ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07403786URIUpdated Nov 3, 2026

Urethral Resistive Index (URI): A New Parameter for Diagnosing Urethral Obstruction

An observational study in Urethral Stricture, sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Ankara City Hospital Bilkent · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Updated Nov 3, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a new, non-invasive uroflowmetry parameter called the Urethral Resistive Index (URI) for detecting urethral stricture in men. Currently, diagnosing urethral stricture often requires invasive procedures like surgery or pressure-flow studies. This research seeks to develop URI as a practical and painless screening tool that could reduce the need for such invasive interventions.

Study Procedures:

A total of 60 male participants (30 with suspected urethral stricture and 30 healthy volunteers) will be enrolled. Participants will undergo two standard, non-invasive uroflowmetry (voiding) tests. The first test is a routine natural voiding session. The second test involves a "forced voiding" (Valsalva maneuver) once the participant feels a sufficient urge to urinate again. The URI is then calculated by comparing the flow rates of these two sessions.

Goals and Benefits: The primary goal is to determine the optimal "cut-off" value of the URI that accurately identifies a surgically proven urethral stricture. By demonstrating URI's effectiveness, the study aims to expedite the diagnostic process and spare patients from unnecessary invasive tests. The procedure involves minimal risk, primarily temporary discomfort or psychological stress during the voiding tests

Read the detailed description

This methodological study is designed as a prospective, cross-sectional, and observational diagnostic accuracy study. The primary objective is to evaluate the clinical validity of the Urethral Resistive Index (URI), a novel non-invasive parameter, in the diagnosis of urethral stricture.

Study Population and Groups:

The study will include a total of 60 male participants aged between 18 and 80 years.

Stricture Group (n=30): Patients planned for surgery (urethroplasty or internal urethrotomy) due to suspected urethral stricture, where the presence of the stricture is confirmed intraoperatively.

Control Group (n=30): Healthy male volunteers without lower urinary tract symptoms, matched for age.

Methodology: The study focuses on comparing standard uroflowmetry with "forced" uroflowmetry using the Valsalva maneuver. All clinical and uroflowmetric parameters will be collected at the Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Urology Clinic.

Natural Uroflowmetry: Participants will perform a standard uroflowmetry test. Forced Uroflowmetry: After reaching sufficient bladder fullness again, participants will perform a second test using the Valsalva maneuver (forced voiding).

Calculation: The URI will be calculated using the formula:

URI= Qmax,forced/ Qmax,normal

Statistical Analysis: The diagnostic performance of the URI will be evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) will be calculated, and the optimal cut-off value for determining urethral stricture will be identified with corresponding sensitivity and specificity values. Correlation between URI and clinical symptom scores, such as the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), will also be analyzed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urethral Stricture

Browse trials for

03

In context

Urethral Stricture

72 studies on the registry are indexed under Urethral Stricture; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 175 across 11 observational studies indexed under Urethral Stricture.

Browse Urethral Stricture studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent is the lead sponsor of 443 studies on the registry; 111 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of 60 male participants, aged 18 to 80 years, recruited from the Urology Outpatient Clinic at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital. The population is divided into two distinct groups: a Stricture Group (n=30) comprising patients with suspected urethral stricture whose diagnosis is confirmed intraoperatively during scheduled surgery, and a Control Group (n=30) comprising healthy male volunteers with a similar age distribution and no lower urinary tract symptoms. Participants are selected based on their clinical presentation and willingness to undergo a specialized two-stage uroflowmetry protocol.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male participants aged between 18 and 80 years.
  • For the Stricture Group: Patients scheduled for surgery (urethroplasty or internal urethrotomy) due to suspected urethral stricture, where the diagnosis is confirmed intraoperatively.
  • For the Control Group: Healthy male volunteers without any lower urinary tract symptoms.
  • Voluntary signing of the Form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Voiding volume less than 150 mL.
  • Causes of obstruction other than stricture, such as Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).
  • Diagnosis of neurogenic bladder dysfunction or a history of neurological disease affecting bladder function.
  • Presence of severe comorbidities.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Stricture Group

    Patients with suspected urethral stricture scheduled for surgery (urethroplasty or internal urethrotomy), with the diagnosis confirmed intraoperatively.

    Diagnostic Test: Uroflowmetry with URI Calculation

  • Control Group

    Healthy male volunteers in a similar age range as the stricture group, without any lower urinary tract symptoms.

    Diagnostic Test: Uroflowmetry with URI Calculation

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testUroflowmetry with URI Calculation

    Performing natural and forced (Valsalva) uroflowmetry sessions to calculate the Urethral Resistive Index.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Urethral Resistive Index (URI)

    A novel non-invasive uroflowmetric parameter calculated to assess the resistance of the urethra during voiding. It is derived using the formula: URI=Qmax,natural/Qmax,forced.

    Time frame: At the time of the uroflowmetry procedure (Baseline)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kranse R, van Mastrigt R. Bladder outlet resistance. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1007-10. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000052693.58772.23. PubMed 12576832 ↗
  • Spyropoulos E, Galanakis I, Deligiannis D, Spyropoulou A, Kotsiris D, Panagopoulos A, Mavrikos S. Flow resistive forces index (QRF): Development and clinical applicability assessment of a novel measure of bladder outlet resistance, aiming to enhance the diagnostic performance of uroflowmetry. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2020 Sep;12(3):190-197. doi: 10.1111/luts.12301. Epub 2020 Jan 30. PubMed 31999073 ↗
  • Krukowski J, Kaluzny A, Klacz J, Piatkowska A, Matuszewski M. Evaluation of non-invasive tests as diagnostic tools in assessment of bladder outlet obstruction severity in men with anterior urethral stricture. Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(3):422-428. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.3.153.R1. Epub 2021 Jul 27. PubMed 34729232 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — To protect participant privacy and maintain data confidentiality according to local institutional regulations

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Primary completion
May 10, 2026→Feb 10, 2027
Nov 3, 2026
Study completion
Jul 10, 2026→Mar 10, 2027
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    Primary completion May 10, 2026→Feb 10, 2027
    Study completion Jul 10, 2026→Mar 10, 2027
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07403786
Responsible party
Yusuf Gökkurt (Attending Physician, Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 11, 2026
Start date
Feb 10, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 10, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 10, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Yusuf Gökkurt
Contact
yusufgokkurt@gmail.com
+90-506-791-0557

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion