ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06902610POPPINS-02-BUpdated Aug 21, 2026

Examining the Medium-term Effect on Non Inferiority of the Previous Training With the DMD Poppins Clinical for Cognitive, Musical Training in Addition to Bi-monthly Speech and Reading Therapy on Reading Writing Abilities of Pediatric Patients With SLD Reading VS Control Group

An observational study in Learning Disorder, Specific, Learning Disability and Specific Learning Disorder, With Impairment in Reading, sponsored by Poppins. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 11 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-21.

Primary conditionDyslexiaRegistry: Specific Learning DisorderReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Specific Learning Disorder — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Dyslexia
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Dyslexia, a narrower term within Specific Learning Disorder.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Poppins · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
306
Ages
7 Years to 11 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Poppins-02-b is an observational follow-up study examining the medium-term effect on non-inferiority of the previous training with the digital medical device (DMN) Poppins Clinical for cognitive and musical training in addition to bi-monthly speech and reading therapy sessions on the reading and writing abilities of pediatrics patients with specific learning disorders involving reading and/or writing deficits compared to a control group that received weekly speech and reading therapy sessions.

Poppins-02-b is an ancillary study to Poppins-02 and consists of monitoring patients who participated in Poppins-02 study.

Read the detailed description

The POPPINS-02-b follow-up study consists in following up patients who took part in the POPPINS-02 clinical trial: a randomized non-inferiority trial with a control group designed to assess the effect of adding the Poppins Clinical digital medical device in addition to bi-monthly speech and reading therapy sessions on the skills of patients with reading disorders. Patients included in the original POPPINS-02 study were randomized into one of two groups:

  1. Experimental group (EXPE group): will receive the Poppins Clinical digital medical device in addition to bi-monthly speech and reading therapy sessions.
  2. Control group (CONT group): will receive weekly speech and reading therapy sessions.

In the original POPPINS-02 study, the experimental phase lasts 12 weeks in total, with a preliminary evaluation (T1) and a final evaluation (T2) after this period.

All patients enrolled in the POPPINS-02 study will be included, if they so wish, in the POPPINS-02-b follow-up study. This study consists of a 12-week follow-up phase after the final POPPINS-02 protocol visit (T2). During this follow-up phase, all patients will return to their usual speech therapy management with the frequency planned before their participation in POPPINS-02. During this follow-up phase, patients in both groups will not have access to the Poppins Clinical application. At the end of the 12-week follow-up period, an evaluation (T3) is scheduled. Assessments will cover primary, secondary and exploratory endpoints.

A questionnaire will also be submitted to parents and speech therapists caring for the children during T3 in order to collect information on the dates of speech therapy sessions during this follow-up period, and to benefit from their perspective on the medium-term effect of the study protocol on speech therapy follow-up.

Access to the Poppins Clinical digital medical device will be offered to children in the two POPPINS-02 study groups who decide to participate in the POPPINS-02-b follow-up study at the end of the experiment.

The investigator and his team will remain blind as to which groups will be assigned to the POPPINS-02 study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Learning Disorder, Specific
  • Learning Disability
  • Specific Learning Disorder, With Impairment in Reading
  • Dyslexia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dyslexia Reclassified

127 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyslexia; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 306 is above the median of 90 across 20 observational studies indexed under Dyslexia.

Browse Dyslexia studies →

Lead sponsor

Poppins is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Compared within Dyslexia, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Specific Learning Disorder. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 11 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

According to the DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 Specific Learning Disability (SLD) or Developmental Learning Disability (DLD) is one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders. It affects between 5% and 15% of schoolchildren. In particular, SLD is one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders. It affects between 6% and 8% of schoolchildren. It is characterized by significant and persistent difficulties in the acquisition of academic skills, which may include reading, writing or arithmetic, although dyslexia is by far the most common type, accounting for 80% of SLD. SLD first manifests itself during the teaching of academic or occupational functioning. Children with SLD do not have associated intellectual retardation, overt brain damage or degenerative disorders. They are therefore likely to benefit most from remediation.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
  • Patient who has been enrolled in the POPPINS-02 study.
  • Participation agreement from the patient as well as from the legal guardians, and commitment to follow the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any pathology that, at the discretion of the investigator, may prevent the patient from participating in the study.
  • Patient participating in an interventional study that could affect the results.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
306 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • No intervention: CONTROL

    1 session of speech and reading therapy weekly, no use of the medical device Poppins Clinical

  • Experimental

    Reduced speech and reading therapy sessions (1 session every 2 weeks) and use of the medical device Poppins Clinical

    Device: Poppins Clinical

Interventions

  • DevicePoppins Clinical

    Poppins Clinical is a software as a medical device that combines a musical and combines a musical and cognitive training program and written language training program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the medium term non-inferiority of Poppins Clinical as a complement to reduced speech and reading therapy compared to only speech and reading therapy

    This endpoint evaluates the non-inferiority on reading abilities using a word reading task measured by the 2-minutes word reading rest form EVALEO (EVAL2M), assessing the number of words correctly read, 12 weeks after the last evaluation of the POPPINS-02 study

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the medium-term effect of adding Poppins Clinical on reading abilities (in terms of reading speed) (non-inferiority).

    This endpoint evaluates the non-inferiority on reading abilities using a word reading task measured by the 2-minute word reading test from EVALEO (EVAL2M), assessing the number of words read, 12 weeks after the last evaluation of the POPPINS-02 study.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Evaluate the medium-term effect of adding Poppins Clinical on text reading skills (non-inferiority).

    This endpoint evaluates the mid-term effect of the addition of Poppins Clinical on word reading skills in terms of speed and accuracy as assessed by a text reading test (Alouette) (speed and accuracy scores), 12 weeks after the last evaluation of the POPPINS-02 study.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Assessment of the medium-term effect of adding Poppins Clinical on parental stress level between the two groups (EXP/CONT) (non-inferiority).

    This endpoint examines the mid-term impact of adding Poppins Clinical on parents' stress levels, measured using the parenting stress index short form, 12 weeks after the last evaluation of the POPPINS-02 study.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Description and comparison of the medium-term effect of adding Poppins Clinical on the quality of life of parents between the two groups (EXP/CONT) (non-inferiority).

    This endpoint examines the mid-term impact of adding Poppins Clinical on parents' quality of life, measured using the EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire, 12 weeks after the last evaluation of the POPPINS-02 study.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Evaluate the medium-term effect of adding Poppins Clinical on metaphonological skills (non-inferiority).

    This endpoint evaluates the mid-term effect of adding Poppins Clinical on meta-phonological skills as assessed by the BALE phoneme suppression test (correct answers score), 12 weeks after the last evaluation of the POPPINS-02 study.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Evaluate the medium-term effect of adding Poppins Clinical on text comprehension (non-inferiority).

    This endpoint evaluates at the mid-term effect of adding Poppins Clinical on text comprehension assessed using the computerized adaptable test battery (BMT-i) (evaluated scores: correct answers to text comprehension questions score, reading precision and speed), 12 weeks after the last evaluation of the POPPINS-02 study.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière
    Paris, 75013, France
  • Hôpital Henri Laborit
    Poitiers, 86000, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2025 to primary completion in Apr 2026, 9 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 24, 2025
First posted
Mar 30, 2025
StartActual
Jun 20, 2025
Primary completionActual
Apr 15, 2026
CompletionActual
Jun 10, 2026
Last update
Aug 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06902610
Lead sponsor
Poppins
Collaborators
Lindus Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 30, 2025
Start date
Jun 20, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2026
Completion
Jun 10, 2026
Last update
Aug 21, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion