ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07738094Updated Aug 25, 2026

Cold and NSAID Trial for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

An interventional study of NSAID alone and Cryoprevention associated with NSAID in Pancreatitis, Acute, sponsored by Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo. Recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-25.

Sponsored by Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
583
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The standard prophylaxis for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is performed with rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). A recent Japanese study demonstrated the efficacy of irrigating the periampullary region with ice water, however without the concomitant use of NSAIDs. The proposed study is a randomized, single-center, single-blind clinical trial that aims to compare the efficacy of rectal NSAIDs alone versus NSAIDs associated with ice water in the prevention of PEP.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of instilling ice-cold distilled water (4ºC to 5ºC) into the second duodenal portion as an adjunct to the standard practice of using NSAIDs, comparing it with a group using NSAIDs only to reduce the incidence of PEP. This is a randomized, sequential, blinded, 1:1 paired clinical trial conducted at a single tertiary center. An initial sample of 530 participants was calculated; considering a 10% drop-out, the final calculation was 583 people. All patients will undergo ERCP under sedation or general anesthesia and will be hydrated intravenously with lactated Ringer's. Rectal administration of NSAIDs (indomethacin 100mg) will be performed for all patients without contraindications. In the intervention group, immediately after the end of the therapeutic ERCP, 250 ml of ice-cold distilled water (4º to 5ºC) will be injected towards the papillary region. The control group will undergo standard ERCP and standard pharmacological prophylaxis (indomethacin 100mg), without the instillation of ice-cold distilled water.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatitis, Acute

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
  • Cryoprevention
  • ERCP
  • NSAIDs
03

In context

Pancreatitis

557 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatitis; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 583 is above the median of 100 across 349 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatitis.

Browse Pancreatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo is the lead sponsor of 91 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years or older
  • Clinical indication for ERCP
  • Presence of native major duodenal papilla without previous manipulation
  • Ability of the patient or companion to provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • to ERCP (e.g., severe hemodynamic instability, visceral perforation)
  • Ongoing acute pancreatitis (except mild biliary where ERCP is therapeutic and pain has already resolved)
  • Inaccessibility of the duodenal papilla (e.g., Gastrectomies with Billroth II and Roux-en-Y reconstruction, or gastroduodenal obstructions)
  • Pregnant women
  • Refusal to participate in the study or inability to sign the ICF
  • Contraindication to NSAID use.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
583 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    NSAID alone

    Standard ERCP, hydration with lactated Ringer's, and standard pharmacological prophylaxis (indomethacin 100mg), without the instillation of ice-cold distilled water.

    Procedure: NSAID alone

  • Experimental
    Cryoprevention associated with NSAID

    Standard ERCP, hydration with lactated Ringer's, rectal administration of NSAIDs (indomethacin 100mg), and irrigation of the duodenal papilla with 250 ml of ice-cold distilled water (4º to 5ºC).

    Procedure: Cryoprevention associated with NSAID

Interventions

  • ProcedureNSAID alone

    Standard ERCP, hydration with lactated Ringer's, and standard pharmacological prophylaxis (indomethacin 100mg), without the instillation of ice-cold distilled water.

  • ProcedureCryoprevention associated with NSAID

    Standard ERCP, hydration with lactated Ringer's, rectal administration of NSAIDs (indomethacin 100mg), and irrigation of the duodenal papilla with 250 ml of ice-cold distilled water (4º to 5ºC).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (PEP).

    New or worsened abdominal pain consistent with pancreatitis, associated with an elevation of serum amylase or lipase at least 3 times the upper limit of normal

    Time frame: Immediately after the procedure until 03 days after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. PEP Severity

    Classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on the length of hospital stay and local/systemic complications

    Time frame: Day 1 (24 hours post-procedure) and 7 days post-procedure

  2. Cholangitis

    Defined by fever, jaundice, and/or leukocytosis with evidence of biliary obstruction or need for reintervention.

    Time frame: Day 1 (24 hours post-procedure) and 7 days post-procedure

  3. Bleeding

    Clinical evidence of hemorrhage (melena, hematemesis) or drop in hemoglobin \> 2g/dL requiring transfusion or endoscopic/surgical intervention.

    Time frame: Day 1 (24 hours post-procedure) and 7 days post-procedure

  4. Perforation

    Radiological or surgical evidence of air or luminal content leakage into the abdominal cavity or retroperitoneum.

    Time frame: Day 1 (24 hours post-procedure) and Day 7 (7 days post-procedure)

  5. Mortality

    Death from any cause up to 90 days after the procedure

    Time frame: Up to 90 days post-procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Serviço de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil.
    São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil
    Recruiting
    • Prof. Dr. Fauze Maluf Filho · Contactfauze.maluf@terra.com.br · +55 11 99191-9014
    • Dr. Mateus Bond Boghossian · Contactmatbogho@gmail.com
    • Fauze Maluf Filho · Principal investigator
    • Mateus Bond Boghossian · Sub investigator
    • João Guilherme Ribeiro Jordão Sasso · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):383-93. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2. PubMed 2070995 ↗
  • Janssens LP, Yamparala A, Martin J, O'Meara J, Harmsen WS, Sathi T, Lemke E, Abu Dayyeh BK, Bofill-Garcia A, Petersen BT, Storm AC, Topazian M, Vargas EJ, Chandrasekhara V, Law RJ. Incidence of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in Patients Receiving Rectal Indomethacin vs. Compounded Rectal Diclofenac Prophylaxis. Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Oct;69(10):3970-3978. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08604-5. Epub 2024 Aug 31. PubMed 39215866 ↗
  • Azuma S, Kobayashi Y, Harada R, Yane K, Sawada K, Tsujimoto A, Inatomi O, Matsumori T, Yoshimura K, Yazumi S, Kurita A. Local Postprocedural Cryoprevention Significantly Reduces the Incidence of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003644. Online ahead of print. PubMed 40638082 ↗
  • Azuma S, Kurita A, Katayama T, Iwano K, Iimori K, Kawai Y, Sawada K, Yazumi S. Cooling the papilla with ice water in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (ice water challenge study). Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):6002-6006. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08924-x. Epub 2022 Jan 3. PubMed 34977992 ↗
  • Lee H, Natsui H, Akimoto T, Yanagi K, Ohshima N, Kono I. Effects of cryotherapy after contusion using real-time intravital microscopy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Jul;37(7):1093-8. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000169611.21671.2e. PubMed 16015124 ↗
  • Dolan MG, Mychaskiw AM, Mendel FC. Cool-Water Immersion and High-Voltage Electric Stimulation Curb Edema Formation in Rats. J Athl Train. 2003 Sep;38(3):225-230. PubMed 14608432 ↗
  • ASGE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE COMMITTEE; Buxbaum JL, Freeman M, Amateau SK, Chalhoub JM, Chowdhury A, Coelho-Prabhu N, Das R, Desai M, Elhanafi SE, Forbes N, Fujii-Lau LL, Kohli DR, Kwon RS, Machicado JD, Marya NB, Pawa S, Ruan WH, Sadik J, Sheth SG, Thiruvengadam NR, Thosani NC, Zhou S, Qumseya BJ; (ASGE Standards of Practice Committee Chair). American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on post-ERCP pancreatitis prevention strategies: methodology and review of evidence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Feb;97(2):163-183.e40. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.09.011. Epub 2022 Dec 12. No abstract available. PubMed 36517309 ↗
  • Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20. PubMed 31863440 ↗
  • Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, Chak A, Mosler P, Higgins PD, Hayward RA, Romagnuolo J, Elta GH, Sherman S, Waljee AK, Repaka A, Atkinson MR, Cote GA, Kwon RS, McHenry L, Piraka CR, Wamsteker EJ, Watkins JL, Korsnes SJ, Schmidt SE, Turner SM, Nicholson S, Fogel EL; U.S. Cooperative for Outcomes Research in Endoscopy (USCORE). A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1414-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111103. PubMed 22494121 ↗
  • Tomoda T, Kato H, Ueki T, Akimoto Y, Hata H, Fujii M, Harada R, Ogawa T, Wato M, Takatani M, Matsubara M, Kawai Y, Okada H. Combination of Diclofenac and Sublingual Nitrates Is Superior to Diclofenac Alone in Preventing Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1753-1760.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.267. Epub 2019 Feb 14. PubMed 30772342 ↗
  • Testoni PA, Mariani A, Giussani A, Vailati C, Masci E, Macarri G, Ghezzo L, Familiari L, Giardullo N, Mutignani M, Lombardi G, Talamini G, Spadaccini A, Briglia R, Piazzi L; SEIFRED Group. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high- and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;105(8):1753-61. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.136. Epub 2010 Apr 6. PubMed 20372116 ↗
  • Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, Elmunzer BJ, Kim KJ, Lennon AM, Khashab MA, Kalloo AN, Singh VK. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):143-149.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.06.045. Epub 2014 Aug 1. PubMed 25088919 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — LGPD

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 14 months after the start.

Of 91 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pancreatitis, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 94 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 59.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 16, 2026
First posted
Jul 30, 2026
StartActual
Jun 9, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2028
Last update
Aug 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07738094
Lead sponsor
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
Responsible party
Fauze Maluf Filho (Director of the Endoscopy Unit at the São Paulo Cancer Institute (ICESP) and HCFMUSP, University of Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 30, 2026
Start date
Jun 9, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 25, 2026

Study contacts

Prof. Dr. Fauze Maluf Filho
Contact
fauze.maluf@terra.com.br
+55 11 99191-9014
Dr. Mateus Bond Boghossian
Contact
matbogho@gmail.com
+55 11 91795-4571
Fauze Maluf Filho
principal investigator · Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion