ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07751133ENHANCEUpdated Nov 4, 2026

Evaluating Hormone Therapy to Achieve Optimal Doses in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of Abiraterone, Apalutamide, Enzalutamide or Darolutamide (ARPI therapy) (per standard of care) therapy in Prostate Cancer, mHSPC and mCRPC, sponsored by University College, London. Recruiting at 4 sites in United Kingdom. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by University College, London · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Updated Nov 4, 20263 sites addedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The goal of this phase 3 clinical trial is to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of using lower doses of Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPI) to treat patients with prostate cancer that has spread (metastasized). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. if overall survival for reduced dose ARPI is not worse than standard dose ARPI when treating patients with metastatic prostate cancer, and
  2. that fatigue (extreme exhaustion) and not stopping ARPI permanently (due to adverse effects) are better than average with the reduced dose.

Participants will:

  • Be randomised to take full dose (100%) of ARPI or half dose (50%) of ARPI.
  • Receive standard of care ADT.
  • Be on treatment for approximately 3 years according to standard of care.
  • Have clinic assessments and visits in clinic or remotely, as per their treating hospital's standard routine local practice in line with standard of care. Additional visits are not expected.
  • Complete quality of life questionnaires at week 0 (pre-treatment) and weeks 4, 16, 32, 48 and 64.
  • Keep a diary of their symptoms.

Translational research samples will be collected as follows:

  • Blood samples at week 0 (pre-treatment) and weeks 24, 32, 48 and at disease progression.
  • Urine samples at week 0 (pre-treatment) and week 24 and at disease progression.
  • FFPE Tumour: Routinely collected diagnostic blocks. The duration of follow-up is approximately 3 years after the last patient is recruited (minimum follow-up is 3 years; maximum follow-up is approximately 6 years for the the first patient recruited) and the trial is expected to complete August 2032 (Last Patient Last Visit).
Read the detailed description

ENHANCE is a clinical trial in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) or castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who are clinically suitable for and planned to commence Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPI) plus standard Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT).

Participants will be randomised according to the trial's stratification criteria to receive standard recommended (100%) dose or reduced dose (50%) of ARPI (enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide or abiraterone) and take ADT.

Participants will have hospital clinic visits according to the trial visits assessment schedule as detailed in the trial protocol and in line with the recruiting centers standard of care policy.

Participants will complete questionnaires and keep a symptoms diary in accordance with the assessments schedule.

Participants will provide urine, blood and tumour diagnostic biopsy samples for translational research purposes according to the assessments schedule which will be sent to and processed by a Central Laboratory located in Manchester.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer
  • mHSPC
  • mCRPC

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • Metastatic
  • ARPI
  • ADT
  • Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor
  • Androgen Deprivation Therapy
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,500 is above the median of 60 across 5,348 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University College, London is the lead sponsor of 651 studies on the registry; 149 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult males (male sex at birth) aged 18 years or older
  2. Newly or cytologically diagnosed prostate cancer (adenocarcinoma) that is hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) or metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), for whom ARPI in combination with androgen deprivation is clinically planned
  3. Prior ADT use for prostate cancer (including bilateral orchidectomy and transcutaneous oestrogen), is permitted provided: (a) ADT has been started less than 12 weeks prior to randomisation in mHSPC, (b) In the setting the completion of adjuvant hormonal therapy was >12 months prior to randomisation and total duration is capped at 36 months total
  4. performance status 0-2
  5. Willing and able to give provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pathology other than adenocarcinoma consistent with small cell, ductal, sarcomatoid carcinoma of the prostate
  2. Unable or unwilling to receive concurrent ADT alongside an ARPI
  3. Any concurrent or previous that required active anti-cancer therapy in the previous 2 years of randomisation (other than basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or adequately treated non-muscle invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma, Tis, Ta and T1 tumours)
  4. Adults with unmanaged psychological, familial, or sociological conditions precluding them from the ability to provide or hampering compliance with the study follow-up, including continued drug and alcohol dependence
  5. Patients who have received an drug (either approved or not approved) in any prior clinical study within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to Screening
  6. Patients on triplet therapy (i.e. receiving additional systemic anti-cancer therapy such as chemotherapy, radionuclide/molecular radiotherapy, PARPi alongside ADT \& ARPI); but concomitant radiotherapy is allowed
  7. to any of the active components or of the IMPs or NIMPs listed in this protocol
  8. Patients with severe hepatic impairment ( Class C)
  9. Patients with uncontrolled or unstable cardiovascular disease, congestive cardiac failure class III/IV
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Arm

    Standard Dose = Standard recommended (100%) dose of ARPI (enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide or abiraterone).

    Drug: Abiraterone, Apalutamide, Enzalutamide or Darolutamide (ARPI therapy) (per standard of care) therapy

  • Experimental
    Interventional Arm

    Reduced Dose = Reduced dose (50%) of the standard recommended dose of ARPI (enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide or abiraterone).

    Drug: Abiraterone, Apalutamide, Enzalutamide or Darolutamide (ARPI therapy) (per standard of care) therapy

Interventions

  • DrugAbiraterone, Apalutamide, Enzalutamide or Darolutamide (ARPI therapy) (per standard of care) therapy

    ARPI therapy (Abiraterone, Apalutamide, Enzalutamide or Darolutamide) selected by local investigator per standard of care

    Also known as: Goserelin, Leuprolide, and Triptorelin, Degarelix or Relugolix (ADT therapy per standard of care)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival (primary efficacy)

    Overall survival, defined as the time from date of randomisation to date of death from any cause, and those who are alive are censored at the date last known to be alive. This will be assessed for non-inferiority using a margin for the absolute risk difference at 2 years of ≤4 percentage points, between reduced and standard dose ARPI arms. A hierarchical approach will be applied to all 3 primary outcome measures, in which each analysis (in turn) should yield a p-value of \<0.05 in the following ranked order: 1. Non-inferiority for overall survival 2. Superiority of a mean difference in QoL fatigue score (expected to be ≥7 units) 3. Superiority for the percentage of patients who do not discontinue ARPI due to adverse events

    Time frame: From randomisation up to 6 years (or date last known to be alive) or date of death, whichever occurs first.

  2. The percentage of patients who permanently discontinue ARPI due to adverse events

    Adverse events will be analysed using CTCAE Version 6.0 categorisation (all grades) for patients who permanently discontinue APRI. A hierarchical approach will be applied to all 3 primary outcome measures, in which each analysis (in turn) should yield a p-value of \<0.05 in the following ranked order: 1. Non-inferiority for overall survival 2. Superiority of a mean difference in QoL fatigue score (expected to be ≥7 units) 3. Superiority for the percentage of patients who do not discontinue ARPI due to adverse events

    Time frame: From start of treatment to permanent discontinuation of trial treatment up to 3 years after last patient is recruited (approximately 6 years for the first patient recruited).

  3. Fatigue assessed using the EORTC 12-point fatigue scale (primary toxicity)

    Fatigue assessed using the EORTC 12-point fatigue scale (QLQ-FA12). A hierarchical approach will be applied to all 3 primary outcome measures, in which each analysis (in turn) should yield a p-value of \<0.05 in the following ranked order: 1. Non-inferiority for overall survival 2. Superiority of a mean difference in QoL fatigue score (expected to be ≥7 units) 3. Superiority for the percentage of patients who do not discontinue ARPI due to adverse events

    Time frame: Pre-treatment, Weeks 16, 32, 48 and 64 from start of treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Toxicities using the CTCAE v6 categorisation (all grades).

    Toxicities using the CTCAE Version 6.0 categorisation (all grades). Events that would be of special interest include hypertension, rash, hot flushes, cardiovascular events, and falls.

    Time frame: From date of consent to 30 days post last IMP dose administration.

  2. Failure-free survival (FFS)

    Failure-free survival (FFS) defined as the time from the date of randomisation to the date of the first of the following forms of treatment failure: biochemical (prostate-specific antigen (PSA)) failure; progression of local, lymph-node, or distant metastases; starting another line of therapy, or death from prostate cancer. Patients without an FFS event would be censored at the date last known to be alive. Stopping treatment for reasons other than the events listed above would not be considered an FFS event.

    Time frame: From randomisation until disease progression or death up to 6 years after first patient enrolled.

  3. Measures of progression (rising PSA, and locally defined clinical and radiological progression), at 1 and 2 years post-randomisation.

    * Proportion of patients who have rising PSA (PSA progression is defined as ≥25% increase and at least a 2 ng/mL absolute increase above the nadir, confirmed by a second value ≥3 weeks later) at 1 and 2 years post randomisation. * Proportion of patients who have PSA only progression: PSA rise of ≥25% above lowest PSA result compared to baseline at 1 and 2 years post randomisation. * Proportion of patients who have significant clinical progression, including new cancer related symptoms, as determined by the local clinical team: at 1 and 2 years post randomisation. * Proportion of patients who have radiological progression as determined by the local clinical team: at 1 and 2 years post randomisation. * Proportion of patients who achieve PSA nadir of \<0.2 within 12 months of starting therapy (primarily for mHSPC patients).

    Time frame: From randomisation to date of documented objective disease progression, assessed up to 2 years post-randomisation.

  4. Adherence: the proportion of patients who stop ARPI permanently due to reasons other than disease progression, at 1 and 2 years.

    Adherence: proportion of patients who stop ARPI permanently due to reasons other than disease progression, at 1 and 2 years (reasons will be recorded).

    Time frame: From randomisation to 2 years post-randomisation.

  5. Adherence: the duration of ARPI.

    Adherence: the duration of ARPI (in months) from the time of starting therapy.

    Time frame: From start of treatment to permanent discontinuation of trial treatment up to 3 years after last patient is recruited (approximately 6 years for the first patient recruited).

  6. Proportion of patients who have a dose reduction of ARPI (from their starting dose, in either arm) due to adverse events.

    Proportion of patients who have a dose reduction of ARPI (from their starting dose, in either arm) due to adverse events.

    Time frame: From start of treatment to documented dose reduction of trial treatment due to adverse events up to 3 years after last patient is recruited (approximately 6 years for the first patient recruited).

  7. Proportion of patients (dose reduction arm) who have their dose increased.

    Proportion of patients (dose reduction arm) who have their dose increased (reasons will be recorded).

    Time frame: From start of treatment to permanent discontinuation of trial treatment up to 3 years after last patient is recruited (approximately 6 years for the first patient recruited).

  8. Health-related quality of life using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questions

    Quality of Life assessments will be undertaken using EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire using Likert score (26 questions scored: 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much; 2 questions scored: 1-7, 1=very poor, 7=excellent). Descriptions of mean change in EORTC QLQ scores will be presented and compared to baseline values from pre-treatment.

    Time frame: Pre-treatment, Weeks 16, 32, 48 and 64 from start of treatment.

  9. Health-related quality of life using the EORTC QLQ-IL249 questions

    Quality of Life assessments will be undertaken using EORTC QLQ-C30 which will include QLQ-IL249 questions using Likert score (22 questions scored: 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Descriptions of mean change in EORTC QLQ scores will be presented and compared to baseline values from pre-treatment.

    Time frame: Pre-treatment, Weeks 16, 32, 48 and 64 from start of treatment.

  10. Health-related quality of life using the Euro-Qol-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L)

    Quality of Life assessments will be undertaken using EQ-5D-5L (self-reported) questionnaire using a combination of Likert score (5 questions with 5 dimensions of abilities) and visual analogue score (scored 0-100, 0=worst, 100=best). Descriptions of mean change in EQ-5D-5L scores will be presented and compared to baseline values from pre-treatment.

    Time frame: Pre-treatment, Weeks 16, 32, 48 and 64 from start of treatment.

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will not be shared until analysed and used as part of the study at which point data access will be considered with the researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Sites
3 sites added
Show 3 added (3 United Kingdom)
  • The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · Sutton, United Kingdom
  • Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust · Huddersfield, United Kingdom
  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · Huddersfield, United Kingdom
across 2 updates, Oct 16, 2026 – Nov 4, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    2 sites added
    Show 2 added (2 United Kingdom)
    • Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust · Huddersfield, United Kingdom
    • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · Huddersfield, United Kingdom
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Oct 16, 2026
    1 site added
    Show site
    • The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · Sutton, United Kingdom

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07751133
Collaborators
Cancer Research UK, Prostate Cancer UK, University of Manchester
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 7, 2026
Start date
Aug 28, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2033 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

ENHANCE Trial Manager
Contact
ctc.enhance@ucl.ac.uk
+44 (0) 207 679 9898
Ananya Choudhury, Professor
principal investigator · The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion