ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06075602COMPLEXUpdated Oct 29, 2024

COMPLEX Registry - a Prospective COhort Study to Describe the Management and Outcomes of Patients Presenting with CompLEX and Calcified Coronary Artery Disease

An observational study in Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Restenosis, sponsored by Luzerner Kantonsspital. Recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-29.

Sponsored by Luzerner Kantonsspital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2021; still recruiting 5 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the COMPLEX Registry is to prospectively and retrospectively collect baseline, clinical and procedural data of patients who have undergone PCI or CABG for complex and/ or calcified chronic CAD, irrespective of clinical presentation as well as to prospectively collect data about their clinical outcomes. The outcomes will be compared in different clinical subgroups (e.g. PCI vs. CABG). The impact of current PCI techniques/ devices, but also CABG strategies in different clinical settings and coronary artery lesions on cardiovascular outcomes will be assessed.

Read the detailed description

a. PCI cohort - Periprocedural outcomes/ complications to be analyzed represent: final result (e.g. TIMI flow), stent expansion, dissections, perforations, and prevalence of thrombus (assessed by angiography and intravascular imaging) b. CABG cohort - Periprocedural outcomes/ complications to be analyzed include: final result (e.g. graft flow), number and type of grafts, total length of surgery, bypass time, cross-clamp time, median chest-tube output (mL), bleeding, duration of CCU/ ICU stay, re-operation.

c. For the PCI, CABG as well as medically managed cohort, short and long-term clinical outcomes of interest include: unstable angina (UA), stent-/scaffold thrombosis, target lesion failure (TLF), target vessel revascularization (TVR), ischemia driven revascularization, repeat hospitalization, new/worsening heart failure, cardiogenic shock, stroke, bleedings, cardiovascular death and all-cause death.

  1. PCI cohort:
  1. To describe procedural and clinical performance of various PCI devices including high pressure balloons, scoring, balloons, cutting balloons, rotational atherectomy, orbital atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy, stent and scaffold devices implanted in patients presenting with complex and calcified chronic CAD
  2. To study the impact of different PCI devices and revascularization strategies used for lesion preparation and PCI optimization strategies among patients undergoing PCI
  3. To describe early and late angiographic and OCT-findings among complex and calcified coronary artery disease patients treated with various metallic stent and scaffold devices
  4. To assess possible predictors for coronary stent implantation or device failure 3. CABG cohort:

a. To describe procedural and clinical performance of various surgical techniques b. To assess outcomes across various surgical cohorts (e.g. urgent vs. elective, diabetic vs. non-diabetic, gender disparities) c. To investigate various CABG revascularization strategies (e.g. off- versus on-pump, "Fully arterial", minimal invasive approach) and their impact on short and long-term outcomes d. To describe perioperative recovery and risk for in-hospital complications (e.g. wound infections, pneumonia) e. To assess possible predictors for graft failure with contemporary surgical techniques 4. Conservative - only medically treated - cohort:

  1. To describe medical management (drugs regimens) as well as other lifestyle interventions in patients presenting with complex and calcified chronic CAD who are being treated with a primarily conservative (non-invasive) strategy.
  2. To study the clinical impact of different treatment strategies/ medical regimens used among chronic, complex CAD, which are being managed solely with medical therapy.
  3. To assess possible predictors for management failure (e.g. recurrence of symptoms or impaired quality of life).

    1. To compare presentation, (medical) management, short- and long-term outcomes across the different treatment cohorts (PCI, CABG and medically managed cohort).
    1. To specifically describe age- and gender-specific disparities across the various treatment regimens (e.g. PCI versus CABG).
    1. To evaluate the impact of different antithrombotic regimens on patient's clinical outcomes 8. To study procedural and clinical outcomes among CAD patients requiring hemodynamic support using mechanical devices.
    1. To analyze the performance of various non-invasive testing modalities (e.g. laboratory/ ECG parameters, treadmill-test, stress-echocardiography, CMR, SPECT or PET-CT) in order to predict outcomes of patients with chronic, complex CAD.
    1. To describe economic implications (cost-effectiveness) of various interventional treatments for CAD.
02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Disease
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Coronary Restenosis
  • Coronary Arteriosclerosis
  • Coronary Artery Calcification
  • Stable Chronic Angina
  • Angina Pectoris
  • Angina, Stable
  • Angina, Unstable
  • Stent Thrombosis
03

In context

Coronary Disease

1,520 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Disease; 167 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 5,000 is above the median of 916 across 478 observational studies indexed under Coronary Disease.

Browse Coronary Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Luzerner Kantonsspital is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

In an all-comers design, virtually any CAD patient with complex and/ or calcified coronary artery disease treated with PCI or CABG at the Heart Center of the Luzerner Kantonsspital (LUKS) and giving consent may be included.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject >18 years of age
  • Individuals presenting with chronic, complex and/or calcified CAD and requiring PCI or CABG
  • Complex coronary artery disease / lesions must include at least one of the following attributes:
  • Long and/ or heavily calcified coronary lesions
  • In-stent restenosis
  • Chronic total occlusions (CTO)
  • Left main lesions
  • Bifurcation lesions
  • Bypass graft lesions
  • Small vessel disease / coronary microvascular dysfunction (e.g. not amenable to PCI)
  • Subjects must be willing to sign a patient (PIC) or must have signed the General Consent (GK).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The presence of any one of the following exclusion criteria will lead to exclusion of the patient.

  • Patient is \<18 years of age
  • Patient unwilling or unable to provide
  • Patients with no complex and calcified CAD
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
10 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Treatment

    The project ́s main goal is to collect baseline, clinical and procedural data as well as to assess angiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with complex coronary lesions treated with current PCI techniques/ devices, but also CABG strategies in different clinical settings.

    Device: Impact of current PCI techniques/ devices in complex coronary artery lesions

Interventions

  • DeviceImpact of current PCI techniques/ devices in complex coronary artery lesions

    To evaluate the impact of current PCI techniques/devices, but also CABG strategies, in patients with complex coronary artery lesions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of combination of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

  2. Rate of acute vessel closure

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

  3. Rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR)

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

  4. Rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR)

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

  5. Rate of target lesion failure (TLF)

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

  6. Rate of ischemia driven TLR

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

  7. Rate of new AMI (NSTEMI/STEMI)

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

  8. Rate of TIA or stroke

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

  9. Rate of cardiovascular mortality

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

  10. Rate of all-cause mortality

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

  11. Rate of bleeding events (access site or non-access site related) according to the BARC classification.

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

  12. Rate of vascular complications (according to VARC criteria)

    Time frame: 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Lucerne Heart Centre
    Lucerne, 6000, Switzerland
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Seiler T, Attinger-Toller A, Cioffi GM, Madanchi M, Teufer M, Wolfrum M, Moccetti F, Toggweiler S, Kobza R, Bossard M, Cuculi F. Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis Using a Dedicated Super High-Pressure Balloon. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Jan;46:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.08.018. Epub 2022 Aug 20. PubMed 36085285 ↗
  • Madanchi M, Cioffi GM, Attinger-Toller A, Wolfrum M, Moccetti F, Seiler T, Vercelli L, Burkart P, Toggweiler S, Kobza R, Bossard M, Cuculi F. Long-term outcomes after treatment of in-stent restenosis using the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold. Open Heart. 2021 Sep;8(2):e001776. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001776. PubMed 34518287 ↗
  • Pinilla-Echeverri N, Bossard M, Hillani A, Chavarria JA, Cioffi GM, Dutra G, Guerrero F, Madanchi M, Attinger A, Kossmann E, Sibbald M, Cuculi F, Sheth T. Treatment of Calcified Lesions Using a Dedicated Super-High Pressure Balloon: Multicenter Optical Coherence Tomography Registry. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Jul;52:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.02.020. Epub 2023 Mar 2. PubMed 36907698 ↗
  • Madanchi M, Cioffi GM, Kobza R, Cuculi F, Bossard M. The Importance of Defining the Coronary Anatomy in Suspected Myopericarditis: A Case Report. Am J Case Rep. 2021 Mar 29;22:e929009. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.929009. PubMed 33780431 ↗
  • Bossard M, Madanchi M, Avdijaj D, Attinger-Toller A, Cioffi GM, Seiler T, Tersalvi G, Kobza R, Schupfer G, Cuculi F. Long-Term Outcomes After Implantation of Magnesium-Based Bioresorbable Scaffolds-Insights From an All-Comer Registry. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 14;9:856930. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.856930. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35498044 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2031, 121 months after the start.

Of 132 non-industry observational studies under Coronary Disease, half reached primary completion within 59 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 192. This study's planned 121 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 154 studies reached it within 47 months; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 123.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 4, 2023
First posted
Oct 10, 2023
StartActual
Nov 1, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2031
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2031
Last update
Oct 29, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06075602
Lead sponsor
Luzerner Kantonsspital
Responsible party
Matthias Bossard (Principal Co-Investigator, Luzerner Kantonsspital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 10, 2023
Start date
Nov 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 29, 2024

Study contacts

Florim Cuculi, MD
Contact
florim.cuculi@luks.ch
+41412052154
Matthias Bossard, MD
Contact
matthias.bossard@luks.ch
+41412051477
Florim Cuculi, MD
principal investigator · Luzerner Kantonsspital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion