ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06442956Updated Mar 30, 2026

Effect of Rapid Heat Stress on Firefighters Musculoskeletal Injury Risk

An interventional study of Rapid Heat Condition and Gradual Heat Condition in Occupational Injuries, Heat Stress and Leg Injury, sponsored by Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 57 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-30.

Sponsored by Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 57 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will examine the effect of heat stress on factors that influence musculoskeletal injury risk in firefighters. Participants will attend 4 data collection sessions. 1: informed consent, screening, and familiarization. 2: pre-tests (strength, balance, and movement quality). 3: heat stress (rapid or gradual) followed by post-tests (strength, balance, and movement quality). 4: heat stress (rapid or gradual) followed by post-tests.

Read the detailed description

This study utilizes a crossover design, with participants acting as their own controls and participating in both the control (gradual uncompensable heat) and experimental (rapid heat stress (RHS)) conditions. The independent variable is the type of heat stress (uncompensable or rapid). The dependent variables are: peak concentric muscle torque (hip abductors, hip adductors, knee flexors, knee extensors), dynamic balance (Y-Balance Test, Firefighter-Specific Functional-Balance Test (FFSFBT)), and frontal plane movement quality (Forward-Step-Down Test (FSDT)). These will be measured three times, once during pre-testing and twice during post-testing as described below.

The study will consist of four visits. Visit one will be the informed consent and familiarization to the outcome measures. Participants will be educated on filling out the 24-hour food/drink diary, and asked to standardize their diet as close as possible to this record the 24 hours before visits 2, 3, and 4. Injury history and demographic data will be collected at visit 1.

Visit two will be the pre-test data collection, which will occur at approximately 22°C. Participants will complete all outcome measures (torque, balance, movement quality measures). Body composition will also be measured in the BodPod at this time.

Before visits 2, 3, and 4, participants will follow the safety guidelines outlined below to ensure proper hydration:

  • 48 hours before: no heat stress (will contact participant to determine if they have been called out to a live fire. Data collection will be postponed if so)
  • 24 hours before: no alcohol consumption, no energy drink consumption (normal coffee/tea is allowed)
  • 24 hours before: no physical activity (exercise or vigorous play)
  • 24 hours before: drink 3.7L of total water to make sure to be well-hydrated
  • 2 hours before: eat last meal

Visits three and four will consist of a steady-state treadmill protocol inside the environmental chamber (37-38°C, 50% humidity) followed by post-test measures. During either session three or four, the participant will don his/her firefighting gear (jacket, pants, hood, boots, gloves) and perform the treadmill test with the gear on. This is the RHS trial and will be denoted GEAR. In the other session, the participant will wear exercise clothes (shirt and shorts) plus a weighted backpack to replicate the weight of the gear. This is the gradual uncompensable heat stress trial and will be denoted NOGEAR. The order of the GEAR and NOGEAR sessions will be randomized and counterbalanced to prevent crossover effects.

Upon arrival for the pre-testing visit (session two), participants will be measured for height using a stadiometer and weight. Body composition will be measured once with the BodPod (Cosmed, USA). They will warm up for five minutes on an exercise bike or treadmill then proceed with taking the outcome measures.

Upon arrival for visits three and four, participants will be weighed again. A urine sample will be collected to assess hydration status. They will swallow the core temperature (Tc) capsule 40-45 minutes prior to the start of the session using a small amount of 20°C water, with no further water ingestion throughout the protocol to avoid artificially lowering Tc. Participants will be fit with the Equivital EQLife Monitor (Equivital, NY) system to record heartrate (HR) and Tc. They will then perform the treadmill protocol, and post-test measures will be completed immediately following the cessation of the treadmill test with removal of their gear. They will be weighed following exercise to determine changes in body weight due to sweating.

Sessions three and four will be separated by at least seven days to reduce the influence of heat acclimatization and fatigue. Continuous monitoring of Tc and HR will help ensure participant safety.

The treadmill exercise protocol begins with a graded approach to reach aerobic steady state. The treadmill protocol includes an initial five-minute stage at 3 miles per hour and a 0% grade, followed by increases in percent grade of 4% at minute 5 and 8% at minute 10 and continued throughout the test. Following the final planned incremental increase in treadmill incline, the incline will then be adjusted to ensure that the subject remains at steady-state for the duration of the protocol, defined by a respiratory exchange ratio between 0.9-0.99 using the lab's metabolic cart (Parvomedics, USA). HR, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), thermal comfort, and thermal sensation will be recorded at each 0.5°C interval. The treadmill test will be stopped when participants either reach a Tc of 39°C or a volitional maximum (participant is unable to continue exercise). The investigators will also halt the test if signs of excessive heat stress are present (unsteady gait, confusion, dizziness, slurred speech, etc.) Should the participant not meet either termination criteria, there will be a 50 minute time limit for the treadmill protocol for the GEAR condition and 2 hour limit for the NOGEAR condition. Both GEAR and NOGEAR sessions will begin with the same treadmill test.

Following the treadmill test, the participants will complete the post-test outcome measures. These consist of isokinetic torque of the hip abductors and adductors, isokinetic torque of the knee flexors and extensors, the Y-Balance Test, the FFSFBT, and FSDT. Participants will doff their gear immediately following cession of the treadmill test. For unilateral tests, the dominant leg will be recorded and used for these tests; this is the leg used to kick a ball. Outcome measure order will be standardized for each participant with testing order based on primary outcomes and difficulty of each test. The FSDT will be performed first, as this is the primary outcome and previous research showed that recovery after a maximal exertion stimulus happens quickly. The FFSFBT will be performed next, followed by the Y-Balance Test. Isokinetic testing will be last due to the fatiguing nature of this testing. Hip muscles will be tested first, followed by thigh muscles. Three minutes will be allotted for rest and instruction between each outcome measure. Five minutes of rest will be given between isokinetic tests to allow for machine set-up and instructions. One minute of rest will be given between each isokinetic speed, with three speeds tested for the hip (30°, 60°, and 120° per second) and knee (60°, 180°, and 300° per second) muscles.

Participants will be followed for 2 years, with 6-month follow-up calls to track injury status. Details on type of injury, location of injury, and time lost to work will be collected.

02

Conditions studied

  • Occupational Injuries
  • Heat Stress
  • Leg Injury
  • Back Injuries

Keywords

  • firefighter
  • musculoskeletal
  • slip
  • trip
  • fall
03

In context

Heat Stress Disorders

118 studies on the registry are indexed under Heat Stress Disorders; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is close to the median of 24 across 104 interventional studies indexed under Heat Stress Disorders.

Browse Heat Stress Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 57 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • professional firefighter
  • healthy per the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire+ screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to swallow core temperature capsule
  • unable to follow pre-testing hydration criteria
  • musculoskeletal injury in the past 3 months that limits ability to perform outcome measures
  • females with known pregnancy (risk of hyperthermia to fetus)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Rapid Heat Stress

    Participants in the rapid heat stress arm will perform an exercise protocol on a treadmill in a hot, humid environment while wearing firefighter protective gear. This results in an uncompensable heat environment with a rapid increase in core temperature.

    Other: Rapid Heat Condition

  • Active comparator
    Gradual Heat Stress

    Participants in the rapid heat stress arm will perform an exercise protocol on a treadmill in a hot, humid environment while wearing light exercise clothing. This results in an uncompensable heat environment but with a gradual increase in core temperature.

    Other: Gradual Heat Condition

Interventions

  • OtherRapid Heat Condition

    The heat condition is the intervention. Personal protective equipment will be used to create the rapid heat stress condition, resulting in a rapid rise in core temperature. This will be in combination with the physiological heat produced by the treadmill protocol.

  • OtherGradual Heat Condition

    The gradual heat condition is the control. Physiological heat will be produced by exercise on a treadmill, and light exercise clothing will help moderate the rise in core temperature.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Forward-Step-Down Test

    a step-down task that is performed off a 20 cm box. Five repetitions are performed to give one score (minimum score 0, maximum score 6). A higher score is worse.

    Time frame: Familiarization trials (session 1, recruitment); pre-testing (baseline, session 2 (approximately day 7)); post-control and post-experimental sessions (session 3 (approximately day 14) & 4 (approximately day 21)).

  2. Y-Balance Test

    A dynamic balance test that is performed on the dominant leg, reaching in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions. The length of reach is standardized to participants' leg length. A higher score is better, with 0 being the minimum distance and the maximum distance in anterior reach being 126cm, and the maximum posteromedial and posterolateral directions being 149cm.

    Time frame: Familiarization trials (session 1, recruitment); pre-testing (baseline, session 2 (approximately day 7)); post-control and post-experimental sessions (session 3 (approximately day 14) & 4 (approximately day 21)).

  3. Firefighter Specific Functional Balance Test

    A dynamic balance test performed by stepping down from a 15cm box, walking across a low beam (4cm high), and stepping up onto a 10cm box, turning around, and returning to the original box. 8 Trials are performed. In 4 trials, a bar is placed at 75% of the participant's height for them to negotiate while on the beam. A faster time with fewer errors is better.

    Time frame: Familiarization trials (session 1, recruitment); pre-testing (baseline, session 2 (approximately day 7)); post-control and post-experimental sessions (session 3 (approximately day 14) & 4 (approximately day 21)).

  4. Knee Flexor/Extensor Isokinetic Test

    Knee flexor/extensor isokinetic strength will be tested at 60°, 180°, and 300° per second from the seated position with 5, 10, and 10 concentric contractions for each speed. A higher reading of strength is better.

    Time frame: Familiarization trials (session 1, recruitment); pre-testing (baseline, session 2 (approximately day 7)); post-control and post-experimental sessions (session 3 (approximately day 14) & 4 (approximately day 21)).

  5. Hip Abductor/Adductor Isokinetic Test

    Hip abductor/adductor strength will be tested at 30°, 60°, and 120° per second from the standing position. A higher reading of strength is better.

    Time frame: Familiarization trials (session 1, recruitment); pre-testing (baseline, session 2 (approximately day 7)); post-control and post-experimental sessions (session 3 (approximately day 14) & 4 (approximately day 21)).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Injury Occurrence

    Participants will be contacted after sessions 1-4 to follow up on occurrence of musculoskeletal injuries, with 0 representing no injury and numerical values indicating presence of injury.

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months after session 4.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • LSUHSC-Shreveport
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O'Brien WL, Bassett DR Jr, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO, Jacobs DR Jr, Leon AS. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S498-504. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009. PubMed 10993420 ↗
  • Brown MN, Char RMML, Henry SO, Tanigawa J, Yasui S. The effect of firefighter personal protective equipment on static and dynamic balance. Ergonomics. 2019 Sep;62(9):1193-1201. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1623422. Epub 2019 Jun 17. PubMed 31204598 ↗
  • Cheung SS, McLellan TM. Influence of hydration status and fluid replacement on heat tolerance while wearing NBC protective clothing. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998;77(1-2):139-48. doi: 10.1007/s004210050312. PubMed 9459534 ↗
  • Cheung SS, McLellan TM. Comparison of short-term aerobic training and high aerobic power on tolerance to uncompensable heat stress. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Jul;70(7):637-43. PubMed 10416998 ↗
  • Cheung SS, McLellan TM, Tenaglia S. The thermophysiology of uncompensable heat stress. Physiological manipulations and individual characteristics. Sports Med. 2000 May;29(5):329-59. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200029050-00004. PubMed 10840867 ↗
  • Coehoorn CJ, Neary JP, Krigolson OE, Service TW, Stuart-Hill LA. Firefighter salivary cortisol responses following rapid heat stress. J Therm Biol. 2022 Aug;108:103305. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103305. Epub 2022 Aug 7. PubMed 36031202 ↗
  • Coehoorn CJ, Patrick Neary J, Krigolson OE, Stuart-Hill LA. Firefighter pre-frontal cortex oxygenation and hemodynamics during rapid heat stress. Brain Res. 2023 Jan 1;1798:148156. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2022.148156. Epub 2022 Nov 4. PubMed 36343724 ↗
  • Colburn D, Russo L, Burkard R, Hostler D. Firefighter protective clothing and self contained breathing apparatus does not alter balance testing using a standard sensory organization test or motor control test in healthy, rested individuals. Appl Ergon. 2019 Oct;80:187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 Jun 18. PubMed 31280804 ↗
  • Ftaiti F, Grelot L, Coudreuse JM, Nicol C. Combined effect of heat stress, dehydration and exercise on neuromuscular function in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 Jan-Feb;84(1-2):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s004210000339. PubMed 11394259 ↗
  • Gagge AP, Stolwijk JA, Hardy JD. Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses at various ambient temperatures. Environ Res. 1967 Jun;1(1):1-20. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(67)90002-3. No abstract available. PubMed 5614624 ↗
  • Games KE, Winkelmann ZK, McGinnis KD, McAdam JS, Pascoe DD, Sefton JM. Functional Performance of Firefighters After Exposure to Environmental Conditions and Exercise. J Athl Train. 2020 Jan;55(1):71-79. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-75-18. Epub 2019 Dec 26. PubMed 31876454 ↗
  • Hewett TE, Ford KR, Hoogenboom BJ, Myer GD. Understanding and preventing acl injuries: current biomechanical and epidemiologic considerations - update 2010. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Dec;5(4):234-51. PubMed 21655382 ↗
  • Lopes TJA, Simic M, Myer GD, Ford KR, Hewett TE, Pappas E. The Effects of Injury Prevention Programs on the Biomechanics of Landing Tasks: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1492-1499. doi: 10.1177/0363546517716930. Epub 2017 Jul 31. PubMed 28759729 ↗
  • Nascimento LR, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Souza RB, Resende RA. Hip and Knee Strengthening Is More Effective Than Knee Strengthening Alone for Reducing Pain and Improving Activity in Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Jan;48(1):19-31. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7365. Epub 2017 Oct 15. PubMed 29034800 ↗
  • McCallister E, Flower D. Can the forward-step-down test be used reliably in the clinical setting to assess movement changes resulting from maximal exertion? A pilot study. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. 2020; 18(4).
  • Nybo L, Nielsen B. Hyperthermia and central fatigue during prolonged exercise in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Sep;91(3):1055-60. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.3.1055. PubMed 11509498 ↗
  • Orr R, Simas V, Canetti E, Schram B. A Profile of Injuries Sustained by Firefighters: A Critical Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 16;16(20):3931. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203931. PubMed 31623104 ↗
  • Park KM, Cynn HS, Choung SD. Musculoskeletal predictors of movement quality for the forward step-down test in asymptomatic women. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(7):504-10. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4073. Epub 2013 Jun 11. PubMed 23756380 ↗
  • Periard JD, Eijsvogels TMH, Daanen HAM. Exercise under heat stress: thermoregulation, hydration, performance implications, and mitigation strategies. Physiol Rev. 2021 Oct 1;101(4):1873-1979. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00038.2020. Epub 2021 Apr 8. PubMed 33829868 ↗
  • Powers CM. The influence of abnormal hip mechanics on knee injury: a biomechanical perspective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Feb;40(2):42-51. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3337. PubMed 20118526 ↗
  • van Melick N, Meddeler BM, Hoogeboom TJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MWG, van Cingel REH. How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS One. 2017 Dec 29;12(12):e0189876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189876. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29287067 ↗
  • Wohlgemuth K, Sekiguchi Y, Mota J. Overexertion and heat stress in the fire service: a new conceptual framework. Am J Ind Med. 2023 Aug;66(8):705-709. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23482. Epub 2023 Apr 16. PubMed 37062940 ↗
  • Coehoorn, C. J., Stuart-Hill, L. A., Abimbola, W., Neary, J. P., & Krigolson, O. E. Firefighter neural function and decision-making following rapid heat stress. Fire Safety Journal, 2020; 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103240
  • Games, K. E., Winkelmann, Z. K., & Eberman, L. E. Physical Exertion Diminishes Static and Dynamic Balance in Firefighters. International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training. 2020; 25(6), 318-322. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijatt.2019-0063
  • Gokeler A, Welling W, Zaffagnini S, Seil R, Padua D. Development of a test battery to enhance safe return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jan;25(1):192-199. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4246-3. Epub 2016 Jul 16. PubMed 27423208 ↗
  • Claiborne TL, Timmons MK, Pincivero DM. Test-retest reliability of cardinal plane isokinetic hip torque and EMG. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009 Oct;19(5):e345-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Oct 8. PubMed 18845450 ↗
  • Brent JL, Myer GD, Ford KR, Paterno MV, Hewett TE. The effect of sex and age on isokinetic hip-abduction torques. J Sport Rehabil. 2013 Feb;22(1):41-6. doi: 10.1123/jsr.22.1.41. Epub 2012 Jun 18. PubMed 22715125 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2025 to primary completion in Nov 2025, 10 months.

Of 75 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Heat Stress Disorders, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 27. This study's 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 75 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 29, 2024
First posted
Jun 5, 2024
StartActual
Jan 7, 2025
Primary completionActual
Nov 7, 2025
CompletionActual
Nov 7, 2025
Last update
Mar 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06442956
Lead sponsor
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 5, 2024
Start date
Jan 7, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 7, 2025
Completion
Nov 7, 2025
Last update
Mar 30, 2026

Study contacts

Erin McCallister, DPT
principal investigator · LSUHSC-Shreveport

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion