ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07762365Updated Nov 6, 2026

Brain Stimulation Paired With Structured Reading Instruction in Children With Dyslexia

An interventional study of Active transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and Sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) in Dyslexia and Reading Disability, sponsored by General Neuro Inc.. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by General Neuro Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 6, 2026Now Enrolling by invitationStart date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 35 studies in Dyslexia with a site in United States — 7 open to participants now, 11 under way, none of them phase 3. Dyslexia · United States.

Planned enrollment
23rd of 29
60 · median 160
Started
2026
with 2 others
No phase
24 of 35
6 open now
Primary completion
2031-06
later than 10 of 10 live
Registered
35th of 35
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 35
General Neuro Inc.

Among the 35 studies in Dyslexia with a site in United States, this one is the 23rd largest by planned enrollment of the 29 interventional ones, is one of 3 that started in 2026, is one of 24 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 10 of the 10 other live ones, and was the 35th registered.

By phase

35 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study24 · 6 open
Observational6 · 1 open
Phase 43 · 0 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open
Phase 21 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 1995; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 160 across the 29 interventional studies, 72 across the 6 observational. Of the 20 that completed or were terminated, 7 (35%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 35 studies in Dyslexia with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study investigates whether transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) delivered during structured reading instruction affects reading proficiency in children with developmental dyslexia and related reading disabilities.

Children aged 7 to 17 who have been identified as having dyslexia or reading difficulties are randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive either active stimulation or sham (placebo) stimulation while completing structured reading instruction. Participants wear a non-invasive transcranial electrical stimulation headset that delivers a low-level electrical current through electrodes resting on the scalp. Sessions typically last 20 to 30 minutes and may take place at home or in person at a participating site. A trained adult is present and supervising for every session.

Reading proficiency is measured with standardized assessments before and after the intervention period. A follow-up assessment may be conducted up to 12 months after the intervention ends.

The device used in this study is investigational and has not been approved or cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Read the detailed description

Regulatory pathway: because developmental dyslexia and related learning disabilities are considered diseases by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for purposes of device classification, the investigational use of tES in this study falls within FDA jurisdiction. The study is conducted under the abbreviated investigational device exemption pathway on the basis of an IRB non-significant risk determination under 21 CFR 812.2(b). No IDE number is issued by FDA for a study conducted under this pathway.

The study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled investigation. Participants are randomized 1:1 to active or sham stimulation, with stratification by site or cohort as applicable. Neither participants nor the research team conducting outcome assessments are aware of assignment during data collection. Stimulation assignment is held by the Sub-Investigator and is not disclosed to the Principal Investigator until all outcome data are collected and locked and primary analyses are finalized.

Sessions may be delivered by decentralized at-home administration, on-site administration at partner schools, tutoring centers and clinical practices, or a hybrid of the two. For all pediatric sessions a trained adult, who may be a parent, legal guardian, or a trained study team member such as a tutor or educator, is required to be present and supervising for the duration of each session. Supervisors complete training on electrode placement, device operation, and adverse event recognition before the first session.

The protocol declares a bounded parameter envelope within which specific stimulation parameters, reading instruction methods, partner sites, and assessment instruments may be selected per cohort without protocol amendment. All parameters operate within the LOTES-2023 limited-output standard for transcranial electrical stimulation devices. For pediatric participants the declared envelope permits 0 to 2 mA average absolute current, a maximum current density of 2 mA/cm2 at the electrode contact area, a maximum session duration of 60 minutes subject to a 6000 mC total-charge-per-session ceiling, and a maximum of 30 total sessions per participant. Anticipated session durations are 20 to 30 minutes.

Concurrent structured reading instruction may follow any evidence-based structured literacy method, including Orton-Gillingham-based and Lindamood-Bell approaches.

Reading assessments are administered by qualified practitioners, including reading specialists, certified educators, or other personnel trained in administration of the selected instrument.

Because assessment instruments and specific stimulation parameters are selected per cohort within the declared envelope, each enrollment cohort has a cohort-specific Statistical Analysis Plan finalized and locked prior to unblinding of that cohort.

03

Conditions studied

  • Dyslexia
  • Reading Disability

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • transcranial electrical stimulation
  • tES
  • transcranial direct current stimulation
  • tDCS
  • dyslexia
  • reading fluency
  • structured literacy
  • pediatric
  • neuromodulation
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 7 to 17 years inclusive
  • Diagnosed with developmental dyslexia or related reading disability, OR exhibiting reading difficulties consistent with developmental dyslexia (for example, performing below the participant's expected grade level on a standardized reading assessment), as identified by the participant's educator, reading practitioner, caregiver, or clinician. A formal clinical diagnosis is not required for enrollment.
  • Concurrently receiving or able to receive structured reading instruction during the intervention period
  • Parent or legal guardian able and willing to provide informed permission
  • Participant able and willing to provide age-appropriate assent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of epilepsy or any seizure disorder
  • Active skin disease, open wounds, or significant skin irritation at electrode contact sites
  • Implanted electronic medical devices where stimulation would be per device manufacturer guidance or investigator judgment after individual risk assessment
  • Significant cognitive impairment beyond reading-related difficulties that would interfere with assent or study participation
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would compromise participant safety or the integrity of the study data
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Stimulation

    Participants receive active transcranial electrical stimulation delivered through a non-invasive scalp-mounted headset while completing structured reading instruction. Stimulation amplitude and session duration are selected per cohort from the declared pediatric parameter envelope, with current ramping at session start and end. Sessions are typically 20 to 30 minutes, with a maximum of 30 total sessions per participant. A trained adult supervises every session.

    Device: Active transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Stimulation

    Participants receive sham stimulation through the same non-invasive scalp-mounted headset while completing the same structured reading instruction. Sham provides the sensory experience of stimulation onset without sustained current delivery. The specific validated sham approach is selected and documented per cohort. A trained adult supervises every session.

    Device: Sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

Interventions

  • DeviceActive transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

    Non-invasive transcranial electrical stimulation delivered by a scalp-mounted headset within the LOTES-2023 limited-output envelope, paired with structured reading instruction. Pediatric declared range 0 to 2 mA average absolute current, maximum current density 2 mA/cm2 at the electrode contact area, maximum session duration 60 minutes subject to a 6000 mC per-session total charge limit, and a maximum of 30 total sessions per participant. Electrodes are placed in standard cephalic or extracephalic montages targeting cortical regions implicated in reading networks. The device is investigational and is not approved or cleared by the U.S. FDA.

  • DeviceSham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES)

    Sham stimulation delivered by the same scalp-mounted headset, providing the initial cutaneous sensory experience of stimulation onset without sustained current delivery, paired with the same structured reading instruction. The specific validated sham approach is selected per cohort and documented in the corresponding cohort plan.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in TOWRE-2 Total Word Reading Efficiency index

    Change in the Total Word Reading Efficiency index of the Test of Word Reading Efficiency, Second Edition (TOWRE-2), a timed measure of word reading efficiency administered by a qualified practitioner. Scores are reported as age-normed standard scores with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate greater word reading efficiency.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention period, up to 10 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in CTOPP-2 Phonological Awareness Composite score

    Change in the Phonological Awareness Composite score of the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing, Second Edition (CTOPP-2), administered by a qualified practitioner. Scores are reported as age-normed standard scores with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate stronger phonological awareness.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention period, up to 10 weeks

  2. Change from baseline in CTOPP-2 Rapid Symbolic Naming Composite score

    Change in the Rapid Symbolic Naming Composite score of the Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing, Second Edition (CTOPP-2), administered by a qualified practitioner. Scores are reported as age-normed standard scores with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate faster symbolic naming.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention period, up to 10 weeks

  3. Change from baseline in WJ IV Reading Fluency cluster score

    Change in the Reading Fluency cluster score of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement (WJ IV ACH), administered by a qualified practitioner. Scores are reported as age-normed standard scores with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate greater reading fluency.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention period, up to 10 weeks

  4. Incidence of adverse events

    Number and severity of adverse events reported, including tingling, itching or warmth under the electrodes, skin redness, headache, fatigue, difficulty sleeping, dizziness or lightheadedness, phosphenes, and skin irritation. Adverse events are captured by app-mediated or device-prompted self-report after each session, investigator queries at scheduled assessments, and participant- or supervisor-initiated reports.

    Time frame: Through the intervention period and follow-up, up to 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in WJ IV Passage Comprehension score

    Change in the Passage Comprehension score of the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement (WJ IV ACH), administered by a qualified practitioner. Scores are reported as age-normed standard scores with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Higher scores indicate stronger reading comprehension. Analyzed as an exploratory outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of intervention period, up to 10 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data are not planned to be shared. De-identified study data may be shared with academic collaborators under data sharing agreements, as described in the study protocol.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2031, 55 months after the start.

Of 69 interventional studies with no phase under Dyslexia, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 55 months is above that.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Nov 2026 → Oct 2026, on Nov 6, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 4, 2026
First posted
Aug 13, 2026
StartActual
Oct 5, 2026was Nov 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2031
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2032
Last update
Nov 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Enrolling by invitation
changed Nov 6, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026→Oct 5, 2026 (actual)
Nov 6, 2026
Contact
No study contact listed any more: removed a•••@generalneuro.com · •••3348; removed l•••@generalneuro.com
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    Recruiting→Enrolling by invitation
    Start date Nov 1, 2026→Oct 5, 2026 (now actual)
    Contact No study contact listed any more: removed a•••@generalneuro.com · •••3348; removed l•••@generalneuro.com
    + 2 other changes: verification date and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07762365
Lead sponsor
General Neuro Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 13, 2026
Start date
Oct 5, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Alec Sheffield, PhD
principal investigator · General Neuro Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion