ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06737068Updated Dec 17, 2024

Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum Using AirSeal® for Reduction in Postoperative Shoulder Pain Following Robot Assisted Hiatal Hernia Repair

An interventional study of Low pressure pneumoperitoneum (8-10mmHg) with AirSeal device and Standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (13- 15 mmHg) with AirSeal device in Hernia, Hiatal, Pneumoperitoneum and Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Riverside University Health System Medical Center. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-17.

Sponsored by Riverside University Health System Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the incidence and severity of post-operative shoulder pain following elective robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair in hopes of reducing pain and associated costs as well as clinic and emergency department visits due to this pain. You will undergo standard robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair with the standard postoperative care. The only difference is that you may be selected for the group where lower pressures used to fill your abdomen with carbon dioxide will be used, and you will be asked to fill out logs regarding your pain postoperatively. You will have postoperative appointments that are standard following this procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hernia, Hiatal
  • Pneumoperitoneum
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Shoulder Pain
03

In context

Hernia, Hiatal

87 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Hiatal; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 100 across 56 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Hiatal.

Browse Hernia, Hiatal studies →

Lead sponsor

Riverside University Health System Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients undergoing elective robot assisted hiatal hernia repair

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients less than 18 years of age
  • conversion to open surgery
  • > 40
  • history of abdominoplasty
  • history of chronic pain and/or opioid dependence
  • history of and/or supplemental oxygen use
  • pregnant patients
  • incarcerated patients
  • patient refusal
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum (8-10 mmHg)

    Elective robot assisted hiatal hernia repair with pneumoperitoneum pressures of 8-10 mmHg throughout the case

    Procedure: Low pressure pneumoperitoneum (8-10mmHg) with AirSeal device

  • Other
    Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum (13-15 mmHg)

    Elective robot assisted hiatal hernia repair with pneumoperitoneum pressures of 13-15 mmHg throughout the case

    Procedure: Standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (13- 15 mmHg) with AirSeal device

Interventions

  • ProcedureLow pressure pneumoperitoneum (8-10mmHg) with AirSeal device

    Elective robot assisted hiatal hernia repair with low pressure pneumoperitoneum (8-10mmHg) with AirSeal device

    Also known as: low pressure

  • ProcedureStandard pressure pneumoperitoneum (13- 15 mmHg) with AirSeal device

    Elective robot assisted hiatal hernia repair with standard pressure pneumoperitoneum (13- 15 mmHg) with AirSeal device

    Also known as: standard pressure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction in post-operative shoulder pain

    Percentage reduction in post-operative shoulder pain from POD#0 to \~1 week post-operative telephone appointment

    Time frame: 1 week (on average)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Severity of postoperative shoulder pain on POD #0

    Severity of postoperative shoulder pain on POD #0 (recorded at nursing shift change \~7PM)

    Time frame: 6 hours (on average)

  2. Severity of postoperative shoulder pain on POD #1

    Severity of postoperative shoulder pain on POD #1 (when surgical team rounds \~6-8AM)

    Time frame: 18 hours (on average)

  3. Severity of postoperative shoulder pain at ~1 week

    Severity of postoperative shoulder pain at \~1 week post-operative telephone appointment

    Time frame: 1 week (on average)

  4. Severity of postoperative shoulder pain at ~2 weeks post-op

    Severity of postoperative shoulder pain at \~2 week postoperative clinic visit measured by numeric pain rating scale and morphine milligram equivalents

    Time frame: 2 weeks (on average)

  5. length of hospital stay

    length of hospital stay

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years

  6. readmission rates for shoulder pain

    readmission rates for chief complaint of shoulder pain

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years

  7. number of postoperative clinic visits related to shoulder pain management

    number of postoperative clinic visits related to shoulder pain management

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years

  8. discharge disposition

    discharge disposition (home, SNF, rehab, etc)

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years

  9. standard vs extended narcotic regimen

    standard vs extended (requiring refill) narcotic regimen

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years

  10. quality of life

    quality of life assessed via EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS questionnaires

    Time frame: 1 week (on average)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Luketina R, Luketina TLH, Antoniou SA, Kohler G, Konneker S, Manzenreiter L, Wundsam H, Koch OO, Knauer M, Emmanuel K. Prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of standard CO2 pressure pneumoperitoneum insufflator versus AirSeal(R). Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3670-3678. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07846-4. Epub 2020 Aug 7. PubMed 32767145 ↗
  • Buda A, Di Martino G, Borghese M, Restaino S, Surace A, Puppo A, Paracchini S, Ferrari D, Perotto S, Novelli A, De Ponti E, Borghi C, Fanfani F, Fruscio R. Low-Pressure Laparoscopy Using the AirSeal System versus Standard Insufflation in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study (ARIEL Study). Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 14;10(3):531. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030531. PubMed 35327010 ↗
  • Yasir M, Mehta KS, Banday VH, Aiman A, Masood I, Iqbal B. Evaluation of post operative shoulder tip pain in low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgeon. 2012 Apr;10(2):71-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Mar 21. PubMed 22385527 ↗
  • Wallace DH, Serpell MG, Baxter JN, O'Dwyer PJ. Randomized trial of different insufflation pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997 Apr;84(4):455-8. PubMed 9112891 ↗
  • Topcu HO, Cavkaytar S, Kokanali K, Guzel AI, Islimye M, Doganay M. A prospective randomized trial of postoperative pain following different insufflation pressures during gynecologic laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov;182:81-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 16. PubMed 25265495 ↗
  • Sroussi J, Elies A, Rigouzzo A, Louvet N, Mezzadri M, Fazel A, Benifla JL. Low pressure gynecological laparoscopy (7mmHg) with AirSeal(R) System versus a standard insufflation (15mmHg): A pilot study in 60 patients. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;46(2):155-158. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2016.09.003. Epub 2017 Jan 30. PubMed 28403972 ↗
  • Saway JP, McCaul M, Mulekar MS, McMahon DP, Richards WO. Review of Outcomes of Low Verses Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery. Am Surg. 2022 Aug;88(8):1832-1837. doi: 10.1177/00031348221084956. Epub 2022 Apr 20. PubMed 35442815 ↗
  • Sarli L, Costi R, Sansebastiano G, Trivelli M, Roncoroni L. Prospective randomized trial of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum for reduction of shoulder-tip pain following laparoscopy. Br J Surg. 2000 Sep;87(9):1161-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01507.x. PubMed 10971421 ↗
  • Joshipura VP, Haribhakti SP, Patel NR, Naik RP, Soni HN, Patel B, Bhavsar MS, Narwaria MB, Thakker R. A prospective randomized, controlled study comparing low pressure versus high pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Jun;19(3):234-40. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181a97012. PubMed 19542853 ↗
  • Hua J, Gong J, Yao L, Zhou B, Song Z. Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2014 Jul;208(1):143-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.027. Epub 2014 Jan 16. PubMed 24503370 ↗
  • Gurusamy KS, Vaughan J, Davidson BR. Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 18;2014(3):CD006930. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006930.pub3. PubMed 24639018 ↗
  • Foley CE, Ryan E, Huang JQ. Less is more: clinical impact of decreasing pneumoperitoneum pressures during robotic surgery. J Robot Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):299-307. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01104-4. Epub 2020 Jun 22. PubMed 32572753 ↗
  • O'Connor SC, Mallard M, Desai SS, Couto F, Gottlieb M, Ewing A, Cobb WS, Carbonell AM, Warren JA. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Approach to Hiatal Hernia Repair: Results After 7 Years of Robotic Experience. Am Surg. 2020 Sep;86(9):1083-1087. doi: 10.1177/0003134820943547. Epub 2020 Aug 18. PubMed 32809844 ↗

Related links

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 17, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06737068
Lead sponsor
Riverside University Health System Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 17, 2024
Start date
Jan 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 17, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion