CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06511232Updated Apr 9, 2026

Intraosseous Morphine Administration During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

A Phase 4 interventional study of Intraosseous Morphine in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, sponsored by The Methodist Hospital Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-09.

Sponsored by The Methodist Hospital Research Institute · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if intraosseous (IO) morphine decreases pain and post-operative opioid use in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
03

In context

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

512 studies on the registry are indexed under Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 84 is above the median of 56 across 373 interventional studies indexed under Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.

Browse Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

The Methodist Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 157 studies on the registry; 60 are open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients of the IRB approved surgeon(s) undergoing ACL reconstruction with bone-to-bone (BTB) autograft
  • Patients aged between 18-40 years old at the time of surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with any other type of autograft or allograft other than BTB
  • Patients younger than 18 years old or older than 40 years old
  • Patients undergoing meniscal root repair or any other repair that changes their weight-bearing status
  • Patients with a history of substance abuse
  • Vulnerable populations
  • Patients on chronic pain medication within the last 6 months
  • BMI >/= 35
  • Allergy to morphine
  • Unwilling to participate
  • Any additional reason the PI deems reasonable
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intraosseous Injection of Morphine

    The intervention group will receive an intraosseous (IO) injection of 10mg of morphine mixed with up to 100mg of saline into the tibial tubercle during a standard ACL reconstruction.

    Drug: Intraosseous Morphine

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care Morphine Administration

    The control group will receive the standard of care treatment, which is no IO injection during a standard ACL reconstruction.

Interventions

  • DrugIntraosseous Morphine

    More recently, intraosseous infusion of analgesics and antibiotics has gained traction in the total joint arthroplasty literature. In knee arthroplasty patients, the combination of a spine and adductor canal block with an intraosseous infusion of morphine into the tibial tubercle prior to incision yielded lower pain in the immediate postoperative period and at 2 weeks, less pain medication use, and significantly better patient-reported outcomes while also reducing systemic opioid exposure in the early postoperative period compared to the spine and adductor block alone.3 No study to date in the available literature has evaluated the efficacy of intraosseous morphine infusion in managing acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, so that is the intended evaluation point with this project.

    Also known as: Duramorph, Astramorph PF, Infumorph

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Pain Levels in the Post-Operative Period as assessed by a patient-reported post operative symptom journal.

    The study will measure patient-reported levels of pain on a daily basis (for a total of two weeks) with a symptom journal, which will ask patients to report on a variety of pain-related outcomes including levels of pain throughout different times of day, levels of nausea throughout different times of the day, and what pain medication(s) they are taking and at what time.

    Time frame: 2 weeks postop, 6 weeks postop, 12 weeks postop

  2. Changes in Post-Operative Opioid Use

    To examine if the use of IO morphine will result in different levels of post-operative opioid use compared to SOC administration of morphine. This outcome will be assessed utilizing the daily symptom journal which will ask patients to complete daily logs of the pain medication that they take (what kind, what dose, when they took it, etc.) for two weeks following their operation.

    Time frame: 2 weeks postop

  3. Patient Pain Levels in the Post-Operative Period as assessed by the Lysholm Knee Survey

    Participants will be asked to complete the Lysholm Knee survey at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postop which will assess patient progress following surgery such as pain, swelling, climbing stairs, using a crutch, etc. The Lysholm scale consists of eight items with each question response being assigned an arbitrary score on an increasing scale. The total score is the sum of each response to the eight questions and may range from 0-100 where higher scores indicate a better outcome with fewer symptoms or disability.

    Time frame: 2 weeks postop, 6 weeks postop, 12 weeks postop

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Range of Motion in the Post-Operative Period as assessed by the KOOS, JR Knee Survey

    Patients will complete the KOOS, JR. Knee Survey to self-report their level of difficulty/pain (from none to extreme) certain movements have caused them. KOOS, JR is scored by summing the raw response (range 0-28) and then converting it to an interval score. The interval score ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 represents total knee disability and 100 represents perfect knee health.

    Time frame: Preop, 2 weeks postop, 6 weeks postop, 12 weeks postop

  2. Patient Activity Level in the Post-Operative Period as assessed by the Tegner scale.

    Patients will complete the Tegner Activity Level Survey which will ask them to self-report their pre-operative and post-operative level of activity. The rating system scores a person's activity level between 0 and 10, where 0 is "sick leave or disability pension because of knee problems" and 10 is "participation in competitive sports such as soccer at a national or international elite level." As such, a higher score reflects better outcomes on this measure.

    Time frame: Preop, 2 weeks postop, 6 weeks postop, 12 weeks postop

  3. Patient Range of Motion in the Post-Operative Period as assessed by the Lysholm Knee Survey

    The Lysholm Knee Survey will ask specific questions with a variety of responses to reflect movement-ability responses such as the use of a cane, the presence of a limp, squatting, climbing stairs, etc.The Lysholm scale consists of eight items with each question response being assigned an arbitrary score on an increasing scale. The total score is the sum of each response to the eight questions and may range from 0-100 where higher scores indicate a better outcome with fewer symptoms or disability.

    Time frame: 2 weeks postop, 6 weeks postop, 12 weeks postop

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Houston Methodist Research Institute
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
    • Haley Goble · Contact
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06511232
Lead sponsor
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Responsible party
Robert A. Jack (Assistant Professor of Clinical Orthopedic Surgery, Academic Institute, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 19, 2024
Start date
Aug 19, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 9, 2026

Study contacts

Haley Goble, MHA
Contact
hmgoble@houstonmethodist.org
713-441-3930
Robert Jack, MD
principal investigator · The Methodist Hospital Research Institute

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion