ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06979284CLARITYUpdated Sep 18, 2026

Intravascular Ultrasound for Peripheral Artery Disease Revascularization

An interventional study of IVUS-guided strategy in Peripheral Arterial Disease(PAD), Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia and Intravascular Ultrasound, sponsored by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation. Recruiting at 5 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Primary conditionChronic Limb-Threatening IschemiaRegistry: Peripheral Arterial DiseaseReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Peripheral Arterial Disease — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, a narrower term within Peripheral Arterial Disease.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
772
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if IVUS use, as compared to angiography alone, prevent major adverse limb events (MALE) or binary restenosis (a greater than 50% re-narrowing of the treated artery) in adult patients who have CLTI and are undergoing percutaneous revascularization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peripheral Arterial Disease(PAD)
  • Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
  • Intravascular Ultrasound
  • Major Adverse Limb Events
  • Restenosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Reclassified

356 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 772 is above the median of 40 across 239 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

Browse Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation is the lead sponsor of 242 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Compared within Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Peripheral Arterial Disease. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients presenting with lower extremity PAD manifesting as CLTI:

    a. CLTI is defined as ischemic rest foot pain, nonhealing wounds, or gangrene present for at least two weeks and that is attributable to objectively proven arterial occlusive disease, compatible with Rutherford class 4, 5 or 6 AND

  2. Scheduled to undergo percutaneous revascularization, AND
  3. Imaging evidence of an obstructive or occluded lesion (> 70%) in the infraiguinal circulation (e.g. femoral, popliteal, or infrapopliteal circulation) using angiography, ultrasound, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging that is responsible for CLTI of the index limb
  4. An infrapopliteal lesion must be located in the proximal 2/3 of native infrapopliteal vessels, with a vessel diameter of > 2.5mm by investigator visual assessment.
  5. The distal margin of the most distal target lesion must be located > 10 cm proximal to the proximal margin on the ankle mortise. The vessel segment distal to the most distal target lesion must be patent all the way to the ankle, with no obstructive lesion (>50% stenosis).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The presence of anatomic or comorbid conditions or other medical, social, or psychological conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, could limit the potential participant's ability to participate in the trial or to comply with the follow-up requirements.
  2. The presence of any medical conditions precluding percutaneous revascularization
  3. The subject has previously had or requires open surgical revascularization involving the vessel containing the target lesion of the ipsilateral extremity.
  4. The subject is bedridden or unable to walk (with assistance is acceptable).
  5. \< 12 months
  6. Age \< 18 years
  7. Active vasculitis, Buerger's disease, or acute limb-threatening ischemia
  8. Planned above-ankle amputation of the index limb within four weeks of the index procedure.
  9. Obstructive supra-inguinal "inflow" (>70% stenosis) which is not planned to be treated during index procedure or within 30 days of the index procedure.
  10. The subject has had any amputation to the ipsilateral extremity other than the toe or forefoot, or the subject has had a major amputation to the contralateral extremity \< 1 year before the index procedure and is not independently walking.
  11. Extensive tissue loss that is salvageable only with complex foot reconstruction or non-traditional trans metatarsal amputations.

    1. Osteomyelitis that extends proximal to the metatarsal heads
    2. Gangrene involving the plantar skin of the forefoot, midfoot or heel
    3. Deep ulcer or large shallow ulcer (> 3 cm) involving the plantar skin of the f forefoot, midfoot, or heel
    4. Full-thickness heel ulcer
    5. Any wound with calcaneal bone involvement
    6. Wounds that would require flap coverage or complex wound management for large soft tissue defect
    7. Full-thickness wounds on the dorsum of the foot with exposed tendon or bone.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
772 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intravascular Ultrasound - guided strategy

    Percutaneous revascularization will be performed using intravascular ultrasound.

    Procedure: IVUS-guided strategy

  • No intervention
    Angiography - guided strategy

    A standard-of-care percutaneous revascularization will be performed without using intravascular ultrasound.

Interventions

  • ProcedureIVUS-guided strategy

    Percutaneous revascularization will be performed using intravascular ultrasound. The operators will follow instructions to modify arteries hardened by calcium and use IVUS to optimize the equipment (balloon and stents) used to unblock the artery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time-to-first occurrence of MALE

    Defined as unplanned above ankle amputation of the index limb or clinically driven target lesion revascularization, or target-lesion binary restenosis, defined as \> 50% stenosis on imaging throughout follow-up.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first unplanned above ankle amputation of the index limb, clinically driven target lesion revascularization or target-lesion binary restenosis, assessed up to a maximum of 5 years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The composite of all-cause mortality, MALE, or target-lesion binary restenosis

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death, MALE, or target lesion binary restenosis, assessed up to a maximum of 5 years.

  2. MALE

    Time frame: From date of randomization, assessed up to a maximum of 5 years.

  3. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: From date of randomization, assessed up to a maximum of 5 years.

  4. Unplanned above-ankle amputation of the index limb

    Time frame: From date of randomization, assessed up to a maximum of 5 years.

  5. Clinically-driven target lesion revascularization

    Time frame: From date of randomization, assessed up to a maximum of 5 years.

  6. Target lesion binary restenosis

    Time frame: From date of randomization, assessed up to a maximum of 5 years.

  7. Unplanned minor amputation of the index limb

    Time frame: From date of randomization, assessed up to a maximum of 5 years.

  8. Wound healing status of the index limb based on the Wound, Ischemia, Foot Infection (WIFI) scale at 12 months

    The WIFI assessment refers to the Wound, Ischemia, and Foot Infection (WIFI) classification system. This system is used to standardize the measurement of wound healing, particularly in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). It is not a questionnaire but rather a classification method that helps in assessing the severity of wounds, the degree of ischemia (restricted blood supply), and the presence of foot infections. Wound, Ischemia and foot infection are all graded on a scale of 0-3, with higher grades indicating more severe conditions.

    Time frame: From date of randomization, assessed up to a maximum of 1 year

  9. Change in the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) score at 12 months

    The Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) is a tool designed to measure walking ability in patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD). It assesses the impact of PAD on walking distance, walking speed, and the ability to climb stairs. The WIQ is particularly useful for evaluating the severity of walking impairment and the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving walking ability in these patients. The WIQ includes several categories, each scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better walking ability. Each category score is calculated based on the patient's self-reported ability to perform these activities. The scores are then used to provide an overall assessment of the patient's walking impairment.

    Time frame: From date of randomization, assessed up to a maximum of 1 year

  10. Change in the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire-6 (VascQol-6) score at 12 months

    The VascuQoL-6 questionnaire is a health-related quality of life (QoL) assessment tool specifically designed for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). It is used in clinical practice and vascular registries to evaluate the impact of PAD on patients' quality of life. Scale Determination The VasQol-6 consists of six questions, each scored on a scale from 1 to 4. The scores for each question are summed to generate a total Quality of Life score. A higher total score indicates a better health status. Score 1: Indicates the worst health status. Score 4: Indicates the best health status.

    Time frame: From date of randomization, assessed up to a maximum of 1 year

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier De L'Universite De Montreal (CHUM)
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Project Manager · Contactclarity@phri.ca · 905-521-2100
    • Laura Drudi, MDCM, MSc, FRCSC, FACS, FAHA · Principal investigator
  • The Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Project Manager · Contactclarity@phri.ca · 905-521-2100
    • Elie Girsowicz, MD, MSc · Principal investigator
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
    Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Project Manager · Contactclarity@phri.ca · 905-521-2100
    • Marc-André d'Entremont, MD, MPH, PhD, FRCPC, DRCPSC · Principal investigator
  • Hamilton General Hospital
    Hamilton, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Project Manager · Contactclarity@phri.ca · 905-521-2100
    • John Harlock, MD MSc FRCSC FACS · Principal investigator
  • Unity Health Toronto - St. Micheal's Hospital
    Toronto, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Project Manager · Contactclarity@phri.ca · 905-521-2100
    • Graham McClure, MD, MSc, FRCSC, PhDc · Principal investigator
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06979284
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 18, 2025
Start date
Dec 5, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

CLARITY Project Office
Contact
CLARITY@phri.ca
905-521-2100

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion