ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07138092Updated Aug 22, 2025

Comparison of Gastric Volume in I-gel and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airways

An interventional study of i jel LMA and proseal LMA in Nausea and Vomiting, Postoperative and Sore-throat, sponsored by Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 79 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-22.

Sponsored by Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 79 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study was planned to compare the gastric insufflation volume between i jel and ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and its relationship with the oropharyngeal sealing pressure and the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing urological surgery.

Read the detailed description

Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) are widely used in both elective and emergency surgeries, resuscitation, and difficult airway management. Compared to endotracheal intubation, they are less invasive, require lower doses of anaesthetic agents, and cause less haemodynamic instability. Among supraglottic airway devices, the I-gel differs from other SADs in that it does not have an inflatable cuff; instead, it features a soft structure made of a transparent thermoplastic elastomer that mimics a cuff. In addition, it has a gastric channel alongside the airway tube that allows for gastric aspiration.

ProSeal LMA is one of the most commonly used SADs in clinical practice. It was developed in the early 2000s as a modification of the classic LMA and includes an inflatable cuff. Like the I-gel, it also features a gastric drainage channel for aspiration.

Aspiration pneumonia is a serious complication of anaesthesia, accounting for approximately 9% of all anaesthesia-related mortality. Traditionally, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) provides information about the potential for gastric insufflation and thus the risk of gastric aspiration. Measurement of the gastric antral cross-sectional area (AGCA) by ultrasound allows for the estimation of gastric volume and helps assess the risk of aspiration.

This study was planned to compare the gastric insufflation volume between i jel and ProSeal LMA and its relationship with the oropharyngeal sealing pressure and the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing urological surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nausea and Vomiting, Postoperative
  • Sore-throat

Keywords

  • Gastric insufflation
  • Ultrasound
  • Supraglottic airway devices
  • Oropharyngeal leak pressure
03

In context

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

638 studies on the registry are indexed under Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; 110 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 112 across 529 interventional studies indexed under Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.

Browse Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting studies →

Lead sponsor

Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital is the lead sponsor of 71 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 79 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with an ASA () physical status score of 1 to 3
  • undergoing urological surgeries performed with I-gel or ProSeal LMA

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Difficult airway
  • upper respiratory tract infection
  • Pre-existing airway disease
  • Pre-existing airway disease
  • History of head and neck surgery
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with upper gastrointestinal tract disease
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    i jel group

    under general anesthesia, patients inserted i jel LMA

    Other: i jel LMA

  • Experimental
    proseal group

    under general anesthesia, patients inserted proseal LMA.

    Other: proseal LMA

Interventions

  • Otheri jel LMA

    Patients will be inserted i jel laryngeal mask under general anesthesia.

  • Otherproseal LMA

    Patients will be inserted proseal laryngeal mask under general anesthesia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measurement of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP)

    One minute after successful LMA placement and fixation, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) will be measured by setting the adjustable pressure limiting valve (APL) to 40 mmHg and maintaining a fresh gas flow of 3 L/min. The OLP will be recorded as the pressure at which an audible leak sound is heard from the mouth.

    Time frame: Five minutes after successful LMA placement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gastric volume

    Before induction of anesthesia, gastric ultrasonography will be performed by an experienced anaesthesiologist using a 2-5 MHz curved-array probe. The gastric antrum will be visualised in the sagittal plane in the epigastric region, located between the left lobe of the liver anteriorly, the aorta or inferior vena cava inferiorly, and the pancreas posteriorly. The gastric cross-sectional area (CSA) will be calculated using the following formula, assuming the antrum is elliptical: CSA = (A × B × π) / 4, where A is the anteroposterior diameter and B is the craniocaudal diameter. The estimated gastric volume will be calculated using a previously validated model for non-pregnant adults: Estimated gastric volume (mL) = 27 + (14.6 × ACSA \[cm²\]) - (1.28 × Age \[years\]).

    Time frame: 1 minute before induction of anesthesia

  2. Gastric volume

    End of the operation,befeore LMA removal gastric ultrasonography will be performed by an experienced anaesthesiologist using a 2-5 MHz curved-array probe. The gastric antrum will be visualised in the sagittal plane in the epigastric region, located between the left lobe of the liver anteriorly, the aorta or inferior vena cava inferiorly, and the pancreas posteriorly. The gastric cross-sectional area (CSA) will be calculated using the following formula, assuming the antrum is elliptical: CSA = (A × B × π) / 4, where A is the anteroposterior diameter and B is the craniocaudal diameter. The estimated gastric volume will be calculated using a previously validated model for non-pregnant adults: Estimated gastric volume (mL) = 27 + (14.6 × ACSA \[cm²\]) - (1.28 × Age \[years\]).

    Time frame: End of the operation, 5 minutes before LMA removal,

  3. fiberoptic view grading

    The Brimacombe score will be used to evaluate the view obtained with fiberoptic bronchoscopy. 1: Vocal cords are not visible; 2: Vocal cords and anterior epiglottis are visible; 3: Vocal cords and posterior epiglottis are visible; 4: Vocal cords are visible.

    Time frame: Five minutes after successful LMA placement

  4. Complications during i jel and propseal LMA removal (emerge)

    Complications during SP\_Air-Q and proseal LMA removal (emerge) such as breath-holding during emergence, airway obstruction, coughing, hypoxia (SpO2 \< 90%), vomiting, lip-tongue-teeth trauma, and bleeding, will be recorded.

    Time frame: One minute after i jel and propseal LMA removal

Other outcomes

  1. sore throat

    The presence or absence of sore throat will be recorded at the firsth postoperative hour.

    Time frame: popstoperative 1. hour

  2. sore throat

    The presence or absence of sore throat will be recorded at the firsth postoperative hour.

    Time frame: popstoperative 24. hours

  3. dysphonia

    The presence or absence of dysphonia will be recorded at the firsth postoperative hour.

    Time frame: popstoperative 1. hour

  4. dysphonia

    The presence or absence of dysphonia will be recorded at the 24th postoperative hour.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gunasekaran A, Govindaraj K, Gupta SL, Vinayagam S, Mishra SK. Comparison of Gastric Insufflation Volume Between Ambu AuraGain and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Using Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus. 2022 Aug 11;14(8):e27888. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27888. eCollection 2022 Aug. PubMed 36110490 ↗
  • Zhou S, Cao X, Zhou Y, Xu Z, Liu Z. Ultrasound Assessment of Gastric Volume in Parturients After High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy. Anesth Analg. 2023 Jul 1;137(1):176-181. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006340. Epub 2023 Jan 11. PubMed 36630297 ↗
  • Ye Q, Wu D, Fang W, Wong GTC, Lu Y. Comparison of gastric insufflation using LMA-supreme and I-gel versus tracheal intubation in laparoscopic gynecological surgery by ultrasound: a randomized observational trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01057-z. PubMed 32493213 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2025; primary completion for Sep 2025, 1 month later.

Of 181 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26. This study's planned 1 month is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 181 studies reached it within 13 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 15, 2025
First posted
Aug 22, 2025
StartEst.
Aug 18, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 29, 2025
CompletionEst.
Oct 10, 2025
Last update
Aug 22, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07138092
Lead sponsor
Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital
Responsible party
Zeynep Koc (principal investigator, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2025
Start date
Aug 18, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 29, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 10, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 22, 2025

Study contacts

Zeynep Koç
Contact
zeynepyilmazkoc@hotmail.com
05345958843

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion