CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07592286Updated Jun 17, 2026

Systematic Screening of Lower Genital Tract Infections

An interventional study of Enhanced microbiological screening and Standard prenatal care in Neonatal Outcomes, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious and Premature Birth, sponsored by Universidade Federal do Pampa. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-17.

Sponsored by Universidade Federal do Pampa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Introduction: The investigation of systematic screening for asymptomatic genital infections in pregnant women is justified by the relevance of these conditions in determining adverse neonatal outcomes, such as prematurity, low birth weight, and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Despite its importance, previous studies have shown inconsistent results, largely due to methodological limitations related to sample size, lack of standardized treatment protocols, and insufficient follow-up of pregnant women. There is also divergence among national and international guidelines, which vary between universal and selective recommendations, highlighting gaps in the standardization of clinical practices.

Objectives: To investigate the effectiveness of implementing systematic screening protocol for asymptomatic genital infections in pregnant women in preventing adverse gestational and neonatal outcomes. The specific objectives are: to identify the most prevalent infections in this group; to evaluate the relationship between treatment and the incidence of complications; to compare outcomes between participants assigned to systematic screening and those receiving standard care and to propose recommendations for clinical practice and health policies based on a critical review of the literature and the results obtained.

Methods: This is a randomized controlled trial that will recruit 250 pregnant women, followed from the first trimester until delivery. Participants will be randomized into two groups: an intervention group, undergoing systematic screening with protocol-guided treatment, and a control group, managed according to current standard care practices, following the municipality's protocol for screening and treatment of genital infections. Primary outcomes include preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, low birth weight, intra-amniotic infection, puerperal infection, neonatal infection, and fetal and neonatal mortality. Statistical analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle, and differences in outcomes between groups will be estimated.

Expected Results: This study is expected to provide evidence on whether systematic screening reduces (or does not reduce) maternal and neonatal complications. The randomized controlled trial will be prospectively registered prior to the enrollment of the first participant, in accordance with current ethical standards.

** The study has not started yet and no participants have been enrolled. The term "low-risk" was removed because the study will recruit pregnant women in general

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether systematic microbiological screening and protocol-based treatment of asymptomatic lower genital tract infections during pregnancy can reduce adverse gestational and neonatal outcomes among low-risk pregnant women.

The study will be conducted in Uruguaiana, a municipality in southern Brazil, within the municipal prenatal care network. Pregnant women receiving care through the Family Health Strategy will be referred to a Women's Health referral service and followed from first-trimester enrollment until delivery. The study is linked to the Graduate Program in Pathology at São Paulo State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Botucatu Medical School.

Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation ratio to either an experimental arm or an active comparator arm. The random allocation sequence will be generated electronically and managed by a designated nursing technician. The physician responsible for clinical care will not have prior access to the allocation sequence, and group assignment will be revealed only after participant enrollment, in order to preserve allocation concealment.

Participants assigned to the experimental arm will undergo enhanced microbiological screening during prenatal follow-up. Vaginal samples will be collected at scheduled prenatal visits for Gram stain-based evaluation of vaginal microbiota. Endocervical samples will be collected once per trimester for real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Samples positive for Mycoplasma genitalium will undergo additional analysis for 23S rRNA gene mutations associated with macrolide resistance. Vaginal and cervical infections identified during follow-up will be managed according to a predefined study protocol based on current clinical guidelines.

Participants assigned to the active comparator arm will receive standard prenatal care according to the current municipal clinical protocol. In this group, screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae will be performed during the first trimester only for pregnant women younger than 30 years, as established by the municipal protocol. Management of vulvovaginal infections will be based on clinical criteria, and treatment will follow the standard municipal protocol.

Study data will be obtained from clinical interviews, biological sample collection, laboratory testing, and review of maternal and neonatal medical records. Clinical interviews will collect sociodemographic, obstetric, and relevant clinical information. Vaginal samples will be analyzed by Gram staining and classified according to predefined microbiological criteria. Endocervical samples will be processed for molecular detection of selected sexually transmitted pathogens. Neonatal and delivery-related outcomes will be collected through review of hospital medical records after delivery at the reference maternity hospital.

All study procedures will be performed by trained personnel in appropriate clinical settings and in accordance with biosafety standards. No additional blood samples will be collected exclusively for research purposes; blood tests will be limited to those routinely performed during prenatal care according to current Brazilian Ministry of Health guidelines.

Participants in both groups will be followed until delivery. The study will compare maternal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes between the experimental and active comparator groups. Data will be recorded using standardized electronic case report forms and stored in an anonymized electronic database with restricted access to authorized research personnel.

The statistical analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle, with participants analyzed according to their originally assigned groups, regardless of adherence to the assigned protocol. Categorical variables will be described using absolute and relative frequencies, and continuous variables will be summarized using measures of central tendency and dispersion, as appropriate. Between-group comparisons will be performed using suitable statistical tests according to variable type and distribution. Logistic regression models may be used to estimate the association between the intervention and study outcomes, adjusting for potential confounding variables when applicable. Results will be reported with effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals.

The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and applicable Brazilian regulations for research involving human participants. Written informed consent will be obtained before enrollment. For participants younger than 18 years, written informed consent will be obtained from a legal guardian, and assent will be obtained from the minor participant. Participant confidentiality and data protection will be ensured in accordance with the Brazilian General Data Protection Law.

** The study has not started yet and no participants have been enrolled. The term "low-risk" was removed because the study will recruit pregnant women in general

02

Conditions studied

  • Neonatal Outcomes
  • Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
  • Premature Birth
  • Premature Rupture of Fetal Membranes
  • Pregnancy

Keywords

  • screening
  • lower genital tract infections
  • pregnancy
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • First-trimester pregnant women.
  • Receiving care at the Women's Health service.
  • Willingness to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

#No specific exclusion criteria.

The study has not started yet and no participants have been enrolled. The term "low-risk" was removed because the study will recruit pregnant women in general

04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental: Enhanced microbiological screening and protocol-based treatment

    Participants in this arm will undergo enhanced microbiological screening as part of prenatal care. Vaginal samples will be collected at each scheduled prenatal visit for Gram stain-based assessment, and endocervical samples will be collected once per trimester for real-time PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Vaginal and cervical infections identified during follow-up will be managed according to the predefined study protocol. Participants will be followed from first-trimester enrollment until delivery.

    Diagnostic Test: Enhanced microbiological screening

  • Active comparator
    Standard prenatal care according to municipal protocol

    Pregnant women in this arm will receive standard prenatal care according to the current municipal clinical protocol. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae will be performed only during the first trimester and only for pregnant women younger than 30 years. Management of vulvovaginal infections will be based on clinical criteria, and treatment will follow the standard municipal protocol. Participants will be followed at quarterly intervals for data collection until delivery.

    Other: Standard prenatal care

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testEnhanced microbiological screening

    Participants assigned to this intervention will undergo enhanced microbiological screening during prenatal care. Vaginal samples will be collected at all each scheduled prenatal visit for Gram stain-based evaluation, and endocervical samples will be collected once per trimester for real-time PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Samples positive for Mycoplasma genitalium will undergo additional analysis for 23S rRNA gene mutations associated with macrolide resistance.

  • OtherStandard prenatal care

    Participants assigned to this intervention will receive standard prenatal care according to the current municipal clinical protocol. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae will be performed only during the first trimester and only for pregnant women younger than 30 years. Management of vulvovaginal infections will be based on clinical criteria, and treatment will follow the standard municipal protocol. Participants will be followed at quarterly intervals for data collection until delivery.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Preterm birth

    Occurrence of preterm birth, defined as delivery before 37 completed weeks of gestation.

    Time frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to approximately 22 weeks after randomization or until 37 completed weeks of gestation, whichever occurs first.

  2. Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM)

    From randomization until delivery, assessed up to approximately 22 weeks after randomization or until 37 completed weeks of gestation, whichever occurs first.

    Time frame: Occurrence of preterm premature rupture of membranes before 37 completed weeks of gestation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Miscarriage

    Occurrence of pregnancy loss before fetal viability, as defined by local clinical criteria, 22 weeks.

    Time frame: Occurrence of pregnancy loss before fetal viability, defined as spontaneous pregnancy loss before 22 completed weeks of gestation, according to local clinical criteria.

  2. Intra-amniotic infection

    Occurrence of clinically diagnosed intra-amniotic infection during pregnancy or labor.

    Time frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to approximately 22 weeks after randomization or until birth, whichever occurs first.

  3. Puerperal infection

    Occurrence of puerperal infection diagnosed during postpartum hospitalization, based on clinical assessment and/or medical record documentation.

    Time frame: From delivery until maternal hospital discharge, assessed up to 7 days postpartum.

  4. Neonatal infection

    Occurrence of clinically diagnosed neonatal infection during the neonatal hospitalization period, based on clinical assessment and/or medical record documentation.

    Time frame: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days of life.

  5. Fetal death

    Occurrence of fetal death during pregnancy or at delivery.

    Time frame: From randomization until delivery, assessed up to approximately 22 weeks after randomization or until birth, whichever occurs first.

  6. Neonatal mortality

    Occurrence of neonatal death during the neonatal hospitalization period, based on medical record documentation.

    Time frame: From birth until neonatal hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days of life.

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • 20. ISSVD - International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of vaginitis. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, v. 26, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2022.
  • Carey JC, Klebanoff MA, Hauth JC, Hillier SL, Thom EA, Ernest JM, Heine RP, Nugent RP, Fischer ML, Leveno KJ, Wapner R, Varner M. Metronidazole to prevent preterm delivery in pregnant women with asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 24;342(8):534-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200002243420802. PubMed 10684911 ↗
  • Sethi N, Narayanan V, Saaid R, Ahmad Adlan AS, Ngoi ST, Teh CSJ, Hamidi M; WHOW research group. Prevalence, risk factors, and adverse outcomes of bacterial vaginosis among pregnant women: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07144-8. PubMed 39833700 ↗
  • Ng BK, Chuah JN, Cheah FC, Mohamed Ismail NA, Tan GC, Wong KK, Lim PS. Maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. Front Surg. 2023 Feb 13;10:1084867. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1084867. eCollection 2023. PubMed 36860946 ↗
  • Kim MJ, Romero R, Gervasi MT, Kim JS, Yoo W, Lee DC, Mittal P, Erez O, Kusanovic JP, Hassan SS, Kim CJ. Widespread microbial invasion of the chorioamniotic membranes is a consequence and not a cause of intra-amniotic infection. Lab Invest. 2009 Aug;89(8):924-36. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2009.49. Epub 2009 Jun 8. PubMed 19506551 ↗
  • Donders GG, Van Calsteren K, Bellen G, Reybrouck R, Van den Bosch T, Riphagen I, Van Lierde S. Predictive value for preterm birth of abnormal vaginal flora, bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis during the first trimester of pregnancy. BJOG. 2009 Sep;116(10):1315-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02237.x. Epub 2009 Jun 17. PubMed 19538417 ↗
  • US Preventive Services Task Force; Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Donahue K, Doubeni CA, Epling JW Jr, Kubik M, Ogedegbe G, Pbert L, Silverstein M, Simon MA, Tseng CW, Wong JB. Screening for Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnant Persons to Prevent Preterm Delivery: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1286-1292. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2684. PubMed 32259236 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 16, 2026
  • Informed consent form · Mar 16, 2026
  • Informed consent form · Mar 16, 2026
  • Informed consent form · Mar 16, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared publicly. Requests for additional information may be evaluated by the study team according to ethical and institutional regulations.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07592286
Lead sponsor
Universidade Federal do Pampa
Collaborators
Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, UNESP, Botucatu, Brasil
Responsible party
Rita de Cássia Fossati Silveira Evaldt (Principal Investigator and Professor of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Pampa) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 18, 2026
Start date
Jul 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 17, 2026

Study contacts

Rita de Cássia Fossati Evaldt, Professor
Contact
ritaevaldt@unipampa.edu.br
+55 55984516440
Luciana Nunes, Dra
Contact
luciananunes@unipampa.edu.br
+55 55991745291
Marcia da Silva, Dra
study chair · São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion