ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06207591CortiComUpdated Oct 3, 2025

Investigation on the Cortical Communication System

An interventional study of ECoG (electrocorticography) sensing in Locked-in Syndrome, Neuromuscular Diseases and Brainstem Stroke, sponsored by UMC Utrecht. Recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-03.

Sponsored by UMC Utrecht · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2023; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate communication through a brain implant in people in locked-in state, i.e. people with severe paralysis and communication problems.

The main questions it aims to answer are efficient and stable control of Brain-Computer interface (BCI) functions for communication with attempted hand movements and operation of a keyword-based speech BCI.

Participants will be implanted with four electrode grids, with in total 128 electrodes, on the surface of the brain and a connector on the skull. Participation includes visits of researchers for recording and training at home, 2-3 times per week for one year. Extension of participation after one year is possible.

If successful, the participant will be able to use the BCI at home independently, without the presence of a researcher.

Read the detailed description

Locked-In Syndrome (LIS) is a neurological condition in which communication is impossible, or profoundly impaired, due to loss of speech and other motor functions, while cognition is intact. The most distressing aspect of LIS is the inability to initiate and sustain communication. Existing assistive technologies (ATs) fall short of a remedy. An effective brain-computer interface (BCI) for communication would dramatically improve quality of life for people with LIS. Electrocorticography (ECoG) with non-penetrating subdural electrodes is a promising implantable approach for BCI. In this study, the "CortiCom system" (which stands for Cortical Communication) wil be used. This system combines an implantable assembly, consisting of four small high-density (HD) ECoG grids on the hand and speech areas of the motor cortex, totalling 128-channels, and a transcutaneous pedestal connector, with an external data acquisition system. With the CortiCom system the overall hypothesis will be tested that broader and more densely spaced ECoG electrodes can better tap into the spatial detail of the organization of the sensorimotor cortex in order to expand BCI function and restore meaningful communication in LIS. Specifically, the CortiCom system will substantially increase the number and density of electrodes recording from the brain to determine whether more sophisticated control and communication can be achieved with more comprehensive and detailed spatial sampling of representations for movements of the hand/arm and of speech articulators. Clinically meaningful outcomes for people with LIS include rapid reestablishment, and stable maintenance of communication, at minimum consisting of a caregiver call-button and menu selections.

Objective:

Primary Objective 1: Demonstrate efficient and stable control of essential BCI functions (initiate BCI, call caregiver, and menu selections). Primary Objective 2: Demonstrate efficient and stable operation of a keyword-based speech BCI.

Intervention:

Participants will be implanted with an assembly consisting of HD-ECoG electrode grids over the sensorimotor cortex and a transcutaneous pedestal connector. The assembly will be connected with an external data acquisition system during recordings. During recordings, feedback about the neural signals is given via a visual display and participants are trained to employ the neural signals for fast brain-based communication. Upon adequate performance, participants can independently (i.e., without researcher involvement) train with and use the system at home for validation of performance and usability. After implantation, participation has a duration of 1 year, with a possibility of extension.

02

Conditions studied

  • Locked-in Syndrome
  • Neuromuscular Diseases
  • Brainstem Stroke
  • Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Locked-in
  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • Neurodegenerative disease
03

In context

Locked-In Syndrome

20 studies on the registry are indexed under Locked-In Syndrome; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2 is below the median of 7 across 17 interventional studies indexed under Locked-In Syndrome.

Browse Locked-In Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

UMC Utrecht is the lead sponsor of 364 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-70 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of locked-in state state or likelihood of soon progressing into LIS (within an estimated 2 years), caused by traumatic brain injury, brainstem stroke, neurodegenerative disease, neuromuscular disease or another cause
    • Current or imminent complete or incomplete tetraplegia (quadriplegia) or tetraparesis (quadriparesis)
    • Current or imminent motor-related speech impairment (dysarthria or anarthria)
  • Either receiving tracheostomy invasive ventilation, or having a stable and adequate respiratory situation without respiratory support, allowing for safe intubation, mechanical ventilation and detubation during surgery according to the involved clinicians, and, if relevant (e.g., in case of a progressive condition), in combination with a confirmed desire to receive tracheostomy invasive ventilation when that becomes necessary
  • Meeting surgical safety criteria, including surgical clearance by the study physicians
  • Meeting (neuro)psychological evaluation criteria
  • Ability to communicate reliably, such as through eye movement
  • Willingness and ability to provide
  • Lives within reasonable distance from University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Participant consents to the study and still wishes to participate at the time of the study
  • Vision and hearing largely intact

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Performance on formal neuropsychological testing that indicates a significant current or recent psychiatric disorder, cognitive or behavioral impairment, that would interfere with obtaining or fully participating in study activities
  • Medical conditions contraindicating surgery of a chronically implanted device or that could interfere with study participation (for example active infections, unexplained fever, existing scalp lesions or skin breakdown, osteomyelitis, hepatitis, any disease/disorder, epilepsy, skin disorders causing excessive skin sloughing or poor wound healing, cranioplasty, significant cardiovascular, metabolic, or renal impairments, chronic oral or intravenous use of or therapy, active cancer within the past year or requires chemotherapy, uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia within the past 3 months, hydrocephalus with or without an implanted ventricular shunt or a medical to stop anti-coagulant medications during surgery)
  • Presence of pre-surgical findings in anatomical, functional, and/or vascular neuroimaging that makes achieving implant locations too challenging or incompatible with desired risk levels
  • Inability to undergo MRI for pre-implantation evaluation, for example due to the presence of implanted devices that are incompatible with MRI, which may include pacemakers, cardiac defibrillators, spinal cord or vagal nerve stimulators, deep brain stimulators, and cochlear implants
  • Anticipated need for MRI after implantation of the CortiCom assembly
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ECoG (electrocorticography) sensing

    Use implantable ECoG-based Brain Computer interface to control assistive technology

    Device: ECoG (electrocorticography) sensing

Interventions

  • DeviceECoG (electrocorticography) sensing

    Implant electrodes and pedestal connector and use, through amplifier and decoding, for control of BCI

    Also known as: CortiCom-Utrecht assembly

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Usability of the BCI system - Accuracy

    Accuracy: \>80% sensitivity (true positive rate) for 1-command control, and 90% sensitivity and 80% classification accuracy (distinguishing between the six classes) for 6-command control

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Usability of the BCI system - speed

    Speed characters or keywords per minute

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Usability of the BCI system - subjective workload Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Subjective Workload: Visual Analogue Scale Continuous scale: Little to no effort (0) - Much effort (5). Lower numbers are better.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Usability of the BCI system - subjective workload National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX)

    Subjective Workload: National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index Scale: 21 point Likert-type scale. Lower numbers are better.

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Usability of the BCI system - user satisfaction Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS)

    User Satisfaction: Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale. Likert-type scale -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3. 3 is best result.

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. Usability of the BCI system - user satisfaction Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST)

    User Satisfaction: Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology version 2.0. Likert-type scale: Extremely dissatisfied - Dissatisfied - Slightly satisfied - Satisfied - Extremely satisfied. Extremely Satisfied is the best result.

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. Usability of the BCI system - validation

    Validation: Questionnaire to evaluate user satisfaction and ease of use of the home use software. Likert-type scale: fully disagree - disagree - neither agree or disagree - agree - fully agree - not applicable. Fully agree is the best result.

    Time frame: 1 year

  8. Degrees of Freedom of BCI Control.

    the number of different commands that are successfully decoded, or the size of the decoded vocabulary

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stability of BCI performance (electrode-tissue interaction)

    Longitudinal data of the 24-hour cycle after implantation of the impedance (in Ω). The data are fitted to determine trends and variance, over weeks, to determine improvement or deterioration of electrode-tissue interaction.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Stability of BCI performance (signal)

    Longitudinal data of the 24-hour cycle after implantation of the raw power (after wavelet transform, in arbitrary units). The data are fitted to determine trends and variance, both within 24 hrs to detect a possible circadian pattern and over weeks, to determine improvement or deterioration of signal amplitude.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Stability of BCI performance (modulation)

    Longitudinal data of the 24-hour cycle after implantation of the task-related modulation in power (correlation in r2). The data are fitted to determine trends and variance, over weeks, to determine improvement or deterioration of modulation.

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Stability of BCI performance (performance)

    Longitudinal data of the 24-hour cycle after implantation of the BCI performance (task accuracy). The data are fitted to determine trends and variance, both within 24 hrs to detect a possible circadian pattern and over weeks, to see improvement or deterioration of accuracy.

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Independent use of BCI

    Longitudinal data of independent use per day. The best result is 24h use. The data are fitted to determine trends and variance, both within 24 hrs to detect a possible circadian pattern and over weeks, to see increase or decrease of the hours of independent use.

    Time frame: 2 years

Other outcomes

  1. Assess device specifications for future application of HD ECoG-BCIs

    qualitative description on device specifications and experimental parameters, such as the specific decoder settings, for future, larger scale, application of HD ECoG-BCIs.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University Medical Center
    Utrecht, 3584CX, Netherlands
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vansteensel MJ, Leinders S, Branco MP, Crone NE, Denison T, Freudenburg ZV, Geukes SH, Gosselaar PH, Raemaekers M, Schippers A, Verberne M, Aarnoutse EJ, Ramsey NF. Longevity of a Brain-Computer Interface for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2024 Aug 15;391(7):619-626. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2314598. PubMed 39141854 ↗
  • Vansteensel MJ, Pels EGM, Bleichner MG, Branco MP, Denison T, Freudenburg ZV, Gosselaar P, Leinders S, Ottens TH, Van Den Boom MA, Van Rijen PC, Aarnoutse EJ, Ramsey NF. Fully Implanted Brain-Computer Interface in a Locked-In Patient with ALS. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 24;375(21):2060-2066. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1608085. Epub 2016 Nov 12. PubMed 27959736 ↗
  • The neural representation of fine hand movements in an individual approaching locked-in syndrome (2025) S.H. Geukes, A. Bekius, M.P. Branco, M.S.W. Verberne, A. Schippers, Z.V. Freudenburg, E.J. Aarnoutse, M.J. Vansteensel, N.E. Crone, N.F. Ramsey. 11th International BCI Meeting, Banff, Canada, DOI: 10.3217/978-3-99161-050-2-085

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — selected datasets will be available through a public repository after publication of results

Time frame: after first published results, no end date

Access criteria: Publicly available

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Dec 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2028, 57 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 1, 2023
First posted
Jan 17, 2024
StartActual
Dec 15, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2028
CompletionEst.
Sep 2029
Last update
Oct 3, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06207591
Lead sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Responsible party
Erik Aarnoutse, PhD (Study Coordinator, UMC Utrecht) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 17, 2024
Start date
Dec 15, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 3, 2025

Study contacts

Mariska J Vansteensel, PhD
Contact
neuroprothese@umcutrecht.nl
+31887555121
Erik J Aarnoutse, PhD
Contact
e.j.aarnoutse@umcutrecht.nl
+31887555123
Nick F Ramsey, PhD
principal investigator · UMC Utrecht

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion