ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07039292CAREUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Clinical Alternatives for Reducing Harm Using E-cigarettes

An interventional study of Harm Reduction (E-cigarette switching) and Standard of Care in Smoking, E-Cig Use and Oncology, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Primary conditionVapingRegistry: SmokingReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Smoking — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Vaping
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Vaping, a narrower term within Smoking.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
208
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

For patients in cancer care, quitting smoking is critical, but a significant portion of patients in cancer care refuse all components of tobacco treatment, even when offered free of charge. The proposed clinical trial will assess one harm reduction intervention, switching completely from cigarettes to e-cigarettes, among oncology outpatients who smoke and refuse traditional tobacco treatment. This study is a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial among oncology outpatients at an NCI-designated cancer center who smoke and refuse all components of tobacco treatment (N=208).

Read the detailed description

In the proposed study, we will conduct a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (N=208) to directly compare rates of switching to e-cigarettes to standard care, and advance understanding of key barriers and facilitators of implementation processes. Outpatients at HCC clinics who have opted out of traditional tobacco treatment will be randomly assigned to either 1) an e-cigarette switching approach (Switch), or 2) standard of care (SC; provision of additional tobacco treatment resources). We will compare rates of switching between the two groups, and conduct a mixed methods evaluation of implementation processes for the e-cigarette switching approach. To further evaluate the impact of harm reduction in this population, we will also collect exploratory data on the impact of switching to e-cigarettes on the biological effects of cancer risk (i.e., inflammation and DNA damage) and subjective effects of product use on health-related quality of life.

Potential subjects will be recruited and screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria from MUSC's telehealth TTP. Once we have determined that someone meets our eligibility criteria, we will invite them to begin the consent process. Participants who consent to participation and are randomized will complete baseline assessments, a baseline breath CO, and a blood draw for baseline biomarker assessment. Participants in the Switch group will be provided with a 13-week supply of e-cigarettes and choose a switch date.

Participants will be asked to complete Assessments remotely via REDCap survey on the Target Switch Day (Week 0 Assessment), and every 2 weeks through the end of product provision (Week 12). An additional assessment will be completed at the Week 24 follow-up. Participants will complete a blood draw at Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24. Participants will complete a remote submission of breath carbon monoxide at baseline, Week 0 (Switch Date), Week 6, Week 12, and Week 24.

We will conduct semi-structured interviews with \~20-25 participants from Switch after they complete the Week 24 follow-up to gain in-depth understanding of intervention experiences. We will also interview the primary providers from MUSC TTP who conducted the telehealth counseling component as well as other key clinic stakeholders. The providers will be interviewed on intervention acceptability including their perceptions of e-cigarettes as harm reduction tools, reach, fit within the clinic environment, resources to support and sustain the intervention in practice, and implementation barriers and facilitators.

02

Conditions studied

  • Smoking
  • E-Cig Use
  • Oncology

Browse trials for

03

In context

Vaping Reclassified

402 studies on the registry are indexed under Vaping; 95 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 208 is above the median of 79 across 322 interventional studies indexed under Vaping.

Browse Vaping studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 874 studies on the registry; 166 are open to participants now.

Of its 131 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (79%) have results posted.

Compared within Vaping, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Smoking. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age 21+,
  • identified as smoking in their medical record and self-report of current smoking within the past 30 days
  • refused traditional treatment options through the opt-out HCC Tobacco Treatment Program
  • English speaking;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently taking part in any TTP or using cessation medication (i.e., taking NRT or other cessation medications, enrolled in the Quitline, or in another study),
  • use of e-cigarettes in the past 30 days,
  • currently imprisoned,
  • pregnant women.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
208 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Harm Reduction (E-cigarette switching)

    Participants will be assigned to receive an e-cigarette and try to switch completely from smoking to using the e-cigarette

    Behavioral: Harm Reduction (E-cigarette switching)

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care

    Participants will be assigned to receive tobacco treatment referrals and the opportunity to re-enroll in the Tobacco Treatment Program

    Behavioral: Standard of Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralHarm Reduction (E-cigarette switching)

    Participants will be assigned to receive an e-cigarette and try to switch completely from smoking to using the e-cigarette

  • BehavioralStandard of Care

    Participants will be assigned to receive tobacco treatment referrals and the opportunity to re-enroll in the Tobacco Treatment Program

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete switching

    The percentage of participants who are abstinent from combustible cigarettes at the 6-month follow up

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Implementation

    Percentage of people who smoke who engage in the intervention

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2029, 45 months after the start.

Of 184 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Vaping, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 45 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 208 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 18, 2025
First posted
Jun 26, 2025
StartActual
Aug 25, 2025
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2029
Last update
Oct 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date
1 update, last Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07039292
Responsible party
Alana Rojewski (Associate Professor-Faculty, Medical University of South Carolina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 26, 2025
Start date
Aug 25, 2025
Primary completion
May 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Alana Rojewski
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina
Tracy Smith
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion