ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07068867Updated Jan 14, 2026

Upfront Ultrasound for Preoperative Localization in Primary Hyperparathyroidism

An observational study in Primary Hyperparathyroidism, sponsored by Odense University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-14.

Sponsored by Odense University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
99
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary hyperparathyroidism is caused by overactive parathyroid glands, leading to elevated calcium levels in the blood. The standard preoperative imaging includes both a radiation-based imaging modality and conventional ultrasound. However, ultrasound alone is a faster, safer, and more patient-friendly alternative. This study evaluates an upfront ultrasound approach, where patients undergo ultrasound first, and only those with certain findings proceed directly to surgery without additional imaging. Patients with uncertain findings proceed to additional imaging. The study is designed as a prospective cohort with a non-inferiority analysis, aiming to confirm whether upfront ultrasound can achieve an acceptable diagnostic sensitivity. If successful, this approach could reduce patient burden, minimize radiation exposure, and optimize healthcare resources

Read the detailed description

This study evaluates the implementation of a stepwise approach using upfront ultrasound for localizing pathological parathyroid glands in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT).

PHPT is caused by overactive parathyroid glands, leading to excessive amounts of calcium in the blood, which can result in complications such as kidney stones, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and neurological symptoms. The standard preoperative imaging process currently includes both nuclear medicine scans and ultrasound. However, nuclear imaging is time-consuming, exposes patients to radiation, and may not always provide definitive results.

The proposed approach prioritizes ultrasound as the initial localization tool, with additional imaging reserved for cases where ultrasound findings are inconclusive. This method has the potential to reduce unnecessary hospital visits, minimize radiation exposure, and streamline the diagnostic process. The study aims to ensure that this approach maintains high sensitivity for the localization of pathological parathyroid glands, with a target sensitivity of at least 89.5% for correctly identifying diseased parathyroid glands.

Designed as a prospective cohort study, the project will assess patients using ultrasound first, assigning confidence scores (0-3) to determine whether further imaging is necessary. A confidence-score of 3 indicates a high diagnostic confidence. To gain a score of 3, the potential parathyroid adenoma must meet all predefined criteria, i.e. hypoechogenicity, well-defined margins, location at the anatomically expected position, a polar feeding vessel, and a vascular arc. A diagnostic-score of 2 reflects moderate suspicion, where one or two of these key features are missing. A diagnostic-score of 1 suggests low suspicion, typically characterized by a poorly defined structure with no vascular features. Finally, a diagnostic-score of 0 means that no potential adenoma was detected.

Postoperative findings will confirm the accuracy of the preoperative imaging with the histopathological result of the surgically removed specimen(s) combined with biochemical cure at 6 months as the reference standard.

The study aims to benefit both patients and society as it intends to decrease patient exposure to radiation, reduce costs, and reduce the time patients have to take off from work for the purpose of preoperative imaging. One less hospital visit will also reduce the pollution caused by an extra day of transportation to and from the hospital.

02

Conditions studied

  • Primary Hyperparathyroidism

Keywords

  • Parathyroid Diseases
  • Ultrasound
  • Preoperative Procedures
  • Preoperative Localization
  • Endocrine System Diseases
  • Hyperparathyroidism
  • Hyperparathyroidism, Primary
03

In context

Hyperparathyroidism, Primary

104 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperparathyroidism, Primary; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 99 is below the median of 130 across 40 observational studies indexed under Hyperparathyroidism, Primary.

Browse Hyperparathyroidism, Primary studies →

Lead sponsor

Odense University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 479 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients 18 years and older with primary hyperparathyroidism referred to the Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery at Odense University Hospital for parathyroidectomy.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18 years and older with primary hyperparathyroidism referred to the Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery at Odense University Hospital for parathyroidectomy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other causes of hypercalcemia
  • Persistent or recurrent hyperparathyroidism.
  • Previous surgery to the thyroid or the parathyroid glands.
  • Inability to read/speak Danish
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
99 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of the sequential imaging regimen (upfront ultrasound)

    The primary outcome measure is the sensitivity of the sequential imaging regimen (upfront ultrasound) for localizing one or more pathological parathyroid glands to the correct quadrant of the neck. The reference standard is histopathology combined with biochemical cure.

    Time frame: No residual disease 6 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Primary outcome re-calculated for a theoretical cut-off at "diagnostic confidence score = 2"

    The primary endpoint re-calculated with a theoretical cut-off at "diagnostic confidence score=2" as the criteria that leads to surgery without additional imaging.

    Time frame: No residual disease 6 months after surgery

  2. Primary outcome re-calculated for a theoretical cut-off at "diagnostic confidence score = 1"

    The primary endpoint re-calculated with a theoretical cut-off at "diagnostic confidence score=1" as the criteria that leads to surgery without additional imaging.

    Time frame: No residual disease 6 months after surgery

  3. Per gland sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the sequential imaging regimen

    Per gland sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the sequential imaging regimen

    Time frame: 6 months after surgery

  4. Patients that didn't need supplementary imaging

    Fractions of patients that didn't need supplementary imaging.

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  5. Surgery duration

    Discrepancy between expected and actual duration of surgery.

    Time frame: Immediately after surgery

  6. Unnecessary supplementary imaging

    Fraction of unnecessary supplementary imaging

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  7. Unnecessarily explored quadrants

    Number of unnecessarily explored quadrants

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  8. Complication rate

    Complication rate in terms of recurrent nerve paralysis, post-operative hemorrhage, or permanent hypoparathyroidism

    Time frame: From surgery until one year after surgery

  9. Cure rate

    No hyperparathyroid hypercalcemia

    Time frame: No residual disease 6 months after surgery

  10. Cost

    Cost of ultrasound, parathyroid scintigraphy and parathyroid choline PET/CT

    Time frame: Through study completion, from baseline to 6 months post-surgery

  11. Confounding

    Is the sensitivity influenced by differences in patient age, sex, BMI, adenoma weight, adenoma depth, adenoma diameter, multiple gland disease, preoperative ionized calcium and preoperative PTH?

    Time frame: Baseline to 6 months post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Odense University Hospital
    Odense, 5000, Denmark
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2023 to primary completion in Sep 2025, 24 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 13, 2025
First posted
Jul 16, 2025
StartActual
Sep 1, 2023
Primary completionActual
Sep 18, 2025
CompletionActual
Sep 18, 2025
Last update
Jan 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07068867
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 16, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 18, 2025
Completion
Sep 18, 2025
Last update
Jan 14, 2026

Study contacts

Sanne H Michaelsen, MD
principal investigator · Odense Universitetshospital
Viveque Egsgaard, MD, PhD
study chair · Odense Universitetshospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion