ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07644455VAC-BiopsyUpdated Jun 12, 2026

Percutaneous Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

An interventional study of Pre-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Clipping and Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB) in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-12.

Sponsored by Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is widely used in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer or in early stages of triple-negative or HER2 overexpressing tumors. Pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with better clinical outcomes. However, confirmation of pCR still depends on surgery, which may represent overtreatment for some patients. In this context, image-guided vacuum-assisted percutaneous biopsy (VAB) has been investigated as an alternative to assess tumor response and potentially avoid breast surgery in the future. However, there are no studies evaluating this strategy in brazilian patients, the majority of whom present with locally advanced tumors at diagnosis.

Read the detailed description

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is widely used in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer or in early stages of triple-negative or HER2 overexpressing tumors. Pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with better clinical outcomes. However, confirmation of pCR still depends on surgery, which may represent overtreatment for some patients. In this context, image-guided vacuum-assisted percutaneous biopsy (VAB) has been investigated as an alternative to assess tumor response and potentially avoid breast surgery in the future. However, there are no studies evaluating this strategy in brazilian patients, the majority of whom present with locally advanced tumors at diagnosis.

To evaluate the accuracy of VAB in predicting mammary anatomopathological response in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

This is a cross-sectional study conducted at the Cancer Institute of the State of São Paulo (ICESP). It will include patients with invasive mammary carcinoma cT1-T3, N0-N1, M0, of any immunohistochemical profile, with complete clinical and imaging response or residual lesion ≤ 2 cm after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. VAB will be guided by ultrasound or stereotaxy, with at least six fragments obtained and shaving of the remaining area. The concordance between VAB findings and surgical specimen will be analyzed by sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Percutaneous biopsy
  • Vacuum-assisted biopsy
  • Pathological complete response
  • Conservative surgery
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo is the lead sponsor of 91 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients with invasive non-special type mammary carcinoma (any immunohistochemical subtype: luminal, triple-negative, or +)
  • Indication for chemotherapy
  • Tumor clipping performed prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Clinical staging cT1-T3, N0-N1, M0, defined by clinical examination, mammography, breast MRI, chest/abdomen/pelvis CT, and bone scintigraphy
  • Complete clinical and imaging response OR residual lesion ≤2 cm in largest diameter on mammography and MRI after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and before surgical treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multicentric tumors (> 2 lesions)
  • Current use of anticoagulants
  • Extensive calcifications (> 2 cm)
  • Pregnant women
  • Not undergoing surgical treatment
  • Personal history of other in the last 5 years
  • Absence of residual lesion on imaging in cases of clip migration from the tumor bed marking
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB)

    Vacuum-assisted percutaneous biopsy has the capacity to assess the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with satisfactory accuracy in relation to surgical resection

    Device: Pre-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Clipping · Procedure: Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB)

Interventions

  • DevicePre-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Clipping

    Patients with an indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be referred for clipping the lesion diagnosed with breast cancer in order to allow subsequent localization of its topography in cases of good response or complete response to treatment. This procedure will be guided by ultrasound, and a specific material consisting of a cannula containing a clip inside is used. Through ultrasound, the cannula is inserted into the center of the target lesion and the clip is positioned at this topography. To allow the clip to be located by ultrasound, it must have a shape that minimizes migration after being positioned, as well as characteristics and dimensions that make it visible on ultrasound, as this method will be preferred for performing the biopsy of the lesion region after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

  • ProcedureVacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB)

    Patients with no residual lesion or residual lesion ≤2 cm on MRI and mammography will undergo vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) targeting the primary lesion, using the pre-placed clip as a reference under ultrasound or stereotactic guidance. Initially, 6-12 tissue samples will be obtained (7-10G needle) from the clip region, with specimen radiography performed to confirm clip retrieval; additional sampling will continue if the clip is not identified. This initial sample (AM1) will be formalin-fixed. A second set of 6-12 samples will then be collected from the margins of the biopsy cavity ("shaving") and fixed separately (AM2). Following sampling, a new clip will be placed at the biopsy site, and mammographic imaging will confirm its position. The final clip will guide subsequent surgical resection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB) in Detecting Pathological Complete Response (pCR) Compared to Surgical Specimen Histopathology

    To evaluate the accuracy of vacuum-assisted percutaneous biopsy in predicting mammary anatomopathological response in breastcancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The diagnostic accuracy of VAB will be assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy using the surgical specimen histopathological analysis as the reference standard (gold standard).

    Time frame: From completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to definitive breast surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Complete Residual Lesion Removal by Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (VAB) Confirmed by Surgical Specimen Histopathology

    To evaluate the ability to completely remove residual lesions after chemotherapy in breast cancer using vacuum-assisted percutaneous biopsy. Complete residual lesion removal will be defined as the absence of residual invasive carcinoma or DCIS in the VAB specimens, confirmed by the absence of residual tumor in the surgical specimen. Results will be expressed as a proportion (%) of participants achieving complete lesion removal.

    Time frame: From VAB procedure to surgical resection

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Boman C, Tranchell C, Liu X, Eriksson Bergman L, Toli MA, Bergh J, Foukakis T, Matikas A. Prognosis After Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2025 Mar 12;23(4):e247093. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7093. PubMed 40073831 ↗
  • Heil J, Pfob A, Sinn HP, Rauch G, Bach P, Thomas B, Schaefgen B, Kuemmel S, Reimer T, Hahn M, Thill M, Blohmer JU, Hackmann J, Malter W, Bekes I, Friedrichs K, Wojcinski S, Joos S, Paepke S, Ditsch N, Rody A, Grosse R, van Mackelenbergh M, Reinisch M, Karsten M, Golatta M; RESPONDER Investigators. Diagnosing Pathologic Complete Response in the Breast After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment of Breast Cancer Patients by Minimal Invasive Biopsy: Oral Presentation at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium on Friday, December 13, 2019, Program Number GS5-03. Ann Surg. 2022 Mar 1;275(3):576-581. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004246. PubMed 32657944 ↗
  • Pinder SE, Shaaban A, Deb R, Desai A, Gandhi A, Lee AHS, Pain S, Wilkinson L, Sharma N. NHS Breast Screening multidisciplinary working group guidelines for the diagnosis and management of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential on core biopsy (B3 lesions). Clin Radiol. 2018 Aug;73(8):682-692. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.04.004. PubMed 29773220 ↗
  • Modestino F, Cappelli A, Mosconi C, Peta G, Bruno A, Vara G, De Benedictis C, Golfieri R. Balloon-assisted coil embolization (BACE) of a wide-necked aneurysm of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery. CVIR Endovasc. 2020 Sep 5;3(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s42155-020-00155-w. PubMed 32889684 ↗
  • Jin J. Counseling on Healthy Diet and Physical Activity to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease. JAMA. 2020 Nov 24;324(20):2114. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.22344. No abstract available. PubMed 33231666 ↗
  • Rached FH, Rocha VZ, Santos RD, Serrano CV, Caixeta A. Computed tomography angiography defined vulnerable plaque in a patient with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and subsequent myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis. 2017 Dec;28(8):712-714. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000524. No abstract available. PubMed 28704240 ↗
  • Alsina Maqueda M, Teijo Quintans A, Cuatrecasas M, Fernandez Acenero MJ, Fernandez Montes A, Gomez Martin C, Jimenez Fonseca P, Martinez Ciarpaglini C, Rivera Herrero F, Iglesias Coma M. Biomarkers in gastroesophageal cancer 2025: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP). Clin Transl Oncol. 2025 Sep;27(9):3580-3594. doi: 10.1007/s12094-025-03865-6. Epub 2025 Mar 12. PubMed 40072752 ↗
  • Karbassi I, Maston GA, Love A, DiVincenzo C, Braastad CD, Elzinga CD, Bright AR, Previte D, Zhang K, Rowland CM, McCarthy M, Lapierre JL, Dubois F, Medeiros KA, Batish SD, Jones J, Liaquat K, Hoffman CA, Jaremko M, Wang Z, Sun W, Buller-Burckle A, Strom CM, Keiles SB, Higgins JJ. A Standardized DNA Variant Scoring System for Pathogenicity Assessments in Mendelian Disorders. Hum Mutat. 2016 Jan;37(1):127-34. doi: 10.1002/humu.22918. Epub 2015 Oct 29. PubMed 26467025 ↗
  • Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, Bonnefoi H, Cameron D, Gianni L, Valagussa P, Swain SM, Prowell T, Loibl S, Wickerham DL, Bogaerts J, Baselga J, Perou C, Blumenthal G, Blohmer J, Mamounas EP, Bergh J, Semiglazov V, Justice R, Eidtmann H, Paik S, Piccart M, Sridhara R, Fasching PA, Slaets L, Tang S, Gerber B, Geyer CE Jr, Pazdur R, Ditsch N, Rastogi P, Eiermann W, von Minckwitz G. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):164-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8. Epub 2014 Feb 14. PubMed 24529560 ↗
  • von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, Gerber B, Eiermann W, Hilfrich J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kaufmann M, Konecny GE, Denkert C, Nekljudova V, Mehta K, Loibl S. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1796-804. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595. Epub 2012 Apr 16. PubMed 22508812 ↗
  • Loibl S, Doering G, Muller L, Grote-Metke A, Muller R, Tome O, Wiest W, Maisch A, Nekljudova V, von Minckwitz G. Multicenter Phase II Study with Weekly Bendamustine and Paclitaxel as First- or Later-Line Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: RiTa II Trial. Breast Care (Basel). 2011 Dec;6(6):457-461. doi: 10.1159/000335199. Epub 2011 Dec 15. PubMed 22419900 ↗
  • Dickson D. Watson floats a plan to carve up the genome. Science. 1989 May 5;244(4904):521-2. doi: 10.1126/science.2717940. No abstract available. PubMed 2717940 ↗
  • Schmid P, Cortes J, Pusztai L, McArthur H, Kummel S, Bergh J, Denkert C, Park YH, Hui R, Harbeck N, Takahashi M, Foukakis T, Fasching PA, Cardoso F, Untch M, Jia L, Karantza V, Zhao J, Aktan G, Dent R, O'Shaughnessy J; KEYNOTE-522 Investigators. Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 27;382(9):810-821. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910549. PubMed 32101663 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — It has been decided not to share individual participant data (IPD) related to the study for several reasons. Protecting the privacy of participants is a priority.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07644455
Lead sponsor
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
Responsible party
Jose Roberto Morales Piato (MD, PhD, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 12, 2026
Start date
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 12, 2026

Study contacts

José RM Piato, MD, PhD
Contact
icesp.pesqclinica@hc.fm.usp.br
55 3893-2000
José RM Piato, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Breast Surgeon at ICESP; Associate Professor at FMUSP.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion