ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05985343Updated Nov 21, 2025

The Impact of Sugammadex on Ileus After Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

A Phase 4 interventional study of Neostigmine / Glycopyrrolate and Sugammadex in Hernia, Ventral and Ileus, sponsored by Clayton Petro. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-21.

Sponsored by Clayton Petro · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was May 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
184
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to determine if the usage of sugammadex would reduce the time to return of bowel function when compared to standard of care (neostigmine/glycopyrrolate) when used for neuromuscular blockade reversal in patients with open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR).

Read the detailed description

The investigators baseline postoperative ileus (POI) rate in the setting of open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) is similar to patients undergoing an open bowel resection and often prolongs patients' hospital stay. Therefore, the investigators aim to determine whether the use of sugammadex has a clinically significant impact on return of postoperative bowel function and prevention of POI in these patients.

The primary outcome is GI-2: postoperative time until passage of 1st bowel movement and tolerance of solid food.

The investigators hypothesize:

  • postoperative time to return of bowel function (GI-2) after open AWR will be significantly shorter for patients who receive sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade when compared to those receiving standard of care (neostigmine/glycopyrrolate).
  • patients who receive sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade will have a reduced incidence of POI requiring nasogastric tube (NG) placement, and decreased length of hospital stay when compared to standard of care.

Specific Aim 1: To determine if the use of sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal reduces the time to postoperative GI-2 bowel function compared to neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for neuromuscular blockade reversal.

Specific Aim 2: To determine if sugammadex reduces the incidence of postoperative NG placement compared to neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for neuromuscular blockade reversal.

Specific Aim 3: To determine if sugammadex reduces postoperative length of stay following AWR compared to neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for neuromuscular blockade reversal.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hernia, Ventral
  • Ileus
03

In context

Hernia, Ventral

230 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Ventral; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 184 is above the median of 90 across 153 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Ventral.

Browse Hernia, Ventral studies →

Lead sponsor

Clayton Petro is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults >18 years old
  • Patients requiring an open ventral hernia repair with retromuscular mesh placement and at least one myofascial advancement flap
  • Hernias with fascial defects \< 20cm wide
  • Non-emergent cases

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known serious or severe reaction to sugammadex or any of the ingredients in sugammadex.
  • Hernias with fascial defects > 20cm wide
  • Concomitant treatment with a strong or moderate cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor (e.g., Ketoconazole and other anti-fungals, Clarithromycin, protease inhibitors, diltiazem, erythromycin, verapamil) or strong inducers (e.g., rifampin).
  • Known small bowel obstruction (SBO) at the time of hernia repair
  • Suspected SBO or at risk of recurrent SBO at the time of hernia repair - at the discretion of the staff surgeon.
  • Nasogastric (NG), orogastric (OG), or gastric (eg. PEG) in place at the time of hernia repair and left in beyond the morning of the first postoperative day.
  • Patients with a stoma.
  • Cancer with increased risk of gastro-duodenal perforation (e.g., infiltrative gastrointestinal tract , recent gastrointestinal tract surgery, diverticular disease including diverticulitis, ischemic colitis, or concomitantly treated with bevacizumab) - at the discretion of the staff surgeon.
  • Disorder that could alter the integrity of the gastrointestinal lining (e.g., Crohn's disease) - at the discretion of the staff surgeon.
  • Severe hepatic failure ( Class C).
  • hepatic failure (e.g. cirrhosis) - at the discretion of the staff surgeon.
  • Severe renal failure (\<30ml/min, on dialysis, or have an arteriovenous fistula, indwelling hemodialysis catheter or peritoneal dialysis catheter) - at the discretion of the staff surgeon.
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during study period.
  • Breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed during study period.
  • Clinically relevant alteration of the blood-brain-barrier - at the discretion of the staff surgeon.
  • Other to sugammadex as documented by a physician.
  • Unable to give ; vulnerable populations; non-English speaking.
  • Emergent operation.
  • Undergoing minimally invasive approaches.
  • Undergoing repair with mesh placed in a position other than retromuscular.
  • Chronic opioid users, as defined by the daily use of opioids for at least 90 days within the past year
  • Inability to safely extubate the patient at the end of the surgery for any reason, as determined by the operative team.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
184 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Neostigmine/Glycopyrrolate

    Patients assigned to the control arm receive the standardized reversal neostigmine dose with on-label dosing (0.03-0.07mg/kg) and a fixed ratio of glycopyrrolate

    Drug: Neostigmine / Glycopyrrolate

  • Other
    Sugammadex

    Patients randomized to the experimental arm will receive an IV dose of sugammadex according to the package insert of 2 mg/kg for ≥ 2 twitches, 4 mg/kg for 1-2 post-tetanic twitches

    Drug: Sugammadex

Interventions

  • DrugNeostigmine / Glycopyrrolate

    Drug pages: Neostigmine · Glycopyrrolate

    Patients will receive standard of care for reversal of neuromuscular blockade

    Also known as: Control arm

  • Patients will receive sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade

    Also known as: Experimental arm

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to GI-2 bowel function after surgery

    The median time to first postoperative bowel movement and tolerance of solid food (defined as GastroIntestinal-2), as measured in hours, will be recorded for each patient and compared between the two groups.

    Time frame: From time of randomization to progression of bowel function, which is an average of 87 hours, or until 1 month after randomization; whichever comes first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of stay

    Duration of hospital stay as measured in hours from end of surgery to placement of discharge order will be

    Time frame: From time of randomization to progression allowing safe discharge home, which is an average of 6 days, or until 1 month after randomization; whichever comes first

  2. Postoperative nasogastric tube placement rate

    Placement of nasogastric tube for nausea/vomiting after surgery will be recorded and compared between the two groups.

    Time frame: Up to 1 month after randomization

  3. Postoperative complications

    All postoperative complications will be recorded and compared between the two groups

    Time frame: Up to 1 month after randomization

  4. Postoperative pain

    Postop pain will be assessed using the Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) where patients will report their pain on a 0-10 scale, where higher scores mean worse pain. Overall scores will be compared between the two groups.

    Time frame: Postop day 1, 2, 3, and 4

  5. Opioid used in morphine milligram equivalents

    Total postoperative opioid use will be recorded after converted into morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and compared between the two groups.

    Time frame: Postop day 1, 2, 3, and 4

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05985343
Lead sponsor
Clayton Petro
Responsible party
Clayton Petro (Assistant Professor of Surgery Lerner College of Medicine, The Cleveland Clinic) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 14, 2023
Start date
Jan 15, 2024
Primary completion
May 30, 2025
Completion
Jun 2, 2025
Last update
Nov 21, 2025

Study contacts

Clayton C Petro, MD
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Neostigmine · Glycopyrrolate · Sugammadex

Start the discussion