An interventional study of Phrenoesophageal Ligament Reconstruction with Mesh: A New Approach to Hiatal Hernia Repair (Alinasser's Technique) and Classic approach in Hiatus Hernia and Gastreoesophageal Reflux Disease, sponsored by Clinical Trial Aseer. Recruiting at 2 sites in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.
Sponsored by Clinical Trial Aseer · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Introduction: The phrenoesophageal ligament (PEL) is a crucial structure that attaches the esophagus to the diaphragm, allowing for independent movement during respiration and swallowing. The ligament provides flexibility and strength, maintaining the integrity of the esophageal hiatus while accommodating pressure changes during breathing and swallowing. It consists of two limbs. The upper limb attaches the esophagus to the superior surface of the diaphragm, extending through the hiatus t'o insert into the esophagus 2-3 cm above it. The Lower Limb attaches the cardiac region of the stomach to the inferior surface of the diaphragm at the cardiac notch of the stomach. Failure and weakness of the PEL can predispose to esophageal HH and GERD symptoms. Understanding its anatomy is essential for the surgical management of hiatal hernia and GERD.
Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of a new technique for hiatal hernia repair (Alinasser's Technique of LHHR) using a mesh fixed to both the esophagus and crura, mimicking PEL, with a focus on reducing recurrence rates and improving patient outcomes. Methods: A randomized controlled trial study will be followed. The study will include 60 HH patients who will be randomized into either the intervention group (30 patients) who will undergo the new approach, or the classic group (30 patients) who will undergo the classic approach. Patients in the intervention group will undergo cruroplasty using a new technique (mesh applied like PEL). Importance: A new surgical technique is being applied for management of HH to decrease postoperative recurrence
Diagnosis of GERD, esophagitis, and hiatus hernia:
Preoperative diagnosis We will use the GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire to evaluate symptoms of GERD [11]. Preoperative assessment to diagnose HH by upper GIT endoscopy and a barium meal test in reverse Trendelenburg position. The Los Angeles system will be used for grading esophagitis [12]. 24 pH and esophageal manometry will be used to assess the esophageal motility and esophageal PH
Surgical technique:
Under general anaesthesia, Alinasser's Technique of LHHR will be carried out in the Frensh position. The pneumoperitoneum was created with CO2 pressures as high as 15 mmHg.
Procedure Position. The patient is positioned the French position, the surgeon stands in-between the legs and the assistants stand on either side of the patient, Steep reverse Trendelenburg positioning is often required. Port placement. We use a standard ports placement for most foregut procedures performed.
This consists of establishment of pneumo-peritoneum using a Veress needle placed at Palmer's point in the left upper abdomen. An 10-mm optical trocar is inserted in the left subcostal position.
Additional ports are placed under direct vision as follows (Figure 1):
Surgeon's left hand port (5 mm) in right upper quadrant at the midclavicular line.
Toupét fundoplication fashioned by positioning of the fundus posterior to the esophagus.
Three Interrupted 2-0 sutures are then used to anchor the stomach to the lower esophagus antero-laterally. Then, the left gastric segment is sutured to the esophagus antero-laterally, leaving a gap of 1.5 to 2 cm from the right gastric segment, completing a 270° wrap.
Typically, four sutures are required to anchor the wrap to both the right and left crura as well as the anterior aspect of the diaphragmatic hiatus. The routine postoperative Care is achieved The Primary Outcome is the recurrence rate of hiatal hernia, as assessed by Endoscopy and imaging studies (e.g., barium meal in Trendelenburg position or endoscopy) at 1-2 years follow-up. Secondary Outcomes are the complication rates (e.g., dysphagia, mesh erosion, infection), Operative time, patient satisfaction and quality of life, hospital stay, readmission rate, Reoperation rate, Symptom improvement (e.g., reflux, chest pain), and coast Postoperative management Every day, vital signs such as heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and intravenous fluid levels will be documented. Clear oral fluid will be initiated six hours after surgery. In the absence of any formal complaints, patients will be allowed to be discharged from the hospital. Follow up There are scheduled follow-up appointments at1,3,6,12, and 24 months postoperatively. The follow-up consisted of a clinical evaluation including presence of symptoms of GERD (heartburn, regurgitation, epigastric discomfort) or nonspecific symptoms such as dysphagia or vomiting), upper GIT endoscopy, radiographic barium meal in trendlenberge position and abdominal CT for selected patient. Statistical analysis For categorical variables, we utilized percentages and numbers as descriptive statistics, whereas for continuous variables, we used mean and standard deviations. The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
87 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Hiatal; 27 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 100 across 56 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Hiatal.
Browse Hernia, Hiatal studies →This is the only study on the registry with Clinical Trial Aseer as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Eligibility criteria have been reformatted as follows:
#Inclusion Criteria:
Not responding to medical treatment
#Exclusion Criteria:
Standard Surgical Procedure Hiatal hernia repair no Mesh
Procedure: Classic approach
A New Approach
Procedure: Phrenoesophageal Ligament Reconstruction with Mesh: A New Approach to Hiatal Hernia Repair (Alinasser's Technique)
Alinasser's technique of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) is carried out, follow same steps of classical approach except before closing the crura A non-absorbable mesh (≈2.0 x 10.0 cm) is sutured to the esophagus( lower mediastinal esophagus) , just above the hiatus by four 2-0 prolene stitches. The continuity of the mesh is then fixed just below the hiatus anteriorly on the abdominal face of diaphragm by four 2-0 prolene stitches. About half of the mesh is fixed to the esophagus and the other half is fixed to the diaphragm. If there is no space for mesh fixation on the diaphragm, the left hepatic triangular ligament will be released.
Classic approach of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) is performed under general anesthesia with the patient in the French position and pneumoperitoneum established at 15 mmHg CO₂. Port placement follows a standardized foregut approach, with a camera port in the epigastrium and additional working ports placed under direct vision. After retracting the left lobe of the liver, the diaphragmatic hiatus is exposed. The stomach and hernia sac are reduced by dividing short gastric vessels and mobilizing the gastric fundus to free the left crus. Circumferential dissection of the hernia sac continues cranially to gain at least 3-5 cm of intraabdominal esophageal length.The diaphragmatic crura are approximated posterior to the esophagus, aided by a calibration tube. If necessary. A posterior 270° Toupét fundoplication is then constructed with interrupted stitches, anchoring the wrap to the esophagus and crura.
The recurrence rate of hiatal hernia by imaging and endoscopy
Imaging-based diagnosis: Most studies utilize radiological evaluation, such as esophagram (fluoroscopic imaging), CT scans, or barium swallow tests, to detect the anatomical recurrence of the hernia. Definitions of recurrence include any evidence of the stomach above the diaphragm or more than 2 cm of herniation above the diaphragm. Endoscopic assessment: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is also used to identify recurrences. Recurrence rate= (number of recurrent patient/total arm patient) x100
Time frame: 12 Months Post- surgery
Plan to share: Undecided
Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2027, 20 months after the start.
Of 33 interventional studies with no phase under Hernia, Hiatal, half reached primary completion within 54 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 68. This study's planned 20 months is below that.
Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Dec 2025 → Mar 2026, on Oct 23, 2026.
Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.