CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06034561Updated May 16, 2025

Bortezomib-based Regimen for Refractory or Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

A Phase 2 interventional study of Bortezomib in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, in Relapse and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia With Failed Remission, sponsored by Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-16.

Sponsored by Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
16 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a interventional phase II study aiming to examine the complete response rate of a bortezomib-based salvage regimen in adults with refractory or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), seeking to compare outcomes with the available literature and with our historical data on relapsed/refractory ALL.

Read the detailed description

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a rare neoplasm in adults, with long-term survival rates approaching 50% with current regimens. Although high rates of complete response are achieved with the first-line therapy, many patients are primary refractory or may further relapse. Arguably, these patients have a more resistant disease with higher risk genetic alterations and a much less likely to be cured, which almost always only can be obtained by a following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Therefore, strategies to salvage patients with detectable disease after induction blocks or with relapsed disease are crucial to prolong survival and potentially cure those patients, working as a bridge therapy to HSCT. Historically, patients with relapsed/refractory ALL have received multidrug regimens based on high-dose cytarabine, such as fludarabine, cytarabine and idarubicin (FLAG-IDA). Those regimens provide a 30-40% complete response rate with non-negligible toxicity. Recently, new targeted agents such as blinatumomab, inotuzumab, and cellular therapies have arisen for B-lineage disease, even though these agents are not available in the public health setting. Previous studies have tested salvage regimens for ALL encompassing proteasome inhibitors plus highly synergistic drugs (dexamethasone, vincristine, asparaginase, doxorubicin), with exciting outcomes in limited case series. For adults, these regimens are less studied. However, preliminary data suggest that they are less toxic and more potent since patients can receive different drug combinations that they had not been exposed to before. The primary objective of this study is to examine the complete response rate of this regimen in our population, aiming to compare with the available literature and with our historical data on relapsed/refractory ALL. Secondary objectives are:

  1. To determine the safety and feasibility of a bortezomib-based regimen for salvage relapsed/refractory ALL in our setting.
  2. To determine the rate of patients who are able to proceed with HSCT after the treatment.
  3. To calculate event-free survival and overall survival after the salvage regimen for relapsed/refractory ALL.
  4. To calculate the rate of measurable residual disease (MRD) negative status after the treatment.
  5. To examine the rate of febrile neutropenia, liver toxicity, neurotoxicity, and treatment-related mortality after this regimen in relapsed/refractory ALL.
02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, in Relapse
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia With Failed Remission

Keywords

  • Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • Bortezomib
  • Salvage therapy
  • Bridge therapy
  • Response rate
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients between 16 and 60 years-old with refractory or relapsed ALL (≥1% of anomalous blasts by flow cytometry in bone marrow or peripheral blood) after one or two lines of therapy, regardless of their phenotype or baseline genetic alteration;
  • Patients are eligible after allogeneic HSCT as long as patients are not actively being treated for graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Burkitt leukemia;
  • Prior myeloproliferative disease;
  • Drug allergies;
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale >2;
  • Total bilirubin>2x upper limit of normal (ULN);
  • Transaminases>5x ULN;
  • Creatinine>2,5 mg/dl;
  • Active uncontrolled infection;
  • History of asparaginase-induced pancreatitis;
  • Prior exposure to bortezomib;
  • Heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV;
  • Patients with more than 400mg/m2 lifetime exposure of anthracycline;
  • Severe psychiatric disorder which prevents adequate compliance;
  • Refusal to participate in the study.
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bortezomib

    Patients with refractory or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia will receive one-two courses of salvage regimen composed by: * Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 I.V. D1,D4,D8,D11; * Vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 I.V. (maximum at 2 mg) - D1, D8,D15,D22; * Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 I.V. - D1; * Peg-asparaginase 2000 IU/m2 I.V. - D4 and D18; * Dexamethasone 20 mg/m2 P.O. or I.V. (divided BID) - D1-D5 and D15-D19 * Intrathecal chemotherapy: methotrexate 12 mg + dexamethasone 2 mg.

    Drug: Bortezomib

Interventions

  • DrugBortezomib

    Patients should receive one or two courses of this regimen, aiming to achieve complete remission as a bridge to proceed with allogeneic HSCT.

    Also known as: Vincristine, Doxorubicin, Peg-asparaginase, Dexamethasone, Methotrexate

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete response

    Disappearance of lymphoid blasts in peripheral blood, with fewer than 5% of lymphoid blasts quantified in the bone marrow aspirate through immunophenotyping.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Event-free survival

    Time interval between study enrollment and the occurrence of an event (non-response, relapse, or death) or last follow-up (censorship).

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Overall survival

    Time interval between study enrollment and the occurrence of death or last follow-up (censorship).

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Rate of MRD-negativity

    Absence of pathological lymphoid blasts in a bone marrow sample detected through immunophenotyping with a minimum sensitivity of 10-4.

    Time frame: 60 days

  4. Rate of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

    Proportion of patients who successfully underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation after the study therapy

    Time frame: 1 year

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo
    São Paulo, SP 01246000, Brazil
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06034561
Lead sponsor
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
Collaborators
Libbs Farmacêutica LTDA
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 13, 2023
Start date
Apr 1, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2029 (estimated)
Last update
May 16, 2025

Study contacts

Graziela S Silva
Contact
graziela.sasilva@hc.fm.usp.br
551138934677
Bruna Moraes, MSc
Contact
pesquisa.hematologia@hc.fm.usp.br
551126628112
Wellington Silva, MD PhD
principal investigator · Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion