ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06017947MuSCAUpdated Sep 16, 2026

Evaluation of a Musical Intervention on the Anxiety of Patients With a Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Pre-Hospital Emergency Situation: MuSCA Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Music care in Acute Coronary Syndrome, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 2 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
92
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 127 studies in Acute Coronary Syndrome with a site in France — 13 open to participants now, 19 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Acute Coronary Syndrome · France.

Planned enrollment
68th of 83
92 · median 640
Started
2023
with 6 others
No phase
39 of 127
6 open now
Primary completion
2026-12
later than 9 of 18 live
Registered
116th of 127
by date

Among the 127 studies in Acute Coronary Syndrome with a site in France, this one is the 68th largest by planned enrollment of the 83 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 7 that started in 2023, is one of 39 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 9 of the 18 other live ones, and was the 116th registered.

Acute Coronary Syndrome

1,490 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome; 272 are open to participants now.

Browse Acute Coronary Syndrome studies →

Open to participants now

13 of the 127 studies in Acute Coronary Syndrome with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

7 more — sign in →

All 13 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 196 Acute Coronary Syndrome studies recruiting now, 145 (74%) set no upper age limit and 19 (10%) stop at 75 or younger; 15 take children under 18; 15 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 127 studies in Acute Coronary Syndrome with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses a continuum of clinical situations secondary to acute myocardial ischemia. In France, it is a major health problem and represented 60,000 to 65,000 hospitalizations in 2010. In 2015, a diagnosis of ACS was made in 15 to 25% of patients consulting for chest pain in emergency medicine.

The incidence of ACS is estimated between 80,000 and 100,000 new cases per year. At the University Hospital Center (CHU) of Réunion, acute chest pain is the leading cause of discharges from the Mobile Emergency and Resuscitation Service (SMUR). In 2019, it represented 23% of exits, 8.5% of which concerned SCAs.

The SCA can be anxiety-provoking due to its unexpected and brutal nature. Pain related to myocardial ischemia generates anxiety. This increases when patients associate these pains with death. This anxiety is exacerbated by waiting times for care, especially for patients living in rural areas. In addition, conditions relating to medical care such as noise and the pre-hospital medical environment are perceived as influencing anxiety by patients.

The prevalence of anxiety is high, ranging from 30 to 48.5%, in patients with chest pain and/or ACS. A 2020 meta-analysis revealed that anxious patients at the start of their ACS treatment had an increased risk of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, rehospitalization, recurrence of ACS and the need for coronary revascularization repeated. Overall, ACS patients with anxiety have a 21% increased risk of mortality and 47% increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events compared to those without anxiety.

Pre-hospital anxiolytic treatment is therefore essential and consists above all in reassuring the patient with ACS. Medicated anxiolytics are often combined with analgesics and recommended in front of a picture of agitation due to anxiety. However, negative effects may interfere, making clinical monitoring of these patients unsuitable. At the same time, several studies note that anxiety is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the care of these patients.

In reducing the anxiety of patients with ACS, unconventional care techniques such as aromatherapy or touch massage have demonstrated their effectiveness. Music therapy is recognized in reducing the anxiety of patients in intensive care or Cardiology.

To the knowledge, in France, the effect of a musical intervention on patients with pre-hospital ACS has not yet been studied. It is in this context that the MuSCA study takes place.

03

Conditions studied

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 and over
  • With an established or suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome diagnosis
  • With a stable clinical condition at the initial assessment:
  • Whose anxiety assessment is > or = 30/100 mm on the Visual Analogue Scale
  • Having provided express, free and
  • With an estimated transport time of at least > 30 minutes

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under guardianship, curatorship or judicial safeguard procedure
  • With hearing and visual impairments
  • Participating in another clinical trial or having already been included in this study.
  • Supported by helicopter
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
92 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    standard process
  • Experimental
    Musical intervention

    Procedure: Music care

Interventions

  • ProcedureMusic care

    20 min music listening during transportation to hospital

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Anxiety change

    This is to assess whether a 20-minute musical intervention associated with the usual care would reduce the anxiety of the patient suffering from an acute coronary syndrome in pre-hospital during his transfer to a health establishment. (intervention group) compared to usual management alone (control group). measurement méthod : analog visual scale

    Time frame: 20 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain change

    assess whether a musical intervention associated with the usual care allows a reduction, during the transfer to a health establishment of the pain score (Numerical Scale)

    Time frame: 20 minutes

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
    Saint-Pierre, Île de La Réunion 97448, France
    Recruiting
    • Alexis LE BON · Contact
    • Alexis LEBON · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 38 months after the start.

Of 213 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Acute Coronary Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 38 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 228 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 16, 2023
First posted
Aug 30, 2023
StartActual
Sep 12, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 11, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 11, 2026
Last update
Sep 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06017947
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 30, 2023
Start date
Sep 12, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 11, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 11, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2026

Study contacts

Alexis LEBON
Contact
alexislebon974@gmail.com
+262262359000

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion