AHRE episodes lasting 6 minutes to 24 hours. Unit of Measure: Number of episodes

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Number of AHRE Episodes (>24 hours)

    Device-detected AHRE episodes lasting more than 24 hours. Unit of measure: Number of episodes

    Time frame: 24 months

  4. Incidence of Clinically Documented Atrial Fibrillation

    Clinically confirmed AF episodes identified via ECG or rhythm strip. Unit of measure : number of events

    Time frame: 24 months

  5. Maximum P-Wave Duration

    Maximum P-wave duration measured on 12-lead ECG Unit of measure : Milliseconds (ms)

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 months

  6. P - wave axis

    Frontal plane P-wave axis measured on 12-lead ECG Unit of Measure: Degrees

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 months

  7. Initiation or Modification of Antiarrhythmic Therapy

    Number of participants requiring initiation or change in antiarrhythmic. Unit of Measure: Number of participants

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Michael Glikson et al., 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: Developed by the Task Force on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) With the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Heart Journal, Volume 42, Issue 35, 14 September 2021, Pages 3427-3520, https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364.
  • Glotzer TV, Hellkamp AS, Zimmerman J, Sweeney MO, Yee R, Marinchak R, Cook J, Paraschos A, Love J, Radoslovich G, Lee KL, Lamas GA; MOST Investigators. Atrial high rate episodes detected by pacemaker diagnostics predict death and stroke: report of the Atrial Diagnostics Ancillary Study of the MOde Selection Trial (MOST). Circulation. 2003 Apr 1;107(12):1614-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000057981.70380.45. Epub 2003 Mar 24. PubMed 12668495 ↗
  • Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Israel CW, Van Gelder IC, Capucci A, Lau CP, Fain E, Yang S, Bailleul C, Morillo CA, Carlson M, Themeles E, Kaufman ES, Hohnloser SH; ASSERT Investigators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):120-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105575. PubMed 22236222 ↗
  • Yoshimoto D, Sakamoto Y, Uemura Y, Yamaguchi R, Naganawa H, Suzuki T. Comparative assessment of interatrial conduction delay during Bachmann's bundle pacing and right atrial appendage pacing using biatrial strain rate echocardiography. Heart Rhythm. 2025 Nov;22(11):2753-2754. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.12.016. Epub 2024 Dec 15. No abstract available. PubMed 39681277 ↗
  • Bailin SJ, Adler S, Giudici M. Prevention of chronic atrial fibrillation by pacing in the region of Bachmann's bundle: results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Aug;12(8):912-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00912.x. PubMed 11513442 ↗
  • Johner N, Namdar M, Shah DC. Intra- and interatrial conduction abnormalities: hemodynamic and arrhythmic significance. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Aug;52(3):293-302. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0413-4. Epub 2018 Aug 20. PubMed 30128800 ↗
  • Kawakami H, Ramkumar S, Nolan M, Wright L, Yang H, Negishi K, Marwick TH. Left Atrial Mechanical Dispersion Assessed by Strain Echocardiography as an Independent Predictor of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: A Case-Control Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Oct;32(10):1268-1276.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Aug 26. PubMed 31466848 ↗
  • Infeld M, Habel N, Wahlberg K, Meagher S, Meyer M, Lustgarten D. Bachmann bundle potential during atrial lead placement: A case series. Heart Rhythm. 2022 Mar;19(3):490-494. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.11.015. Epub 2021 Nov 12. No abstract available. PubMed 34775070 ↗
  • Zagoridis K, Koutalas E, Intzes S, Symeonidou M, Zagoridou N, Karagogos K, Spanoudakis E, Kanoupakis E, Kochiadakis G, Dinov B, Dagres N, Hindricks G, Bollmann A, Nedios S. P-wave duration and interatrial block as predictors of new-onset atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2023 Jul-Aug;72:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2023.03.007. Epub 2023 Apr 5. PubMed 37028490 ↗
  • Vedage NA, Cronin EM. Effect of pacing site on P wave parameters: Within-patient comparison of right atrial appendage and Bachmann's bundle. J Electrocardiol. 2024 May-Jun;84:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.02.006. Epub 2024 Feb 27. PubMed 38432160 ↗
  • Shali S, Su Y, Ge J. Interatrial septal pacing to suppress atrial fibrillation in patients with dual chamber pacemakers: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 15;219:421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.093. Epub 2016 Jun 23. PubMed 27371866 ↗
  • Infeld M, Nicoli CD, Meagher S, Tompkins BJ, Wayne S, Irvine B, Betageri O, Habel N, Till S, Lobel J, Meyer M, Lustgarten DL. Clinical impact of Bachmann's bundle pacing defined by electrocardiographic criteria on atrial arrhythmia outcomes. Europace. 2022 Oct 13;24(9):1460-1468. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac029. PubMed 35304608 ↗
  • Lemery R, Guiraudon G, Veinot JP. Anatomic description of Bachmann's bundle and its relation to the atrial septum. Am J Cardiol. 2003 Jun 15;91(12):1482-5, A8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00405-3. No abstract available. PubMed 12804741 ↗
  • Kreimer F, Gotzmann M. Pacemaker-induced atrial fibrillation reconsidered-associations with different pacing sites and prevention approaches. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jun 18;11:1412283. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1412283. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38957332 ↗
  • Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, Lamas GA; MOde Selection Trial Investigators. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2932-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072769.17295.B1. Epub 2003 Jun 2. PubMed 12782566 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07305194
Lead sponsor
University Hospital of Patras
Responsible party
Georgios Leventopoulos (Assistant Professor of Cardiology - Electrophysiology Patras University Hospital, Greece, University Hospital of Patras) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 26, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 5, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 14, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 26, 2025

Study contacts

GEORGIOS LEVENTOPOULOS
Contact
levent2669@gmail.com
+306977786020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion