ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03702309LIBERATEUpdated Sep 25, 2026

Liquid Biopsy Evaluation and Repository Development at Princess Margaret

An observational study in Cancer, Breast Cancer and Lung Cancer, sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by University Health Network, Toronto · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2017; still recruiting 9 years 3 months later.
Updated Sep 25, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,500
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this protocol is to develop an institution-wide liquid biopsy protocol that will establish a common process for collecting blood and corresponding archived tumor specimens for future research studies at the University Health Network's Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Circulating cell-free nucleic acids (cfNA), including cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and cell-free RNA (cfRNA), are non-invasive, real-time biomarkers that can provide diagnostic and prognostic information before cancer diagnosis, during cancer treatment, and at disease progression. Cancer research scientists and clinicians at the Princess Margaret are interested in incorporating the collection of peripheral blood samples ("liquid biopsies") into research protocols as a means of non-invasively assessing tumor progression and response to treatment at multiple time points during a patient's course of disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer
  • Breast Cancer
  • Lung Cancer
  • Colon Cancer
  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Melanoma
  • Lymphoma
  • Leukemia
  • Mutation
  • Lynch Syndrome
  • Cowden Syndrome
  • BRCA1 Mutation
  • BRCA2 Mutation
  • Uterine Cancer
  • Myeloma
  • Kidney Cancer
  • Head and Neck Cancer
  • Meningioma

Keywords

  • High Risk
  • Liquid Biopsy
  • Circulating Tumor DNA
  • Blood
  • Molecular Profiling
  • Next Generation Sequencing
  • Solid Tumors
  • Hematological
03

In context

Neoplasms

10,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,324 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,500 is above the median of 200 across 2,638 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Health Network, Toronto is the lead sponsor of 1,438 studies on the registry; 297 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (18%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with solid tumors or hematological malignancy and patients identified as high-risk for cancer.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with either histological confirmation of a solid tumor or hematological , OR patients identified as high-risk for cancer (based on identified aberration in cancer predisposition gene or on hormonal and/or family history without known aberration).
  2. Patient must be ≥ 18 years old.
  3. All patients must have signed and dated an form for this LIBERATE study.
  4. If patients are being co-consented for a separate primary research study listed in Appendix I, they must fulfill the eligibility criteria for that separate primary research study. If there is a discrepancy in the eligibility criteria between protocols, the separate primary research study's criteria take precedence.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

None

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • LIBERATE

    Patients with either histological confirmation of a solid tumor or hematological malignancy, or patients identified as high-risk for cancer (based on identified aberration in cancer predisposition gene or on hormonal and/or family history without known aberration).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Collection and annotation of biospecimens

    Facilitate and streamline the collection, banking, and annotation of biospecimens (especially liquid biopsy specimens and optionally corresponding archived tumor specimens) for research studies across the University Health Network institution

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Electronic Consenting

    Implement an electronic informed consent process for clinical research at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 years

  2. Correlative Studies Questionnaire

    Collect observational/epidemiological data using a Correlative Studies Questionnaire for clinical annotation of specimens and future research use. Data collected involves demographics such as family history, medical history, smoking history, and lifestyle.

    Time frame: Through study completion, up to 5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhao D, Lang N, Liu T, Shelton V, Rangel-Patino J, Gong IY, Hong M, Travas A, Murad V, Alrekhais I, Metser U, Prica A, Kukreti V, Bhella S, Vijenthira A, Crump M, Kuruvilla J, Arruda A, Minden MD, Lam B, Kridel R. Risk Assessment With Ultra-Low-Pass Whole-Genome Sequencing of Cell-Free DNA for Large B-Cell Lymphoma. JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Jul;9:e2500200. doi: 10.1200/PO-25-00200. Epub 2025 Jul 9. PubMed 40632977 ↗
  • Han K, Zou J, Zhao Z, Baskurt Z, Zheng Y, Barnes E, Croke J, Ferguson SE, Fyles A, Gien L, Gladwish A, Lecavalier-Barsoum M, Lheureux S, Lukovic J, Mackay H, Marchand EL, Metser U, Milosevic M, Taggar AS, Bratman SV, Leung E. Clinical Validation of Human Papilloma Virus Circulating Tumor DNA for Early Detection of Residual Disease After Chemoradiation in Cervical Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;42(4):431-440. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00954. Epub 2023 Nov 16. PubMed 37972346 ↗
  • Sanz-Garcia E, Genta S, Chen X, Ou Q, Araujo DV, Abdul Razak AR, Hansen AR, Spreafico A, Bao H, Wu X, Siu LL, Bedard PL. Tumor-Naive Circulating Tumor DNA as an Early Response Biomarker for Patients Treated With Immunotherapy in Early Phase Clinical Trials. JCO Precis Oncol. 2023 Apr;7:e2200509. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00509. PubMed 37027812 ↗
  • Spiliopoulou P, Janse van Rensburg HJ, Avery L, Kulasingam V, Razak A, Bedard P, Hansen A, Chruscinski A, Wang B, Kulikova M, Chen R, Speers V, Nguyen A, Lee J, Coburn B, Spreafico A, Siu LL. Longitudinal efficacy and toxicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy. Cell Death Dis. 2023 Jan 20;14(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05548-4. PubMed 36670100 ↗
  • Watson GA, Sanz-Garcia E, Zhang WJ, Liu ZA, Yang SC, Wang B, Liu S, Kubli S, Berman H, Pfister T, Genta S, Spreafico A, Hansen AR, Bedard PL, Lheureux S, Abdul Razak A, Cescon D, Butler MO, Xu W, Mak TW, Siu LL, Chen E. Increase in serum choline levels predicts for improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced cancers receiving pembrolizumab. J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Jun;10(6):e004378. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004378. PubMed 35705312 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Potential to share de-identified study data (including genetic data) with approved research collaborators.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2017 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 119 months after the start.

Of 1,098 non-industry observational studies under Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 61 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 227. This study's planned 119 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,246 studies reached it within 58 months; a quarter within 24 and three quarters within 210.

Neoplasms covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Sep 25, 2026: primary completion Jul 2026 → Jul 2027 and completion Jul 2026 → Jul 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 25, 2018
First posted
Oct 11, 2018
StartActual
Aug 3, 2017
Primary completionEst.
Jul 6, 2027was Jul 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 6, 2027was Jul 2026
Last update
Sep 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary completion
Jul 6, 2026→Jul 6, 2027
Sep 25, 2026
Study completion
Jul 6, 2026→Jul 6, 2027
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Primary completion Jul 6, 2026→Jul 6, 2027
    Study completion Jul 6, 2026→Jul 6, 2027
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03702309
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 11, 2018
Start date
Aug 3, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 6, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 6, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Celeste Yu, MSc
Contact
Celeste.Yu@uhn.ca
416-946-4501 ext. 5281
Lillian Siu, MD
principal investigator · Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion