ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06112093Updated Oct 10, 2025

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Post-concussion Headaches

A Phase 1 interventional study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Brain Concussion, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Headache, sponsored by State University of New York - Upstate Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-10.

Primary conditionPost-Concussion SyndromeRegistry: Brain ConcussionReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Brain Concussion — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Post-Concussion Syndrome
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Post-Concussion Syndrome, a narrower term within Brain Concussion.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by State University of New York - Upstate Medical University · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2023; still recruiting 3 years later.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to examine the long-term effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, on chronic headaches following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). rTMS has been shown to be effective in reducing chronic headaches without side effects commonly seen in medications, such as sleepiness and addiction. This study uses rTMS to manage chronic headaches to improve post-concussion symptoms and reduce the economic burden due to delayed recovery. This project aims to better identify biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis and maximize recovery from mTBI.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Concussion
  • Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Headache
  • Post-Concussion Symptoms

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation
  • Neuromodulation
  • Chronic pain
  • Biomarkers
03

In context

Post-Concussion Syndrome Reclassified

141 studies on the registry are indexed under Post-Concussion Syndrome; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 52 across 114 interventional studies indexed under Post-Concussion Syndrome.

Browse Post-Concussion Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

State University of New York - Upstate Medical University is the lead sponsor of 157 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (36%) have results posted.

Compared within Post-Concussion Syndrome, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Brain Concussion. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 - 55 years old
  • mTBI with loss of consciousness for less than 30 min, initial Glasgow Coma Scale between 13 and 15, or post-traumatic amnesia for ≤ 24 hours
  • diagnosis of persistent post-traumatic headache according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) criteria
  • headache develops within 7 days after head trauma
  • headache persists for >=3 months after head trauma despite receiving standard care
  • average persistent headache intensity is >= 3/10 of the numerical rating scale (NRS) on >=3days/week
  • no evidence of radiculopathy or peripheral neuropathy on electromyography or clinical evaluation
  • no evidence of other possible causes of headaches

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of chronic headache diagnoses such as migraine, tension, or cluster headaches prior to the incidence of mTBI
  • history of other neurologic conditions with medications affecting the central nervous system
  • of receiving TMS (e.g., a history of epileptic seizure and having implants like a cardiac pacemaker or intracerebral vascular clip
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Moderate-dose rTMS

    12 sessions (1 session/day, 3 days/week for 4 weeks) of active rTMS

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS

    12 sessions (1 session/day, 3 days/week for 4 weeks) of sham rTMS will be administered at the same location and duration as the Moderate-rTMS protocol. After the study is completed, participants will be offered an opportunity to receive active rTMS.

    Device: Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

  • Active comparator
    High-dose rTMS

    24 sessions (4 sessions/day, 3 days/week for 2 weeks) of active rTMS

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

  • Active comparator
    Low-dose rTMS

    6 sessions (1 session/day, 3 days/week for 2 weeks) of active rTMS

    Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    rTMS will be used to regulate the motor cortex to reduce headaches and post-concussion symptoms.

    Also known as: Transcranial magnetic stimulation

  • DeviceSham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    Sham rTMS will be delivered by a sham coil as a comparator to the (active) rTMS. Sham rTMS will not change the brain function of the control group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Daily headache diary

    Composite headache score will be calculated as average intensity (NRS) × average frequency (episode/day) × average duration (hours/episode).

    Time frame: daily documentation throughout the treatment course (4 weeks)

  2. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

    The PROMIS questionnaires with subsections of 1) pain interference, 2) pain behavior will be used as patient-reported outcomes of pain and sleep. For all subsections, on a scale of 1 to 5, higher numbers indicate worse outcomes.

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post-treatment (completion of rTMS), 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up

  3. Protein expression

    Peripheral blood will be collected to measure protein expression

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post-treatment (completion of rTMS)

  4. Neurophysiological measures by TMS

    Neurophysiology will be measured by TMS to indicate changes in brain function.

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post-treatment (completion of rTMS)

  5. Headache impact test 6 (HIT-6)

    The HIT-6 will be used to assess the impact of headaches on one's ability to function in occupational and social lives. On a scale of 36 to 78, higher numbers indicate worse outcomes.

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post-treatment (completion of rTMS), 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up

  6. Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS)

    The change in global post-concussion symptoms will be measured by the PCSS. On a scale of 1 to 5, higher numbers indicate worse outcomes.

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post-treatment (completion of rTMS), 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up

  7. Wrist actigraphy - physical activity level

    Kinematic assessments by the wrist actigraphy will be worn to measure physical activity level.

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post-treatment (completion of rTMS)

  8. Gene expression

    Peripheral blood will be collected to measure mRNA to impute gene expression.

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post-treatment (completion of rTMS)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Wrist actigraphy - sleep quality

    Kinematic assessments by the wrist actigraphy will be worn to measure sleep quality.

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post-treatment (completion of rTMS)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Iverson GL, Gardner AJ, Terry DP, Ponsford JL, Sills AK, Broshek DK, Solomon GS. Predictors of clinical recovery from concussion: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jun;51(12):941-948. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097729. PubMed 28566342 ↗
  • De Kruijk JR, Leffers P, Menheere PP, Meerhoff S, Rutten J, Twijnstra A. Prediction of post-traumatic complaints after mild traumatic brain injury: early symptoms and biochemical markers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;73(6):727-32. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.6.727. PubMed 12438478 ↗
  • Minen MT, Boubour A, Walia H, Barr W. Post-Concussive Syndrome: a Focus on Post-Traumatic Headache and Related Cognitive, Psychiatric, and Sleep Issues. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Nov;16(11):100. doi: 10.1007/s11910-016-0697-7. PubMed 27709555 ↗
  • Bomyea J, Lang AJ, Delano-Wood L, Jak A, Hanson KL, Sorg S, Clark AL, Schiehser DM. Neuropsychiatric Predictors of Post-Injury Headache After Mild-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury in Veterans. Headache. 2016 Apr;56(4):699-710. doi: 10.1111/head.12799. Epub 2016 Mar 29. PubMed 27028095 ↗
  • Howard L, Schwedt TJ. Posttraumatic headache: recent progress. Curr Opin Neurol. 2020 Jun;33(3):316-322. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000815. PubMed 32304441 ↗
  • Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, Di Lazzaro V, Ferreri F, Fitzgerald PB, George MS, Hallett M, Lefaucheur JP, Langguth B, Matsumoto H, Miniussi C, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rothwell JC, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Walsh V, Ziemann U. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10. PubMed 25797650 ↗
  • Rossi S, Antal A, Bestmann S, Bikson M, Brewer C, Brockmoller J, Carpenter LL, Cincotta M, Chen R, Daskalakis JD, Di Lazzaro V, Fox MD, George MS, Gilbert D, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Ilmoniemi RJ, Lefaucheur JP, Leocani L, Lisanby SH, Miniussi C, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Peterchev AV, Quartarone A, Rotenberg A, Rothwell J, Rossini PM, Santarnecchi E, Shafi MM, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wassermann EM, Zangen A, Ziemann U, Hallett M; basis of this article began with a Consensus Statement from the IFCN Workshop on "Present, Future of TMS: Safety, Ethical Guidelines", Siena, October 17-20, 2018, updating through April 2020. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jan;132(1):269-306. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 24. PubMed 33243615 ↗
  • Major BP, Rogers MA, Pearce AJ. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation to quantify electrophysiological changes following concussive brain injury: a systematic review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2015 Apr;42(4):394-405. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12363. PubMed 25603731 ↗
  • Leung A, Shukla S, Fallah A, Song D, Lin L, Golshan S, Tsai A, Jak A, Polston G, Lee R. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Managing Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Headaches. Neuromodulation. 2016 Feb;19(2):133-41. doi: 10.1111/ner.12364. Epub 2015 Nov 10. PubMed 26555886 ↗
  • Leung A, Fallah A, Shukla S, Lin L, Tsia A, Song D, Polston G, Lee R. rTMS in Alleviating Mild TBI Related Headaches--A Case Series. Pain Physician. 2016 Feb;19(2):E347-54. PubMed 26815263 ↗
  • Choi GS, Kwak SG, Lee HD, Chang MC. Effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic central pain after mild traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2018 Feb 28;50(3):246-252. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2321. PubMed 29392332 ↗
  • Hess JL, Tylee DS, Barve R, de Jong S, Ophoff RA, Kumarasinghe N, Tooney P, Schall U, Gardiner E, Beveridge NJ, Scott RJ, Yasawardene S, Perera A, Mendis J, Carr V, Kelly B, Cairns M; Neurobehavioural Genetics Unit; Tsuang MT, Glatt SJ. Transcriptome-wide mega-analyses reveal joint dysregulation of immunologic genes and transcription regulators in brain and blood in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2016 Oct;176(2-3):114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 20. PubMed 27450777 ↗
  • Hiskens MI, Schneiders AG, Angoa-Perez M, Vella RK, Fenning AS. Blood biomarkers for assessment of mild traumatic brain injury and chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Biomarkers. 2020 May;25(3):213-227. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2020.1735521. Epub 2020 Mar 12. PubMed 32096416 ↗
  • Glatt SJ, Tsuang MT, Winn M, Chandler SD, Collins M, Lopez L, Weinfeld M, Carter C, Schork N, Pierce K, Courchesne E. Blood-based gene expression signatures of infants and toddlers with autism. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;51(9):934-44.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 2. PubMed 22917206 ↗
  • Hess JL, Quinn TP, Zhang C, Hearn GC, Chen S; Neuropsychiatric Consortium for Analysis and Sharing of Transcriptomes; Kong SW, Cairns M, Tsuang MT, Faraone SV, Glatt SJ. BrainGENIE: The Brain Gene Expression and Network Imputation Engine. Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 22;13(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02390-w. PubMed 36949060 ↗
  • Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorova I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1. PubMed 31901449 ↗
  • Askew RL, Cook KF, Revicki DA, Cella D, Amtmann D. Evidence from diverse clinical populations supported clinical validity of PROMIS pain interference and pain behavior. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.035. Epub 2016 Feb 27. PubMed 26931296 ↗
  • Yu L, Buysse DJ, Germain A, Moul DE, Stover A, Dodds NE, Johnston KL, Pilkonis PA. Development of short forms from the PROMIS sleep disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment item banks. Behav Sleep Med. 2011 Dec 28;10(1):6-24. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2012.636266. PubMed 22250775 ↗
  • Full KM, Kerr J, Grandner MA, Malhotra A, Moran K, Godoble S, Natarajan L, Soler X. Validation of a physical activity accelerometer device worn on the hip and wrist against polysomnography. Sleep Health. 2018 Apr;4(2):209-216. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Jan 17. PubMed 29555136 ↗
  • Kuo YL, Lin DJ, Vora I, DiCarlo JA, Edwards DJ, Kimberley TJ. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to assess motor neurophysiology after acute stroke in the United States: Feasibility, lessons learned, and values for future research. Brain Stimul. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):179-181. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.12.001. Epub 2021 Dec 7. No abstract available. PubMed 34890840 ↗
  • Kuo YL, Kutch JJ, Fisher BE. Relationship between Interhemispheric Inhibition and Dexterous Hand Performance in Musicians and Non-musicians. Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 9;9(1):11574. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47959-y. PubMed 31399612 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The study investigators will make the de-identified data available to users for research purposes. Sharing and modification rights of the study data will be determined for individual users by the Principal Investigator.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Data will be available no later than upon the publication of the final dataset.

Access criteria: Study personnel on the list approved by the Institutional Review Board and researchers outside of this project as approved by the Principal Investigator

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 36 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 23, 2023
First posted
Nov 1, 2023
StartActual
Oct 23, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Oct 23, 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 23, 2027
Last update
Oct 10, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06112093
Responsible party
Yi-Ling Kuo, PT, PhD (Assistant Professor, State University of New York - Upstate Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 1, 2023
Start date
Oct 23, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 23, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 23, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 10, 2025

Study contacts

Yi-Ling Kuo, PT, PhD
Contact
kuoy@upstate.edu
3154646911
Yi-Ling Kuo, PT, PhD
principal investigator · State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion