ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06592911POPPINS-02Updated Feb 5, 2026

Examining the Effect of a Digital MD for Cognitive and Musical Training + Reduced Conventional SOC on the Reading and Writing Skills of Pediatric Participants With a Specific Learning Disability With Reading and/or Written Expression Deficit vs a Control Group Receiving Conventional SOC.

An interventional study of Poppins Clinical in Learning Disorder, Specific, Learning Disability and Specific Learning Disorder, With Impairment in Reading, sponsored by Poppins. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 11 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-05.

Primary conditionDyslexiaRegistry: Specific Learning DisorderReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Specific Learning Disorder — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Dyslexia
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Dyslexia, a narrower term within Specific Learning Disorder.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Poppins · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
306
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 11 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Poppins-02 is a multicentric randomized non-inferiority study examining the effect of the digital medical device Poppins Clinical for cognitive and musical training in addition to bi-monthly speech and reading therapy sessions on the reading and writing skills of pediatric participants with a specific learning disability with reading and/or written expression deficit.

Participants will be assigned randomly either to an experimental group that will use the medical device in combination with reduced speech and reading therapy sessions (1 session each 2 weeks) or to the control group receiving conventional standard of care, i.e. 1 speech and reading therapy sessions per week.

Read the detailed description

The study is a multicentric randomized non-inferiority clinical trial that has the aim to evaluate the impact of the digital medical device Poppins Clinical in addition to reduced speech and reading therapy sessions on children aged 7 to 11 years on their reading and writing skills.

Poppins Clinical is a software as a medical device (saMD) that combines a musical and cognitive training program and a written language training program. It is intended to provide a therapeutic rehabilitation for children with Specific Learning Disorders (SLD) with reading deficit. Poppins Clinical saMD operates on a tablet or smartphone and is designed to offer a fun and interactive gaming experience for children in form of a serious game.

The POPPINS-02 study thus proposes to include two patient arms:

  • The experimental arm benefiting from Poppins Clinical training during 12 weeks in addition to reduced conventional speech and reading therapy (1 session each 2 weeks),
  • The control arm having only conventional speech and reading therapy (1 session per week) during 12 weeks.

A randomization list will be generated, directing patients to the experimental or control arm, and informing parents, the patient, and the speech and reading therapist after the first pre-test. The investigator and his team will be blinded to the patient allocation group. It is therefore a single-blind study since parents, patients, and speech and reading therapists will be aware of the randomization.

In the experimental group, patients will have access to training with Poppins Clinical for 5 sessions per week, each session lasting approximately 20 minutes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Learning Disorder, Specific
  • Learning Disability
  • Specific Learning Disorder, With Impairment in Reading
  • Dyslexia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dyslexia Reclassified

127 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyslexia; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 306 is above the median of 71 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Dyslexia.

Browse Dyslexia studies →

Lead sponsor

Poppins is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Compared within Dyslexia, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Specific Learning Disorder. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 11 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of SLD with reading deficit, based on a speech-language assessment. SLD with reading deficit is defined in the (DSM-5-TR, 2022). The speech-language assessment should consist of at least three reading and/or transcription tests with a SD (standard deviation) of at least - 1.4 or a result below the 20th percentile or two reading and/or transcription tests with a SD of at least - 2 SD or a results below the 10th percentile;
  • Subject aged between 7 and 11, enrolled from CE1 to CM2;
  • Subject receiving speech and reading therapy for less than 2 years, receiving speech and reading therapy for written language for less than 2 years, with a maximum treatment frequency of one session per week, either for at least 3 months for children followed for more than 3 months, or for the duration of the treatment for children followed for less than 3 months.;
  • French mother tongue or French bilingualism at home and more than 3 years schooling in France;
  • Tablet or smartphone available at home;
  • Subject affiliated to the French National Insurance (Sécurité Sociale);
  • Subject and parental/legal guardians consent to participate, and commitment to follow the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has previously used Poppins Clinical or a previous version (Mila-Learn);
  • Unstabilized chronic illness (at investigator's discretion);
  • Participants with autism spectrum disorders or documented intellectual disabilities;
  • Vision or Hearing difficulties preventing the use of the tablet or smartphone;
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may prevent the patient from participating in the trial
  • Participant actively participating in an interventional study that may affect results.
  • Concurrent participation of any other family member in the same clinical trial
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
306 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    CONTROL

    1 session of speech and reading therapy weekly, no use of the medical device Poppins Clinical

  • Experimental
    EXPERIMENTAL

    Reduced speech and reading therapy sessions (1 session every 2 weeks) and use of the medical device Poppins Clinical

    Device: Poppins Clinical

Interventions

  • DevicePoppins Clinical

    Poppins Clinical is a software as a medical device that combines a musical and cognitive training program and written language training program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the non-inferiority of Poppins Clinical as a complement to reduced speech and reading therapy compared to only speech and reading therapy.

    This endpoint evaluates the non-inferiority on reading abilities using a word reading task measured by the EVALEO 2-minute word reading test (EVAL2M) and measuring the number of correctly read words.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary safety objective

    any adverse events will be collected from participants. Evaluation of adverse events reported by participants

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Secondary objective 1: Evaluate the effect of adding Poppins Clinical on reading abilities in terms of speed (non-inferiority)

    This endpoint evaluates the non-inferiority on reading abilities using a word reading task measured by the EVALEO 2-minute word reading test (EVAL2M) and measuring the number of read words.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Secondary objective 2: Evaluate the effect of adding Poppins Clinical on text reading skills (non-inferiority)

    This endpoint evaluates the effect of the addition of Poppins Clinical on word reading skills in terms of speed and accuracy as assessed by a text reading test (Alouette).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Secondary objective 3: description and evaluation of the coast associated to children's treatment

    This endpoint evaluates the coasts related to the medical care between the two groups, based on the number of treatment sessions, cost per session, cost of the medical device and travel cost, using a custom-made questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Secondary objective 4: Evaluation of the effect of adding Poppins Clinical on the parents' stress level between the two groups (EXPE/CONT) (non-inferiority)

    This endpoint examines the impact of adding Poppins Clinical on parents' stress levels, measured using the parenting stress index short form

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Secondary objective 5: Description and comparison of the effect of adding Poppins Clinical on the parents' quality of life between the two groups (EXPE/CONT) (non-inferiority)

    This endpoint examines the impact of adding Poppins Clinical on parents' quality of life, measured using the EQ-5D-5L quality of life questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Secondary outcome 6: evaluate the effect of adding Poppins Clinical on meta-phonological skills between the two groups (EXPE/CONT) (non-inferiority)

    This endpoint evaluates the effect of adding Poppins Clinical on meta-phonological skills as assessed by the BALE phoneme suppression test (correct answers score)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Secondary objective 7: Evaluate the effect of adding Poppins Clinical on text comprehension (non-inferiority)

    This endpoint evaluates at the effect of adding Poppins Clinical on text comprehension assessed using the computerized adaptable test battery (BMT-i)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, Paris 75013
    Paris, 75013, France
  • Hôpital Henri Laborit Poitiers, 86000
    Poitiers, 86000, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Grossard C, Descamps M, Cadoni S, Pellerin H, Vonthron F, Xavier J, Falissard B, Cohen D. Assessing the Noninferiority of a Rhythm and Language Training Serious Game Combined With Speech Therapy Versus Speech Therapy Care for Children With Dyslexia: Protocol for an Investigator-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 3;14:e71326. doi: 10.2196/71326. PubMed 40179385 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06592911
Lead sponsor
Poppins
Collaborators
Lindus Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Dec 20, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 29, 2026
Completion
Jan 29, 2026
Last update
Feb 5, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion