ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06002516RELIEFUpdated Sep 9, 2026

RELIEF-pathway in Patients With Upper Abdominal Pain

An interventional study of RELIEF-pathway in Abdominal Pain, Gallstone; Colic and Dyspepsia, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
471
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Upper abdominal pain (UAP) is a common symptom and frequently the reason to visit the hospital. The prevalence of epigastric pain in the Dutch population is estimated to be as high as 37%. Moreover, Dutch hospitals yearly record >100.000 diagnoses related to UAP. In most patients, UAP can be attributed to symptomatic (functional) dyspepsia (FD), Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) or uncomplicated gallstone disease (cholecystolithiasis), with a prevalence in the general population of 20-30%, 20%, and 6-9%, respectively. However, these conditions may have overlapping symptom patterns and generally affect similar populations. which contributes to ineffective (diagnostic) interventions. Patients are generally not aware of the similarity of symptoms and the poor outcome of some treatments.

Education positively influences patients' self-management and health judgment. In a recent open-label, multicentre trial the effectiveness of web-based patients' education is applied to reduce overuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies in patients with dyspepsia. This study illustrated that an web-based education tool safely reduced 40% in upper gastrointestinal endoscopies. Lifestyle interventions (such as change of diet and/or physical activity) are widely incorporated in treatment programs for cardio-vascular diseases including diabetes mellitus and obesity. An web-based education tool on upper abdominal pain and other complaints combined with a lifestyle interventions for patients may be an effective treatment option for this large group of patients.

This study investigates the potential of an individualized web-based education tool as intervention for patients with functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome and uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis with the possibility to visit the Prevention and Lifestyle clinic (RELIEF pathway). The RELIEF pathway aims to reduce unnecessary health care utilization and, secondly, to maintain and improve quality of life by educating patients on lifestyle improvement.

Read the detailed description

Objective: The main goal is to evaluate the effect of the RELIEF pathway versus usual care on health care utilization in terms of hospital visits and number of interventions.

Study design: A multicenter randomized controlled open-label superiority trial, with two parallel arms, usual care (control arm) versus the RELIEF pathway (intervention arm). Patients will randomly be assigned (1:1) to usual care or the RELIEF pathway with use of stratification for disease severity, age and sex.

Study population: All patients between 18 and 70 years old, with a first referral by their general practitioner (GP) to the Department of Surgery or Gastroenterology with functional dyspepsia (ICPC D87.02), irritable bowel syndrome (ICPC D93) or uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis (ICPC D98.03). Patients are not eligible for inclusion if they and/or GP report alarm symptoms, which may be direct or indirect signs of cancer or upper GI tract bleeding: weight loss, persistent vomiting, dysphagia, jaundice, hematemesis, melena, haematochezia, or anaemia. Patients with a first or second-degree relative with a history of upper GI tract malignant neoplasm, patients with a history of complicated cholecystolithiasis (acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, biliary pancreatitis and cholangitis) or a history of or current malignancy (except SCC or BCC of the skin).

Intervention:

Patients in the intervention group (RELIEF-pathway) will receive access to the web-based education tool before visit of the outpatient clinic of Surgery or Gastroenterology.

The personalized web-based education tool contains information on:

  • Information of cause and symptoms of functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome and uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis;
  • Symptom checker based on the ROME III and ROME IV criteria;
  • Red flags symptoms defined as direct or indirect signs of upper GI hemorrhage.
  • Lifestyle adjustments to improve abdominal symptoms and quality of life.
  • Information on effect of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, colonoscopy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The investigators aim that the patient will complete the web-based education tool before visiting the outpatient clinic of Surgery and Gastroenterology. The web-based education tool is available during 12 months after randomization.

After the web-based education tool is completed we will offer an additional visit at the Prevention and Lifestyle clinic, this is optional and not obligatory.

Control: Patients assigned to the control group will receive the usual care given at participating centers. During the first visit at the surgery or gastroenterology outpatient clinic subjects are seen by a random medical specialist, who will assess history, examine the patient, and review investigations.Diagnostic and treatment decisions will be based on the physician's preference and experience and on the patients' preferred choice of treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Abdominal Pain
  • Gallstone; Colic
  • Dyspepsia
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome
  • Health Care Utilization
  • Patient Reported Outcomes
  • Upper Abdominal Pain
  • Decision Aid

Keywords

  • Abdominal pain
  • Health care utilization
03

In context

Abdominal Pain

387 studies on the registry are indexed under Abdominal Pain; 58 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 471 is above the median of 70 across 290 interventional studies indexed under Abdominal Pain.

Browse Abdominal Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 986 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients between 18 and 70 years old.
  • First referral due to upper abdominal pain (UAP) and symptoms due to Functional dyspepsia (ICPC code 87.02), Irritable Bowel syndrome (ICPC 93.0) or uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis (ICPC 98.03).
  • Proficient in reading and understanding of the Dutch language.
  • Referred to the outpatient clinic of gastroenterology or surgery.
  • Providing .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unexplained weight loss
  • Persistent vomiting
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Any other direct or indirect signs of cancer or upper GI tract bleeding
  • Anemia
  • Jaundice
  • Pregnancy
  • An expected life span of less than 12 months
  • Known liver diseases
  • A history of complicated cholecystolithiasis
  • A history of inflammatory bowel disease
  • A history of , except squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)/basal cell -carcinoma (BCC)
  • First or second degree relative with history of upper GI malignancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
471 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    RELIEF pathway

    Patients in the intervention group (RELIEF-pathway) will receive access to the web-based education tool before visit of the outpatient clinic of Surgery or Gastroenterology.

    Other: RELIEF-pathway

  • No intervention
    Usual care

    Patients assigned to the control group will receive the usual care given at participating centers. During the first visit at the surgery or gastroenterology outpatient clinic subjects are seen by a random medical specialist, who will assess history, examine the patient, and review investigations. Diagnostic and treatment decisions will be based on the physician's preference and experience and on the patients' preferred choice of treatment.

Interventions

  • OtherRELIEF-pathway

    The personalized web-based education tool contains information on: * Information of cause and symptoms of functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome and uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis; * Symptom checker based on the ROME III and ROME IV criteria; * Red flags symptoms defined as direct or indirect signs of upper GI hemorrhage. * Lifestyle adjustments to improve abdominal symptoms and quality of life. * Information on effect of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, colonoscopy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. After the web-based education tool is completed we will offer an additional visit at the Prevention and Lifestyle clinic, this is optional and not obligatory.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary endpoint

    The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who will undergo diagnostic or treatment intervention within 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to diagnosis

    time to diagnosis in days minimum value: 3 days, maxium value: 365 days, higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. outpatient clinic- or emergency room visits

    outpatient clinic- or emergency room visits in numbers minimum value: 0 maximum value: 50 higher scores mean worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Pain severity

    measured with Izbicky pain izbicky pain score: 0-100 scale, minimum: 0, maximum: 100, higher scores means worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Imaging use

    Numbers of Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Minimum: 0, maximum: 50, higher numbers means worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Morbidity and complications

    will be specified by type of morbidity and complication minimum: 0 maximum: 100 Higher scores mean worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Patient-reported outcomes

    Questionnaire: PAGI-SYM Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index Heartburn / Regurgitation (7 items)Nausea / Vomiting (3 items)Postprandial Fullness / Early Satiety (4 items)Bloating (2 items)Upper Abdominal Pain (2 items)Lower Abdominal Pain (2 items). Patients rank their symptoms based on a 2-week recall period. Each symptom is rated on a 6-point scale:0 = None / Absent1 = Mild2 = Moderate3 = Severe4 = Very Severe5 = Extremely Severe A higher score indicates more severe symptoms and a greater physical burden. If reporting a score on a scale, please include the unabbreviated scale title, the minimum and maximum values, and whether higher scores mean a better or worse outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Pain severity

    VAS (visual analogue score): 0-10, minimum: 0, maximum: 10, higher scores means worse outcome

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Patient-reported outcomes

    Questionnaire: SHAI The Short Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI) is an 18-item self-report questionnaire used to measure the severity of health anxiety and hypochondriasis. Total scores range from 0 to 54. Higher numerical scores reflect greater levels of preoccupation with health, bodily vigilance, and distress regarding potential illness.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Patient-reported outcomes

    Questionnaire: SDM-Q-9 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire. A 9-item self-report tool used to measure a patient's perception of shared decision-making during a medical consultation. Each item is rated on a 6-point scale from 0 ("completely disagree") to 5 ("completely agree"). 0 to 100 scale (higher scores mean greater perceived involvement (= better outcome)).

    Time frame: 12 Months

  10. Patient-reported outcome measurements

    The iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) scoring works by multiplying the self-reported frequency of each health care service use by its corresponding standard unit cost price. Higher score means worse outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • de Jong JJ, Lantinga MA, Tan ACITL, Aquarius M, Scheffer RCH, Uil JJ, de Reuver PR, Keszthelyi D, Westert GP, Masclee AAM, Drenth JPH. Web-Based Educational Intervention for Patients With Uninvestigated Dyspepsia Referred for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Endoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jun 1;181(6):825-833. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1408. PubMed 33900373 ↗
  • van Dijk AH, Wennmacker SZ, de Reuver PR, Latenstein CSS, Buyne O, Donkervoort SC, Eijsbouts QAJ, Heisterkamp J, Hof KI', Janssen J, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Schaap HM, Steenvoorde P, Stockmann HBAC, Boerma D, Westert GP, Drenth JPH, Dijkgraaf MGW, Boermeester MA, van Laarhoven CJHM. Restrictive strategy versus usual care for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal pain (SECURE): a multicentre, randomised, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019 Jun 8;393(10188):2322-2330. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30941-9. Epub 2019 Apr 27. PubMed 31036336 ↗
  • Kok L, Elias SG, Witteman BJ, Goedhard JG, Romberg-Camps MJ, Muris JW, Moons KG, de Wit NJ. Application of the Rome III criteria is not likely to reduce the number of unnecessary referrals for colonoscopy in primary care. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May;25(5):568-74. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835d4ddd. PubMed 23325277 ↗
  • Latenstein CSS, Hannink G, van der Bilt JDW, Donkervoort SC, Eijsbouts QAJ, Heisterkamp J, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Schreinemakers JMJ, Wiering B, Boermeester MA, Drenth JPH, van Laarhoven CJHM, Dijkgraaf MGW, de Reuver PR; SECURE trial collaborators. A Clinical Decision Tool for Selection of Patients With Symptomatic Cholelithiasis for Cholecystectomy Based on Reduction of Pain and a Pain-Free State Following Surgery. JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):e213706. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3706. Epub 2021 Oct 13. PubMed 34379080 ↗
  • de Jong JJ, Latenstein CSS, Boerma D, Hazebroek EJ, Hirsch D, Heikens JT, Konsten J, Polat F, Lantinga MA, van Laarhoven CJHM, Drenth JPH, de Reuver PR. Functional Dyspepsia and Irritable Bowel Syndrome are Highly Prevalent in Patients With Gallstones and Are Negatively Associated With Outcomes After Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study (PERFECT - Trial). Ann Surg. 2022 Jun 1;275(6):e766-e772. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004453. Epub 2020 Sep 1. PubMed 32889877 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2024 to primary completion in Apr 2026, 17 months.

Of 85 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Abdominal Pain, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 30. This study's 17 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 101 studies reached it within 13 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 7, 2023
First posted
Aug 21, 2023
StartActual
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completionActual
Apr 15, 2026
CompletionEst.
Apr 15, 2027
Last update
Sep 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06002516
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 21, 2023
Start date
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2026
Completion
Apr 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Cornelis van Laarhoven, MD PhD
principal investigator · Radboud University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion