ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05946772CITUpdated May 1, 2026

Cyclosporine In Takotsubo Syndrome

A Phase 2 interventional study of Cyclosporine A and Placebo in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy, sponsored by University Hospital Heidelberg. Recruiting at 24 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-01.

Sponsored by University Hospital Heidelberg · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
204
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the impact of repetitive acute Cyclosporine A (CsA) bolus therapy in patients suffering from TTS with an elevated risk of impaired outcome. The main question it aims to answer is whether CsA reduces myocardial injury (primary outcome). Participants will receive CsA or placebo at baseline and every 12h in the first 24h after study inclusion. Researchers will compare CsA and the placebo group to see if a) myocardial injury is reduced, and b) ejection fraction is improved compared to baseline, as well as several other secondary endpoints over a one year follow-up.

Read the detailed description

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) has been suggested to be caused by catecholamine excess with myocardial inflammation-enhanced cardiac injury. Substantial morbidity and mortality have repeatedly been reported, even though reduced ejection fraction frequently recovers spontaneously. So far there is no evidence-based treatment available. In a clinically relevant mouse model of catecholamine-driven TTS, cyclosporine A (CsA) bolus therapy markedly improves outcome, likely mediated via suppression of calcineurin-driven inflammation. The investigators have thus designed a pilot multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the impact of repetitive CsA bolus therapy vs. placebo in acute TTS patients with an increased risk of intrahospital complications and a 32% estimated 5-year mortality. As primary outcome myocardial damage will be compared between groups via high-sensitive Troponin T plasma area under the curve (AUC). Recovery of cardiac function, the extent of myocardial oedema at 72h, length of hospital-stay, 30-day-, and 1-year composite clinical outcome as well as psychosocial and quality of life self-assessment will be secondary endpoints. The results of this trial may reveal CsA as a first pathophysiology-driven treatment option of TTS and enable a phase III follow-up trial with outcome parameters as primary endpoint.

02

Conditions studied

  • Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy

Keywords

  • Takotsubo syndrome
  • Troponin
  • Cyclosporine
  • Inflammation
  • Acute heart failure
03

In context

Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy; 26 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 204 is above the median of 65 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy.

Browse Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Heidelberg is the lead sponsor of 177 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key inclusion criteria:

  • Patients aged over 18
  • Enrollment and first IMP administration within 24 hours after cardiac catheterization
  • Regional Wall Motion Abnormality (WMA) consistent with TTS in angiography or echocardiography
  • InterTAK prognostic score- or a GEIST Score ≥ 9 -
  • Written

Key exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with significant coronary stenosis potentially associated with wall motion abnormalities (WMA) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
  • Infection (defined as concomitant infection with a positive blood culture at the time of study inclusion)
  • History of to cyclosporine
  • History of hypersensitivity to egg, peanut or soybean proteins
  • History of chronic renal insufficiency (either creatinin clearance \<30 ml/min/1.73m² or current medical care for severe renal insufficiency)
  • History of liver insufficiency
  • Uncontrolled hypertension at the time of screening for study inclusion (systolic blood pressure >180mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure >110mmHg)
  • Current medication with any compound containing Hypericum perforatum (St. John's worth) or Stiripentol or Aliskiren or Bosentan or Rosuvastatine (Rosuvastatine >5mg within 24h intake\<48h before IMP administration)
  • Female patients currently pregnant or women of childbearing age without negative pregnancy test or without effective
  • Any disorder associated with immunological dysfunction ≤6 months prior to presentation ( disease, known positive serology for or hepatitis)
  • , chemotherapeutical, or antibody treatment
  • Participation in other clinical trials except for non interventional trials
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
204 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    A concealed 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl) preparation will be applied intravenously at baseline, 12h, and 24h.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    CsA

    Cyclosporine A will be applied intravenously at baseline, 12h, and 24h.

    Drug: Cyclosporine A

Interventions

  • 2.5mg/kg body weight Cyclosporine A as an intravenous bolus

  • DrugPlacebo

    The same amount of 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl0.9%) will be applied in an indistinguishable package as an intravenous bolus

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Myocardial damage

    High-sensitive Troponin T AUC over several time points between CsA and Placebo.

    Time frame: baseline, hour 3, hour 12, hour 24, hour 36, hour 48, hour 60, hour 72, day 30

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Ejection fraction from baseline

    Multiple timepoints will be compared to baseline between CsA and Placebo.

    Time frame: baseline, hour 24, hour 48, hour 72, day 30

  2. Fold-change in Troponin plasma concentration

    The change of high-sensitive Troponin T will be compared to baseline between CsA and Placebo for multiple time points.

    Time frame: baseline, hour 3, hour 12, hour 24, hour 36, hour 48, hour 60, hour 72, day 30

  3. Fold-change in creatine kinase plasma concentration

    The change of creatine kinase will be compared to baseline between CsA and Placebo for multiple time points.

    Time frame: baseline, hour 3, hour 12, hour 24, hour 36, hour 48, hour 60, hour 72, day 30

  4. Fold-change in NTproBNP plasma concentration

    The change of NTproBNP will be compared to baseline between CsA and Placebo for multiple time points.

    Time frame: baseline, hour 3, hour 12, hour 24, hour 36, hour 48, hour 60, hour 72, day 30

  5. Fold-change in interleukin-6 plasma concentration

    The change of interleukin-6 will be compared to baseline between CsA and Placebo for multiple time points.

    Time frame: baseline, hour 12, hour 24, hour 36, hour 48, hour 60, hour 72, day 30

  6. Fold-change in procalcitonin plasma concentration

    The change of procalcitonin will be compared to baseline between CsA and Placebo for multiple time points.

    Time frame: baseline, hour 12, hour 24, hour 36, hour 48, hour 60, hour 72, day 30

  7. Myocardial edema

    Cardiac MRI will be used to assess the T2 signal intensity ratio for comparison between CsA and Placebo at 72h.

    Time frame: hour 72

  8. Myocardial inflammation

    Cardiac MRI will be used to assess the early gadolinium enhancement ratio for comparison between CsA and Placebo at 72h.

    Time frame: hour 72

  9. Rate of cardiovascular events at day 30

    At day 30 a composite cardiovascular outcome measure includes overall mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, recurrent TTS, cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, novel atrial fibrillation, and thromboembolism. The measure is considered positive if one of the above occurs. The amount of patients with positive and negative events is then compared between the CsA and placebo arm.

    Time frame: day 30

  10. Rate of cardiovascular events at 1 year

    At 1 year a composite cardiovascular outcome measure includes overall mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, recurrent TTS, cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, novel atrial fibrillation, and thromboembolism. The measure is considered positive if one of the above occurs. The amount of patients with positive and negative events is then compared between the CsA and placebo arm.

    Time frame: 1 year

  11. Rate of novel disease onset

    At 30 days and 1-year novel clinical diagnoses during follow-up including cancer or neurological diseases will be assessed.

    Time frame: day 30 and at 1 year

  12. Symptom burden at day 30

    Patient-reported outcome will be quantified by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire after 30d and 1 year (scale 0-100 points: 0-24 points: very poor; 25-49 points: poor; 50-74 points: fair; 75-100: good).

    Time frame: day 30

  13. Symptom burden at 1 year

    Patient-reported outcome will be quantified by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire at 1 year (scale 0-100 points: 0-24 points: very poor; 25-49 points: poor; 50-74 points: fair; 75-100: good).

    Time frame: 1 year

  14. Depression score at day 30

    Patient-reported psychosocial assessment will be quantified by the well validated German patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) scale (range 0-27 points, higher points indicate worse depressive symptoms).

    Time frame: day 30

  15. Depression score at year 1

    Patient-reported psychosocial assessment will be quantified by the well validated German patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) scale (range 0-27 points, higher points indicate worse depressive symptoms).

    Time frame: 1 year

  16. Anxiety score at day 30

    Patient-reported psychosocial assessment will be quantified by the well validated German generalized anxiety disorder 7 (GAD-7) questionnaire (range 0-21 points, higher points indicate worse anxiety).

    Time frame: day 30

  17. Anxiety score at year 1

    Patient-reported psychosocial assessment will be quantified by the well validated German generalized anxiety disorder 7 (GAD-7) questionnaire (range 0-21 points, higher points indicate worse anxiety).

    Time frame: year 1

  18. PTSD score at 30 days

    Patient-reported psychosocial assessment will be quantified by the well validated German primary care posttraumatic stress disorder questionnaire 5 (PC-PTSD-5) (0-5 points, higher points indicate more symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder).

    Time frame: day 30

  19. PTSD score at 1 year

    Patient-reported psychosocial assessment will be quantified by the well validated German primary care posttraumatic stress disorder questionnaire 5 (PC-PTSD-5) (0-5 points, higher points indicate more symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder).

    Time frame: year 1

  20. Length of intermediate care or intensive care unit stay

    Length of intermediate care or intensive care unit stay will be compared between groups

    Time frame: day 30

  21. Length of hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay will be compared between groups

    Time frame: day 30

07

Study locations

24 of 24 sites recruiting
  • Kerckhoff Heart Center, Bad Nauheim / Gießen University
    Bad Nauheim, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Christian Hamm, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin
    Berlin, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Ulf Landmesser, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum
    Berlin, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Frank Edelmann, MD · Principal investigator
    • Henryk Dreger, MD · Principal investigator
  • Heart Centre - University Hospital Bonn
    Bonn, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Georg Nickenig, MD · Principal investigator
    • Margarita Schulz, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Köln
    Cologne, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Roman Pfister, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Dresden
    Dresden, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Axel Linke, MD · Principal investigator
  • Cardiovascular Centre - University Hospital Düsseldorf
    Düsseldorf, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Daniel Schreiber, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology - University Hospital Essen
    Essen, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Tienush Rassaf, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Frankfurt
    Frankfurt, Germany
    Recruiting
    • David Leistner, MD · Principal investigator
  • University Medical Center Göttingen
    Göttingen, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Gerd Hasenfuß, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Halle
    Halle, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Daniel Sedding, MD · Principal investigator
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Stefan Blankenberg, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, Heidelberg University Hospital
    Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Bastian Bruns, MD · Contact
    • Norbert Frey, MD · Principal investigator
    • Bastian Bruns, MD · Sub investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Leipzig
    Leipzig, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Rolf Wachter, MD · Principal investigator
  • Leipzig Heart Center
    Leipzig, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Holger Thiele, MD · Principal investigator
  • University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein/Campus Lübeck
    Lübeck, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Ingo Eitel, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Magdeburg
    Magdeburg, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Rüdiger Braun-Dullaeus, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Mainz
    Mainz, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Tommaso Gori, MD · Sub investigator
    • Maike Knorr, MD · Principal investigator
    • Philipp Lurz, MD · Sub investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Mannheim
    Mannheim, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Ibrahim Akin, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
    München, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Ulrich Grabmaier, MD · Principal investigator
  • University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich
    München, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, MD · Principal investigator
    • Isabell Bernlochner, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Rostock
    Rostock, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Hüseyin Ince, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Ulm
    Ulm, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Mirjam Keßler, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Wuppertal
    Wuppertal, Germany
    Recruiting
    • Melchior Seyfarth, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bruns B, Elsous N, Burghaus I, Steyrer K, Joos M, Kramer T, Scheffel M, Blankenberg S, Eitel I, Massberg S, Thiele H, Meder B, Backs J, Frey N. Rationale and design of the cyclosporine in Takotsubo syndrome (CIT) trial. Am Heart J. 2025 Nov;289:147-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2025.04.020. Epub 2025 Apr 21. PubMed 40268179 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 24 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 19, 2023
First posted
Jul 14, 2023
StartActual
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 2028
Last update
May 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05946772
Collaborators
German Centre of Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Coordinating Centre for Clinical Studies (KKS) Heidelberg
Responsible party
Norbert Frey, MD (Professor Dr. Norbert Frey, MD, University Hospital Heidelberg) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 14, 2023
Start date
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 1, 2026

Study contacts

Bastian Bruns, MD
Contact
bastian.bruns@med.uni-heidelberg.de
+496221-56-36266
Norbert Frey, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital Heidelberg
Bastian Bruns, MD
principal investigator · University Hospital Heidelberg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cyclosporine

Start the discussion