ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05958953PROACT PROMUpdated Jul 25, 2023

PeRinatal Outcomes With ACTive Versus Expectant Management of Women With Pre-labor Rupture Of Membranes

A Phase 3 interventional study of Induction of Labor IoL in Rupture of Membranes; Premature, Distress; Fetal, Complicating Delivery and Delayed Delivery After Spontaneous or Unspecified Rupture of Membranes, sponsored by University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-25.

Sponsored by University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2025, 1 year 1 month ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Term pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM) occurs in about 12% of pregnancies and the time between PROM and delivery increases the risk of maternal/fetal infections. However, conflicting results are reported by studies investigating risks and benefits of expectant management versus induction of labor (IOL). Expectant management was associated with maternal and fetal infectious complications and subsequent increased risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Studies suggest that the increase in infectious risk for both is proportional to the increase in the time interval between the ROM and the birth, others reject this assumption.

In PeRinatal Outcomes With ACTive Versus Expectant Management of Women With Pre-labor Rupture Of Membranes (PROACTIVE PROM) on admission, PROM will be diagnosed. After 6 hours from the rupture of membranes, the woman will then be assessed for eligibility. A 1:1 randomization will follow within two hours (6-8 hours from PROM) in two distinct arms: 1) Expectant management 2) Active menagement (early IOL within 8 hours of rupture of membranes).

The first objective of this study is to evaluate whether active management of women with PROM (early induction) reduces the newborn need of respiratory support.

The secondary objectives of this study are related to the safety of the active management assessed through the rate of stillbirths, the onset of infections in both mother and fetus and the length of hospitalization of the dyads. Moreover, another objective is to reduce the use of antibiotic treatments (ATB) in both mothers and newborns.

The rationale of this study is that reducing the time between the PROM and delivery through an early IOL will reduce the adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

The hypothesis underneath this trial comes from a preliminary retrospective cohort study conducted in Modena, which included 2689 mother-neonates dyads from singleton pregnant women at term. In deliveries of ROM >24 hours significantly more neonates required ventilatory support than those born within 24 hours, although no significant differences were found regarding overt infections. According to the Cochrane database, expectant management of PROM is associated with maternal and fetal infectious complications and subsequent increased risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity together with an increased risk of ATB use. The increase of infectious risk is proportional to the time elapsed since the rupture of the membranes (ROM) and birth. However, unpublished data from our group suggest that respiratory distress requiring interventions may be frequently caused by intrinsic inflammatory-related effects of prolonged ROM rather than infection; this is suggested by an increase of C-reactive protein levels in neonates with mild respiratory signs untreated with antibiotics.

In addition, in a survey performed in our country expectant management increased intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), although not strictly indicated by the most current guidelines.

On the light of these data, it appears reasonable to promote induction of labor, to prevent complication caused not only by the infectious risk mentioned above, but also respiratory distress, probably associated to a neonatal maladaptation, in non-infectious newborns.

On the other hand, it should also be considered that 75% of women enter labor spontaneously within 24 hours from PROM and induction of labor (IOL) might not be needed in such cases.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rupture of Membranes; Premature
  • Distress; Fetal, Complicating Delivery
  • Delayed Delivery After Spontaneous or Unspecified Rupture of Membranes
  • Maternal Sepsis
03

In context

Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture

100 studies on the registry are indexed under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,400 is above the median of 150 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture.

Browse Fetal Membranes, Premature Rupture studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥18 years of age at the time of randomization
  2. Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks
  3. Negative rectovaginal GBS swab
  4. Absent/poor uterine contractile activity 6 h after PROM (0-2 contractions /10 min)
  5. Cephalic presentation
  6. Ability to provide an
  7. Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prematurity (\<37 weeks)
  2. GBS positive vagino-rectal swab or with an unknown swab
  3. Multiple pregnancies
  4. Previous cesarean section (CS)
  5. Breech presentation, transverse lie or other indication for elective CS
  6. Suspected clinic for intra-amniotic infection (According to the Triple I criteria)
  7. Stained amniotic fluid
  8. Alterations of the FHR
  9. Unknown exact ROM time
  10. Known to drugs for IOL or their
  11. Presence of unknown vaginal bleeding
  12. Presence of maternal kidney disease ( \<15 ml/min/1,73 m2).
  13. Every condition contraindicating vaginal delivery
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    active management

    early IOL within 8 hours of rupture of membranes. Center-specific IOL protocols will be used.

    Procedure: Induction of Labor IoL

  • No intervention
    Expectant management

    monitoring until 24 hours from rupture of membranes, with subsequent induction of labor (IOL).

Interventions

  • ProcedureInduction of Labor IoL

    Center-specific IOL protocols, based on international guidelines, will be used.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of respiratory support in newborns

    The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether active management of women with PROM (early induction) reduces the newborn need of respiratory support, collecting data on Apgar score, neonatal blood gas analysis and the rate of respiratory distress after birth and rate of respiratory support divided by type. The need for neonatal ventilatory support will be evaluated at delivery and include at least one of the following measures: free flowing oxygen in incubator, low flow oxygen (\<2 LPM), high flow oxygen (\>3 LPM), NCPAP or other NIV, mechanical ventilation.

    Time frame: On day 1 or 2 post-partum all relevant delivery and post-partum as well as neonatal variables will be collected.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stillbirth and infection rate

    This secondary objectives of this study are related to the safety of the active management assessed through the rate of stillbirths, the onset of infections in the mother and fetus and through the length of hospitalization of the dyads. Moreover, another objective is to reduce the use of antibiotic treatments (ATB) in both mothers and newborns.

    Time frame: On day 1 or 2 post-partum all relevant delivery and post-partum as well as neonatal variables will be collected.

  2. length of hospitalization expressed in days

    The lenght of hospitalization and the need for re-hospitalizations are related to the safety of the active management assessed through the rate of stillbirths, the onset of infections in the mother and fetus and through the length of hospitalization of the dyads. Moreover, another objective is to reduce the use of antibiotic treatments (ATB) in both mothers and newborns.

    Time frame: From day 1 after delivery to the end of the puerperium (42 days after delivery)

  3. use of antibiotics in both mother and newborn as quantity (mg) and quality.

    The use of antibiotics will be recorded

    Time frame: From admission in the Hospital to 42 days after delivery

  4. neonatal infection as the yield of pathogen from blood or CFS coltures

    Suspected infection is based on the presence of clinical symptoms (neonatal tachycardia, hyperpyrexia, alteration of the skin color) and abnormal laboratory markers, i.e. an increase in C reactive proteins above 1.5 mg/dl.

    Time frame: From birth to 42 days after delivery

  5. Rate of Pathogen isolation in placenta's speciemen

    Placentas and umbilical cord will be collected only in the Milano Buzzi center

    Time frame: Collection of speciemens immediately after delivery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • AUO Policlinico di Modena
    Modena, 41120, Italy
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2023; primary completion for Oct 2025, 25 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 6, 2023
First posted
Jul 25, 2023
StartEst.
Sep 2023
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2025
CompletionEst.
Nov 12, 2025
Last update
Jul 25, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 25, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05958953
Lead sponsor
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Responsible party
Prof. Fabio Facchinetti (Full professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology Chairmen Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 25, 2023
Start date
Sep 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 12, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 25, 2023

Study contacts

Fabio Facchinetti, Professor
Contact
fabio.facchinetti@unimore.it
0039 059 4225334

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion