ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06560788Updated Aug 21, 2024

The Role of CSF in Chiari II Brain Malformation

An observational study in Myelomeningocele, Brain Malformation and Chiari Malformation Type 2, sponsored by University College, London. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged Up to 1 Year. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-21.

Sponsored by University College, London · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
18
Ages
Up to 1 Year
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spina bifida, particularly its most severe form known as open spina bifida (myelomeningocele), is a significant congenital disorder that results in profound neurological impairments, including Chiari II malformation. This malformation is associated with the downward displacement of the cerebellum and brainstem into the spinal canal, often leading to hydrocephalus, a condition where cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) accumulates in the brain1. These conditions can result in a range of complications, including cognitive and motor disabilities, learning difficulties, and, in severe cases, early mortality1,2.

While surgical interventions, including prenatal and postnatal surgeries, have been developed to manage the physical manifestations of spina bifida and Chiari II malformation, these procedures have not been fully successful in addressing the associated brain anomalies3. This study aims to explore the hypothesis that the composition of CSF plays a critical role in the development of these brain defects. Specifically, it is hypothesized that the rapid replenishment of CSF, due to its leakage from the open spine in spina bifida, results in a "less mature" fluid composition, which negatively affects neurogenesis and neuronal migration during critical periods of brain development.

Read the detailed description

Study Population and Methodology

This prospective case-control study will involve the collection of CSF samples from several groups, including:

  1. Newborns with open spina bifida undergoing postnatal surgery.
  2. Fetuses undergoing prenatal surgery for spina bifida.
  3. Newborns with hydrocephalus undergoing shunt surgery (control group).
  4. Infants undergoing spinal surgery for conditions unrelated to spina bifida (control group).
  5. Age-matched fetuses obtained from the Human Developmental Biology Resource (HDBR) as controls.
  6. Mouse models: This includes a genetic mouse model of spina bifida (Cdx2Cre x Pax3flox) and normal (wild-type) mice as controls

These samples will be analyzed using mass spectrometry-based proteomics to identify differences in protein composition and concentrations between the groups. Additionally, brain slices from human embryos and mouse models will be cultured in the presence of these CSF samples to assess the impact on neurogenesis and neuronal migration.

Expected Benefits The findings from this study are expected to provide new insights into the pathogenesis of Chiari II malformation and other associated brain anomalies in children with spina bifida. By understanding how CSF composition influences brain development, the study could pave the way for novel therapeutic strategies aimed at modifying CSF composition during early pregnancy. This could potentially prevent or mitigate the neurological impairments associated with spina bifida, ultimately improving the quality of life for affected individuals.

Impact on Clinical Practice and Policy Should the study confirm the hypothesis, it could lead to changes in clinical practices concerning the management of spina bifida and Chiari II malformation. For instance, it might inform the development of new prenatal treatments or interventions designed to normalize CSF composition before significant brain damage occurs4-6. This would represent a significant advancement in fetal surgery and pediatric neurosurgery, with the potential to influence guidelines and policies within the NHS and other healthcare systems globally.

Relation to Academic Qualification This study is being conducted as part of the Lewis Spitz PhD program at University College London (UCL) and Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (GOSH ICH). The research builds upon previous studies sponsored by UCL-ICH/GOSH, particularly those investigating the neurodevelopmental consequences of spina bifida and related congenital conditions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myelomeningocele
  • Brain Malformation
  • Chiari Malformation Type 2

Keywords

  • myelomeningocele
  • Chiari type 2
  • brain malformations
  • cognitive impairment
  • cerebrospinal fluid
03

In context

Meningomyelocele

58 studies on the registry are indexed under Meningomyelocele; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 18 is below the median of 30 across 17 observational studies indexed under Meningomyelocele.

Browse Meningomyelocele studies →

Lead sponsor

University College, London is the lead sponsor of 651 studies on the registry; 149 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 1 Year
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

  1. Newborns with open spina bifida undergoing postnatal surgery.
  2. Fetuses undergoing prenatal surgery for spina bifida.
  3. Newborns with hydrocephalus undergoing shunt surgery (control group).
  4. Infants undergoing spinal surgery for conditions unrelated to spina bifida (control group).
  5. Age-matched fetuses obtained from the Human Developmental Biology Resource (HDBR) as controls.
  6. Mouse models: This includes a genetic mouse model of spina bifida (Cdx2Cre x Pax3flox) and normal (wild-type) mice as controls

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Newborns with Spina Bifida (Postnatal Closure)

  • Diagnosed with open spina bifida (myelomeningocele).
  • Scheduled for postnatal surgical closure of the spinal lesion at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH).
  • Age: Between 1 day to 1 year old.

Control Group 1 (Newborns with Hydrocephalus)

  • Newborns scheduled for shunt surgery for hydrocephalus unrelated to spina bifida.
  • Age and sex matched to the spina bifida newborns as closely as possible.
  • Age: Between 1 day to 1 year old.

Control Group 2 (Infants with Spinal Conditions Unrelated to Spina Bifida)

  • Infants undergoing paned spinal surgery for conditions such as spinal lipoma, fatty filum, tethered cord, etc.
  • Age and sex matched to the spina bifida newborns as closely as possible.
  • Age: Between 1 day to 1 year old. Fetuses with Spina Bifida (Prenatal Closure)
  • Prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida (myelomeningocele) and scheduled for fetal surgery at UCLH.
  • Reviewed by Mr Thompson at his outpatient clinic at GOSH
  • Gestational age: Between 22 and 24 weeks.

Control Fetal Samples

  • Aborted fetuses within the gestational age range of 22-24 weeks.
  • Samples obtained through the Human Developmental Biology Resource (HDBR).

Mouse Models

  • Genetic mouse model of spina bifida (Cdx2Cre x Pax3flox).
  • At embryonic day (E)13.5 (end of the embryonic period) and E18.5 (just before birth)

Control Mouse Models

  • Normal (wild-type) mice to serve as controls.
  • Normal brain development
  • At embryonic day (E)13.5 (end of the embryonic period) and E18.5 (just before birth)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Newborns with Spina Bifida (Postnatal Closure)

  • Newborns who have undergone previous surgical intervention.
  • Presence of additional unrelated congenital anomalies that could affect cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) composition like meningitis or intraventricular bleeding
  • Older than 1 year and 1 month of age.
  • Parents refused to participate
  • Native language different to English with no translation services available

Control Group 1 (Newborns with Hydrocephalus)

  • Newborns with hydrocephalus caused by spina bifida.
  • Presence of intraventricular infection or haemorrhage.
  • Older than 1 year and 1 month of age.
  • Parents refused to participate
  • Native language different to English with no translation services available

Control Group 2 (Infants with Spinal Conditions Unrelated to Spina Bifida)

  • Infants who were born with spina bifida
  • Infants with coexisting conditions that could affect CSF composition like intraspinal tumours, empyema or haemorrhage.
  • Older than 1 year and 1 month of age.
  • Parents refused to participate
  • Native language different to English with no translation services available

Fetuses with Spina Bifida (Prenatal Closure)

  • Fetuses with additional major anomalies unrelated to spina bifida like diaphragmatic hernia.
  • Gestational age outside the range of 22-24 weeks.
  • Surgery performed by other neurosurgery team (not GOSH)
  • Parents refused to participate
  • Native language different to English with no translation services available

Control Fetal Samples

  • Poorly preserved aborted fetuses not suitable for CSF collection.
  • Gestational age outside the range 22-24 weeks.

Mouse Models

  • Mice with any genetic modifications other than those specified for the spina bifida model.
  • Mice with other congenital or acquired anomalies affecting the central nervous system.

Control Mouse Models

● Mice with any genetic modifications or health conditions that could influence the study's outcomes.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
18 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Case group 1: Children with Open Spina Bifida and Chiari II Malformation

    CSF will be collected during postnatal surgical repair at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH)

    Other: collection of cerebrospinal fluid

  • Control group 1: Newborns with hydrocephalus undergoing shunt surgery, unrelated to spina bifida

    CSF will be collected during suregry at GOSH

    Other: collection of cerebrospinal fluid

  • Control group 1bis: Infants undergoing spinal surgery for conditions other than SB

    CSF will be collected during surgery at GOSH.

    Other: collection of cerebrospinal fluid

  • Case group 2: Fetuses Undergoing Prenatal Surgery for Spina Bifida

    CSF will be collected during prenatal surgery at University College London Hospitals (UCLH).

    Other: collection of cerebrospinal fluid

  • Control group 2: Aborted fetuses within the gestational age range of 22-24 weeks,

    CSF will be collected from fetuses provided by the Human Developmental Biology Resource (HDBR).

    Other: collection of cerebrospinal fluid

  • Case group 3: mouse model of spina bifida (Cdx2Cre x Pax3flox)

    CSF will be collected

    Other: collection of cerebrospinal fluid

  • Control group 3: normal (wild-type) mice

    CSF will be collected

    Other: collection of cerebrospinal fluid

Interventions

  • Othercollection of cerebrospinal fluid

    CSF is collected as part of routine care in any of the surgeries listed in the control or cases groups. We will take part of that CSF for proteomic analysis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Identification of Proteins in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)

    The presence of specific proteins in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) will be identified through proteomic analysis. This outcome will focus on categorizing which proteins are present in the CSF samples from patients with spina bifida and control participants.

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Quantification of Protein Concentrations in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)

    The concentration of each identified protein in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) will be measured using proteomic analysis. This outcome will report the amount of each protein present in the CSF, expressed in micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL) or nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL), allowing for comparison between patients with spina bifida and controls.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measurement of Neurogenesis in Median Ganglionic Eminence (MGE) Cultures

    The rate of neurogenesis in the median ganglionic eminence (MGE) of embryonic brain slice cultures will be measured following exposure to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients with Chiari II malformation and control subjects. The outcome will focus on the number of proliferating neurons per unit area, measured in cells per square millimeter (cells/mm²).

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Measurement of Neuronal Migration in Median Ganglionic Eminence (MGE) Cultures

    The distance of neuronal migration in the median ganglionic eminence (MGE) of embryonic brain slice cultures will be measured following exposure to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients with Chiari II malformation and control subjects. The outcome will report the migration distance of neurons, measured in micrometers (µm).

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Masse O, Kraft E, Ahmad E, Rollins CK, Velasco-Annis C, Yang E, Warfield SK, Shamshirsaz AA, Gholipour A, Feldman HA, Estroff J, Grant PE, Vasung L. Abnormal prenatal brain development in Chiari II malformation. Front Neuroanat. 2023 Apr 17;17:1116948. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2023.1116948. eCollection 2023. PubMed 37139180 ↗
  • Schneider J, Mohr N, Aliatakis N, Seidel U, John R, Promnitz G, Spors B, Kaindl AM. Brain malformations and cognitive performance in spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021 Mar;63(3):295-302. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14717. Epub 2020 Nov 2. PubMed 33140418 ↗
  • Paslaru FG, Panaitescu AM, Iancu G, Veduta A, Gica N, Paslaru AC, Gheorghiu A, Peltecu G, Gorgan RM. Myelomeningocele Surgery over the 10 Years Following the MOMS Trial: A Systematic Review of Outcomes in Prenatal versus Postnatal Surgical Repair. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 12;57(7):707. doi: 10.3390/medicina57070707. PubMed 34356988 ↗
  • Treble-Barna A, Juranek J, Stuebing KK, Cirino PT, Dennis M, Fletcher JM. Prospective and episodic memory in relation to hippocampal volume in adults with spina bifida myelomeningocele. Neuropsychology. 2015 Jan;29(1):92-101. doi: 10.1037/neu0000111. Epub 2014 Jul 28. PubMed 25068670 ↗
  • Treble A, Juranek J, Stuebing KK, Dennis M, Fletcher JM. Functional significance of atypical cortical organization in spina bifida myelomeningocele: relations of cortical thickness and gyrification with IQ and fine motor dexterity. Cereb Cortex. 2013 Oct;23(10):2357-69. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs226. Epub 2012 Aug 8. PubMed 22875857 ↗
  • Taylor HB, Barnes MA, Landry SH, Swank P, Fletcher JM, Huang F. Motor contingency learning and infants with Spina Bifida. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2013 Feb;19(2):206-15. doi: 10.1017/S1355617712001233. Epub 2013 Jan 8. PubMed 23298791 ↗
  • David AL. Improving motor function in fetal surgery for open spina bifida. BJOG. 2024 May;131(6):768. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17730. Epub 2023 Nov 30. No abstract available. PubMed 38037518 ↗
  • Vergote S, Van der Stock J, Kunpalin Y, Bredaki E, Maes H, Banh S, De Catte L, Devlieger R, Lewi L, Devroe S, Spencer R, David A, De Vloo P, Van Calenbergh F, Deprest JA. Patient empowerment improves follow-up data collection after fetal surgery for spina bifida: institutional audit. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;62(4):565-572. doi: 10.1002/uog.26230. Epub 2023 Aug 27. PubMed 37099513 ↗
  • Bueno D, Parvas M, Nabiuni M, Miyan J. Embryonic cerebrospinal fluid formation and regulation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020 Jun;102:3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Oct 12. PubMed 31615690 ↗
  • Zappaterra MD, Lisgo SN, Lindsay S, Gygi SP, Walsh CA, Ballif BA. A comparative proteomic analysis of human and rat embryonic cerebrospinal fluid. J Proteome Res. 2007 Sep;6(9):3537-48. doi: 10.1021/pr070247w. Epub 2007 Aug 16. PubMed 17696520 ↗
  • Pal K, Sharma U, Gupta DK, Pratap A, Jagannathan NR. Metabolite profile of cerebrospinal fluid in patients with spina bifida: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Feb 1;30(3):E68-72. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152161.08313.04. PubMed 15681999 ↗
  • Shokohi R, Nabiuni M, Irian S, Miyan JA. In Vitro Effects of Wistar Rat Prenatal and Postnatal Cerebrospinal Fluid on Neural Differentiation and P roliferation of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Derived from Bone Marrow. Cell J. 2018 Jan;19(4):537-544. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2018.4130. Epub 2017 Nov 4. PubMed 29105387 ↗
  • Alonso MI, Lamus F, Carnicero E, Moro JA, de la Mano A, Fernandez JMF, Desmond ME, Gato A. Embryonic Cerebrospinal Fluid Increases Neurogenic Activity in the Brain Ventricular-Subventricular Zone of Adult Mice. Front Neuroanat. 2017 Dec 19;11:124. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2017.00124. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29311854 ↗
  • Eid L, Lachance M, Hickson G, Rossignol E. Ex Utero Electroporation and Organotypic Slice Cultures of Embryonic Mouse Brains for Live-Imaging of Migrating GABAergic Interneurons. J Vis Exp. 2018 Apr 20;(134):57526. doi: 10.3791/57526. PubMed 29733310 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Becuase the infromation provided comes from susceptible (children) population, information won't be shared

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2024; primary completion for Sep 2025, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 12, 2024
First posted
Aug 19, 2024
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Aug 1, 2027
Last update
Aug 21, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06560788
Collaborators
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, University College London Hospitals
Responsible party
Amparo Saenz (PhD student and pediatric neurosurgeon, University College, London) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2024
Start date
Sep 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2024

Study contacts

Andrew Copp, PhD
Contact
a.copp@ucl.ac.uk
02079052698

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion