A Phase 2 interventional study of nivolumab and pembrolizumab in Renal Cell Carcinoma, Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and Melanoma, sponsored by Diwakar Davar. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-16.
Sponsored by Diwakar Davar · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The study will evaluate patient and Health Care Professional- reported preference for Subcutaneous (SC) compared with IV nivolumab administration or similarly for SC compared with IV pembrolizumab.
The development of SC nivolumab and SC pembrolizumab was intended to provide patients, physicians and health care systems compelling advantages to reduce the burden associated with ICI administration. However, despite the results of CheckMate 76K, Hillman Cancer Center utilization of SC nivolumab is poor. This study aims to formally assess, from the patients' perspective, whether SC administration of ICI agents is preferable to IV administration. Key secondary objectives include physician experience with SC vs. IV administration, cancer-related efficacy endpoints, and safety. Patients who are pending initiation of nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab-based chemotherapy or targeted therapy combinations (Cohort A-1) will be enrolled. However, patients who are already receiving nivolumab or other ICI but are willing to be switched to nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab-based combinations may be eligible to enroll in a separate cohort (Cohort B-1). US FDA has accepted a Biologics License Application from Merck for SC pembrolizumab for an FDA action date of 9/23/2025. Should SC pembrolizumab achieve FDA approval, we will aim to open 2 separate cohorts to evaluate patient preference for SC vs. IV pembrolizumab.
Prior and concurrent therapy criteria
o Patients should either be ICI-naïve (Cohorts A-1, A-2) or be currently receiving adjuvant or front-line PD-(L)1 based therapy singly or in combination with FDA-approved agents (TKIs or chemotherapy) (Cohorts B-1, B-2).
Locally advanced or advanced/metastatic solid tumor for which nivolumab OR pembrolizumab is on-label.
Cohort-specific criteria.
Exclusion Criteria:
SC nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) x3 cycles followed by IV nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) x3 cycles.
Drug: nivolumab · Drug: pembrolizumab
IV nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) x3 cycles followed by SC nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) x3 cycles
Drug: nivolumab · Drug: pembrolizumab
IV nivolumab (480mg Q4W), SC nivolumab (1200mg Q4W)
Also known as: OPDIVO®
IV pembrolizumab (400mg Q6W) or SC pembrolizumab (790mg Q6W)
Also known as: Keytruda®
Preference for Subcutaneous Nivolumab Treatment
The proportion of patients with locally advanced or advanced/metastatic solid tumors who prefer SC to IV nivolumab.
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Preference for Subcutaneous Pembrolizumab Treatment
The proportion of patients with locally advanced or advanced/metastatic solid tumors who prefer SC to IV pembrolizumab.
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Therapy Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire
Patient assessed satisfaction with SC vs. IV nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) using Therapy Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (using TASQ-IV) in patients with locally advanced or advanced/metastatic solid tumors pending initiation of nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) monotherapy or nivolumab- (or pembrolizumab-) based combinations.
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Therapy Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire
Patient assessed satisfaction with SC vs. IV nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) using Therapy Administration Satisfaction Questionnaire (using TASQ-SC) in patients with locally advanced or advanced/metastatic solid tumors pending initiation of nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) monotherapy or nivolumab- (or pembrolizumab-) based combinations.
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) - EORTC QLQ-C30
Patient reported HRQoL scores using the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument. The categories/domains include functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), global health status and quality of life scale. Item scoring for functional items is 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much); Item scoring for global health items is 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). Total scores (all items) range from 0 to 100. For functional and global quality of life scales higher scores mean a better level of functioning. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score means more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Screening Phase - Up to 28 days after signed consent
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) - EORTC QLQ-C30
Patient reported HRQoL scores using the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument (30 items). The categories/domains include functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), and global health status and quality of life scale. Item scoring for functional and symptom items is 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much); Item scoring for global health items is 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). Total scores range from 0 to 100. For functional and global quality of life scales higher scores mean a better level of functioning. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score means more severe symptoms.
Time frame: At Day 1 of Treatment Cycle 3
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) - EORTC QLQ-C30
Patient reported HRQoL scores using the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument (30 items). The categories/domains include functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), and global health status and quality of life scale. Item scoring for functional and symptom items is 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much); Item scoring for global health items is 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). Total scores range from 0 to 100. For functional and global quality of life scales higher scores mean a better level of functioning. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score means more severe symptoms.
Time frame: At Day 1 of Treatment Cycle 6
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) - EORTC QLQ-C30
Changes in patient reported HRQoL scores using the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument. The categories/domains include functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting), and global health status and quality of life scale. Item scoring for functional and symptom items is 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much); Item scoring for global health items is 1 (Very poor) to 7 (Excellent). Total scores range from 0 to 100. For functional and global quality of life scales higher scores mean a better level of functioning. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score means more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Up to 48 nmonths
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) - EQ-5D-5L
Patient reported HRQoL scores using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. EQ-5D-5L is a preference-based measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scores from each of the five dimensions range from 1 to 5. Total score ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate worse health status.
Time frame: Screening Phase - Up to 28 days after signed consent
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) - EQ-5D-5L
Patient reported HRQoL scores using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. EQ-5D-5L is a preference-based measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scores from each of the five dimensions range from 1 to 5. Total score ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate worse health status.
Time frame: At Day 1 of Treatment Cycle 3
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) - EQ-5D-5L
Patient reported HRQoL scores using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. EQ-5D-5L is a preference-based measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scores from each of the five dimensions range from 1 to 5. Total score ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate worse health status.
Time frame: At Day 1 of Treatment Cycle 6
Change Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) - EQ-5D-5L
Change in patient reported HRQoL scores using the EQ-5D-5L instrument. EQ-5D-5L is a preference-based measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Scores from each of the five dimensions range from 1 to 5. Total score ranges from 5 to 25, where higher scores indicate worse health status.
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Physician-defined TTNT
Physician-defined time to next therapy (TTNT) is defined as the period from the start of the treatment to the start of the next line of treatment.
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Incidence of irAEs
Incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that result in a dose hold or delay in patients treated with either SC or IV nivolumab (or pembrolizumab) per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) guidelines v5
Time frame: Up to 48 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Diwakar Davar