ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06918288Updated Aug 25, 2026

Post-Extubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Non-Invasive Ventilation in Type II Respiratory Failure

An interventional study of High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) in Type II Respiratory Failure and Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, sponsored by Benha University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 51 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-25.

Sponsored by Benha University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
51 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure is characterized by elevated arterial carbon dioxide levels and commonly occurs in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. Patients with type II respiratory failure who experience difficult weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation are at increased risk of post-extubation respiratory failure and reintubation. This randomized clinical trial compared high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as respiratory support immediately after extubation in patients aged over 50 years with type II respiratory failure and difficult weaning. The primary objective was to compare reintubation rates at 72 hours and 7 days after extubation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type II Respiratory Failure
  • Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Keywords

  • Type II respiratory failure
  • Hypercapnia
  • Difficult weaning
  • Post-extubation
  • Reintubation
  • Non-invasive ventilation
  • High-flow nasal cannula
03

In context

Hypoventilation

96 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypoventilation; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 52 across 63 interventional studies indexed under Hypoventilation.

Browse Hypoventilation studies →

Lead sponsor

Benha University is the lead sponsor of 362 studies on the registry; 66 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
51 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >50 years.
  • Type II respiratory failure.
  • Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.
  • Difficult weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation, defined as failure to wean after 3-7 days of weaning attempts.
  • Fulfillment of predefined clinical criteria for extubation.
  • Written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate or absence of .
  • to NIV, including hemodynamic instability, excessive respiratory secretions with poor expectoration ability, oral or facial trauma, or recent esophageal surgery.
  • Poor short-term prognosis, including a very high risk of death within 7 days or receipt of palliative care.
  • Severe failure of another organ system, including severe cardiac, neurological, renal, or hepatic failure.
  • Existing tracheostomy.
  • Loss to follow-up resulting in uncertain 28-day survival.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Group

    Participants randomized to this group received high-flow nasal cannula immediately after extubation. The initial airflow was set at 50 L/min and subsequently adjusted according to patient tolerance. Absolute humidity was set at 44 mg H2O/L and temperature at 37°C. Therapy was adjusted to maintain SpO2 between 88% and 92% and respiratory rate below 30 breaths/min or at the pre-extubation baseline. Escalation to NIV or invasive mechanical ventilation because of respiratory failure was considered HFNC treatment failure.

    Device: High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC)

  • Active comparator
    Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) Group

    Participants randomized to this group received non-invasive ventilation immediately after extubation through a conventional oronasal mask using spontaneous/timed (S/T) mode. Expiratory positive airway pressure was initially set at 4 cmH2O and inspiratory pressure at 8 cmH2O, with subsequent adjustment according to patient tolerance and to achieve a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg. Pressure support and FiO2 were adjusted to maintain SpO2 between 88% and 92%, respiratory rate ≤30 breaths/min or at the pre-extubation baseline, and PaCO2 between 45 and 60 mmHg or at the most recent pre-extubation value. Requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation was considered NIV treatment failure.

    Device: Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV)

Interventions

  • DeviceHigh-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC)

    Heated and humidified high-flow oxygen was delivered through a nasal cannula immediately after extubation. The device provided adjustable high-flow oxygen to achieve the predefined oxygenation and respiratory-rate targets.

  • DeviceNon-Invasive Ventilation (NIV)

    Positive-pressure ventilatory support was delivered immediately after extubation through a conventional oronasal mask using spontaneous/timed (S/T) ventilation, with pressure and inspired oxygen adjusted according to predefined respiratory and gas-exchange targets.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reintubation Rate

    Number and proportion of participants requiring reinstitution of invasive mechanical ventilation after planned extubation.

    Time frame: At 72 hours and 7 days after extubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treatment Failure Rate

    Treatment failure was defined as escalation from HFNC to NIV or invasive mechanical ventilation in the HFNC group and requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation in the NIV group.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours after extubation

  2. Ventilator-Free Days at Day 28

    Number of days alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation during the first 28 days after randomization.

    Time frame: During the first 28 days after extubation

  3. Duration of Post-Extubation Respiratory Support

    Duration of respiratory support with HFNC or NIV following extubation.

    Time frame: Through 72 hours after extubation

  4. Arterial Blood pH

    Arterial blood pH measured by arterial blood gas analysis after extubation.

    Time frame: At 1, 12, 24, and 48 hours after extubation

  5. Arterial Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2)

    PaCO2 measured by arterial blood gas analysis after extubation.

    Time frame: At 1, 12, 24, and 48 hours after extubation

  6. Arterial Bicarbonate (HCO3)

    Arterial bicarbonate concentration measured as part of arterial blood gas analysis after extubation.

    Time frame: At 1, 12, 24, and 48 hours after extubation

  7. PaO2/FiO2 Ratio

    Ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), used to assess oxygenation after extubation.

    Time frame: At 1, 12, 24, and 48 hours after extubation

  8. Post-Extubation Complications

    Incidence of post-extubation complications were recorded during follow-up in the HFNC and NIV groups.

    Time frame: From extubation through 28 days after randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Benha University Hospital
    Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate 13511, Egypt
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Thille AW, Harrois A, Schortgen F, Brun-Buisson C, Brochard L. Outcomes of extubation failure in medical intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2011 Dec;39(12):2612-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182282a5a. PubMed 21765357 ↗
  • Comellini V, Pacilli AMG, Nava S. Benefits of non-invasive ventilation in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. Respirology. 2019 Apr;24(4):308-317. doi: 10.1111/resp.13469. Epub 2019 Jan 12. PubMed 30636373 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2025 to primary completion in Nov 2025, 7 months.

Of 35 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Hypoventilation, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26. This study's 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 35 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 15, 2025
First posted
Apr 9, 2025
StartActual
Apr 15, 2025
Primary completionActual
Nov 15, 2025
CompletionActual
Nov 15, 2025
Last update
Aug 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06918288
Lead sponsor
Benha University
Responsible party
Amr Tarek Atwa Heikal (Dr, Benha University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 9, 2025
Start date
Apr 15, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 15, 2025
Completion
Nov 15, 2025
Last update
Aug 25, 2026

Study contacts

Ahmed Mostafa Abdelhamid, Professor of Anesthesia
study director · Benha University
Fatma Ahmed Abdelfattah, MD Anesthesia and intensive ca
principal investigator · Benha University
Mohamed Shaker Sadek, MD chest diseases
study chair · Benha University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion