ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06371079Updated Nov 25, 2024Results posted

Safety and Suitability of ICL for Correction of Refractive Errors Without the Use of Dispersive OVDs

An observational study in Refractive Errors, Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism, sponsored by Loay Abdulmutalib Almusawi. Completed at 1 site in Iraq. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-25.

Sponsored by Loay Abdulmutalib Almusawi · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
448
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to test whether surgeries for lenses designed to be implanted in the eye to correct refractive error can be done without the need for using viscoelastic substances that are used routinely nowadays to make it easier to introduce them inside the human eye and protect the inside of the eye during the operation.

The main question it aims to answer is that is it safe to do the surgery without using them? to answer this question researchers will access recorded data of patients that underwent refractive surgeries in a private clinic since 2017 and compare them as two groups: those who underwent the traditional procedures and those who had it without the use of dispersive viscoelastics in regard to their vision before and after surgery, their ocular pressure and biomicroscopic analysis of the inside of their corneas before and after surgery.

Read the detailed description

Records of patients that had undergone ICL implantation surgery in Al-Ferdows private eye hospital in Baghdad between 2017 and 2023 were accessed. Two groups of patients were identified, for the first group the ICL was implanted with the use of both dispersive and cohesive OVDs (traditional OVD group) and for the second one a novel method of implantation was used without utilizing dispersive OVD (reduced OVD) group. Both types of surgery were done by the same surgeon and in the same settings. The operative notes of the OVD group were as follows: under topical anesthesia if the ICL is toric, manual corneal marking is done in the sitting position using pendular marker. After loading of the ICL, two-step clear corneal main incision 2.8 mm in width with a bit long track of 1.5-2 mm to enhance its valve action was fashioned. Intracameral injection of dispersive OVD. The ICL was implanted with mouth-to-mouth technique. Anterior chamber reformation with cohesive OVD, then haptics are gently pushed behind the iris using an olive-tipped manipulator, ensuring alignment to proper axis in case of toric ICL, otherwise spherical ICL is placed directly at 180° axis. After that, AC (anterior chamber) wash with irrigation/aspiration is performed then stromal hydration was done to seal the surgical wound. In the reduced OVD group, modification to the traditional method involved omitting the step of dispersive OVD injection and instead utilizing Intracameral injection of 1:1 mixture of 1:1000 adrenaline and 2% lidocaine in an overfilling manner. All other surgical steps are performed in an identical manner.

The study was ethically approved by the institutional review committee at the respective hospital and a similar committee at the college of medicine of university of Basrah according to the local guidelines and protocols. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before the surgery. The study followed tenets of declaration of Helsinki.

For both groups, records involving preoperative and postoperative assessments such as uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, refractive error quantification both objectively utilizing an autorefractometer autorefractor Nidek ARK 1 (Nidek Inc, Gamagori, Japan) and subjectively as manifest refraction, clinical slit-lamp examination notes, intraocular pressure with non-contact air puff tonometer Topcon CT-1P (Topcon Inc., Tokyo, Japan), AC depth assessment by Pentacam Scheimpflug (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH Inc., Wetzlar, Germany), specular microscopy study of corneal endothelial cells (endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation (CV) and hexagonality) using Topcon SP-1p Specular Microscope (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), were accessed and analyzed using the latest software in SPSS. Patients with missing or incomplete data were excluded from the study. Exclusion criteria also included patients with severe ocular surface disease, unstable refraction, glaucoma, cataract, retinal detachment and uveitis. Unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the two groups according to fulfilled statistical assumptions. Significance was considered at P value less than 0.05.

02

Conditions studied

  • Refractive Errors
  • Myopia
  • Myopic Astigmatism
  • Hypermetropia

Keywords

  • refractive errors
  • myopia
  • hypermetropia
  • astigmatism
  • refractive surgery
  • ICL
  • ophthalmic viscosurgical device
03

In context

Refractive Errors

420 studies on the registry are indexed under Refractive Errors; 59 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 448 is above the median of 150 across 108 observational studies indexed under Refractive Errors.

Browse Refractive Errors studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Loay Abdulmutalib Almusawi as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Records of patients that had undergone ICL implantation surgery in Al-Ferdows private eye hospital in Baghdad between 2017 and 2023 were accessed. Two groups of patients were identified, for the first group the ICL was implanted with the use of both dispersive and cohesive OVDs (traditional OVD group) and for the second one, a novel method of implantation was used without utilizing dispersive OVD (reduced OVD) group.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with refractive errors and stable refraction seeking refractive surgery who are fit for phakic IOL (intraocular lens) implantation and having reasonable improvement of visual acuity with refractive correction.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with severe ocular surface disease, unstable refraction, glaucoma, cataract, retinal detachment and uveitis.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
448 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Traditional OVD group

    In this group of patients, the ICL was implanted utilizing both cohesive and dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device.

    Device: phakic intraocular lens implantation traditional

  • Reduced OVD group

    In this group of patients, the ICL was implanted with the use of cohesive OVD only.

    Device: phakic intraocular lens implantation reduced OVD

Interventions

  • Devicephakic intraocular lens implantation traditional

    patients with refractive errors undergo surgical implantation of a lens inside the eye (implantable collamer lens or ICL) to correct these refractive errors. The procedure is done with help of use of both cohesive and dispersive OVD

    Also known as: ICL implantation traditional, Intraocular refractive surgery

  • Devicephakic intraocular lens implantation reduced OVD

    patients with refractive errors undergo surgical implantation of a lens inside the eye (implantable collamer lens or ICL) to correct these refractive errors. The procedure is done with help of use of only cohesive OVD without using dispersive OVD.

    Also known as: ICL implantation reduced OVD, Intraocular refractive surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Unaided Visual Acuity After the Procedure

    visual acuity (vision of the patient) without use of any glasses measured using LogMar charts. This measure has no specified units

    Time frame: 1-2 years after the surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intraocular Pressure Postoperatively

    intraocular pressure in mmHg as measured by non-contact airpuff tonometer Topcon CT-1P (Topcon Inc., Tokyo, Japan). intraocular pressure is measured in millimeters of mercury

    Time frame: first day, first week and first month after the procedure

  2. Specular Microscopy Parameter: Endothelial Cell Density

    defined as the number of corneal endothelial cells per square millimeter of area, measured using the automated machine from Topcon SP-1P (Topcon Inc, Tokyo, Japan)

    Time frame: 1-2 years after the surgery

  3. Specular Microscopy Parameter: Endothelial Cells Hexagonality

    defined as the percentage of endothelial cells having 6 borders and shaped like a hexagon. this measure reflects the overall health of the endothelial cells and decreased hexagonality below 58-60% indicates corneal enodthelial pleomorphism, also measured using the automated machine from Topcon SP-1P (Topcon Inc, Tokyo, Japan)

    Time frame: 1-2 years after the surgery

  4. Specular Microscopy Parameter: Coefficient of Variation of Corneal Endothelial Cells

    The standard deviation of the mean cell area divided by the mean cell area gives the coefficient of variation, a unitless number that is normally less than 0.30. it reflects the health of endothelial cells and measured using the automated machine from Topcon SP-1P (Topcon Inc, Tokyo, Japan).

    Time frame: 1-2 years after the surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Postoperative Complications

    such as glaucoma, cataract, persistent uveitis, macular edema, endophthalmitis..etc.

    Time frame: any time post op within the maximum 2 years follow up period

07

Results

Posted Nov 25, 2024

Participant flow

Data from all patients that had undergone ICL implantation surgery for the correction of refractive errors in Al-Ferdows private eye hospital in Baghdad between 2017 and 2023 were accessed.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTraditional OVD GroupReduced OVD Group
Started134314
Completed4667
Not completed88247
Withdrew: Missing data88247

Outcome measures

PrimaryUnaided Visual Acuity After the Procedure

visual acuity (vision of the patient) without use of any glasses measured using LogMar charts. This measure has no specified units

Time frame:
1-2 years after the surgery
Reported as:
Mean · LogMar vision
Unaided Visual Acuity After the Procedure
LogMar visionTraditional OVD GroupReduced OVD Group
Unaided Visual Acuity After the Procedure0.264 ± 0.170.227 ± 0.12
SecondaryIntraocular Pressure Postoperatively

intraocular pressure in mmHg as measured by non-contact airpuff tonometer Topcon CT-1P (Topcon Inc., Tokyo, Japan). intraocular pressure is measured in millimeters of mercury

Time frame:
first day, first week and first month after the procedure
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Intraocular Pressure Postoperatively
mmHgTraditional OVD GroupReduced OVD Group
Intraocular Pressure Postoperatively17.44 ± 4.4617.80 ± 4.58
SecondarySpecular Microscopy Parameter: Endothelial Cell Density

defined as the number of corneal endothelial cells per square millimeter of area, measured using the automated machine from Topcon SP-1P (Topcon Inc, Tokyo, Japan)

Time frame:
1-2 years after the surgery
Reported as:
Mean · cells per square millimeter
Specular Microscopy Parameter: Endothelial Cell Density
cells per square millimeterTraditional OVD GroupReduced OVD Group
Specular Microscopy Parameter: Endothelial Cell Density2785.4 ± 417.12851.0 ± 305.1
SecondarySpecular Microscopy Parameter: Endothelial Cells Hexagonality

defined as the percentage of endothelial cells having 6 borders and shaped like a hexagon. this measure reflects the overall health of the endothelial cells and decreased hexagonality below 58-60% indicates corneal enodthelial pleomorphism, also measured using the automated machine from Topcon SP-1P (Topcon Inc, Tokyo, Japan)

Time frame:
1-2 years after the surgery
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of hexagonal cells
Specular Microscopy Parameter: Endothelial Cells Hexagonality
percentage of hexagonal cellsTraditional OVD GroupReduced OVD Group
Specular Microscopy Parameter: Endothelial Cells Hexagonality58.69 ± 10.4357.93 ± 9.26
SecondarySpecular Microscopy Parameter: Coefficient of Variation of Corneal Endothelial Cells

The standard deviation of the mean cell area divided by the mean cell area gives the coefficient of variation, a unitless number that is normally less than 0.30. it reflects the health of endothelial cells and measured using the automated machine from Topcon SP-1P (Topcon Inc, Tokyo, Japan).

Time frame:
1-2 years after the surgery
Reported as:
Mean · uniteless
Specular Microscopy Parameter: Coefficient of Variation of Corneal Endothelial Cells
unitelessTraditional OVD GroupReduced OVD Group
Specular Microscopy Parameter: Coefficient of Variation of Corneal Endothelial Cells27.37 ± 3.7629.64 ± 3.85
Other pre-specifiedPostoperative Complications

such as glaucoma, cataract, persistent uveitis, macular edema, endophthalmitis..etc.

Time frame:
any time post op within the maximum 2 years follow up period

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over within one to two years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Traditional OVD Group0/46 (0%)0/46 (0%)1/46 (2.2%)
Reduced OVD Group0/67 (0%)0/67 (0%)0/67 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTraditional OVD GroupReduced OVD Group
GlaucomaEye disorders1/460/67

Baseline characteristics

this involves all participants with complete data

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Traditional OVD GroupReduced OVD GroupTotal
Mean32.04 ± 7.3929.07 ± 8.0430.23 ± 7.90
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(eyes)Traditional OVD GroupReduced OVD GroupTotal
Female5679135
Male224264
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Traditional OVD GroupReduced OVD GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White4667113
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Traditional OVD GroupReduced OVD GroupTotal
Iraq4667113
Anterior Chamber Depth
Anterior Chamber Depth(Millimeter)Traditional OVD GroupReduced OVD GroupTotal
Mean3.279 ± 0.2993.308 ± 0.2413.297 ± 0.265
Endothelial Cell Density
Endothelial Cell Density(cells per square millimeter)Traditional OVD GroupReduced OVD GroupTotal
Mean2793.75 ± 310.62904.56 ± 307.42861.47 ± 312.6
Corneal endothelial coefficient of variation
Corneal endothelial coefficient of variation(unitless)Traditional OVD GroupReduced OVD GroupTotal
Mean29.6 ± 4.429.6 ± 3.929.6 ± 4.1
Corneal endothelial cells hexagonality
Corneal endothelial cells hexagonality(percentage)Traditional OVD GroupReduced OVD GroupTotal
Mean58.22 ± 10.5558.30 ± 9.7758.27 ± 10.07

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Al-Ferdows private eye hospital
    Baghdad, Iraq
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Peng M, Tang Q, Zhao L, Khan MA, Lin D. Safety of implantable Collamer lens implantation without ophthalmic viscosurgical device: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20691. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020691. PubMed 32541520 ↗
  • Zhang Z, Niu L, Zhao J, Miao H, Chen Z, Shen Y, Chen X, Ye Y, Wang X, Zhou X. Safety of EVO ICL Implantation With an Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device-Free Technique in the Early 24 h After Surgery. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 17;8:764653. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.764653. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34869472 ↗
  • Qin Q, Bao L, He Z, Chen F, Zhu D, Zhang S, Zhang W, Liu Y, Gao R, Xie Z. Pure ICL Implantation: A Novel Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device-Free Method. J Ophthalmol. 2021 Oct 6;2021:7363267. doi: 10.1155/2021/7363267. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34659826 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 25, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06371079
Lead sponsor
Loay Abdulmutalib Almusawi
Responsible party
Loay Abdulmutalib Almusawi (Ophthalmology Lecturer, University of Basrah) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 17, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 22, 2024
Completion
Aug 22, 2024
Results posted
Nov 25, 2024
Last update
Nov 25, 2024

Study contacts

Sohaib A Mahmood, FIBMS
study chair · Ibn Al-Haithem eye teaching hospital
Loay A Almusawi, FIBMS
study director · University of Basrah

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion