ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07422688OCTAVEUpdated Nov 9, 2026

Optical Coherence Tomography in Acute Vessel Evaluation

An interventional study of Angiographic Guided PCI and OCT Guided PCI in Ischemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease and ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome), sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital Skejby. Enrolling by invitation at 29 sites in 12 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Primary conditionAcute Coronary SyndromeRegistry: Myocardial IschemiaReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Myocardial Ischemia — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Acute Coronary Syndrome, a narrower term within Myocardial Ischemia.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital Skejby · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 9, 20264 sites addedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose is to investigate if a strategy of routine OCT based diagnosis and guidance of PCI improves clinical outcomes compared with a standard strategy of guidance by angiography in patients presenting with ACS

Read the detailed description

Patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have worse short and mid-term prognosis compared with patients revascularized for chronic coronary syndrome. Angiographic assessment of patients with ACS is frequently limited by high ambiguity both in identification of culprit lesions, characterization of non-culprit lesions, and in identification of suboptimal treatment results. Intravascular imaging may improve diagnosis and allow for better treatment optimization during coronary intervention of patients with ACS. The large-scale Chinese IVUS-ACS trial showed a 50% reduction in one-year MACE with IVUS-guided PCI in patients with ACS whereas a number of small studies on routine OCT guiding as well as ACS subgroups in RCTs did not indicate a potential similar benefit with OCT. OCT assessment has several theoretical advantages over IVUS in patients with ACS indicating the need for a well-designed strategy trial on OCT vs angiographic guided PCI.

Hypothesis: Routine OCT-guided diagnosis and revascularization yields superior one-year clinical outcome compared with standard angiography-guided diagnosis and revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome Methods: Investigator initiated, open label, prospective, 1:1 randomized, multi-center, clinical outcome, superiority trial.

Primary Endpoint: Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) comprising all-cause death, spontaneous myocardial infarction and stroke.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ischemic Heart Disease
  • Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease
  • ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • OCT guided PCI
  • ACS undergoing PCI
03

In context

Acute Coronary Syndrome Reclassified

1,488 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome; 273 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 3,000 is above the median of 200 across 865 interventional studies indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Browse Acute Coronary Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Compared within Acute Coronary Syndrome, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Myocardial Ischemia. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Clinical inclusion criteria:

  • NSTEMI, STEMI
  • Symptom duration \<12h for STEMI and \<48h for NSTEMI
  • Age ≥ 18yrs
  • Ability to provide written

Angiographic inclusion criteria:

  • Angiographic signs of at least one possible culprit lesion. Signs including acute occlusion, partial occlusion, proximal embolus, haziness, high grade stenosis, stent thrombosis
  • Wire in true distal lumen

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Clinical exclusion criteria

  • Intravascular imaging evaluation of any lesions at index procedure
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation
  • Planned CABG
  • \<1 year
  • Known severe heart failure with class equal or above III
  • Known \<30% before the admission
  • Known renal failure with \<30 ml/min/1.73 m2
  • Active bleeding or coagulopathy
  • Relevant allergies (contrast media, aspirin, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, everolimus)
  • Suspected inability to lie flat for the duration of the PCI procedure
  • Inability to comply with the planned follow-up program
  • Known or anticipated compliance problems with medical therapy

Angiographic exclusion criteria

  • Study lesion involving the Left main coronary artery
  • Study lesion involving a true bifurcation lesion with a SB >2.5mm
  • Severe tortuosity
  • Distal embolus
  • Isolated coronary artery spasm
  • Suspected spontaneous coronary artery dissection
  • Chronic total occlusions with treatment indication and no antegrade intra plaque wire pass
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Angiographic Guided PCI

    Revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by angiography alone

    Procedure: Angiographic Guided PCI

  • Experimental
    OCT Guided PCI

    Revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by systematic use of intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT)

    Procedure: OCT Guided PCI

Interventions

  • ProcedureAngiographic Guided PCI

    Revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by angiography alone

  • ProcedureOCT Guided PCI

    Revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by systematic use of intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Combined endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (MACE)

    Comprising all-cause death, spontaneous myocardial infarction and stroke

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Combined endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (MACE)

    Comprising all-cause death, spontaneous myocardial infarction and stroke

    Time frame: 30 days, 36 months and 60 months

  2. Patient-oriented composite (PoCE) MACE endpoint

    Comprising all cause death, any myocardial infarction, any unplanned revascularization and stroke

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  3. All-cause mortality

    All-cause mortality includes death of any cause including cardiac deaths and non-natural causes of deaths

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months, 60 months and 10 years

  4. Cardiac death

    Encompasses death due to coronary heart disease including fatal myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death including fatal arrhythmias and cardiac arrest without successful resuscitation, death from heart failure including cardiogenic shock, and death related the cardiac procedure within 28 days from the procedure. If death is not clearly attributable to other non-cardiac causes it is adjudicated as cardiac death.

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  5. Spontaneous myocardial infarction

    Following 4th universal MI definition

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  6. Any ischemia-driven revascularization

    Any repeat iscemia-driven revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting or PCI) except staged revascularization planned during the index procedure

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  7. Any unplanned revascularization

    Any unplanned repeat revascularization

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  8. Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization

    Any non-staged repeat ischemia-driven revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting or PCI) of any lesion treated at the index admission

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  9. Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization

    Any non-staged repeat ischemia-driven revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting or PCI) of any vessel treated at the index admission

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  10. Target lesion revascularization

    Any non-staged repeat revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting or PCI) of any lesion treated at the index admission

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  11. Target vessel revascularization

    Any non-staged repeat revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting or PCI) of any vessel treated at the index admission

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  12. Stroke

    Acute neurological deficit of cerebrovascular cause that persists beyond 24 hours with CT or MRI confirmation

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  13. Rose dyspnea Scale

    Assesses the severity of dyspnea during specific physical activities, ranging from 0-4. Higher scores indicate worse dyspnea

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  14. CCS-angina class

    4-level grading system to categorizes stable angina symptoms based on the severity of physical limitations

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  15. Peri-procedure related MI

    According to the ARC-2 and 4th universal definition criterias

    Time frame: During or within 48 hours after the procedure (index or staged within the same admission)

  16. Stent thrombosis

    Definite, probable or possible in time categories: acute, subacute, late and very late (ARC-2 definitions)

    Time frame: 30 days, 12 months, 36 months and 60 months

  17. Contrast induced nephropathy

    Defined as a \>50% increase in plasma creatinine after the procedure within the first 48 hours

    Time frame: 48h

Other outcomes

  1. Contrast volume

    Total volume of contrast used at index admission

    Time frame: Baseline (index procedure and procedures staged within the same index admission)

  2. Fluoroscopy time

    Total fluoroscopy time during index admission

    Time frame: Baseline (index procedure and procedures staged within the same index admission)

  3. Length of stents implanted in culprit lesion

    Total length of stents implanted in culprit lesion

    Time frame: Baseline (index procedure and procedures staged within the same index admission)

  4. Number of NCL treated

    Number of Non Culprit Lesions treated

    Time frame: Baseline (index procedure and procedures staged within the same index admission)

  5. Procedural failure

    No stent implanted in target lesion

    Time frame: Baseline (index procedure and procedures staged within the same index admission)

  6. Procedural success

    TIMI III flow and less than 30% diameter stenosis in target segments by corelab QCA

    Time frame: Baseline (index procedure and procedures staged within the same index admission)

  7. Procedure time

    Total procedure time at index admission

    Time frame: Baseline (index procedure and procedures staged within the same index admission)

07

Study locations

29 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Limited and pseudo-anonymized data will be transferred to studies investigating the effect of OCT treatment across other studies, so-called meta-analyses. These meta-analyses will be carried out with Rigshospitalet (Copenhagen, Denmark) and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (New York, USA). Full anonymization means that the information cannot be linked to individuals. The studies to which data are transferred comply with the General Data Protection Regulation and the Danish Data Protection Act. Data from this study will also be transferred to a project at Aarhus University investigating prognosis across patient groups treated with OCT.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

3 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Sites
4 sites added
Show 4 added (2 Belgium, 1 United Kingdom, 1 Sweden)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital - Oxford Heart Centre · Oxford, United Kingdom
  • Jessa Hospital · Hasselt, Belgium
  • Danderyds Sjukhus · Danderyd, Sweden
  • Hôpital de la Louviére - site Jolimont · Haine-Saint-Paul, Belgium
across 3 updates, Oct 2, 2026 – Nov 9, 2026
Show all 3 updates
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    1 site added
    Show site
    • Hôpital de la Louviére - site Jolimont · Haine-Saint-Paul, Belgium
  2. Oct 30, 2026
    2 sites added
    Show 2 added (1 Belgium, 1 Sweden)
    • Jessa Hospital · Hasselt, Belgium
    • Danderyds Sjukhus · Danderyd, Sweden
  3. Oct 2, 2026
    1 site added
    Show site
    • John Radcliffe Hospital - Oxford Heart Centre · Oxford, United Kingdom

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07422688
Lead sponsor
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Collaborators
Abbott
Responsible party
Evald Hoej Christiansen (Prof., MD, PhD, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2026
Start date
Nov 23, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2039 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Evald H Christiansen, Prof.MD.PhD
study chair · Aarhus University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion