ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06399302PROMISEUpdated Aug 7, 2026

Prospective Multicenter Research on Donor and Recipient Management Strategies to Improve Lung Transplant Outcomes

An observational study in Lung Transplant; Complications, Lung Transplant; Infection or Inflammation and Lung Transplant Rejection, sponsored by Duke University. Recruiting at 19 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.

Sponsored by Duke University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,600
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project aims to collect detailed clinical data, blood samples, and patient-reported outcomes from 2,600 lung transplant candidates, donors, and recipients at Lung Transplant Centers. The goal is to create a robust resource for various research objectives, including studying the impact of variations in donor and medical practices on clinical outcomes. The project also seeks to identify serum biomarkers associated with or predictive of specific post-transplant complications and conditions.

Read the detailed description

This is an observational, prospective, multicenter cohort study of 2,600 lung transplant donors and adult (18 years and older) lung transplant candidates and recipients that will collect longitudinal clinical data, and serial biological (blood) specimens and PROs to support a broad range of clinical and translational future research. Data and biospecimens will be rigorously collected and monitored to ensure high quality future studies that will address unmet needs and optimal management at each stage of the transplant journey from listing, to donor selection, to postoperative management. Subjects are recruited to the study either prior to undergoing lung transplant at the time of listing or within 30 days of having undergone a lung transplant at one of the enrolling centers.

The study design will generally follow the SOC practices at each center to minimize additional research related visits. Participants will follow the SOC transplant protocols at each site. Every attempt will be made by the site to collect study data and research specimens from participants at the time of SOC visits. Participation in this study will include scheduled data extraction or data transfers at specified time intervals, serial prospective blood collection (including plasma, serum), recipient DNA sample collection (with donor DNA sample collection optional), and PRO measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Transplant; Complications
  • Lung Transplant; Infection or Inflammation
  • Lung Transplant Rejection
  • Lung Transplant Failure
03

In context

Infections

2,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 364 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,600 is above the median of 300 across 685 observational studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,063 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 167 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Lung transplant donors and adult (18 years and up) lung transplant candidates and recipients

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Able to understand and provide
  2. ≥ 18 years of age at the time of written informed consent
  3. Anticipated listing or listed for a single or bilateral cadaveric donor lung transplant or having received a lung transplant within 30 days

    • Participants undergoing repeat lung transplantation or multi-organ transplantation are eligible if they meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unwillingness of a participant or legally authorized representative (LAR) to give written or comply with study protocol
  2. Pregnancy or plans to become pregnant
  3. Past or current medical problems or findings from physical examination or laboratory testing, which, in the opinion of the investigator, may pose additional risks from participation in the study, may interfere with the participant's ability to comply with study requirements or that may impact the quality or interpretation of the data obtained from the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,600 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Lung transplant donors and recipients

    Lung transplant donors and adult (18 years and up) lung transplant candidates and recipients

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants enrolled and critical variable completeness

    To collect detailed clinical data, blood samples (including DNA), and PROs in 2,600 lung transplant candidates, donors, and recipients across the participating LTC centers to create a robust resource that will support a broad range of additional future clinical and translational research objectives

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. Number of PROs collected per patient

    To collect clinical data and PROs that will specifically support future research studies to determine how variation in donor, surgical, or medical management practices across the participating LTC centers are associated with specific differences in relevant clinical outcomes such as PGD, AR, AMR, ALAD, post-transplant infections, PROs including health-related quality of life, or one-year survival.

    Time frame: 3 years

  3. Number of specimens per participant collected

    To collect clinical data and biosamples that will specifically support future research studies to identify serum biomarkers that are associated with or predict the development of PGD, AR, AMR, ALAD, or CLAD.

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

19 of 19 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — After the study is completed, information about the study, including study data, will be submitted to the NIH data repository. NHLBI's BioData Catalyst will be used for data, and BioLINCC will be used for biosample deposition after study completion.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Data from each cycle of an examination or follow-up component are prepared by the DCC and sent to the NHLBI Program Officer for distribution no later than 3 years after the completion of each examination or follow-up cycle or 2 years after the baseline, follow-up, genetic, ancillary study, or other data set is finalized within the study for analysis for use in publication, whichever comes first.

Access criteria: The overall governance of the protocol is under the guidance of the NHLBI and the steering committee, composed of members of the DCC and UO1 site representatives. Future studies using these sample will be governed by an ancillary committee of the steering committee. In addition, further analysis using this data may occur via ancillary studies that are submitted separately for IRB review. https://biodatacatalyst.nhlbi.nih.gov/ https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/home/

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 33 months after the start.

Of 257 non-industry observational studies under Infections, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 79. This study's planned 33 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 295 studies reached it within 35 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 67.

Infections covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 1, 2024
First posted
May 3, 2024
StartActual
Sep 3, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Aug 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06399302
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 3, 2024
Start date
Sep 3, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2026

Study contacts

Allyn Damman
Contact
allyn.damman@duke.edu
919-259-4414
Carl Schuler, RN
Contact
carl.schuler@duke.edu
919-695-2721
Scott M Palmer, MD, MHS
principal investigator · Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine
Jason D Christie, MD, MSCE
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania
Megan L Neely, PhD
principal investigator · Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion