ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06874920Updated Mar 13, 2025

Outcomes of Empiric Antibiotic Therapy Based on Hospital Antibiograms in Organ Transplant Recipients with Bacteraemia

An observational study in Bacteremia and Transplant Recipient, sponsored by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-13.

Sponsored by Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this observational study is to examine how using the hospital cumulative antibiogram to guide empirical antibiotic therapy affects outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections who have undergone solid organ transplants. The key question is: does the use of a hospital cumulative antibiogram reduce mortality and improve outcomes in these patients?

Read the detailed description

Sepsis is a critical condition responsible for more than 750,000 hospitalisations and 200,000 deaths annually in the US. Severe sepsis remains a leading cause of death worldwide, with in-hospital mortality ranging from 12% to 26% in the US. An early and appropriate antimicrobial therapy in sepsis leads to a decreased progression to septic shock and death. However, physicians are often unaware of microbiological results when confronting sepsis; moreover, adopting a broad spectrum antibiotic therapy can lead to multiple adverse events. Therefore, a good balance between antibiotic efficacy and the consequence of indiscriminate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics is necessary, particularly for immunocompromised individuals at a higher risk of severe sepsis. Different studies have addressed choosing adequate empiric antibiotic in sepsis: multivariable models using readily available epidemiologic factors to predict antimicrobial susceptibility and clinical decision tree to estimate multi-drug resistance (MDR) infections have been developed to help clinicians. Moreover, hospital cumulative antibiograms have been created to identify the most common sensitivity profile for every bacterium.

In this study we will analyse the potential role of hospital cumulative antibiograms in the outcome of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with bacteraemia. In particular, the primary objective of the study is to assess the 15-days mortality of SOT recipients with bacteraemia according to the treatment administered referred to overall antimicrobial susceptibility (OAS), while the secondary objectives of the study are to assess the 30-days mortality, the in-hospital mortality, the length of in-hospital, the ICU admission, and the length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay in these patients. Moreover, we will also assess the frequency of empiric therapy change at antibiogram availability, and we will describe the reasons for empiric therapy change.

We will conduct a retrospective single-centre cohort study to investigate the effect of empiric antibiotic treatment according to OAS on outcomes of the target population composed by SOT recipients transplanted in our Centre who were hospitalized at Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Policlinico of Milano from 01/01/2015 to 31/12/2023 and developed monomicrobial bloodstream infection (BSI) due to Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella other-than pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, and Streptococcus spp.

Patients will be divided into two groups according to the overall antimicrobial susceptibility of the empiric antibiotic therapy prescribed based on hospital cumulative antibiograms:

  • Patients who have been prescribed an empiric therapy with OAS \< 90%;
  • Patients who have been prescribed an empiric therapy with OAS ≥ 90%. Hospital cumulative antibiograms of the years included in the study are already available for the following temporal periods: 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023. OAS is defined as the ratio of strains of a pathogen which are sensitive to an antibiotic regimen referred to all the strain of this pathogen identified.
02

Conditions studied

  • Bacteremia
  • Transplant Recipient

Keywords

  • Hospital cumulative antibiogram
  • Solid organ transplant
  • Bloodstream infections
03

In context

Bacteremia

297 studies on the registry are indexed under Bacteremia; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is below the median of 300 across 125 observational studies indexed under Bacteremia.

Browse Bacteremia studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico is the lead sponsor of 233 studies on the registry; 77 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Solid organ transplant recipients with bloodstream infections.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Being SOT
  • Monomicrobial bloodstream infection due to Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella other-than pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, and Streptococcus spp.
  • Hospitalization in Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Policlinico of Milano from 2015 to 2023.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Antibiotic therapy administration outside 48h before-after blood culture collection.
  • Polymicrobial bloodstream infections.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients who was prescribed an empiric antibiotic therapy with OAS < 90%

    Other: No intervention (observational study)

  • Patients who was prescribed an empiric antibiotic therapy with OAS ≥ 90%

    Other: No intervention (observational study)

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention (observational study)

    No intervention (observational study)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 15-days mortality

    Time frame: 15 days from bloodstream infection

Secondary outcomes

  1. 30-days mortality

    Time frame: 30 days from bloodstream infection

  2. In-hospital mortality

    From bloodstream infection to hospital discharge

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

  3. Lenght of hospital stay

    From hospital admission to hospital discharge

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

  4. ICU admission

    From bloodstream infection to hospital discharge

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

  5. Lenght of ICU stay

    From ICU admission to ICU discharge

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

  6. Frequency of empiric therapy change at antibiogram availability

    From empiric antibiotic therapy prescription to targeted antibiotic therapy prescription

    Time frame: Up to five days

  7. Reason for empiric antibiotic change

    Change from empiric to targeted antibiotic therapy

    Time frame: From empiric antibiotic therapy prescription to targeted antibiotic therapy prescription at 5 days

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Dec 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2026, 12 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 6, 2025
First posted
Mar 13, 2025
StartActual
Dec 3, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 1, 2027
Last update
Mar 13, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06874920
Responsible party
Andrea Lombardi (Professor, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 13, 2025
Start date
Dec 3, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 13, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion