ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07686913STRIP-CSUpdated Jul 7, 2026

Steri-Strip Application Versus Standard Wound Closure for Cesarean Section Incisions

An interventional study of Steri-Strip™ Skin Closures and Standard Cesarean Wound Closure in Cesarean Section, Surgical Site Infection and Wound Dehiscence, sponsored by Riverside University Health System Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Riverside University Health System Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
610
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study is evaluating whether Steri-Strips® provide additional benefits when used after cesarean section (C-section) surgery. Steri-Strips are adhesive strips that are commonly placed over a surgical incision to provide support while the wound heals. At our hospital, Steri-Strips are routinely used after C-sections in addition to standard wound closure techniques, although they are not considered part of the standard recommended closure method.

Researchers want to determine whether adding Steri-Strips actually reduces wound complications such as infection, fluid collection under the skin, or reopening of the incision. Previous studies have shown mixed results, with some suggesting little difference in wound healing outcomes while others reported differences in scar appearance. Steri-Strips may also increase costs, add time to the surgery, and occasionally cause skin irritation or allergic reactions.

Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive standard cesarean wound closure with Steri-Strips, while the other group will receive standard wound closure without Steri-Strips. Researchers will compare wound healing, complications, patient outcomes, and costs between the two groups.

The goal of this study is to determine whether Steri-Strips improve recovery after cesarean delivery and whether their routine use is beneficial and cost-effective. The findings may help guide future recommendations for cesarean wound care and improve outcomes for patients undergoing C-section delivery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cesarean Section
  • Surgical Site Infection
  • Wound Dehiscence
  • Seroma

Keywords

  • Cesarean Section
  • Cesarean Delivery
  • C-Section
  • Steri-Strips
  • Skin Closure
  • Wound Closure
  • Surgical Site Infection
  • Wound Dehiscence
  • Seroma
  • Postoperative Wound Complications
  • Obstetric Surgery
  • Incision Management
  • Surgical Wound Healing
  • Maternal Morbidity
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
03

In context

Surgical Wound Infection

745 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound Infection; 151 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 610 is above the median of 200 across 581 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound Infection.

Browse Surgical Wound Infection studies →

Lead sponsor

Riverside University Health System Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients age 18 years or older
  • Pregnant patients undergoing cesarean delivery at Riverside University Health System Medical Center (RUHS)
  • Able and willing to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or to Steri-Strip™ materials or adhesives
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide
  • Anticipated inability to complete the 30-day postpartum follow-up evaluation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
610 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Standard Closure + Steri-Strips

    Participants undergo standard cesarean skin closure followed by application of Steri-Strip™ skin closure strips according to a standardized study protocol.

    Device: Steri-Strip™ Skin Closures · Procedure: Standard Cesarean Wound Closure

  • Active comparator
    Standard Closure Alone

    Participants undergo standard cesarean skin closure without application of Steri-Strip™ skin closure strips.

    Procedure: Standard Cesarean Wound Closure

Interventions

  • DeviceSteri-Strip™ Skin Closures

    Application of Steri-Strip adhesive skin closure strips following standard cesarean section wound closure according to a standardized protocol.

  • ProcedureStandard Cesarean Wound Closure

    Standard skin closure performed following cesarean delivery according to institutional practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Cesarean Section Wound Complications

    Composite incidence of postoperative wound complications including surgical site infection, wound seroma, and wound separation/dehiscence following cesarean delivery.

    Time frame: Within 30 days postpartum

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Hospital Stay

    Duration of hospitalization measured from cesarean delivery until discharge.

    Time frame: From cesarean delivery until hospital discharge (up to 7 days)

  2. Readmission Related to Wound Complications

    Hospital readmission attributable to wound infection, seroma, or wound separation/dehiscence following cesarean delivery.

    Time frame: Within 30 days postpartum

  3. Cost of Wound Management

    Comparison of direct healthcare costs associated with wound closure materials and management of postoperative wound complications between study groups.

    Time frame: From cesarean delivery through 30 days postpartum

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Herman A, Kerre S, Stras A, Desmedt B. Two Additional Cases of Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused by Wound Closure Tape Steri-Strip3M. Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Jul;93(1):68-70. doi: 10.1111/cod.14788. Epub 2025 Mar 20. No abstract available. PubMed 40114334 ↗
  • Hall JD, Schwartz E. Solving "T" Junction Wound Breakdown With a Single Tension-reducing Device. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Aug 15;13(8):e6882. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006882. eCollection 2025 Aug. PubMed 40821899 ↗
  • Dominoni M, Torella M, Molitierno R, Fordellone M, Saccone G, Colacurci D, Lagana AS, Pano MR, Gardella B, La Verde M. Single-versus double-layer uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery and risk of uterine scar niche: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Oct;312(4):1095-1106. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08151-y. Epub 2025 Aug 20. PubMed 40833607 ↗
  • Zempsky WT, Parrotti D, Grem C, Nichols J. Randomized controlled comparison of cosmetic outcomes of simple facial lacerations closed with Steri Strip Skin Closures or Dermabond tissue adhesive. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Aug;20(8):519-24. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000136068.45198.ae. PubMed 15295247 ↗
  • Sah N, Punga R, Kumar A, Shivhare P, Singh AK, Sah S, Shekhar A. The surgical outcome of sutureless skin closures using Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) versus Steri-Strip. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2024 May-Aug;15(2):307-312. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_102_22. Epub 2024 Jul 24. PubMed 39234130 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jun 2026; primary completion for Jun 2027, 12 months later.

Of 201 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Surgical Wound Infection, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 208 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 24, 2026
First posted
Jul 7, 2026
StartEst.
Jun 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Jul 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07686913
Lead sponsor
Riverside University Health System Medical Center
Responsible party
Matthew X Perera, DO (Research Coordinator, Riverside University Health System Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 7, 2026
Start date
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

Matthew Perera, DO, MS
Contact
matthew.perera@ruhealth.org
8184800214

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion