ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06790719BEACONUpdated Jan 24, 2025

Paediatric Breakthrough Pain Assessment

An observational study in Breakthrough Pain, Palliative Medicine and Oncology Pain, sponsored by University of Southampton. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 99 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-24.

Sponsored by University of Southampton · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
210
Ages
8 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Many children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening illnesses get sudden bursts of pain called breakthrough pain. At the moment, there aren't any good ways to measure this pain in children and young people. The investigators are developing two questionnaires to help: one for patients to fill out themselves and another for parents or healthcare professionals to complete for younger children and young people who cannot explain their pain for themselves.

The investigators plan to work with 210 people across hospitals and hospices in England and Wales. This includes children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening illnesses, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals. The investigators have already made a first version of the questionnaires.

The project has three main Studies:

In Study 1, the investigators will talk to 5-10 young patients and 5-10 caregivers about their experiences with breakthrough pain. The investigators will use their feedback to improve the questionnaires.

In Study 2, the investigators will ask 5-10 patients, 5-10 caregivers, and 5-10 healthcare professionals to fill out the questionnaires while speaking their thoughts out loud. This will help the investigators find any parts that are confusing or difficult to understand.

In Study 3, the investigators will test how well the questionnaires works. 80 patients, 40 caregivers, and 40 healthcare professionals will complete the questionnaires three different times to make sure they measure breakthrough pain as accurately as possible.

These questionnaire will be useful for hospitals and hospices across England and Wales to help them better manage pain, including breakthrough pain, in patients aged 3 months to 25 years who have life-limiting and life-threatening illnesses.

Read the detailed description

Children and young people (CYP) with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) and life-threatening conditions (LTCs) can experience various forms of pain, including breakthrough pain (BTP). BTP can be characterized as a sudden, temporary increase in pain severity that occurs above the pre-existing baseline level of pain. This type of pain is particularly challenging to assess and manage due to its unpredictable nature and the lack of a universally agreed-upon definition, leading to difficulties in controlling pain effectively.

Available data indicates that BTP is highly prevalent in CYP, with one study reporting that 57% of paediatric patients experienced at least one episode of BTP within a 24-hour period. Despite this, much of the existing research on BTP primarily focuses on adult populations, resulting in insufficient clinical information on the prevalence and management of BTP in CYP with LLCs or LTCs. Furthermore, BTP can significantly impact quality of life for patients and their families, yet no research has explored the lived experience of BTP in CYP, and research involving parents and caregivers remains limited. Moreover, research has found the absence of a validated questionnaire to assess BTP, further complicating the ability to consistently assess and manage this type of pain in paediatric palliative care settings. Developing a reliable and validated questionnaire to assess BTP in CYP crucial for improving pain management and quality of life.

The aim of this study is to develop a reliable, validated, multidimensional questionnaire to assess breakthrough pain in 3-months-25-year-olds. Two versions of the questionnaire will be developed: a self-report form and a form for caregivers/healthcare professionals (for pre- or non-verbal children).

This is a mixed-methods study comprising three separate studies. The investigators have developed a first draft (alpha version) of the paediatric BTP questionnaire using standard, approved methodology. In the first study (Study 1), the investigators will carry out interviews with children and young people (CYP) with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions (LLCs or LTCs) and their caregivers to explore their experiences of BTP. Using the findings, the investigators will modify the questionnaire if needed, to make sure the participants experiences are represented within it.

Next, the investigators will develop the second draft of the questionnaire (the beta version) and ask the steering group and additional pain experts for feedback. The investigators will modify the questionnaire again following this. For Study 2, the investigators will conduct cognitive interviews with CYP with LLCs or LTCs, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals. The investigators will ask participants to complete the questionnaire and 'think aloud' as they do this i.e. to say aloud everything they are thinking as they answer the questions. The investigators will use the findings to check if the questionnaire is easy to understand and to modify it if needed.

For Study 3, the investigators will check if the final version of the questionnaire can accurately characterize paediatric BTP by asking CYP with LLCs or LTCs, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals to complete it at three time points.

Time 1: Participants will complete the BTP questionnaire, another pain intensity questionnaire and a quality-of-life questionnaire. Participants will also be asked additional questions about their pain/the CYP's pain. A doctor responsible for the CYP's care will assess the presence/absence of BTP in the last week. The doctor will be blinded to the participant's responses in the BTP questionnaire and the pain intensity questionnaire.

Time 2: Participants will complete the questionnaire 24 hours after Time 1.

Time 3: Participants will complete the BTP questionnaire, another pain intensity questionnaire and a quality-of-life questionnaire 4 weeks after Time 1. Participants will also be asked additional questions about their pain/the CYP's pain.

The results will be looked at in detail to explore the validity, reliability and responsiveness of the final versions of the BTP assessment questionnaire and ensure the questionnaire accurately assesses BTP.

The final questionnaire i.e., the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) will be used in healthcare settings in England to help improve pain control in 3-month-25-year-olds.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breakthrough Pain
  • Palliative Medicine
  • Oncology Pain
  • Pediatric ALL
  • Young People

Keywords

  • Breakthrough pain
  • paediatrics
  • paediatric pain
  • palliative care
  • pain assessment
03

In context

Breakthrough Pain

34 studies on the registry are indexed under Breakthrough Pain; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 210 is above the median of 125 across 10 observational studies indexed under Breakthrough Pain.

Browse Breakthrough Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Southampton is the lead sponsor of 122 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This multicenter study will recruit participants from primary care, pediatric oncology, and palliative care settings across England and Wales, as well as from community settings in the UK.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children and young people aged 8-25 years who have experienced 1) background pain related to a life limiting or life threatening condition and 2) around-the-clock analgesia prescribed for the previous week, as confirmed by their healthcare team (Studies 1, 2, and 3).
  • Children and young people must be able to communicate and read in English at a level close to, or in line with their chronological age.
  • For study 1, non-verbal children and young people, or those with limited verbal ability, will be recruited if they are happy to participate using the Microsoft Teams chat function.
  • Parents and caregivers of children and young people aged 3-month-25-years who have experienced 1) background pain related to a life limiting or life threatening condition and 2) around-the-clock analgesia prescribed for the previous week, as confirmed by their healthcare team. (Studies 1, 2, and 3).
  • Caregivers can be caring for verbal, non-verbal, or pre-verbal children with or without cognitive or developmental difficulties of any level.
  • Parents and caregivers must have self-reported full or partial responsibility for assessing the child or young person's pain.
  • Healthcare professionals in primary, secondary and tertiary care who are involved in the care of children and young people with life limiting or life threatening conditions (Studies 2 and 3).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Children, young people, parents and caregivers with limited ability to communicate and read in English.

      • Children and young people judged by caregivers or healthcare professionals to lack capacity to take part, who are too unwell, or might find it too distressing.
      • Parents and caregivers judged by healthcare professionals to lack capacity to consent, or to be 'struggling' too much. However, if they wish to take part, they can send an email or text message to the study email account or mobile phone.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
210 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Children and young people

    Children and young people with life limiting or life threatening conditions aged between 8 to 25 years

  • Parents and caregivers

    Parents and carers of children and young people with life limiting or life threatening conditions aged between 3 months and 25 years

  • Healthcare professionals

    Healthcare professionals caring for children and young people with life limiting or life threatening conditions aged between 3 months and 25 years

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    Kappa statistic will be calculated to assess agreement between the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) algorithm's BTP diagnoses and the diagnoses made by doctors responsible for CYP care at Time 1. A kappa value of ≥0.61 will indicate good agreement.

    Time frame: From participant enrollment in Study 3 through completion of the final assessment up to 4 weeks later

  2. Test-retest reliability of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    Intraclass correlation coefficients between Time 1 and Time 2 scores on the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) will be calculated, with coefficients above 0.8 indicating good test-retest reliability.

    Time frame: From participant enrolment in Study 3 through completion of the second assessment 24 hours later

Secondary outcomes

  1. Internal consistency of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    Cronbach's alpha coefficients will be calculated for the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) items, with values \>0.7 indicating good internal consistency.

    Time frame: From participant enrolment in Study 3 through completion of the final assessment up to 4 weeks later

  2. Construct validity of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    Scores on the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) from CYP with participant-rated adequately controlled BTP will be compared to those with inadequately controlled BTP using independent t-tests. Significant group differences (p\<0.05) will indicate construct validity.

    Time frame: From participant enrolment in Study 3 through completion of the final assessment up to 4 weeks later

  3. Discriminant validity of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    Correlation coefficients will be calculated between scores on the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) and unrelated demographic variables (e.g., sex), with low values indicating discriminant validity.

    Time frame: From participant enrolment in Study 3 through completion of the final assessment up to 4 weeks later

  4. Responsiveness of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    The minimally important difference (MID) on the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) will be calculated to determine the smallest value that represents a clinically relevant change in BTP over time. The investigators will calculate the mean difference in BTPAQ scores between Time 1 and Time 3 for all CYP. The MID will be determined by comparing the mean score differences between participants who reported their BTP as "improved" versus those who reported it as "unchanged" from Time 1 to Time 3.

    Time frame: From participant enrolment in Study 3 through completion of the final assessment up to 4 weeks later

  5. Acceptability of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    The percentage of missing data on the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) will be calculated to assess acceptability, with less than 5% missing data deemed acceptable.

    Time frame: From participant enrolment in Study 3 through completion of the final assessment up to 4 weeks later

  6. Convergent validity of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    For typically developing participants aged 2-3 years, Pearson correlation coefficients will be used to compare scores on the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) with scores on the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC).

    Time frame: From participant enrolment in Study 3 through completion of the final assessment up to 4 weeks later

  7. Convergent validity of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    For typically developing participants aged 4-7 years, Pearson correlation coefficients will be used to compare scores on the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) with scores on the Faces Pain Scale-Revised.

    Time frame: From participant enrolment in Study 3 through completion of the final assessment up to 4 weeks later

  8. Convergent validity of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    For typically developing participants aged 8-25 years, Pearson correlation coefficients will be used to compare scores on the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) with scores on the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale.

    Time frame: From participant enrolment in Study 3 through completion of the final assessment up to 4 weeks later

  9. Convergent validity of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    For participants aged 3 months to 25 years with cognitive impairment, Pearson correlation coefficients will be used to compare scores on the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) with scores on the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC) Revised.

    Time frame: From participant enrolment in Study 3 through completion of the final assessment up to 4 weeks later

  10. Convergent validity of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    Based on participant age, Pearson correlation coefficients will be used to compare scores on the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) with scores on the age-appropriate version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0. The specific versions are: * PedsQL 4.0 Young Child Report for typically developing children aged 5-7 years * PedsQL 4.0 Child Report for typically developing children aged 8-12 years * PedsQL 4.0 Teen Report for typically developing adolescents aged 13-18 years * PedsQL 4.0 Young Adult Report for typically developing young adults aged 18-25 years

    Time frame: From participant enrolment in Study 3 through completion of the final assessment up to 4 weeks later

  11. Convergent validity of the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ)

    Based on participant age, Pearson correlation coefficients will be used to compare scores on the Breakthrough Pain Assessment Questionnaire (BTPAQ) with scores on the age-appropriate version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0. The specific versions are: * PedsQL 4.0 Parent Report for typically developing 2-4 year-olds * PedsQL 4.0 Parent Report for 5-7 year-olds * PedsQL 4.0 Parent Report for 8-12 year-olds * PedsQL 4.0 Parent Report for 13-25 year-olds

    Time frame: From participant enrolment in Study 3 through completion of the final assessment up to 4 weeks later

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Liossi C, Greenfield K, Schoth DE, Mott C, Jassal S, Fraser LK, Rajapakse D, Howard RF, Johnson M, Anderson AK, Harrop E. A Systematic Review of Measures of Breakthrough Pain and Their Psychometric Properties. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Nov;62(5):1041-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.04.018. Epub 2021 Apr 30. PubMed 33933619 ↗
  • Greenfield K, Schoth DE, Hain R, Bailey S, Mott C, Rajapakse D, Harrop E, Renton K, Anderson AK, Carter B, Johnson M, Liossi C. A rapid systematic review of breakthrough pain definitions and descriptions. Br J Pain. 2024 Jun;18(3):215-226. doi: 10.1177/20494637231208093. Epub 2023 Dec 25. PubMed 38751563 ↗
  • Dawson E, Greenfield K, Carter B, Bailey S, Anderson AK, Rajapakse D, Renton K, Mott C, Hain R, Harrop E, Johnson M, Liossi C. Definition and Assessment of Paediatric Breakthrough Pain: A Qualitative Interview Study. Children (Basel). 2024 Apr 18;11(4):485. doi: 10.3390/children11040485. PubMed 38671702 ↗
  • Greenfield K, Holley S, Schoth DE, Bayliss J, Anderson AK, Jassal S, Rajapakse D, Fraser LK, Mott C, Johnson M, Wong I, Howard R, Harrop E, Liossi C. A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify measures of breakthrough pain and evaluate their psychometric properties. BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 29;10(3):e035541. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035541. PubMed 32229524 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Study participants with rare diseases may be identifiable due to their unique conditions.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06790719
Collaborators
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 24, 2025
Start date
Jan 20, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 24, 2025

Study contacts

Georgia Turner, BSc
Contact
beacon@soton.ac.uk
+44 23 8059 9660
Christina Liossi, DPsych
Contact
cliossi@soton.ac.uk
+44 2380 594645
Christina Liossi, DPsych
study chair · University of Southampton

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion