ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06494280Updated Apr 13, 2026

PIEB Compared With CEI on Breakthrough Pain in Nulliparous Women

An interventional study of programmed intermittent Bolus epidural analgesia and continuous epidural infusion in Breakthrough Pain, sponsored by Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel. Recruiting at 1 site in Israel. Open to female participants, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
240
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the impact of programmed intermittent bolus epidural analgesia technique on the incidence of breakthrough pain during labor in nulliparous women compared to continuous epidural infusion.

Nulliparous women will randomly be divided during labor into two groups; study group will receive mix of Bupivacaine and fentanyl once (bolus) every 60 minutes; the control group will receive continuously the same dose during an hour, until delivery.

Read the detailed description

There are several pharmacological and non-pharmacological techniques for pain relief during labor. Epidural analgesia is considered the most effective modality for intrapartum pain relief.

Maintenance of epidural analgesia is achieved by different techniques; continuous epidural infusion (CEI), intermittent epidural analgesia (IEA), patient control epidural analgesia (PCEA) and combination between the techniques.

Another technique, the Programmed Intermittent Bolus Epidural Analgesia (PIBEA). The advantage of this technique is that boluses are given all the time at planned intervals, so laboring women do not depend on the medical staff to receive the bolus when there is a breakthrough pain.

This method has been reported to be associated with less motor block, lower incidence of instrumental vaginal deliveries, and less consumption of anesthetic agents when compared to CEI. There are no conclusive data regarding the use of PIBEA in combination with PCEA compared to CEI and PCEA on the effect of pain relief during labor and birth outcomes. The hypothesis of the current trial is that PIBEA and PCEA will decrease the incidence of breakthrough pain, and probably shorten the second stage of labor, lead to fewer instrumental deliveries and higher women's satisfaction compared to CEI and PCEA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breakthrough Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Nullipara
  • Term pregnancy
  • Singleton
  • Vertex presentation
  • Latent phase
  • Maternal request for epidural
  • Visual analogue scale > 4
03

In context

Breakthrough Pain

34 studies on the registry are indexed under Breakthrough Pain; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 240 is above the median of 91 across 21 interventional studies indexed under Breakthrough Pain.

Browse Breakthrough Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Nulliparous women
  • Term pregnancy
  • Singleton
  • Vertex presentation
  • Latent phase (cervical dilatation \<6 cm)
  • Epidural analgesia request
  • Visual Analogue Scale score > 40

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Estimated fetal weight > 4 kg
  • Intra uterine fetal death
  • Drug sensitivity
  • Anomalous fetus
  • for epidural analgesia
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
240 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    study group

    Epidural analgesia will be maintained by receiving programmed intermittent 10ml bolus of 0.1% Bupivacaine and 2microgram\\ml Fentanyl every one hour, until the delivery is completed, and lacerations are sutured.

    Drug: programmed intermittent Bolus epidural analgesia

  • Active comparator
    control group

    Epidural analgesia will be maintained by receiving 10ml\\h continuous infusion of 0.1% Bupivacaine and 2microgram\\ml Fentanyl until the delivery is completed, and lacerations are sutured.

    Drug: continuous epidural infusion

Interventions

  • Drugprogrammed intermittent Bolus epidural analgesia

    Drug pages: Bupivacaine · Fentanyl

    About 30 minutes after the end of the epidural and administration of the loading dose, the woman will be asked to report her pain level. If the VAS score \<30, the woman will receive the study group protocol for pain maintenance, i.e., a programmed intermittent bolus of 10 ml of 0.1% bupivacaine and 2 μg/ml fentanyl every hour until the completion of labor and suturing of the incision. The participant can add to herself 5 ml of the same solution of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl every 30 minutes. The maximum dose that the parturient is allowed to receive is 20 ml for one hour. If a breakthrough pain appears during labor, a bolus of 10 ml of anesthetic solution with the same concentration will be added. Participants with a VAS score \>30 after 30 minutes of the loading dose will be asked to perform a new epidural (if it was decided that the epidural failed) otherwise her data will not be collected for the final analysis of the study.

    Also known as: Bupivacaine + Fentanyl

  • Drugcontinuous epidural infusion

    Drug pages: Bupivacaine · Fentanyl

    About 30 minutes after the end of the epidural and administration of the loading dose, the woman will be asked to report her pain level. If the VAS score \<30, the woman will receive the control group protocol for pain maintenance, i.e., 0.1% Bupivacaine and 2 μg/ml fentanyl as a continuous infusion per one hour, until the delivery is completed, and laceration is sutured. The participant can add to herself 5 ml of the same solution of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl every 30 minutes. The maximum dose that the parturient is allowed to receive is 20 ml for one hour. If a breakthrough pain appears during labor, a bolus of 10 ml of anesthetic solution with the same concentration will be added. Participants with a VAS score \>30 after 30 minutes of the loading dose will be asked to perform a new epidural (if it was decided that the epidural failed) otherwise her data will not be collected for the final analysis of the study.

    Also known as: Bupivacaine + Fentanyl

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. breakthrough pain

    Incidence of breakthrough pain, defined as Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score \> 30. The VAS consists of a 100cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 100 (severe pain).

    Time frame: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. manual bolus (top up)

    Number of participants who will require top up of Bupivacaine and Fentanyl due to breakthrough pain.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  2. Hourly visual analogue scale

    Hourly pain according to visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The VAS consists of a 100cm line, with two end points representing score 0 (no pain) and score 100 (severe pain).

    Time frame: 48 hours

  3. Time to delivery

    Time from epidural analgesia to delivery.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  4. Oxytocin augmentation

    Incidence of women who will require Oxytocin for labor augmentation

    Time frame: 48 hours

  5. Duration of second stage

    The time from complete cervical dilatation until delivery of the fetus (minutes)

    Time frame: 48 hours

  6. Intrapartum fever

    Number of patients that will have intrapartum fever ≥ 38 °C

    Time frame: 48 hours

  7. Number of patients that will require use of intrapartum use of antibiotic treatment.

    Number of patients that will require use of intrapartum use of antibiotic treatment due to intrapartum infection.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  8. Mode of delivery

    Whether the birth was a normal spontaneous birth, operative vaginal birth or a cesarean section.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  9. Indications for cesarean or operative vaginal deliveries

    Was the reason for operative vaginal delivery or cesarean delivery due to non-progressive labor, fetal status, or a combination of both?

    Time frame: 48 hours

  10. duration of third stage

    time from delivery of the fetus the delivery of the placenta (minutes)

    Time frame: 48 hours

  11. Early postpartum hemorrhage (PPH)

    Number of Participants with develop PPH

    Time frame: 48 hours

  12. Hemoglobin level

    The lowest postpartum Hemoglobin level

    Time frame: 96 hours

  13. Blood transfusion

    Number of Participants that will need blood transfusion.

    Time frame: 72 hours

  14. Obstetric anal sphincter injury

    Number of Participants with that will develop 3rd and 4th degrees perineal lacerations.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  15. Motor block of any leg

    Incidence of motor block will be assessed according to Bromage score: Bromage 0 = No motor block. Bromage 1 = the participant is unable to flex her hip Bromage 2 = the participant is able to flex her ankle but unable to flex her hip and knee Bromage 3 = the participant is unable to flex her hip, knee and ankle

    Time frame: 48 hours

  16. Urinary retention

    Participant will not be able to urinate spontaneously 6 hours after delivery

    Time frame: 48 hours

  17. Dural puncture

    Incidence of dural puncture during performing epidural analgesia

    Time frame: 48 hours

  18. Side effects related epidural analgesia use

    nausea, vomiting, and pruritis

    Time frame: 48 hours

  19. mean arterial blood pressure

    mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) of the participant during labor

    Time frame: 48 hours

  20. systolic blood pressure < 90mmHg

    incidence of systolic blood pressure \< 90 during labor

    Time frame: 48 hours

  21. Bupivacaine consumption

    total Bupivacaine consumption during labor (ml)

    Time frame: 48 hours

  22. maternal satisfaction

    participant satisfaction from labor experience from 1 to 10. 1= very dissatisfied 10 = very satisfied

    Time frame: 48 hours

  23. Apgar score (0 to 10)

    APGAR\< 7 after 1 and 5 minutes where lower scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 48 hours

  24. fetal cord artery pH

    Cord artery pH \<7.1

    Time frame: 48 hours

  25. meconium staining

    Incidence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid before delivery of the fetus

    Time frame: 48 hours

  26. Neonatal sepsis

    Incidence of early neonatal sepsis

    Time frame: 72 hours

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • 1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetric analgesia and anesthesia. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 209. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e208-25. 2. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018:5;CD000331. 3. Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012:3;CD009234. 4. George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2013;116:133-44. 5. Sng BL, Zeng Y, de Souza NNA, Leong WL, Oh TT, Siddiqui FJ, Assam PN, Han NR, Chan ES, Sia AT. Automated mandatory bolus versus basal infusion for maintenance of epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5:CD011344. 6. Ferrer LE, Romero DJ, Vasquez OI, Matute EC, Van de Velde M. Effect of programmed intermittent epidural boluses and continuous epidural infusion on labor analgesia and obstetric outcomes: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296:915-22. 7. Ojo OA, Mehdiratta JE, Gamez BH, Hunting J, Habib AS. Comparison of programmed intermittent epidural boluses with continuous epidural infusion for the maintenance of labor analgesia: a randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Anesth Analg. 2020;130:426-35. 8. Haidl F, Arne Rosseland L, Rorvik AM, Dahl V. Programmed intermittent boluses vs continuous epidural infusion in labor using an adrenaline containing solution: A randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020;64:1505-12. 9. Riazanova OV, Alexandrovich YS, Guseva YV, Ioscovich AM. A randomized comparison of low dose ropivacaine programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labour analgesia. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2019;26:25-30. 10. Fan Y, Hou W, Feng S, Mao P, Wang X, Jiang J, Yuan H, Shen X, Feng S, Li P. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus decreases the incidence of intra-partum fever for labor analgesia in primiparous women: a randomized controlled study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300:1551-7 11. Xu J, Zhou J, Xiao H, Pan S, Liu J, Shang Y, Yao S. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing programmed intermittent bolus and continuous infusion as the background infusion for parturient-controlled epidural analgesia. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2583. 12. Wang XX, Zhang XL, Zhang ZX, Xin ZQ, Guo HJ, Liu HY, Xiao J, Zhang YL, Yuan SZ. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus in parturients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101: e28742. 13. Bullingham A, Liang S, Edmonds E, Mathur S, Sharma S. Continuous epidural infusion vs programmed intermittent epidural bolus for labour analgesia: a prospective, controlled, before-and-after cohort study of labour outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121:432-7. 14. Lin Y, Li Q, Liu J, Yang R, Liu J. Comparison of continuous epidural infusion and programmed intermittent epidural bolus in labor analgesia. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016;12:1107-12. 15. Lim Y, Sia AT, Ocampo C. Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005;14:305-9. 16. Salim R, Nachum Z, Moscovici R, Lavee M, Shalev E. Continuous compared with intermittent epidural infusion on progress of labor and patient satisfaction. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:301-6. 17. Lim Y, Ocampo CE, Supandji M, Teoh WH, Sia AT. A randomized controlled trial of three patient-controlled epidural analgesia regimens for labor. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1968-72. 18. Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S, Farcomeni A. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women. Anesth Analg 2011;113:826-31. 19. Carvalho B, George RB, Cobb B, McKenzie C, Riley ET. Implementation of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for the Maintenance of Labor Analgesia. Anesth Analg 2016;123:965-71 20. Diez-Picazo LD, Guasch E, Brogly N, Gilsanz F. Is breakthrough pain better managed by adding programmed intermittent epidural bolus to a background infusion during labor epidural analgesia? A randomized controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019;85:1097-104. 21. Roofthooft E, Barbé A, Schildermans J, Cromheecke S, Devroe S, Fieuws S, Rex S, Wong CA, Van de Velde M. Programmed intermittent epidural bolus vs. patient-controlled epidural analgesia for maintenance of labour analgesia: a two-centre, double-blind, randomised study. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:1635-42. 22. Sultan P, Murphy C, Halpern S, Carvalho B. The effect of low concentrations versus high concentrations of local anesthetics for labour analgesia on obstetric and anesthetic outcomes: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:840-54.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD that underlie results in a publication

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: starting 6 months after publication

Access criteria: Access to IPD can be requested by qualified researchers and will be granted after review and approval of a research proposal and statistical analysis plan and execution of a data sharing agreement. For more information or to apply, please contact the Principal Investigator

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06494280
Lead sponsor
Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel
Responsible party
Raed Salim, MD (head of obstetrics and gynecology department, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2024
Start date
Sep 10, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Study contacts

Raed Salim, MD
Contact
r.salim@hfhosp.org
+972544986960
Asmaa Masri Esmail, MD
Contact
Asmaa.Masri94@gmail.com
+972544986960
Raed Salim, MD
study chair · Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Bupivacaine · Fentanyl

Start the discussion