ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07777939Updated Sep 28, 2026

TENS Use for Post-cesarean Pain Management

An interventional study of TENS in Post Cesarean Pain Management, sponsored by Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Israel. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-28.

Sponsored by Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Sep 28, 2026Start date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
196
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous 24-hour Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) as an adjunct to standard postoperative care for pain management following cesarean delivery. Eligible women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group, which will receive continuous TENS in addition to standard postoperative analgesia, or the control group, which will receive standard postoperative analgesia alone. The primary outcome is the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score assessed 24 hours after cesarean delivery.

Read the detailed description

Cesarean delivery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide and is frequently associated with moderate to severe acute postoperative pain. Adequate pain control is particularly important following cesarean delivery because women must recover from major abdominal surgery while caring for and breastfeeding their newborns. Poorly controlled postoperative pain has been associated with delayed mobilization, impaired maternal-infant interaction, increased opioid consumption, chronic postsurgical pain, and postpartum depression. Although multimodal pharmacological analgesia is the standard approach for post-cesarean pain management, opioid analgesics may cause adverse maternal effects, including nausea, vomiting, sedation, and constipation, and there is increasing interest in adjunctive non-pharmacological interventions that may improve recovery while reducing opioid requirements.

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) is a non-invasive, safe, and inexpensive modality that delivers low-voltage electrical stimulation through surface electrodes to reduce pain. Proposed mechanisms include modulation of nociceptive transmission through the gate control mechanism and stimulation of endogenous opioid release. Although previous systematic reviews suggest that TENS may reduce postoperative pain after cesarean delivery, the available evidence is limited by small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, and low certainty. Additional well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to establish its clinical effectiveness.

This study is a single-center, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous 24-hour TENS as an adjunct to standard postoperative analgesia in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either continuous TENS therapy in addition to standard postoperative care or standard postoperative care alone.

TENS treatment will be initiated within 2 hours following cesarean delivery and applied around the surgical incision using standardized electrode placement and stimulation parameters. TENS will be administered for up to 24 hours. The TENS program is designed to deliver continuous stimulation for one hour. Participants will be encouraged to restart the program every hour for up to 24 hours. They may temporarily discontinue stimulation in the event of discomfort, skin irritation, mobilization, hygiene needs, or at their request.

All participants will receive the same perioperative management, including standardized spinal anesthesia, local wound infiltration, postoperative analgesic regimen, and postoperative care according to departmental protocols. The primary outcome will be the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score assessed 24 hours after cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative pain intensity at rest and during movement, patient satisfaction with pain management, opioid consumption during the first 72 postoperative hours, time to bowel function recovery, maternal postoperative complications, breastfeeding outcomes, length of hospital stay, and adverse events related to TENS.

The study will enroll 196 participants, with sample size determined to detect a clinically meaningful difference in QoR-15 scores between groups. Analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. The findings of this trial will provide high-quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of continuous 24-hour TENS as an adjunctive strategy for improving postoperative recovery and pain management following cesarean delivery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post Cesarean Pain Management

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cesarean delivery
  • TENS
  • POSTPARTUM PAIN
03

In context

Pain

10,054 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain; 1,649 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 196 is above the median of 66 across 8,493 interventional studies indexed under Pain.

Browse Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18-45 years.
  • Undergoing CD under spinal anesthesia.
  • Hemodynamically stable postoperatively.
  • Able to provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing CD under epidural or general anesthesia.
  • Skin lesions or infection at electrode placement sites.
  • Pacemaker or implanted electrical devices.
  • Neurological disorders affecting pain perception.
  • Chronic opioid use or chronic pain disorders.
  • Allergy or other to opioids, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, or acetaminophen use.
  • Adhesive allergy.
  • Midline vertical skin incision (in the current or previous cesarean).
  • Intraoperative sterilization.
  • Cesarean hysterectomy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
196 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TENS Group

    Patient will receive TENS within 2 hours after surgery in addition to the standard analgesic protocol.

    Device: TENS

  • No intervention
    No-TENS Control Group

    Patients will receive the standard analgesic protocol only.

Interventions

  • DeviceTENS

    Participants randomized to the intervention group will receive TENS in addition to standard postoperative analgesia. TENS will be initiated within 2 hours after cesarean delivery and administered during the first 24 postoperative hours. Participants will be instructed to wear the device continuously during this period. Each TENS stimulation cycle will last 1 hour, using a frequency of 80 Hz, a pulse width of 200 µs, and an intensity of 20-40 mA. Participants will be encouraged to restart the stimulation program at the end of each hourly cycle for up to 24 hours. Stimulation may be temporarily discontinued in the event of discomfort or skin irritation, during mobilization or hygiene activities, or at the participant's request. All participants will additionally receive the institution's standard postoperative care and analgesic regimen following cesarean delivery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) total score

    The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a validated 15-item patient-reported questionnaire that assesses postoperative recovery across five domains: pain, physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, and emotional state. Each item is scored from 0 to 10, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better postoperative recovery.

    Time frame: 24 hours after cesarean delivery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative pain intensity at rest

    Pain intensity assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) while at rest.

    Time frame: 2-4, 8-10, 24, and 48 hours after cesarean delivery

  2. Postoperative pain intensity during movement

    Pain intensity assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) after 2-3 minutes of walking.

    Time frame: 2-4, 8-10, 24, and 48 hours after cesarean delivery

  3. Satisfaction with pain control

    Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management measured using an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied).

    Time frame: 24 and 48 hours after cesarean delivery

  4. Total opioid consumption

    Total rescue opioid use during the postoperative period, recorded as the number of tablets and total milligram dose.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after cesarean delivery

  5. Time to first bowel function

    Time from surgery to first passage of flatus or bowel movement.

    Time frame: Within hospitalization (up to discharge, approximately 72 hours)

  6. Postpartum fever

    Occurrence of postpartum fever according to institutional diagnostic criteria.

    Time frame: During hospitalization (up to approximately 72 hours after surgery)

  7. Endometritis

    Occurrence of clinically diagnosed postpartum endometritis.

    Time frame: Perioperatively

  8. Surgical site infection

    Occurrence of surgical site infection diagnosed according to institutional criteria.

    Time frame: Perioperatively

  9. Change in hemoglobin concentration

    Maximum difference between preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after cesarean delivery

  10. Heart rate

    Maximum and minimum daily heart rate recorded during routine postoperative monitoring

    Time frame: Within the first 24 hours after cesarean delivery

  11. Respiratory rate

    Maximum and minimum daily respiratory rate recorded during routine postoperative monitoring

    Time frame: Within the first 24 hours after cesarean delivery

  12. Time to first breastfeeding

    Time from cesarean delivery to the first breastfeeding session.

    Time frame: Perioperatively

  13. Neonatal feeding method at discharge

    Infant feeding method at hospital discharge (exclusive breastfeeding, mixed feeding, or formula feeding).

    Time frame: Up to one weeks

  14. Length of hospital stay

    Duration of hospitalization from cesarean delivery until discharge.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 days.

  15. TENS-related adverse events

    Occurrence of adverse events related to TENS use, including skin irritation, pain, burning sensation, or other device-related reactions.

    Time frame: During the 24-hour TENS intervention period

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gogenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22. PubMed 29397134 ↗
  • Chazapis M, Walker EM, Rooms MA, Kamming D, Moonesinghe SR. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):241-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev413. PubMed 26787793 ↗
  • Garmi G, Parasol M, Zafran N, Rudin M, Romano S, Salim R. Efficacy of Single Wound Infiltration With Bupivacaine and Adrenaline During Cesarean Delivery for Reduction of Postoperative Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2242203. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42203. PubMed 36378307 ↗
  • Albadrani MS, Elhusein AM, Ali Fadlalmola H et al. The Clinical Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Enhancing Recovery after Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Current Women s Health Reviews. 2024;20(5):53-64. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404820666230731100639.
  • Zimpel SA, Torloni MR, Porfirio GJ, Flumignan RL, da Silva EM. Complementary and alternative therapies for post-caesarean pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 1;9(9):CD011216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011216.pub2. PubMed 32871021 ↗
  • Vance CG, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Sluka KA. Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence. Pain Manag. 2014 May;4(3):197-209. doi: 10.2217/pmt.14.13. PubMed 24953072 ↗
  • Smith BH, Lee J, Price C, Baranowski AP. Neuropathic pain: a pathway for care developed by the British Pain Society. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;111(1):73-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet206. PubMed 23794648 ↗
  • Bjordal JM, Johnson MI, Ljunggreen AE. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can reduce postoperative analgesic consumption. A meta-analysis with assessment of optimal treatment parameters for postoperative pain. Eur J Pain. 2003;7(2):181-8. doi: 10.1016/S1090-3801(02)00098-8. PubMed 12600800 ↗
  • Johnson MI, Walsh DM. Pain: continued uncertainty of TENS' effectiveness for pain relief. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010 Jun;6(6):314-6. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.77. No abstract available. PubMed 20520646 ↗
  • Sluka KA, Walsh D. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness. J Pain. 2003 Apr;4(3):109-21. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2003.434. PubMed 14622708 ↗
  • Halawani RK El, Elmokadem EM, Ismael KS et al. Adjuvant therapies for postoperative pain management in cesarean section: A comprehensive review of clinical evidence. Futur J Pharm Sci. 2026;12(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-026-00956-1.
  • Carvalho B, Butwick AJ. Postcesarean delivery analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Mar;31(1):69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 12. PubMed 28625307 ↗
  • Pharmacologic Stepwise Multimodal Approach for Postpartum Pain Management: ACOG Clinical Consensus No. 1. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep 1;138(3):507-517. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004517. PubMed 34412076 ↗
  • ACOG Committee Opinion No. 742: Postpartum Pain Management. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):e35-e43. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002683. PubMed 29781876 ↗
  • Jin J, Peng L, Chen Q, Zhang D, Ren L, Qin P, Min S. Prevalence and risk factors for chronic pain following cesarean section: a prospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0270-6. PubMed 27756207 ↗
  • Ciechanowicz S, Joy RR, Kasmirski J, Blake L, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Incidence, Severity, and Interference of Chronic Postsurgical Pain After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2025 Jun;104:111832. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111832. Epub 2025 Apr 24. PubMed 40279839 ↗
  • Shtainmetz N, Tesler R, Ash N, Korn L. Implementation of the Robson classification for caesarean sections in Israel: a 10-year cross-sectional study. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2025 Nov 4;14(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13584-025-00726-z. PubMed 41184971 ↗
  • Demilew BC, Zurbachew N, Getachew N, Mekete G, Lema DT. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Postoperative Acute Pain for Mothers Who Gave Birth With Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Manag Nurs. 2024 Dec;25(6):e452-e464. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.010. Epub 2024 Jul 20. PubMed 39033057 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual patient data (IPD) that underlie results in a publication

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: After publication (starting 6 months after publication).

Access criteria: De-identified IPD will be available to academic or clinical researchers for meta-analyses, and research addressing questions related to the study topic. Requests must include a research protocol, statistical analysis plan, ethics approval, and details of the research team. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator. Data will be provided after approval and completion of a data-sharing agreement.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026→Sep 2026
Sep 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 28, 2026
    Start date Aug 2026→Sep 2026
    + 3 other changes: verification date, description and arm descriptions

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07777939
Lead sponsor
Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel
Responsible party
Raed Salim, MD (Professor, Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, Israel) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 20, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2026

Study contacts

Maysa Abboud, MD
Contact
abboudmaysa@gmail.com
972-509516904
Raed Salim, MD
Contact
r.salim@hfhosp.org
0544986960
Raed Salim
study chair · The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar Ilan University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion