ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07640711INTENSE-BCIUpdated Jun 11, 2026

Innovative Brain-Computer Interface for People With Spinal Cord Injury

An interventional study of ECoG (electrocorticography) sensing in Spinal Cord Injury, Tetraplegia C1-C4 and Quadriplegia, sponsored by UMC Utrecht. Recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-11.

Sponsored by UMC Utrecht · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate control of digital devices through a brain implant in people with spinal cord injury. The main question it aims to answer is efficient, independent, BCI-based control over digital devices in settings of daily living of an individual with SCI. In this project an advanced generation fully implantable BCI system will be used, the Brain InterChange (BIC) from CorTec.

Participants will be implanted with an electrode grid on the surface of the brain and an amplifier/transmitter on the skull, under the skin. Participation includes visits of researchers for recording and training at home, 1-3 times per week for one year. Extension of participation after one year is possible. If successful, the participant will be able to use the BCI at home independently, without the presence of a researcher.

Read the detailed description

Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) results in motor impairments in body parts innervated by the spinal cord below the site of the lesion. In addition to loss of leg movements, individuals with high cervical SCI experience significant impairments in arm and hand function (tetraplegia), impacting their access to digital devices, with obvious consequences for their ability to communicate, participate in society and the workforce, autonomously manage their life, and benefit from the entertainment options digital devices offer these days. Current assistive technologies (AT) for control over digital devices, such as voice control, eye-tracking, and head- or mouth-controlled devices, are often unintuitive, slow, limited in functionality, aesthetically unattractive, and they often interfere with regular movement or speech. An effective Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) would enable individuals with SCI to use movement-related neural signals to directly control digital devices, taking away the disadvantages of current AT. This would dramatically improve their quality of life.

The Brain InterChange from CorTec is an active implantable medical device for measurement of neuronal activity and electrical stimulation of the human nervous system, comprising an internal and an external unit. The internal unit consists of a small high-density ECoG grid with 32 contacts placed subdurally and a connected implantable amplifier/transmitter device that is placed subcutaneously. The external unit comprises a headpiece, for power transmission to the internal unit, a communication unit, that receives the data transmitted from the internal unit and controls the power transmission, and a USB cable, that connects the communication unit to the computer that has software to process and translate the brain data to a means of digital device control for SCI patients with custom in-house software developed during this study.

The BCI system also allows to provide users with somatosensory feedback about their motor attempts (in addition to the visual feedback), by delivering electrocortical stimulation (ECS) to the somatosensory regions of the brain. As such, the aim is to generate a more natural relation between intent (movement attempt of a body part) and effect (sensation in the same body part), which is expected to lead to fast training and accurate BCI performance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injury
  • Tetraplegia C1-C4
  • Quadriplegia
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

2,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 537 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1 is below the median of 24 across 1,633 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

UMC Utrecht is the lead sponsor of 364 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of SCI at the cervical level C4 or higher (C1-C4)
  • Complete or incomplete tetraplegia (quadriplegia) or tetraparesis (quadriparesis), i.e., level A or B at the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale
  • Meeting surgical safety criteria, including surgical clearance by the study physicians
  • Meeting (neuro)psychological evaluation criteria
  • Ability to communicate reliably, via speech or other means
  • Willingness and ability to provide .
  • Lives within reasonable distance from UMC Utrecht
  • Participant consents to the study and still wishes to participate at the time of the study.
  • Vision and hearing largely intact.
  • For candidates who are not currently receiving invasive ventilation, and who have current respiratory problems (e.g., at night), there should be a clear and confirmed desire to proceed with tracheostomy ventilation whenever that would become necessary.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a spinal cord injury with a degenerative or progressive etiology.
  • Having evident swallowing problems.
  • Having a significant current or recent anxiety disorder or depression or cognitive impairment that would interfere with obtaining or fully participating in study activities.
  • Medical conditions contraindicating surgery of a chronically implanted device or that could interfere with study participation (for example active infections, unexplained fever, existing scalp lesions or skin breakdown, osteomyelitis, hepatitis, any disease/disorder, epilepsy, skin disorders causing excessive skin sloughing or poor wound healing, cranioplasty, significant cardiovascular, metabolic, or renal impairments, chronic oral or intravenous use of or therapy, active cancer within the past year or requires chemotherapy, uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia within the past 3 months, hydrocephalus with or without an implanted ventricular shunt or a medical to stop anti-coagulant medications during surgery, or a catabolic state, or strong and frequent spasms)
  • Presence of pre-surgical findings in anatomical, functional, and/or vascular neuroimaging that makes achieving implant locations too challenging or incompatible with desired risk levels.
  • Inability to undergo MRI for pre-implantation evaluation, for example due to the presence of implanted devices that are incompatible with MRI, which may include pacemakers, cardiac defibrillators, spinal cord or vagal nerve stimulators, deep brain stimulators, and cochlear implants or devices that deliver diaphragm pacing.
  • Anticipated need for MRI after implantation of the Brain InterChange system.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1 participant (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ECoG (electrocorticography) sensing

    Use implantable ECoG-based Brain Computer interface to control digital devices

    Device: ECoG (electrocorticography) sensing

Interventions

  • DeviceECoG (electrocorticography) sensing

    Implant electrodes and amplifier/transmitter and use, through amplifier and decoding, for control of BCI

    Also known as: Brain Interchange

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness of BCI Control: Accuracy

    Accuracy: \>80% sensitivity (true positive rate) for 1-command control; 80% classification accuracy (distinguishing between multiple classes) for multi-command control; and 80% classification accuracy and the correlation between the intended and actual response for multi-command continuous control

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Efficiency of BCI control: Speed

    number of accurate selections made per minute

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Efficiency of BCI control: Subjective Workload - Visual Analogue Scale

    Subjective Workload: Visual Analogue Scale Continuous scale: Little to no effort (0) - Much effort (5). Lower numbers are better.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Efficiency of BCI control: Subjective Workload - National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index

    Subjective Workload: National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index Scale: 21 point Likert-type scale. Lower numbers are better.

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. User satisfaction Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST)

    User Satisfaction: Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology version 2.0. Likert-type scale: Extremely dissatisfied - Dissatisfied - Slightly satisfied - Satisfied - Extremely satisfied. Extremely Satisfied is the best result.

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. user satisfaction Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS)

    User Satisfaction: Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale. Likert-type scale -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3. 3 is best result.

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. Stability of BCI performance: impedance

    Longitudinally follow the electrode impedance (in Ω), to assess their stability throughout the day and across the weeks and months after implantation.

    Time frame: 1 year

  8. Stability of BCI performance: signal dynamics

    Longitudinally follow the raw signal dynamics (in µV) of neural signals, to assess their stability throughout the day and across the weeks and months after implantation.

    Time frame: 1 year

  9. Stability of BCI performance: task-related modulation

    Longitudinally follow the task-related modulation in power (in µV), to assess their stability throughout the day and across the weeks and months after implantation.

    Time frame: 1 year

  10. Effects of somatosensory feedback on BCI Training and Performance: accuracy

    Compare BCI control accuracy (in %), including variability and improvement therein before and after applying somatosensory feedback through electrocortical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex

    Time frame: 1 year

  11. Effects of somatosensory feedback on BCI Training and Performance: neural signals

    Compare neural signal changes (in µV) in the sensorimotor areas before and after applying somatosensory feedback through electrocortical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assess device specifications for future, larger-scale, application of HD ECoG-BCIs

    qualitative description on device specifications and experimental parameters, such as the specific decoder settings, for future, larger scale, application of HD ECoG-BCIs

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Validation of software for independent home-use of advanced BCIs

    Validation: Questionnaire to evaluate user satisfaction and ease of use of the home use software. Likert-type scale: fully disagree - disagree - neither agree or disagree - agree - fully agree - not applicable. Fully agree is the best result.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — selected datasets will be available through a public repository after publication of results

Time frame: after first published results, no end date

Access criteria: Publicly available

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Aug 2027, 12 months later.

Of 790 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Spinal Cord Injuries, half reached primary completion within 37 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 65. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 839 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 64.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 29, 2026
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 2028
Last update
Jun 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07640711
Lead sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Responsible party
Erik Aarnoutse, PhD (Researcher, UMC Utrecht) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 11, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 11, 2026

Study contacts

Mariska J Vansteensel, PhD
Contact
neuroprothese@umcutrecht.nl
+31887555121
Erik J Aarnoutse, PhD
Contact
e.j.aarnoutse@umcutrecht.nl
+31887555123
Nick F Ramsey, PhD
principal investigator · UMC Utrecht

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion