ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07467356Updated Oct 16, 2026

Anterior Iliopsoas Space Block Versus PENG Block on Ease of Positioning for Spinal Anathesia in Patients Undergoing Hip Surgeries

A Phase 3 interventional study of Bupivacaine and Bupivacaine in Pain Management, sponsored by Benha University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by Benha University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Updated Oct 16, 2026Primary completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been one of the most significant advancements in orthopedic surgery over the past century. hip fractures are typically associated with severe pain, effective analgesia is crucial both before and after surgery.Spinal anesthesia (SA) is the most commonly employed method of anesthesia for repairing these fractures.The anterior iliopsoas space block is a considered as a novel technique that targets the lumbosacral trunk as it passes beneath the psoas major muscle, offering potential advantages over the traditional sacral plexus block, which is performed in the supine position.

Read the detailed description

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been one of the most significant advancements in orthopedic surgery over the past century. hip fractures are typically associated with severe pain, effective analgesia is crucial both before and after surgery.

Consequently, efforts are made to facilitate enhanced recovery profiles to reduce postoperative pain in THA patients. At present, multimodal analgesia approaches have been used for pain management after THA, including oral analgesia, epidural analgesia, and peripheral nerve block.

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is the most commonly employed method of anesthesia for repairing these fractures. The intense pain resulting from the fracture can impede the optimal positioning required for these procedures , rendering access to the subarachnoid space challenging. Suboptimal postoperative analgesia may restrict limb mobility, consequently delaying recovery and increasing opioid consumption. Therefore, it is imperative to establish effective perioperative analgesia strategies that not only reduce the reliance on opioids but also mitigate their adverse effects, particularly in this patient population .

Based on previous anatomical studies, it has been established that the articular branches of the femoral nerve, the obturator nerve, and the accessory obturator nerve (AON) play a crucial role in innervating the anterior hip capsule. Consequently, these nerves are identified as the primary targets for hip analgesia, and their effective blockade can be achieved through the peri-capsular nerve group (PENG) technique .

Recently, The anterior iliopsoas space block is a considered as a novel technique that targets the lumbosacral trunk as it passes beneath the psoas major muscle, offering potential advantages over the traditional sacral plexus block, which is performed in the supine position.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain Management

Keywords

  • PENG block
  • anterior iliopsoas space block
  • ease of positioning
  • hip surgeries
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Benha University is the lead sponsor of 362 studies on the registry; 66 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • (ASA )classes I and II
  • patients of either sex, above the age of 18 who will undergo hip surgeries( (Dynamic hip screw fixation or hemiarthroplasty)(not older than 2 weeks) with persistent pain and scheduled for surgery under SA with an expected duration of 2.5 hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient's refusal to participate
  • any to SA or peripheral nerve blocks
  • history of ischemic heart disease
  • patients on opioids for chronic pain
  • patients with significant cognitive impairment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group (P)

    patients will receive PENG block(using bupivacaine 0.20% 25ml).

    Drug: Bupivacaine

  • Active comparator
    Group (A)

    patients will receive anterior ilio-psoas space block(using bupivacaine 0.20% 25ml).

    Drug: Bupivacaine

Interventions

  • The site to be blocked will be painted with 5% povidone iodine followed by 70% ethyl alcohol and draped. Linear high-frequency ultrasound probe (7 -15 mhz) (General Electric; GE, "LOGIQ E") will be initially placed in a transverse plane over the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and then alignes to identify the following landmarks: Anterior inferior iliac spine, ilio-pubic eminence, iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and Pectineus muscle. Point of injection will be musculo-fascial plane between the psoas tendon and ilio-pubic eminence.

  • placing a patient supine, identifying the anterior superior iliac spine and iliac crest, the skin of the block region will be cleaned with 5% povidone iodine followed by 70% ethyl alcohol .Both the sterile window sheets and probe will be covered with sterile drapes. A standardised amount of local anaesthetic will be administered utilising ultrasound guidance and a portable ultrasound system (General Electric; GE, "LOGIQ P5")to visualize the iliopsoas muscle in a transverse or longitudinal scan. The needle is advanced in-plane to the fascial plane between the iliopsoas muscle and the iliofemoral ligament or iliac bone, and local anesthetic is injected to spread along the iliopsoas muscle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the ease of spinal positioning

    EOSP will be assessed on the scale of 0-3 (0 = unable to position, 1 = patient had abnormal posturing due to pain and required support for positioning, 2 = mild discomfort but does not require support for positioning, 3 = optimal condition where the patient was able to position himself without pain)

    Time frame: 30 minutes after block

Secondary outcomes

  1. VAS at rest and on passive 15° limb lifting

    0 no pain and 10 the strongest pain imaginable

    Time frame: 30 minutes after block 2 hours postoperatively 6 hours postoperatively 12 hours postoperatively 24 hours postoperatively

  2. amount of pethidine intake

    amount of pethidine taken by the patient after surgery to relieve pain

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  3. quality of recovery score

    This questionnaire covers a total of 15 questions under five clinical dimensions of health; physical comfort (five-item), emotional status (four-item), psychological support (two-item), physical independence (two-item) and pain (two-item). a numerical rating scale of 11 point for each question leads to a minimum score of 0 (very poor recovery) and a maximum score of 150 (excellent recovery).

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Banha Faculity of Medicine
    Banhā, Elqalyoubea 13511, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 7 months after the start.

Primary completion moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Nov 2026, on Oct 16, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 8, 2026
First posted
Mar 12, 2026
StartActual
Mar 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2026was Sep 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 15, 2026
Last update
Oct 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2026→Nov 1, 2026
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    Primary completion Sep 15, 2026→Nov 1, 2026

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07467356
Lead sponsor
Benha University
Responsible party
Fatma Ahmed Abdel Fatah (Assistant professor, Benha University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 12, 2026
Start date
Mar 15, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

fatma ahmed abdelfatah, MD
Contact
drfatmaahmed86@gmail.com
00201091921540

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Bupivacaine

Start the discussion