ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07640243Updated Jun 10, 2026

Sedation Methods in Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage: Procedure Quality and Recovery

An interventional study of Remifentanil and Ketamine in Fragility, Biliary Obstruction and Cholangitis, sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-10.

Sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
98
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective, randomized, single-center study aims to evaluate and compare two different sedation and analgesia regimens used during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) procedures. A total of 96 adult patients undergoing elective PTBD or biliary stenting will be randomized to receive either propofol-remifentanil or propofol-ketamine sedation. The primary outcome is recovery time assessed using the Modified Aldrete Score. Secondary outcomes include procedure quality, pain scores, patient and operator satisfaction, hemodynamic stability, and the incidence of sedation-related adverse events. The study is designed to determine the optimal sedation strategy for PTBD, particularly in fragile and elderly patient populations.

Read the detailed description

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is a therapeutic procedure commonly performed in patients with biliary obstruction when surgical intervention or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is not feasible. These patients frequently present with advanced age, malignancy, cholangitis, and significant comorbidities, making them particularly vulnerable to sedation-related complications.

Procedural sedation and analgesia are commonly used during interventional radiology procedures to ensure patient comfort, immobility, and procedural success. However, inadequate sedation may result in patient movement, increased anxiety, procedural failure, and complications, whereas excessive sedation may lead to hemodynamic instability, respiratory depression, and delayed recovery, especially in frail patients.

In this study, two commonly used sedation regimens-propofol combined with remifentanil and propofol combined with ketamine-will be compared. Both regimens are routinely used in non-operating room anesthesia settings in our institution. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two groups. Standard monitoring will be applied, including non-invasive blood pressure, electrocardiography, and pulse oximetry, with supplemental oxygen administered via nasal cannula.

Sedation depth will be targeted to a Ramsay Sedation Score of 3-4 and assessed every five minutes during the procedure. Hemodynamic parameters, oxygen saturation, pain scores, recovery time, and adverse events such as hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxia, nausea, vomiting, and airway interventions will be recorded. Recovery will be evaluated using the Modified Aldrete Score at two-minute intervals until adequate recovery is achieved.

The primary objective of the study is to compare recovery times between the two sedation regimens. Secondary objectives include comparison of pain intensity, patient and operator satisfaction, total drug consumption, procedural tolerance, and incidence of adverse events. The findings of this study aim to contribute to safer and more effective sedation strategies for PTBD procedures in high-risk patient populations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fragility
  • Biliary Obstruction
  • Cholangitis
  • Malignancy

Keywords

  • FRAGILITY
  • Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage
  • SEDATION
  • KETAMINE
  • REMİFENTANIL
03

In context

Cholangitis

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholangitis; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 98 is close to the median of 100 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Cholangitis.

Browse Cholangitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent is the lead sponsor of 443 studies on the registry; 111 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Scheduled for elective percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and/or biliary stenting
  • II-IV
  • Fasting time of at least 6 hours prior to the procedure
  • Ability to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide or to complete study assessments (e.g., Ramsay Sedation Scale, FRAIL scale, Numeric Rating Scale)
  • Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Clinical diagnosis of demantia
  • Known allergy or to propofol, remifentanil, ketamine, ondansetron, or deksketoprofen
  • Grade 3-4 aortic, mitral, or tricuspid valve disease
  • Advanced or decompensated heart failure ( \<25%)
  • Emergency procedures
  • Refusal to participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
98 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Propofol-Remifentanil

    Participants received intravenous propofol 0.5 mg/kg followed by a continuous intravenous remifentanil infusion initiated at 0.10-0.18 mcg/kg/min during the procedure. The remifentanil infusion rate was adjusted within the specified range according to clinical response to maintain adequate sedation, analgesia, and hemodynamic stability throughout the procedure.

    Drug: Remifentanil

  • Experimental
    Propofol-Ketamine

    IParticipants received intravenous propofol 0.5 mg/kg followed by intravenous ketamine 0.3 mg/kg. Additional intravenous ketamine 5 mg was administered every 5 minutes as needed during the procedure to maintain the target sedation level and hemodynamic stability.

    Drug: Ketamine

Interventions

  • Intravenous propofol combined with remifentanil infusion for procedural sedation during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage.

  • Intravenous propofol combined with ketamine bolus for procedural sedation during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recovery Time

    Time to achieve adequate recovery assessed using the Modified Aldrete Score.

    Time frame: From completion of the procedure until Modified Aldrete Score >8, assessed up to 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hemodynamic Stability

    Changes in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation during the procedure.

    Time frame: Baseline, every 5 minutes during the procedure (assessed up to 60 minutes), and immediately after the procedure.

  2. Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-procedure), immediately after recovery, and at 30 minutes post-recovery.

  3. Sedation Depth

    Sedation level assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale.

    Time frame: Every 5 minutes during the procedure, assessed up to 30 minutes.

  4. Adverse Events

    Incidence of sedation-related adverse events including hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxia, apnea, nausea, and vomiting.

    Time frame: Perioperatively and through the recovery period, assessed up to 30 minutes.

  5. Patient and Operator Satisfaction

    Patient and operator satisfaction assessed after completion of the procedure.

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2026, 3 months after the start.

Of 21 interventional studies with no phase under Cholangitis, half reached primary completion within 43 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 68. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 12, 2026
First posted
Jun 10, 2026
StartActual
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 10, 2026
Last update
Jun 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07640243
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 10, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2026
Primary completion
May 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 10, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Remifentanil · Ketamine

Start the discussion