CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07861763DRF-LUKSUpdated Oct 6, 2026

Optimal Duration of Longitudinal Mechanical Traction in Displaced Radius Fractures: a Prospective Non-inferiority Study

An interventional study of Longitudinal mechanical traction in Distal Radius Fracture, sponsored by Luzerner Kantonsspital. Recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-06.

Sponsored by Luzerner Kantonsspital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 6, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if 1 minute of mechanical traction lines up a broken wrist bone as well as 5 or 10 minutes of traction in adults (18 years and older) who come to the emergency department with a displaced distal radius fracture (a broken wrist with the bone pieces out of place) that needs to be set and put in a cast. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Is the bone position on X-ray after 1 minute of traction no worse than after 5 or 10 minutes? Bone position is measured as wrist tilt, radial inclination, radial height and ulnar variance.

At what point during traction does the bone reach its best position?

There is no separate comparison group. Each participant serves as their own comparison. Researchers will compare X-rays taken before traction and after 1, 5 and 10 minutes of traction in the same participant to see if longer traction improves bone alignment.

Participants will:

Receive standard pain relief and have their arm placed in traction with finger loops and a 5 kg weight, as in usual care Have two extra wrist X-rays (front and side view) after 1 minute and again after 5 minutes of traction, in addition to the standard X-rays before traction and after 10 minutes Have their fracture set and a cast applied as usual. Participation ends when they leave the emergency department, and there are no extra follow-up visits.

02

Conditions studied

  • Distal Radius Fracture

Browse trials for

03

In context

Wrist Fractures

323 studies on the registry are indexed under Wrist Fractures; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36 is below the median of 64 across 261 interventional studies indexed under Wrist Fractures.

Browse Wrist Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Luzerner Kantonsspital is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age 18 years or older Acute, displaced distal radius fracture (AO/OTA 23-A, 23-B or 23-C) presenting to the Emergency Department and requiring closed reduction with mechanical traction and cast immobilisation Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Pathological fracture Open distal radius fracture Irreducible fracture requiring immediate operative fixation Previous surgery, previous fracture, or concomitant fracture of the same (ipsilateral) upper extremity Acute neurovascular compromise requiring immediate surgical intervention Inability to provide informed consent (e.g. severe cognitive impairment, dementia, acute substance intoxication, or a language barrier with no interpreter available) Pregnancy (screened per standard ED protocol)

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sequential traction (1, 5 and 10 minutes)

    Adults with an acute displaced distal radius fracture receive standard longitudinal mechanical traction, using finger traps on the thumb, index and middle fingers and a 5 kg counterweight. Standard wrist radiographs (PA and lateral) are taken before traction (T0) and after 10 minutes (T3). Two additional study radiographs (PA and lateral) are taken after 1 minute (T1) and 5 minutes (T2) of traction. Each participant serves as their own control. Closed reduction and casting then follow standard care.

    Procedure: Longitudinal mechanical traction

Interventions

  • ProcedureLongitudinal mechanical traction

    Continuous longitudinal traction with standardized finger traps and a 5 kg weight over a pulley on the emergency department reduction frame, lasting 10 minutes. Wrist radiographs are taken at 1, 5 and 10 minutes of traction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in volar/dorsal tilt

    Volar or dorsal tilt of the distal radius (degrees), measured on the lateral wrist radiograph. The difference between time points is compared against a non-inferiority margin of 5 degrees.

    Time frame: Before traction (0 minutes) and after 1, 5 and 10 minutes of tracti

  2. Change in radial inclination

    Radial inclination (degrees), measured on the posteroanterior wrist radiograph. The difference between time points is compared against a non-inferiority margin of 5 degrees.

    Time frame: Before traction (0 minutes) and after 1, 5 and 10 minutes of traction

  3. Change in radial height

    Radial height (mm), measured on the posteroanterior wrist radiograph. The difference between time points is compared against a non-inferiority margin of 2 mm.

    Time frame: Before traction (0 minutes) and after 1, 5 and 10 minutes of traction

  4. Change in ulnar variance

    Ulnar variance (mm), measured on the posteroanterior wrist radiograph. The difference between time points is compared against a non-inferiority margin of 2 mm.

    Time frame: Before traction (0 minutes) and after 1, 5 and 10 minutes of traction

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of fractures with acceptable radiological alignment

    Percentage of participants whose fracture meets acceptable alignment criteria for volar/dorsal tilt, radial inclination, radial height and ulnar variance at each traction time point.

    Time frame: After 1, 5 and 10 minutes of traction

  2. Time point of maximal radiological realignment

    The traction time point (1, 5 or 10 minutes) at which each of the four radiological parameters (volar/dorsal tilt, radial inclination, radial height, ulnar variance) reaches its maximal correction relative to baseline.

    Time frame: Before traction (0 minutes) and after 1, 5 and 10 minutes of traction

  3. Effect of fracture morphology on change in radiological alignment

    Association between fracture type (AO/OTA 23-A, 23-B, 23-C) and baseline displacement, and the change in the four radiological parameters over time. This is analysed with linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: Before traction (0 minutes) and after 1, 5 and 10 minutes of traction

  4. Effect of age and sex on change in radiological alignment

    Association between patient age and sex and the change in the four radiological parameters over time. This includes a sex × time interaction, analysed with linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: Before traction (0 minutes) and after 1, 5 and 10 minutes of traction

  5. Effect of BMI, forearm circumference, time to presentation and pain on change in radiological alignment

    Association between BMI, forearm circumference (a proxy for muscle volume), time from injury to emergency department presentation and maximum pain during traction, and the change in volar/dorsal tilt, radial inclination, radial height and ulnar variance over time. Pain is scored on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). This is analysed with linear mixed-effects models.

    Time frame: Before traction (0 minutes) and after 1, 5 and 10 minutes of traction

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Luzerner Kantonsspital
    Lucerne, Canton of Lucerne 6000, Switzerland
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lippuner K, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R. Remaining lifetime and absolute 10-year probabilities of osteoporotic fracture in Swiss men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2009 Jul;20(7):1131-40. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0779-8. Epub 2008 Oct 31. PubMed 18974918 ↗
  • Walenkamp MM, Goslings JC, Beumer A, Haverlag R, Leenhouts PA, Verleisdonk EJ, Liem RS, Sintenie JB, Bronkhorst MW, Winkelhagen J, Schep NW. Surgery versus conservative treatment in patients with type A distal radius fractures, a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Mar 19;15:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-90. PubMed 24642190 ↗
  • McQueen M, Caspers J. Colles fracture: does the anatomical result affect the final function? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Aug;70(4):649-51. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.70B4.3403617. PubMed 3403617 ↗
  • Candela V, Di Lucia P, Carnevali C, Milanese A, Spagnoli A, Villani C, Gumina S. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures: a detailed survey on a large sample of patients in a suburban area. J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Aug 30;23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00663-6. PubMed 36040542 ↗
  • Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. Epub 2006 Jun 30. PubMed 16814787 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07861763
Lead sponsor
Luzerner Kantonsspital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 6, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 6, 2026

Study contacts

Jill I de Bode
Contact
jilliris.debode@luks.ch
+410412054770
Bryan JM van de Wall
Contact
bryan.vandewall@luks.ch

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion