ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06978127TACcare 2 0Updated Aug 24, 2026

Technology Assisted Collaborative Care Intervention to Improve Patient-centered Outcomes in Dialysis Patients

An interventional study of Technology Assisted Stepped Collaborative Care and Usual Care Arm in Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Hemodialysis, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-24.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
424
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 988 studies in Renal Insufficiency, Chronic with a site in United States — 171 open to participants now, 218 under way, 25 of them phase 3. Renal Insufficiency, Chronic · United States.

Planned enrollment
123rd of 819
424 · median 72
Started
2025
with 56 others
No phase
314 of 988
62 open now
Primary completion
2029-06
later than 173 of 216 live
Registered
906th of 988
by date

Among the 988 studies in Renal Insufficiency, Chronic with a site in United States, this one is the 123rd largest by planned enrollment of the 819 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 57 that started in 2025, is one of 314 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 173 of the 216 other live ones, and was the 906th registered.

Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

3,094 studies on the registry are indexed under Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; 701 are open to participants now.

Browse Renal Insufficiency, Chronic studies →

Open to participants now

171 of the 988 studies in Renal Insufficiency, Chronic with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

166 more — sign in →

All 171 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 434 Renal Insufficiency, Chronic studies recruiting now, 244 (56%) set no upper age limit and 111 (26%) stop at 75 or younger; 45 take children under 18; 80 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 988 studies in Renal Insufficiency, Chronic with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this study is to learn if a collaborative care intervention of pharmaco-therapy and/or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), delivered in a real-world setting, improves symptoms of pain, fatigue and/or depression.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to conduct a hybrid Type II effectiveness-implementation, cluster randomized trial of TĀCcare 2.0 facilitated by dialysis staff in a real-world setting. This is a multi-center, dialysis-clinic level cluster randomized trial of 424 patients from 36 dialysis clinics comparing TACcare 2.0 facilitated by dialysis staff versus usual care. Patients' dialysis clinic will be placed randomly into one of two study groups: the Technology Assisted Stepped Collaborative Care Intervention Group or the Usual Care Group.

The intervention will target three of the most debilitating End State Kidney Disease (ESKD) related symptoms- fatigue, pain and depression. A stepped collaborative care approach for pharmaco and/or CBT allows for shared decision-making and individualization of treatment according to a patient's clinical status, preferences and treatment response. The TĀCcare 2.0 intervention will build on successful design elements of the original intervention, enhance depression management strategies and increase durability of effect by incorporating monthly longitudinal telemedicine-delivered booster sessions to complete a total 12-month intervention. Additionally, using a collaborative care approach, the patients' symptom management will be integrated with their dialysis treatment, thus increasing patient acceptability and adherence.

03

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Hemodialysis

Keywords

  • Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Hemodialysis
  • Pain
  • Depression
  • Fatigue
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Eligibility Criteria:

  1. age 18 years or older;
  2. undergoing thrice-weekly maintenance hemodialysis (HD) for > 3 months;
  3. English or Spanish speaking;
  4. able to provide

Ineligibility Criteria:

  1. active thought disorder, delusions or active suicidal ideation
  2. active substance abuse
  3. enrolled in hospice or \< 6 months (based on clinician's judgement)
  4. too ill or cognitively impaired to participate based on renal provider's judgement
  5. living kidney transplant scheduled in \<3 months
  6. undergoing active cancer treatment.
  7. enrolled in another research study
  8. plan to transition to home dialysis within 3 months
  9. plan to move to another dialysis facility within 3 months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
424 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Technology Assisted Stepped Collaborative Care Group

    Participants in the Technology Assisted Stepped Collaborative Care group will receive a stepped-approach for pharmaco and/or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and individualization of treatment to improve symptoms of fatigue, pain and/or depression, in a real-world setting.

    Behavioral: Technology Assisted Stepped Collaborative Care

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care Group

    Participants in the Usual Care Group will continue with their usual care.

    Other: Usual Care Arm

Interventions

  • BehavioralTechnology Assisted Stepped Collaborative Care

    The TĀCcare 2.0 intervention will provide pharmacotherapy recommendations and/or CBT for pain, fatigue and depression. A stepped-treatment approach will be used to intensify treatment. CBT will be provided through 12 weekly telehealth sessions (done during dialysis treatment or from home) with the behavioral specialist. Booster sessions will be used to enhance the maintenance of effect following the initial intervention to complete a total 12 month intervention. A collaborative care approach will be used so that patients' symptom management will be integrated with their dialysis treatment. Throughout the study, participants will be asked to complete phone surveys about their symptoms and health.

  • OtherUsual Care Arm

    Participants in the Usual Care Arm will continue with their usual care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. TĀCcare 2.0 Effectiveness evaluation/Change in fatigue (co-primary outcome)

    Change in fatigue is a primary outcome. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) will be used to measure fatigue. Scores range from 0-52 with lower scores indicating greater fatigue.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. TĀCcare 2.0 Effectiveness evaluation/Change in Pain Intensity (co-primary outcome)

    Change in pain intensity score is also a primary outcome measure. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to measure pain intensity. The BPI uses a scale of 0 to 10. Higher scores on the pain intensity scale indicate greater pain severity.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. TĀCcare 2.0 Effectiveness evaluation/Change in Depression (co-primary outcome)

    Change in depression severity score is also a primary outcome measure. The Beck Depression Inventory-II will be used to measure the depression severity score. Each item is scored on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 to 3, allowing for a total score ranging from 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fatigue

    Change in fatigue measured by The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F). Scores range from 0-52 with lower scores indicating greater fatigue.

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  2. Pain Intensity

    Change in pain intensity measured by Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), which uses a scale of 0 to 10. Higher scores on the pain intensity scale indicate greater pain severity.

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  3. Depression

    Change in depression severity score using The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Each item is scored on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 to 3, allowing for a total score ranging from 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

  4. Pain interference

    Brief Pain Inventory will be used to measure interference due to pain. Change in pain intensity measured by Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), which uses a scale of 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse pain interference.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  5. Dialysis Symptom Burden

    Dialysis symptom burden and severity will be assessed using the Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI). The total score can range from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating a greater symptom burden.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  6. Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions Short Form 8A will be used; higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy in managing chronic conditions.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  7. Sleep quality

    PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and sleep duration questions will be asked to assess sleep quality. The scale consists of 6 items with a 5-point response scale. Higher scores indicate greater sleep disturbance.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  8. Post Dialysis fatigue

    Single Item Question asking patients length of time it takes to recover from dialysis treatment will be used to assess post dialysis fatigue. Higher recovery time indicates greater post dialysis fatigue

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  9. Anxiety

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale will be used to assess severity of anxiety symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  10. Health related quality of life

    RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) will be used to measure health related quality-of-life measures. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health status.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  11. Perceived Social Support

    The Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) will be used to assess patients' perceived level of social support. It is a 12 item measure that uses a 5-point Likert scale with higher scores indicating greater perceived social support.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  12. Adherence to dialysis treatments

    Data on missed dialysis treatments will be recorded from dialysis electronic health record

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  13. Hospitalization/ER visits

    Data on hospitalizations and ER visits will be collected from the dialysis electronic health records

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Fatigue Assessment Scale

    The Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) is scored by summing up the responses to each of its 10 items, where each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from "never" (1) to "always" (5), resulting in a total score ranging from 10 (minimal fatigue) to 50 (extreme fatigue) ; higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity.

    Time frame: Every 4 weeks during 12 week intervention

  2. PROMIS Anxiety SF 8A

    The PROMIS Anxiety SF 8A is scored by summing up the responses to each of the 8 questions, where each question is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never to 5=always), resulting in a raw score; this raw score is then converted into a T-score using a reference table to provide a standardized measure of anxiety severity, with a mean T-score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 across the general population.

    Time frame: Every 4 weeks during 12 week intervention

  3. PROMIS Depression SF 8A

    The PROMIS Depression SF 8A is scored by summing up the responses to each of the 8 questions, where each question is rated on a 5-point scale from 1 ("Never") to 5 ("Always"), resulting in a raw score; this raw score is then converted into a T-score using a provided table to interpret the severity of depression, with higher T-scores indicating greater depression severity.

    Time frame: Every 4 weeks during 12 week intervention

  4. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain

    A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain is a simple pain measurement tool where a patient marks a point on a 10cm line to indicate the intensity of their pain, with one end representing "no pain" and the other end representing "worst pain imaginable"; the score is determined by measuring the distance from the "no pain" end to the mark made by the patient, usually in centimeters, providing a numerical value representing their pain level

    Time frame: Every 4 weeks during 12 week intervention

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All subject-level clinical, survey, and laboratory will be preserved and shared. Data will be deidentified before submission. The study protocol, date collection forms/case report forms, data dictionary, manual of operations, interview guides, qualitative analysis codebook and a glossary of domain-specific terms will be submitted.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

Time frame: Baseline data (defined as any data collected prior to any intervention), such as demographics, tabular clinical data will be submitted within 4 months after enrollment is completed and released through the repositories 4 months after that. After the study is complete and unblinded, the study team will submit all remaining scientific data to the data repositories and will update the RCT status to "complete" in clinicaltrials.gov. This data will be released 12 months after the end of the study. Under the current repository policies, data will be preserved and available for the wider research community in perpetuity.

Access criteria: To maximize the appropriate sharing of scientific data and protect research participants' privacy and confidentiality, reuse of this dataset should use the following Data Use Limitations (DULs) under Controlled Access that is made available by a data repository only after approval of the request by the repository's independent review panel process.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2029, 46 months after the start.

Of 576 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 46 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 616 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 30, 2025
First posted
May 18, 2025
StartActual
Aug 28, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2029
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2029
Last update
Aug 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06978127
Responsible party
Manisha Jhamb (Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 18, 2025
Start date
Aug 28, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 24, 2026

Study contacts

Manisha Jhamb, MD, MPH
Contact
jhambm@upmc.edu
412-647-7062
Mark Unruh, MD, MS
Contact
MLUnruh@salud.unm.edu
(505) 272-0407
Manisha Jhamb, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh
Mark L Unruh, MS, MS
principal investigator · University of New Mexico

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion