ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06215079Updated Jan 22, 2024

Investigation of the Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients Developing Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1 in the Upper Extremity During the Subacute-Chronic Period After Ischemic Stroke

An interventional study of The Magstim Rapid2 Plus Magnetic Stimulator (Magstim, Whitland, Dyfed, UK) and Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-22.

Sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2024, 2 years 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 14 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Turkey — 7 open to participants now, 7 under way, none of them phase 3. Complex Regional Pain Syndromes · Turkey.

Planned enrollment
6th of 10
45 · median 48
Started
2023
with 1 other
No phase
10 of 14
6 open now
Registered
3rd of 14
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 14
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Among the 14 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Turkey, this one is the 6th largest by planned enrollment of the 10 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2023, is one of 10 with no phase, and was the 3rd registered.

Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

206 studies on the registry are indexed under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes; 55 are open to participants now.

Browse Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 14 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Turkey are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

1 more — sign in →

All 7 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Turkey have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Turkey →

Who these studies take

Of the 39 Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies recruiting now, 17 (44%) set no upper age limit and 16 (41%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 5 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 80 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 14 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Turkey, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The aim of our study is to investigate transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a treatment option in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, disseminate it to a broader patient population, and simultaneously demonstrate its applicability in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome using a novel frequency matching.

Read the detailed description

After ischemic stroke in the subacute to chronic period, 45 patients developing complex regional pain syndrome in the upper extremity will be divided into three groups: those receiving combined rTMS with conventional rehabilitation (occupational therapy and transcutaneous electrical stimulation for pain), those receiving sham rTMS with conventional rehabilitation, and those undergoing only conventional rehabilitation. The TMS group is planned to include 15 patients, the sham group 15 patients, and the group included in the conventional rehabilitation program only will also consist of 15 patients.

03

Conditions studied

  • Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

Keywords

  • complex regional pain syndrome
  • transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • ischemic stroke
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Clinical diagnosis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Diagnosis of ischemic stroke

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Epilepsy Pregnancy Cardiac Pacemaker, Brain pacemaker, Cochlear Implants

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    active transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients with complex regional pain syndrome

    The intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) intensity for patients, applied under doctor supervision for a total of 5 days over one week (from Monday to Friday), will be set at 70% of the resting motor threshold. Stimulation will consist of bursts at a frequency of 50 Hz, with 3 bursts every 10 seconds, each burst lasting 2 seconds, totaling 600 bursts. Subsequently, the resting motor threshold will be adjusted to 80%, and a total of 2000 bursts will be delivered at a frequency of 10 Hz, repeated every 30 seconds, each lasting 10 seconds.

    Device: The Magstim Rapid2 Plus Magnetic Stimulator (Magstim, Whitland, Dyfed, UK)

  • Sham comparator
    sham transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke patients with complex regional pain syndrome

    Similar protocol will be applied and sham transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment will be given with a sham coil to the sham group.

    Device: Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation

  • Placebo comparator
    conventional rehabilitation program in stroke patients with complex regional pain syndrome

    Only a conventional rehabilitation program consisting of discontinuous ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and contrast bath, formed by 5 sessions, will be applied to this group.

    Device: conventional rehabilitation program

Interventions

  • DeviceThe Magstim Rapid2 Plus Magnetic Stimulator (Magstim, Whitland, Dyfed, UK)

    Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method that modulates the cortical excitability of the targeted motor area. While single-pulse TMS is generally used to explore the functioning of the brain, repetitive TMS is employed to induce lasting changes in brain activity. High-frequency rTMS leads to an increase in excitability in the motor cortex, whereas low-frequency application results in inhibition of motor cortical excitability. Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) is a form of rTMS that can be delivered continuously (cTBS) or intermittently (iTBS), thus modulating the excitability of corticospinal neurons beneath the stimulation area to either decrease or increase. rTMS is a growing research area in pain management, proven to be a safe and well-tolerated method. Studies have shown that rTMS applied to the motor cortex is a promising treatment method for chronic pain

  • DeviceSham transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Patients in the control group will receive sham transcranial magnetic stimulation with sham coil for 35 minutes a day, 5 sessions in total, together with conventional rehabilitation.

  • Deviceconventional rehabilitation program

    Patients will receive 5 minutes of continuous ultrasound (1MHz, 2W/cm2, 1:4)), followed by a 20-minute contrast bath, and 15 minutes of TENS (frequency: 100 Hz; pulse duration: 50-100 ms; and amplitude adjusted to avoid discomfort or muscle contraction to the patient).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    A 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) has been used to objectively assess widespread body pain in patients. Participants use this scale to determine the intensity of their pain. While 0 represents no pain, 10 indicates the most severe pain experienced by the individual.

    Time frame: Before the treatment, At the end of the treatment (1 week), Four weeks after the treatment

  2. Brunnstrom's Hemiplegia Recovery Staging

    According to Brunnstrom, the stages of recovery in patients developing paralysis due to stroke progress as follows: Stage 1, where muscles are completely flaccid; Stage 2, the emergence of muscle synergies; Stage 3, the peak of involuntary movements; Stage 4, a decrease in involuntary movements and the initiation of voluntary movements; Stage 5, the appearance of more coordinated movements; Stage 6, the disappearance of spasms and the observation of fine joint movements, approaching near-complete recovery; Stage 7, where all functions return to normal.

    Time frame: Before the treatment, At the end of the treatment (1 week), Four weeks after the treatment

  3. Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QoL)

    The SS-QoL is an instrument specifically used to assess health-related QoL among individuals who experienced stroke. It has 49 items in 12 domains, varying from 49 to 245 points, with responses varying from 1 to 5 points. Higher values indicate better health-related QoL.

    Time frame: Before the treatment, At the end of the treatment (1 week), Four weeks after the treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment

    It assesses the upper extremity in three parts: shoulder-elbow-forearm (upper part of the arm), wrist, and hand, allowing for the evaluation of reflex activity, synergy patterns, and voluntary movement. The maximum score for the upper part of the arm is 36 points. Wrist assessment is scored out of 10 points, evaluating stability at different angles, joint range of motion, and complex movements. The maximum total score for upper extremity assessment using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale is 66 points.

    Time frame: Before treatment (initial), at the end, four weeks after treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gaertner M, Kong JT, Scherrer KH, Foote A, Mackey S, Johnson KA. Advancing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Methods for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: An Open-Label Study of Paired Theta Burst and High-Frequency Stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2018 Jun;21(4):409-416. doi: 10.1111/ner.12760. Epub 2018 Mar 4. PubMed 29504190 ↗
  • Chang MC, Kwak SG, Park D. The effect of rTMS in the management of pain associated with CRPS. Transl Neurosci. 2020 Sep 28;11(1):363-370. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2020-0120. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33335776 ↗
  • Nardone R, Brigo F, Holler Y, Sebastianelli L, Versace V, Saltuari L, Lochner P, Trinka E. Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies in complex regional pain syndrome type I: A review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2018 Feb;137(2):158-164. doi: 10.1111/ane.12852. Epub 2017 Oct 3. PubMed 28971481 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2024, 5 months after the start.

Of 64 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 65 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 9, 2024
First posted
Jan 22, 2024
StartActual
Nov 15, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Apr 15, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 15, 2024
Last update
Jan 22, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06215079
Responsible party
Özlem Yücealp (Research Assistant in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 22, 2024
Start date
Nov 15, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 22, 2024

Study contacts

Hüma Bölük Şenlikçi Associate Professor
Contact
humaboluk@gmail.com
+905370630777
Özlem Yücealp Ali Medical Doctor
Contact
ozlem.yucealp@gmail.com
+905318491996

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion