ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07277920Updated Dec 11, 2025

Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and Molecular Correlation in Atypical Melanocytic Lesions

An observational study in Melanocytic Nevi, Melanoma (Skin Cancer) and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), sponsored by University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-11.

Sponsored by University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2023; still recruiting 3 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational, prospective cohort study aims to evaluate the diagnostic relevance of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM) features in atypical melanocytic lesions scheduled for surgical excision, and to correlate these imaging features with molecular profiles obtained through Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Approximately 200 consecutive lesions, including atypical nevi and early-stage melanomas, will be analyzed from patients attending the Videomicroscopy and Confocal Clinic at the Dermatology Department of the University Hospital of Modena.

The primary objective is to assess the diagnostic significance of RCM features-specifically atypical cells and disarrangement of the dermoepidermal junction (DEJ)-for early detection of melanoma. Secondary objectives include correlating RCM morphological patterns with NGS-derived genetic alterations and identifying molecular signatures that differentiate early-stage melanomas from benign nevi.

All procedures are performed as part of routine clinical care, including dermoscopic and confocal evaluation, surgical excision, histopathology, and molecular analysis on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks. Data will be anonymized, securely stored, and analyzed to determine associations between imaging and genetic variables. This study integrates morphological and molecular data to refine diagnostic workflows and improve early melanoma detection.

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale

Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a non-invasive imaging technique that allows in vivo evaluation of the skin with near-histologic resolution. Integrating RCM into clinical dermatology has been shown to reduce unnecessary excisions of benign lesions and improve diagnostic accuracy compared with dermoscopy alone.

Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) enables the identification of key genetic mutations in atypical nevi and melanomas, providing valuable insights into their biological behavior and potential malignant transformation.

This study aims to evaluate the correlation between characteristic RCM features and molecular findings obtained through NGS in melanocytic lesions already scheduled for surgical excision, to improve early diagnosis of melanoma and risk classification.

Objectives Primary Objective

To assess the diagnostic relevance of characteristic RCM features - specifically atypical cells and DEJ disarrangement - in melanocytic lesions already scheduled for surgical excision due to dermoscopic suspicion of atypical nevus or melanoma.

Secondary Objectives

To correlate RCM morphological features with molecular profiles obtained through NGS in both nevi and early-stage melanomas, comparing the genetic and morphologic patterns between these two groups.

To identify distinctive biological and molecular signatures that may differentiate early-stage melanomas from benign nevi, providing potential markers for early diagnosis and risk stratification.

Funding Statement

This study is funded by the European Union - NextGenerationEU, through the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) under PNRR - M4C2-I1.3 Project PE_00000019 HEAL ITALIA, CUP E93C22001860006.

02

Conditions studied

  • Melanocytic Nevi
  • Melanoma (Skin Cancer)
  • Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)
03

In context

Nevus, Pigmented

19 studies on the registry are indexed under Nevus, Pigmented; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 50 across 11 observational studies indexed under Nevus, Pigmented.

Browse Nevus, Pigmented studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Approximately 200 melanocytic lesions from adult patients (age ≥18 years) scheduled for surgical excision due to dermoscopic suspicion of atypical nevus or early-stage melanoma will be included. Patients of all genders are eligible. Lesions will be evaluated using routine clinical assessment, dermoscopy, and Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM). Histopathological evaluation will be performed on all excised lesions. Molecular analysis via Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) will be performed on lesions with available tissue, and not all lesions may undergo NGS. Participants are recruited consecutively at the Videomicroscopy and Confocal Clinic, Dermatology Department, University Hospital of Modena.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Presence of cutaneous lesions with dermoscopic and reflectance confocal microscopy suspicion of melanocytic neoplasia, already scheduled for surgical excision
  • Written obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Lesions not scheduled for excision or with uncertain dermoscopic diagnosis
  • Lack of
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic relevance of RCM features in atypical melanocytic lesions

    Evaluation of the presence of atypical cells (\>20 µm, dendritic or round, suprabasal or at the dermoepidermal junction level) and disarrangement of the dermoepidermal junction (non-edged papillae, chaotic patterns, architectural irregularity) using Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM), and comparison with histopathological diagnosis.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Differential gene expression profiles distinguishing nevi and early-stage melanomas

    Quantitative assessment of molecular features obtained through genomic/molecular analysis to identify patterns that distinguish benign nevi from early-stage melanomas. Data will be summarized as differential expression levels and/or frequency of molecular alterations.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. Correlation between RCM morphological patterns and NGS-derived molecular signatures

    Outcome Measure Description Quantitative correlation analysis between: RCM morphological features, measured using Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM) (e.g., presence of atypical cells, dermoepidermal junction disarrangement, architectural irregularity), summarized as categorical imaging features, and NGS-derived molecular signatures, measured through Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), including identification of specific genes showing differential expression or genomic alterations, not only presence/absence of alterations. The reported outcome will be the correlation coefficient between imaging-defined RCM patterns and gene-level molecular profiles identified through NGS. Unit of Measure: Correlation coefficient (r value) Measurement Tools: Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM) for morphological features Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) for molecular signatures

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Dermatology Department, University Hospital of Modena
    Modena, Mo 41125, Italy
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mesbah Ardakani N. Dysplastic/Clark naevus in the era of molecular pathology. Australas J Dermatol. 2019 Aug;60(3):186-191. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13019. Epub 2019 Mar 10. PubMed 30854639 ↗
  • Piepkorn MW, Barnhill RL, Elder DE, Knezevich SR, Carney PA, Reisch LM, Elmore JG. The MPATH-Dx reporting schema for melanocytic proliferations and melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Jan;70(1):131-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.07.027. Epub 2013 Oct 28. PubMed 24176521 ↗
  • Ferrara G, Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Corona R, Sera F, Brunetti B, Cerroni L, Chimenti S, El Shabrawi-Caelen L, Ferrari A, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Kaddu S, Piccolo D, Scalvenzi M, Staibano S, Wolf IH, De Rosa G. Dermoscopic and histopathologic diagnosis of equivocal melanocytic skin lesions: an interdisciplinary study on 107 cases. Cancer. 2002 Sep 1;95(5):1094-100. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10768. PubMed 12209696 ↗
  • Kozubek J, Ma Z, Fleming E, Duggan T, Wu R, Shin DG, Dadras SS. In-depth characterization of microRNA transcriptome in melanoma. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 4;8(9):e72699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072699. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24023765 ↗
  • Sadrolashrafi K, Cotter DG. Not Your Mother's Melanoma: Causes and Effects of Early Melanoma Diagnosis. Dermatopathology (Basel). 2022 Nov 27;9(4):368-378. doi: 10.3390/dermatopathology9040043. PubMed 36547217 ↗
  • Navarrete-Dechent C, DeRosa AP, Longo C, Liopyris K, Oliviero M, Rabinovitz H, Marghoob AA, Halpern AC, Pellacani G, Scope A, Jain M. Reflectance confocal microscopy terminology glossary for nonmelanocytic skin lesions: A systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 May;80(5):1414-1427.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.007. Epub 2018 Dec 8. PubMed 30529706 ↗
  • Pellacani G, Farnetani F, Gonzalez S, Longo C, Cesinaro AM, Casari A, Beretti F, Seidenari S, Gill M. In vivo confocal microscopy for detection and grading of dysplastic nevi: a pilot study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Mar;66(3):e109-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.05.017. Epub 2011 Jul 13. PubMed 21742408 ↗
  • Argenziano G, Catricala C, Ardigo M, Buccini P, De Simone P, Eibenschutz L, Ferrari A, Mariani G, Silipo V, Sperduti I, Zalaudek I. Seven-point checklist of dermoscopy revisited. Br J Dermatol. 2011 Apr;164(4):785-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10194.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10. PubMed 21175563 ↗
  • Alma A, Beretti F, Bonilauri C, Chester J, Kaleci S, Ciardo S, Bertoni L, Pellacani G, Farnetani F. Atypical naevi in dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy: correlation between immunohistochemistry and diagnostic patterns of atypia. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2024 Dec 23;50(1):172-174. doi: 10.1093/ced/llae326. No abstract available. PubMed 39180293 ↗
  • Gandini S, Sera F, Cattaruzza MS, Pasquini P, Abeni D, Boyle P, Melchi CF. Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi. Eur J Cancer. 2005 Jan;41(1):28-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.015. PubMed 15617989 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Nov 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 25 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 19, 2025
First posted
Dec 11, 2025
StartActual
Nov 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Dec 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07277920
Lead sponsor
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Collaborators
European Union
Responsible party
Francesca Farnetani (Professor / PI, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 11, 2025
Start date
Nov 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 11, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion