ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06634823Updated Jul 22, 2026

Efficacy of Intramuscular Steroid Injection for Chronic Cough.

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Triamcinolone Acetonide Injectable Suspension and Saline injection in Chronic Cough (CC), Laryngeal Disease and Coughing, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-22.

Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2024; still recruiting 1 year 11 months later.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary goal of this study is to test the hypothesis that injecting steroid intramuscularly is an effective treatment for unexplained chronic cough. This will be achieved through the design of a prospective, placebo-controlled, single-blind, randomized clinical trial in which one group of patients will undergo a steroid injection into the deltoid muscle and the second group will undergo a placebo injection into the deltoid muscle. Data to determine if a clinically significant difference exists between the outcomes of the two groups will be measured by a dichotomous yes/no response to improvement, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire, and a visual analogue scale for symptom severity. This will provide the answer to the general question of whether or not the intramuscular injections are clinically effective for patients with unexplained chronic cough. Furthermore, any adverse reactions will be thoroughly documented. If this hypothesized treatment is proven effective, this can greatly improve the care of chronic cough patients by allowing for an evidence-based treatment option and a treatment option that may improve access to care. While the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) injection is typically performed by fellowship trained laryngologists, intramuscular injections could be more widely utilized by general otolaryngologists or providers in other fields of medicine.

Read the detailed description

A significant subset of patients are found to have "unexplained chronic cough", which is a diagnosis of exclusion. For these patients, the etiology of the cough is often not isolated. However, the cause is thought to be related to hypersensitivity and inflammation of both the nerves involved in cough sensation and/or mucosa of the larynx. A similar theory described by Driessen et al. hypothesizes that neuroinflammation related to glial cells in central and peripheral neural pathways may contribute to chronic cough in a similar way to how chronic pain is mediated by this pathway. Glial cells in the central and peripheral nervous system may be an important target for steroid hormones and their metabolites, which may have impact on inflammation and excitatory action.

Superior laryngeal nerve injections have been well studied in literature and were recently studied here at the Medical University of South Carolina in a prospective placebo-controlled trial for use in neurogenic cough. This study showed that there was a significant improvement in cough compared to placebo. This study was completed using randomization of 17 patients into the control and steroid/lidocaine injection groups. In the treatment group, 80% of patients reported improvement in symptoms, while in the control group only 14% of patients reported improvement. The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) and visual analog scoring were used to compare cough data from pre and post injection.

The hypothesis revolves around the idea that SLN blocks may actually work systemically, so the site of injection may not be the key in cough improvement. This combined with the theory on glial cell involvement and systemic steroid use to inhibit the neuroinflammatory pathway leads us to believe that intramuscular steroid injections could improve chronic cough. Therefore, this study focuses on the use of systemic intramuscular steroids in patients with chronic cough and we hypothesize that patients will have improvement in cough severity. By opening another treatment option that could be utilized by general (non-fellowship trained) otolaryngologists, access to care and treatment may be improved for patients with chronic cough.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Cough (CC)
  • Laryngeal Disease
  • Coughing

Keywords

  • Throat
  • Chronic cough
  • Neurogenic cough
  • Unexplained cough
03

In context

Chronic Cough

142 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Cough; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 104 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Cough.

Browse Chronic Cough studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 874 studies on the registry; 166 are open to participants now.

Of its 131 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • History consistent with chronic unexplained or cough
  • Age ≥ 18

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current smokers
  • Uncontrolled diabetes (A1c>7%)
  • Patients on ACE inhibitors or Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs)
  • Abnormal pulmonary function testing (PFTs) since start of the cough
  • Patients with uncontrolled obstructive sleep apnea
  • Abnormal chest X-ray within past 6 months
  • Uncontrolled reflux
  • Prior superior laryngeal nerve injection
  • Current neuromodulating medication use for chronic cough*
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo injection into deltoid (arm)

    Drug: Saline injection

  • Experimental
    Steroid

    Triamcinolone injection into deltoid (arm)

    Drug: Triamcinolone Acetonide Injectable Suspension

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Leicester Cough Questionnaire

    The primary outcome for which this study is powered is the change in mean Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) scores, both global and specific domains (physical, psychological, and social) from baseline to 1-4 weeks post-treatment. This score will be 19-133, with higher score indicating better outcomes.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale

    Visual analog scale for symptom severity. This will be reported as a percentage (ratio of X marked spot to total line).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Dichotomous yes/no to symptom improvement

    Yes/No response to cough improvement

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29403, United States
    Recruiting
    • Laryngology Office · Contacthowser@musc.edu · 843-792-6755
    • Lauren Howser, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD can be made available at the end of the trial with de-identified patient data. A data dictionary will be provided so that the data can be fully interpreted.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: After trial completion for 1 year

Access criteria: Qualified researchers from academic institutions will be able to request access by contacting the PI.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Dec 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 30 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 8, 2024
First posted
Oct 10, 2024
StartActual
Dec 2, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Jul 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06634823
Responsible party
Lauren Howser (Principal Investigator, Medical University of South Carolina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 10, 2024
Start date
Dec 2, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2026

Study contacts

Kirsten Meenan
Contact
meenan@musc.edu
843-792-6755
Lauren Howser
Contact
howser@musc.edu
843-792-6755
Lauren Howser
principal investigator · Medical University of South Carolina

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Triamcinolone Acetonide

Start the discussion